Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Oregon Case Commentaries

Oregon Supreme Court Reinforces Admissibility of 'Other Acts' Evidence in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

Oregon Supreme Court Reinforces Admissibility of 'Other Acts' Evidence in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

Date: Mar 20, 2015
Oregon Supreme Court Reinforces Admissibility of 'Other Acts' Evidence in Child Sexual Abuse Cases Introduction The case of State of Oregon v. Shawn Gary Williams addressed the contentious issue of...
Clarifying 'Reasonable Diligence': Oregon Supreme Court's Interpretation of Employer Liability under OSEA

Clarifying 'Reasonable Diligence': Oregon Supreme Court's Interpretation of Employer Liability under OSEA

Date: Dec 27, 2014
Clarifying 'Reasonable Diligence': Oregon Supreme Court's Interpretation of Employer Liability under OSEA Introduction In the landmark case of Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. CBI...
Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Cable Television and Internet Access as Data Transmission Services Under ORS 308.515

Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Cable Television and Internet Access as Data Transmission Services Under ORS 308.515

Date: Oct 3, 2014
Oregon Supreme Court Establishes Cable Television and Internet Access as Data Transmission Services Under ORS 308.515 Introduction In Comcast Corporation v. Department of Revenue, 356 Or. 282 (2014),...
Enhancing the 'Exploitation' Analysis: Oregon Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in State v. Unger

Enhancing the 'Exploitation' Analysis: Oregon Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in State v. Unger

Date: Aug 29, 2014
Enhancing the 'Exploitation' Analysis: Oregon Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in State v. Unger Introduction In State of Oregon v. Unger, 333 P.3d 1009 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2014), the Supreme...
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion Through Collective Knowledge and Officer Observation: State of Oregon v. Holdorf

Establishing Reasonable Suspicion Through Collective Knowledge and Officer Observation: State of Oregon v. Holdorf

Date: Aug 8, 2014
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion Through Collective Knowledge and Officer Observation: State of Oregon v. Holdorf Introduction State of Oregon v. John Leonard Holdorf, Jr. is a pivotal case decided...
Reaffirming Corroboration Requirements and Courtroom Security in STATE v. Washington (330 P.3d 596)

Reaffirming Corroboration Requirements and Courtroom Security in STATE v. Washington (330 P.3d 596)

Date: Jun 20, 2014
Reaffirming Corroboration Requirements and Courtroom Security in STATE v. Washington (330 P.3d 596) Introduction STATE of Oregon v. Michael Spencer Washington Jr., decided by the Supreme Court of...
Establishing the Scope of Summary Judgment in Negligence and Strict Liability Claims

Establishing the Scope of Summary Judgment in Negligence and Strict Liability Claims

Date: May 9, 2014
Establishing the Scope of Summary Judgment in Negligence and Strict Liability Claims Introduction The case of Linda Two Two and Patricia Fodge v. Fujitec America, Inc. addresses pivotal issues...
Affirmation of Felony-Murder Conviction: Causal Connection and Jury Instruction Standards in STATE v. SERRANO

Affirmation of Felony-Murder Conviction: Causal Connection and Jury Instruction Standards in STATE v. SERRANO

Date: Apr 18, 2014
Affirmation of Felony-Murder Conviction: Causal Connection and Jury Instruction Standards in STATE v. SERRANO Introduction State of Oregon v. Ricardo Serrano, 324 P.3d 1274 (Or. 2014), serves as a...
STATE v. MONTEZ: Affirmation of Adequate Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing

STATE v. MONTEZ: Affirmation of Adequate Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing

Date: Mar 21, 2014
STATE v. MONTEZ: Affirmation of Adequate Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing Introduction In Marco Antonio Montez v. Stanley Czerniak, Superintendent, Oregon State Penitentiary, the Supreme...
ORCP 59 H Does Not Bar Plain Error Review: Comprehensive Commentary on State v. Vanornum

ORCP 59 H Does Not Bar Plain Error Review: Comprehensive Commentary on State v. Vanornum

Date: Dec 28, 2013
ORCP 59 H Does Not Bar Plain Error Review: Comprehensive Commentary on State of Oregon v. Vanornum Introduction State of Oregon v. Ian George Vanornum is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court...
Clarification of 'Any Evidence' Standard in Juvenile Wardship Decisions: Department of Human Services v. N.P. (257 Or. App. 633)

Clarification of 'Any Evidence' Standard in Juvenile Wardship Decisions: Department of Human Services v. N.P. (257 Or. App. 633)

Date: Jul 25, 2013
Clarification of 'Any Evidence' Standard in Juvenile Wardship Decisions: Department of Human Services v. N.P. (257 Or. App. 633) Introduction The case of In the Matter of T.P., a Child. Department of...
Seizure of a Person within the Home Context: Establishing Law Enforcement Boundaries in Fair v. State of Oregon

Seizure of a Person within the Home Context: Establishing Law Enforcement Boundaries in Fair v. State of Oregon

Date: Jun 1, 2013
Seizure of a Person within the Home Context: Establishing Law Enforcement Boundaries in Fair v. State of Oregon Introduction The case of State of Oregon v. Natasha Larae Fair revolves around the...
STATE v. BACKSTRAND: Defining ‘Seizure’ in Police Identification Requests under Oregon's Constitution

STATE v. BACKSTRAND: Defining ‘Seizure’ in Police Identification Requests under Oregon's Constitution

Date: Jan 8, 2013
STATE v. BACKSTRAND: Defining ‘Seizure’ in Police Identification Requests under Oregon's Constitution Introduction State of Oregon v. Steven Nicholas Backstrand, 354 Or. 392 (2013) represents a...
Revising Eyewitness Identification Admissibility: Insights from STATE of Oregon v. Lawson and James

Revising Eyewitness Identification Admissibility: Insights from STATE of Oregon v. Lawson and James

Date: Nov 30, 2012
Revising Eyewitness Identification Admissibility: Insights from STATE of Oregon v. Lawson and James Introduction In the landmark decision of STATE of Oregon v. Lawson and James (352 Or. 724), the...
Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies Admissibility of Prior Misconduct Evidence Under OEC 404(3)

Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies Admissibility of Prior Misconduct Evidence Under OEC 404(3)

Date: Oct 19, 2012
Oregon Supreme Court Clarifies Admissibility of Prior Misconduct Evidence Under OEC 404(3) Introduction In State of Oregon v. Douglas Leroy Pitt, decided on October 18, 2012, the Oregon Supreme Court...
Severability and Conditional Effectiveness in Campaign Finance Law: Insights from HAZELL v. BROWN

Severability and Conditional Effectiveness in Campaign Finance Law: Insights from HAZELL v. BROWN

Date: Oct 5, 2012
Severability and Conditional Effectiveness in Campaign Finance Law: Insights from HAZELL v. BROWN Introduction The case of HAZELL v. BROWN, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Oregon in 2012,...
Discovery Rule Applied to Legal Malpractice Claims: Darell Kaseberg v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP

Discovery Rule Applied to Legal Malpractice Claims: Darell Kaseberg v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP

Date: Nov 11, 2011
Discovery Rule Applied to Legal Malpractice Claims: Darell Kaseberg v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP Introduction Darell Kaseberg v. Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
ORS 138.050 Limits Appellate Jurisdiction to Statutory Maximums: Due Process Claims Insufficient

ORS 138.050 Limits Appellate Jurisdiction to Statutory Maximums: Due Process Claims Insufficient

Date: Sep 23, 2011
ORS 138.050 Limits Appellate Jurisdiction to Statutory Maximums: Due Process Claims Insufficient Introduction Petitioner on Re v. EW (351 Or. 68), decided by the Oregon Supreme Court on September 22,...
Clarifying Affirmative Defense Pleadings in Comparative Negligence: A Commentary on LASLEY v. COMBINED TRANSPort, Inc.

Clarifying Affirmative Defense Pleadings in Comparative Negligence: A Commentary on LASLEY v. COMBINED TRANSPort, Inc.

Date: Sep 23, 2011
Clarifying Affirmative Defense Pleadings in Comparative Negligence: A Commentary on LASLEY v. COMBINED TRANSPort, Inc. Introduction LASLEY v. COMBINED TRANSPort, Inc. is a pivotal 2011 decision by...
Stare Decisis and Insurance Policy Exclusions: Farmers Insurance Co. of Oregon v. Mowry

Stare Decisis and Insurance Policy Exclusions: Farmers Insurance Co. of Oregon v. Mowry

Date: Sep 10, 2011
Stare Decisis and Insurance Policy Exclusions: Farmers Insurance Co. of Oregon v. Mowry Introduction In the landmark case of Farmers Insurance Company of Oregon v. Mowry, the Supreme Court of Oregon...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert