Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Oklahoma Case Commentaries

Oklahoma Supreme Court Limits Municipal Immunity in Tortious Business Interference and Negligence Claims

Oklahoma Supreme Court Limits Municipal Immunity in Tortious Business Interference and Negligence Claims

Date: Jan 21, 2009
Oklahoma Supreme Court Limits Municipal Immunity in Tortious Business Interference and Negligence Claims Introduction In the landmark case of TUFFY'S, INC. v. CITY OF OKLAHOMA CITY, adjudicated by...
Negligent Supervision and Employer Liability in Ecclesiastical Context: Schovanec v. Archdiocese of Oklahoma City

Negligent Supervision and Employer Liability in Ecclesiastical Context: Schovanec v. Archdiocese of Oklahoma City

Date: Jul 3, 2008
Negligent Supervision and Employer Liability in Ecclesiastical Context: Schovanec v. Archdiocese of Oklahoma City Introduction In the landmark case of Phillip Schovanec v. Archdiocese of Oklahoma...
Enhancing Whistleblower Protections: Oklahoma Supreme Court's Ruling in Darrow v. Integris Health

Enhancing Whistleblower Protections: Oklahoma Supreme Court's Ruling in Darrow v. Integris Health

Date: Jan 16, 2008
Enhancing Whistleblower Protections: Oklahoma Supreme Court's Ruling in Darrow v. Integris Health Introduction In the landmark case of Chris Eugene Darrow v. Integris Health, Inc. (176 P.3d 1204),...
Mandatory Adherence to Burk Factors for Attorney Fee Awards: Insights from Spencer v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.

Mandatory Adherence to Burk Factors for Attorney Fee Awards: Insights from Spencer v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co.

Date: Oct 10, 2007
Mandatory Adherence to Burk Factors for Attorney Fee Awards: Insights from Spencer v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Co. Introduction In the landmark case of Theresa Spencer v. Oklahoma Gas and Electric...
Oklahoma Supreme Court Sets New Precedent on Class Action Certification in Multi-Jurisdictional Contract and Unjust Enrichment Claims

Oklahoma Supreme Court Sets New Precedent on Class Action Certification in Multi-Jurisdictional Contract and Unjust Enrichment Claims

Date: Jul 4, 2007
Oklahoma Supreme Court Sets New Precedent on Class Action Certification in Multi-Jurisdictional Contract and Unjust Enrichment Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Lori HARVELL v. GOODYEAR...
Impartiality in Judicial Proceedings: A New Precedent Established in Miller DOLLARHIDE v. TAL

Impartiality in Judicial Proceedings: A New Precedent Established in Miller DOLLARHIDE v. TAL

Date: Jul 4, 2007
Impartiality in Judicial Proceedings: A New Precedent Established in Miller DOLLARHIDE v. TAL Introduction Miller Dollarhide, P.C. v. Moshe Tal, 163 P.3d 548 (OK Supreme Court, 2007), marks a...
Defining the Scope of Duty of Care in Negligence Actions: Lowery v. Echostar Satellite Corp.

Defining the Scope of Duty of Care in Negligence Actions: Lowery v. Echostar Satellite Corp.

Date: May 23, 2007
Defining the Scope of Duty of Care in Negligence Actions: Lowery v. Echostar Satellite Corp. Introduction Lowery v. Echostar Satellite Corp. is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma...
Reinforcing Evidentiary Hearings and Assessing Arbitration Clause Validity: A Comprehensive Analysis of Oklahoma Oncology Hematology P.C. v. US Oncology, Inc.

Reinforcing Evidentiary Hearings and Assessing Arbitration Clause Validity: A Comprehensive Analysis of Oklahoma Oncology Hematology P.C. v. US Oncology, Inc.

Date: Mar 16, 2007
Reinforcing Evidentiary Hearings and Assessing Arbitration Clause Validity: A Comprehensive Analysis of Oklahoma Oncology Hematology P.C. v. US Oncology, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case of...
Limitation of Third-Party Beneficiary Status in Insurance Policies: May v. Mid-Century Insurance Company

Limitation of Third-Party Beneficiary Status in Insurance Policies: May v. Mid-Century Insurance Company

Date: Dec 20, 2006
Limitation of Third-Party Beneficiary Status in Insurance Policies: May v. Mid-Century Insurance Company Introduction In the landmark case of June C. May, M.D. v. Mid-Century Insurance Company, the...
Oklahoma Supreme Court Reinforces Make-Whole Rule in ERISA Subrogation Claims

Oklahoma Supreme Court Reinforces Make-Whole Rule in ERISA Subrogation Claims

Date: Oct 4, 2006
Oklahoma Supreme Court Reinforces Make-Whole Rule in ERISA Subrogation Claims Introduction In the case of William S. Reeds, Co-Guardian of the Estate of Phillip M. Reeds, et al. v. National American...
Affirmation of First Degree Murder and Rape Conviction in WARNER v. STATE of Oklahoma

Affirmation of First Degree Murder and Rape Conviction in WARNER v. STATE of Oklahoma

Date: Sep 27, 2006
Affirmation of First Degree Murder and Rape Conviction in WARNER v. STATE of Oklahoma Introduction WARNER v. STATE of Oklahoma, 144 P.3d 838 (2006), is a significant case adjudicated by the Court of...
Oklahoma Supreme Court Recognizes Nurse Expertise in Decubitus Ulcer Malpractice Cases

Oklahoma Supreme Court Recognizes Nurse Expertise in Decubitus Ulcer Malpractice Cases

Date: Sep 12, 2006
Oklahoma Supreme Court Recognizes Nurse Expertise in Decubitus Ulcer Malpractice Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Stephen GAINES, Appellant, v. COMANCHE COUNTY MEDICAL HOSPITAL and...
Oklahoma Supreme Court Expands Insurer's Duty of Good Faith, Affirming $2.2M Award

Oklahoma Supreme Court Expands Insurer's Duty of Good Faith, Affirming $2.2M Award

Date: Jun 23, 2005
Oklahoma Supreme Court Expands Insurer's Duty of Good Faith, Affirming $2.2M Award Introduction In the case of Mario BADILLO v. MID CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, decided on June 22, 2005, the Supreme...
Nondelegable Duty and Liability of Third-Party Administrators: Insights from Wathor v. Mutual Assurance Administrators, Inc.

Nondelegable Duty and Liability of Third-Party Administrators: Insights from Wathor v. Mutual Assurance Administrators, Inc.

Date: Mar 30, 2004
Nondelegable Duty and Liability of Third-Party Administrators: Insights from Wathor v. Mutual Assurance Administrators, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case Wathor v. Mutual Assurance...
Limitation of Shareholders' Liability under the Oklahoma Nursing Home Care Act: Analysis of Lula Fanning v. SSCC Shareholders

Limitation of Shareholders' Liability under the Oklahoma Nursing Home Care Act: Analysis of Lula Fanning v. SSCC Shareholders

Date: Feb 11, 2004
Limitation of Shareholders' Liability under the Oklahoma Nursing Home Care Act: Analysis of Lula Fanning v. SSCC Shareholders Introduction The case of Lula Fanning, as Guardian of Eva Jackson v....
Entitlement and Reasonableness of Attorney's Fees under Oklahoma § 940 for Negligent Property Damage

Entitlement and Reasonableness of Attorney's Fees under Oklahoma § 940 for Negligent Property Damage

Date: Apr 2, 2003
Entitlement and Reasonableness of Attorney's Fees under Oklahoma § 940 for Negligent Property Damage Introduction In the case of Bill Finnell and Sandra Finnell v. Jebco Seismic and Jebco Seismic...
Oklahoma Supreme Court Establishes Daubert and Kumho Standards for Expert Testimony in Civil Cases

Oklahoma Supreme Court Establishes Daubert and Kumho Standards for Expert Testimony in Civil Cases

Date: Feb 12, 2003
Oklahoma Supreme Court Establishes Daubert and Kumho Standards for Expert Testimony in Civil Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Dwain Lee Christian, III, et al. v. Mid-South Abatement...
Single Operator Mandate in Joint Operating Agreements: Pitco Production Co. v. Chaparral Energy, Inc.

Single Operator Mandate in Joint Operating Agreements: Pitco Production Co. v. Chaparral Energy, Inc.

Date: Jan 22, 2003
Single Operator Mandate in Joint Operating Agreements: Pitco Production Company v. Chaparral Energy, Inc. Introduction In Pitco Production Company v. Chaparral Energy, Inc., the Supreme Court of...
Oklahoma Supreme Court Establishes Exemption from GTCA Notice Requirements for Claims Against Employees Acting Outside Employment Scope

Oklahoma Supreme Court Establishes Exemption from GTCA Notice Requirements for Claims Against Employees Acting Outside Employment Scope

Date: Jan 22, 2003
Oklahoma Supreme Court Establishes Exemption from GTCA Notice Requirements for Claims Against Employees Acting Outside Employment Scope Introduction In the landmark case of Dr. Robert J. Pellegrino...
Limiting Inherent Judicial Authority in Granting Attorney Fee Sanctions: Analysis of State ex rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma City

Limiting Inherent Judicial Authority in Granting Attorney Fee Sanctions: Analysis of State ex rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma City

Date: Dec 18, 2002
Limiting Inherent Judicial Authority in Granting Attorney Fee Sanctions: Analysis of State ex rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma City Introduction In the landmark case of State ex rel. Tal v. City of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert