Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Oklahoma Case Commentaries

Oklahoma Supreme Court Expands Insurer's Duty of Good Faith, Affirming $2.2M Award

Oklahoma Supreme Court Expands Insurer's Duty of Good Faith, Affirming $2.2M Award

Date: Jun 23, 2005
Oklahoma Supreme Court Expands Insurer's Duty of Good Faith, Affirming $2.2M Award Introduction In the case of Mario BADILLO v. MID CENTURY INSURANCE COMPANY, decided on June 22, 2005, the Supreme...
Nondelegable Duty and Liability of Third-Party Administrators: Insights from Wathor v. Mutual Assurance Administrators, Inc.

Nondelegable Duty and Liability of Third-Party Administrators: Insights from Wathor v. Mutual Assurance Administrators, Inc.

Date: Mar 30, 2004
Nondelegable Duty and Liability of Third-Party Administrators: Insights from Wathor v. Mutual Assurance Administrators, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case Wathor v. Mutual Assurance...
Limitation of Shareholders' Liability under the Oklahoma Nursing Home Care Act: Analysis of Lula Fanning v. SSCC Shareholders

Limitation of Shareholders' Liability under the Oklahoma Nursing Home Care Act: Analysis of Lula Fanning v. SSCC Shareholders

Date: Feb 11, 2004
Limitation of Shareholders' Liability under the Oklahoma Nursing Home Care Act: Analysis of Lula Fanning v. SSCC Shareholders Introduction The case of Lula Fanning, as Guardian of Eva Jackson v....
Entitlement and Reasonableness of Attorney's Fees under Oklahoma § 940 for Negligent Property Damage

Entitlement and Reasonableness of Attorney's Fees under Oklahoma § 940 for Negligent Property Damage

Date: Apr 2, 2003
Entitlement and Reasonableness of Attorney's Fees under Oklahoma § 940 for Negligent Property Damage Introduction In the case of Bill Finnell and Sandra Finnell v. Jebco Seismic and Jebco Seismic...
Oklahoma Supreme Court Establishes Daubert and Kumho Standards for Expert Testimony in Civil Cases

Oklahoma Supreme Court Establishes Daubert and Kumho Standards for Expert Testimony in Civil Cases

Date: Feb 12, 2003
Oklahoma Supreme Court Establishes Daubert and Kumho Standards for Expert Testimony in Civil Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Dwain Lee Christian, III, et al. v. Mid-South Abatement...
Single Operator Mandate in Joint Operating Agreements: Pitco Production Co. v. Chaparral Energy, Inc.

Single Operator Mandate in Joint Operating Agreements: Pitco Production Co. v. Chaparral Energy, Inc.

Date: Jan 22, 2003
Single Operator Mandate in Joint Operating Agreements: Pitco Production Company v. Chaparral Energy, Inc. Introduction In Pitco Production Company v. Chaparral Energy, Inc., the Supreme Court of...
Oklahoma Supreme Court Establishes Exemption from GTCA Notice Requirements for Claims Against Employees Acting Outside Employment Scope

Oklahoma Supreme Court Establishes Exemption from GTCA Notice Requirements for Claims Against Employees Acting Outside Employment Scope

Date: Jan 22, 2003
Oklahoma Supreme Court Establishes Exemption from GTCA Notice Requirements for Claims Against Employees Acting Outside Employment Scope Introduction In the landmark case of Dr. Robert J. Pellegrino...
Limiting Inherent Judicial Authority in Granting Attorney Fee Sanctions: Analysis of State ex rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma City

Limiting Inherent Judicial Authority in Granting Attorney Fee Sanctions: Analysis of State ex rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma City

Date: Dec 18, 2002
Limiting Inherent Judicial Authority in Granting Attorney Fee Sanctions: Analysis of State ex rel. Tal v. City of Oklahoma City Introduction In the landmark case of State ex rel. Tal v. City of...
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: Supreme Court of Oklahoma Reinforces Strict Standards

Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: Supreme Court of Oklahoma Reinforces Strict Standards

Date: Jun 12, 2002
Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress: Supreme Court of Oklahoma Reinforces Strict Standards Introduction The case of Computer Publications, Inc. v. Alysia Beth Welton (49 P.3d 732)...
Keating v. Edmondson: Restricting Gubernatorial Authority in Cabinet Organization

Keating v. Edmondson: Restricting Gubernatorial Authority in Cabinet Organization

Date: Dec 5, 2001
Keating v. Edmondson: Restricting Gubernatorial Authority in Cabinet Organization Introduction In Keating v. Edmondson (37 P.3d 882), decided on December 4, 2001, the Supreme Court of Oklahoma...
Workers' Compensation Court's Jurisdiction Limited to Statutory Provisions at Time of Last Injury

Workers' Compensation Court's Jurisdiction Limited to Statutory Provisions at Time of Last Injury

Date: Sep 19, 2001
Workers' Compensation Court's Jurisdiction Limited to Statutory Provisions at Time of Last Injury Introduction The case of Larry Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust Fund adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Affirmation of Capital Sentencing Standards and Application of Aggravating Circumstances in Williams v. State of Oklahoma

Affirmation of Capital Sentencing Standards and Application of Aggravating Circumstances in Williams v. State of Oklahoma

Date: Apr 10, 2001
Affirmation of Capital Sentencing Standards and Application of Aggravating Circumstances in Williams v. State of Oklahoma Introduction The case of Sterling Bernard Williams v. State of Oklahoma (22...
Discovery Rule Applicable to Libel Claims: Oklahoma Supreme Court in DDG v. Information Builders

Discovery Rule Applicable to Libel Claims: Oklahoma Supreme Court in DDG v. Information Builders

Date: Feb 28, 2001
Discovery Rule Applicable to Libel Claims: Oklahoma Supreme Court in DDG v. Information Builders Introduction The case of Digital Design Group, Inc. v. Information Builders, Inc., heard by the...
PATTERSON v. BEALL: Oklahoma Supreme Court Bars Summary Judgment in Small Claims Actions

PATTERSON v. BEALL: Oklahoma Supreme Court Bars Summary Judgment in Small Claims Actions

Date: Nov 15, 2000
PATTERSON v. BEALL: Oklahoma Supreme Court Bars Summary Judgment in Small Claims Actions Introduction In the landmark case of Jerry Patterson, dba Patterson Pest and Weed Control v. Lonnie and...
Supreme Court of Oklahoma Upholds Good Faith Breach and Punitive Damages in Barnes v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company

Supreme Court of Oklahoma Upholds Good Faith Breach and Punitive Damages in Barnes v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company

Date: Jul 19, 2000
Supreme Court of Oklahoma Upholds Good Faith Breach and Punitive Damages in Barnes v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company Introduction In Julie Barnes v. Oklahoma Farm Bureau Mutual...
Affirmation of First Degree Murder Conviction in Bland v. State: Comprehensive Commentary

Affirmation of First Degree Murder Conviction in Bland v. State: Comprehensive Commentary

Date: Jun 22, 2000
Affirmation of First Degree Murder Conviction in Bland v. State: Comprehensive Commentary Introduction The case of Jimmy Dale Bland v. State of Oklahoma presents a significant examination of...
Supreme Court of Oklahoma Reverses Summary Judgment on Property Access Indenture

Supreme Court of Oklahoma Reverses Summary Judgment on Property Access Indenture

Date: Apr 19, 2000
Supreme Court of Oklahoma Reverses Summary Judgment on Property Access Indenture Introduction In the landmark case of K K Food Services, Inc. d/b/a Burger King Restaurant at 721 S. Meridian Avenue in...
Expanding Wrongful Death Claims to Include Nonviable Fetuses Born Alive: Nealis v. Baird and Hartwig

Expanding Wrongful Death Claims to Include Nonviable Fetuses Born Alive: Nealis v. Baird and Hartwig

Date: Dec 8, 1999
Expanding Wrongful Death Claims to Include Nonviable Fetuses Born Alive: Nealis v. Baird and Hartwig Introduction Nealis v. Baird and Hartwig is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Oklahoma,...
Liability of Religious Organizations for Ministers' Criminal Conduct: N.H. v. Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)

Liability of Religious Organizations for Ministers' Criminal Conduct: N.H. v. Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.)

Date: Nov 3, 1999
Liability of Religious Organizations for Ministers' Criminal Conduct: N.H. v. Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.) Introduction N.H. v. Presbyterian Church (U.S.A.), 998 P.2d 592 (Okla. 1999), is a landmark...
Unsettled Law Does Not Constitute Legal Malpractice: Supreme Court Affirms Summary Judgment for Defendants

Unsettled Law Does Not Constitute Legal Malpractice: Supreme Court Affirms Summary Judgment for Defendants

Date: Sep 29, 1999
Unsettled Law Does Not Constitute Legal Malpractice: Supreme Court Affirms Summary Judgment for Defendants Introduction In the case of Jim D. Manley and John L. Houchin v. Jack L. Brown et al., the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert