Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

North Dakota Case Commentaries

Enhanced Standards for Dismissing Post-Conviction Relief Claims in North Dakota: The Chase v. State Decision

Enhanced Standards for Dismissing Post-Conviction Relief Claims in North Dakota: The Chase v. State Decision

Date: Aug 1, 2017
Enhanced Standards for Dismissing Post-Conviction Relief Claims in North Dakota: The Chase v. State Decision Introduction The case of Lorry Van Chase v. State of North Dakota addresses significant...
Affirmation of Voluntary Consent and Evidentiary Standards in State v. Shick

Affirmation of Voluntary Consent and Evidentiary Standards in State v. Shick

Date: Jun 8, 2017
Affirmation of Voluntary Consent and Evidentiary Standards in State of North Dakota v. Harold Dean Shick Introduction State of North Dakota v. Harold Dean Shick, 895 N.W.2d 773 (2017), is a pivotal...
Clarity in Royalty Assignments: North Dakota Supreme Court Affirms Unambiguous Conveyance

Clarity in Royalty Assignments: North Dakota Supreme Court Affirms Unambiguous Conveyance

Date: Apr 4, 2017
Clarity in Royalty Assignments: North Dakota Supreme Court Affirms Unambiguous Conveyance Introduction The case of THR Minerals, LLC v. Stephen D. Robinson et al. addresses the interpretation of a...
Enforcing Collateral Estoppel to Prevent Relitigation of Established Factual Findings: Jon Norberg v. Alonna Knorr Norberg

Enforcing Collateral Estoppel to Prevent Relitigation of Established Factual Findings: Jon Norberg v. Alonna Knorr Norberg

Date: Feb 17, 2017
Enforcing Collateral Estoppel to Prevent Relitigation of Established Factual Findings: Jon Norberg v. Alonna Knorr Norberg Introduction The case of Jon Norberg, M.D. & Jon Norberg, M.D., P.C. v....
Affirmation of State Court Jurisdiction in Mineral Title Disputes on Reservation Fee Lands

Affirmation of State Court Jurisdiction in Mineral Title Disputes on Reservation Fee Lands

Date: Dec 10, 2016
Affirmation of State Court Jurisdiction in Mineral Title Disputes on Reservation Fee Lands Introduction The case of Paul J. Fredericks v. Lyndon B. Fredericks was adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Written Contract Supremacy and Burden of Proof in Contractual Disputes: Welch Construction v. Duong

Affirmation of Written Contract Supremacy and Burden of Proof in Contractual Disputes: Welch Construction v. Duong

Date: Mar 19, 2016
Affirmation of Written Contract Supremacy and Burden of Proof in Contractual Disputes: Welch Construction v. Duong Introduction Welch Construction & Excavating, LLC v. Linh Duc Duong is a significant...
Admissibility of Prior Convictions in Criminal Trials: The North Dakota v. Acker Decision

Admissibility of Prior Convictions in Criminal Trials: The North Dakota v. Acker Decision

Date: Dec 2, 2015
Admissibility of Prior Convictions in Criminal Trials: The North Dakota v. Acker Decision Introduction In State of North Dakota v. Gino James Acker, 871 N.W.2d 603 (2015), the Supreme Court of North...
Strict Enforcement of N.D. R.Ev. 412 for Admission of Prior Consensual Sexual Conduct

Strict Enforcement of N.D. R.Ev. 412 for Admission of Prior Consensual Sexual Conduct

Date: Sep 18, 2015
Strict Enforcement of N.D. R.Ev. 412 for Admission of Prior Consensual Sexual Conduct Introduction In the landmark case of STATE of North Dakota v. Lorry Van Chase, 869 N.W.2d 733 (N.D. 2015), the...
Comprehensive Vacation Required for Divorce Judgments Under Rule 60(b): Insights from Nieuwenhuis v. Nieuwenhuis

Comprehensive Vacation Required for Divorce Judgments Under Rule 60(b): Insights from Nieuwenhuis v. Nieuwenhuis

Date: Jul 18, 2014
Comprehensive Vacation Required for Divorce Judgments Under Rule 60(b): Insights from Nieuwenhuis v. Nieuwenhuis Introduction The case of Brian K. Nieuwenhuis, Plaintiff and Appellant v. Lora N....
North Dakota Supreme Court Establishes Statutory Limitations for Post-Conviction Relief Applications in LEHMAN v. STATE

North Dakota Supreme Court Establishes Statutory Limitations for Post-Conviction Relief Applications in LEHMAN v. STATE

Date: May 29, 2014
North Dakota Supreme Court Establishes Statutory Limitations for Post-Conviction Relief Applications in LEHMAN v. STATE Introduction LEHMAN v. STATE (847 N.W.2d 119) is a pivotal decision by the...
Enforcement of Quitclaim Deeds and the Parol Evidence Rule: Insights from Finstad v. Gord

Enforcement of Quitclaim Deeds and the Parol Evidence Rule: Insights from Finstad v. Gord

Date: May 3, 2014
Enforcement of Quitclaim Deeds and the Parol Evidence Rule: Insights from Finstad v. Gord Introduction In the case of John Finstad and Lorie Finstad v. James Gord and Wendy Gord, et al. (844 N.W.2d...
Trosen v. Trosen: Clarifying the Applicability of the Statute of Frauds in Lease Agreements

Trosen v. Trosen: Clarifying the Applicability of the Statute of Frauds in Lease Agreements

Date: Jan 15, 2014
Trosen v. Trosen: Clarifying the Applicability of the Statute of Frauds in Lease Agreements Introduction Jeff Trosen v. Shirley Trosen and Brent Trosen is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Enforcement of Attorney Fees for Frivolous Claims under N.D.C.C. §§ 28–26–01 and 28–26–31 in Sagebrush Resources LLC v. Peterson

Enforcement of Attorney Fees for Frivolous Claims under N.D.C.C. §§ 28–26–01 and 28–26–31 in Sagebrush Resources LLC v. Peterson

Date: Jan 15, 2014
Enforcement of Attorney Fees for Frivolous Claims under N.D.C.C. §§ 28–26–01 and 28–26–31 in Sagebrush Resources LLC v. Peterson Introduction The case of Sagebrush Resources, LLC v. Daryl Peterson,...
First International Bank & Trust v. Thimjon Farms and Hagemeister Farms: Establishing Boundaries in Tortious Interference Claims

First International Bank & Trust v. Thimjon Farms and Hagemeister Farms: Establishing Boundaries in Tortious Interference Claims

Date: Nov 1, 2013
First International Bank & Trust v. Thimjon Farms and Hagemeister Farms: Establishing Boundaries in Tortious Interference Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Thimjon Farms Partnership and...
Lindsey Hysjulien v. Hill Top Home of Comfort: Key Insights on Employment Discrimination and Emotional Distress Claims

Lindsey Hysjulien v. Hill Top Home of Comfort: Key Insights on Employment Discrimination and Emotional Distress Claims

Date: Mar 5, 2013
Lindsey Hysjulien v. Hill Top Home of Comfort: Key Insights on Employment Discrimination and Emotional Distress Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Lindsey Hysjulien v. Hill Top Home of...
Clarifying the Duty to Defend in Indemnity Agreements: Specialized Contracting, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.

Clarifying the Duty to Defend in Indemnity Agreements: Specialized Contracting, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co.

Date: Dec 19, 2012
Clarifying the Duty to Defend in Indemnity Agreements: Specialized Contracting, Inc. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company Introduction Specialized Contracting, Inc., a North Dakota...
Clarifying Jury Instructions in Child Abuse Cases: Analysis of STATE v. Pavlicek (2012)

Clarifying Jury Instructions in Child Abuse Cases: Analysis of STATE v. Pavlicek (2012)

Date: Jul 27, 2012
Clarifying Jury Instructions in Child Abuse Cases: Analysis of STATE of North Dakota v. Sarah Ann Pavlicek (2012) Introduction The case of STATE of North Dakota v. Sarah Ann Pavlicek, adjudicated by...
Admission of Rebuttal Witness Testimony in Criminal Appeals: STATE v. Procive

Admission of Rebuttal Witness Testimony in Criminal Appeals: STATE v. Procive

Date: Aug 19, 2009
Admission of Rebuttal Witness Testimony in Criminal Appeals: STATE v. Procive Introduction In the case of STATE of North Dakota v. Benjamin Lee Procive (771 N.W.2d 259), the Supreme Court of North...
Affirmation of District Court’s Discretion in Divorce Judgment: Vann v. Vann

Affirmation of District Court’s Discretion in Divorce Judgment: Vann v. Vann

Date: Jul 10, 2009
Affirmation of District Court’s Discretion in Divorce Judgment: Vann v. Vann Introduction In the case of Gretchen W. Vann v. James P. Vann, 767 N.W.2d 855 (Supreme Court of North Dakota, 2009), the...
Unconscionability in Divorce Settlements: Analysis of Eberle v. Eberle

Unconscionability in Divorce Settlements: Analysis of Eberle v. Eberle

Date: Jun 18, 2009
Unconscionability in Divorce Settlements: Analysis of Eberle v. Eberle (766 N.W.2d 477) Introduction The case of John Eberle, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Heidi Eberle, Defendant and Appellant...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert