Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

North Carolina Case Commentaries

Defining 'Residence' in Chattel Mortgages and Conditional Sales Contracts: Sheffield Motor Co. v. Walker

Defining 'Residence' in Chattel Mortgages and Conditional Sales Contracts: Sheffield Motor Co. v. Walker

Date: Mar 2, 1950
Defining 'Residence' in Chattel Mortgages and Conditional Sales Contracts: Sheffield Motor Co. v. Walker Introduction Sheffield Motor Company and Universal Commercial Investment Trust Corporation v....
Limitation on Appeals from Nonappealable Interlocutory Orders: Veazey v. City of Durham

Limitation on Appeals from Nonappealable Interlocutory Orders: Veazey v. City of Durham

Date: Feb 2, 1950
Limitation on Appeals from Nonappealable Interlocutory Orders: Veazey v. City of Durham Introduction CORA VEAZEY v. CITY OF DURHAM is a landmark 1950 decision by the Supreme Court of North Carolina....
Reevaluation of Stare Decisis and Police Power in Occupational Licensing: STATE v. OWEN BALLANCE

Reevaluation of Stare Decisis and Police Power in Occupational Licensing: STATE v. OWEN BALLANCE

Date: Feb 2, 1949
Reevaluation of Stare Decisis and Police Power in Occupational Licensing: STATE v. OWEN BALLANCE Introduction STATE v. OWEN BALLANCE is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of North Carolina...
Jess Young v. Whitehall Company, Inc.: Advancing the Interpretation of Occupational Disease Compensation under North Carolina Law

Jess Young v. Whitehall Company, Inc.: Advancing the Interpretation of Occupational Disease Compensation under North Carolina Law

Date: Oct 2, 1948
Jess Young v. Whitehall Company, Inc.: Advancing the Interpretation of Occupational Disease Compensation under North Carolina Law Introduction The case of Jess Young v. Whitehall Company, Inc....
L.G. White v. Dixie Fire Insurance Company: Establishing the Burden of Proof in Policy Cancellation

L.G. White v. Dixie Fire Insurance Company: Establishing the Burden of Proof in Policy Cancellation

Date: Feb 2, 1946
L.G. White v. Dixie Fire Insurance Company: Establishing the Burden of Proof in Policy Cancellation Introduction The case of L.G. White v. Dixie Fire Insurance Company (226 N.C. 119) adjudicated by...
Independent Contractor Classification under Workmen's Compensation: Hayes v. Board of Trustees of Elon College

Independent Contractor Classification under Workmen's Compensation: Hayes v. Board of Trustees of Elon College

Date: Mar 2, 1944
Independent Contractor Classification under Workmen's Compensation: Hayes v. Board of Trustees of Elon College Introduction The case of Hayes v. Board of Trustees of Elon College (224 N.C. 11, 1944)...
Duty to Warn of Obvious Dangers: Benton v. United Bank Building Co.

Duty to Warn of Obvious Dangers: Benton v. United Bank Building Co.

Date: Jan 2, 1944
Duty to Warn of Obvious Dangers: Benton v. United Bank Building Company Introduction The case of Flores Ollie Benton v. United Bank Building Company and United Cigar-Whelan Stores Corporation,...
Affirmation of 'Last Injuriously Exposed' Principle in Workmen's Compensation: Haynes v. Feldspar Producing Company

Affirmation of 'Last Injuriously Exposed' Principle in Workmen's Compensation: Haynes v. Feldspar Producing Company

Date: Oct 2, 1942
Affirmation of 'Last Injuriously Exposed' Principle in Workmen's Compensation: Haynes v. Feldspar Producing Company Introduction James R. Haynes, Sr. v. Feldspar Producing Company, Employer, and...
Contribution Among Joint and Several Debtors under Compromise Agreements: An Analysis of W. L. Scales, Jr. v. Pannie S. Scales et al.

Contribution Among Joint and Several Debtors under Compromise Agreements: An Analysis of W. L. Scales, Jr. v. Pannie S. Scales et al.

Date: Nov 2, 1940
Contribution Among Joint and Several Debtors under Compromise Agreements: An Analysis of W. L. Scales, Jr. v. Pannie S. Scales et al. Introduction The case of W. L. Scales, Jr. v. Pannie S. Scales,...
Res Judicata in Partition Proceedings: Insights from HIGGINS v. HIGGINS

Res Judicata in Partition Proceedings: Insights from HIGGINS v. HIGGINS

Date: Mar 2, 1939
Res Judicata in Partition Proceedings: Insights from HIGGINS v. HIGGINS Introduction The case of Eva Higgins Gibbs and H. C. Gibbs v. R. L. (Bob) Higgins and Winnie Higgins stands as a pivotal...
Felton v. Felton: Establishing Administratrix Authority in Estate Asset Sales

Felton v. Felton: Establishing Administratrix Authority in Estate Asset Sales

Date: Mar 2, 1938
Felton v. Felton: Establishing Administratrix Authority in Estate Asset Sales Introduction The case of Minnie L. Felton, Mattie E. Daniels, Nellie B. Felton, and Pattie W. Norfleet v. Ealey A....
Flake v. Greensboro News Company: Defining Libel Per Se and Privacy in Unauthorized Photographic Use in Advertising

Flake v. Greensboro News Company: Defining Libel Per Se and Privacy in Unauthorized Photographic Use in Advertising

Date: Feb 2, 1938
Flake v. Greensboro News Company: Defining Libel Per Se and Privacy in Unauthorized Photographic Use in Advertising Introduction The case of Nancy Flake v. Greensboro News Company stands as a pivotal...
Affirmative Defense Responsibilities and Statutory Compliance for Mutual Fire Insurers: A Commentary on Abernethy v. Mecklenburg Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance Company

Affirmative Defense Responsibilities and Statutory Compliance for Mutual Fire Insurers: A Commentary on Abernethy v. Mecklenburg Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance Company

Date: Feb 2, 1938
Affirmative Defense Responsibilities and Statutory Compliance for Mutual Fire Insurers: A Commentary on Abernethy v. Mecklenburg Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance Company Introduction The case Emelyn A....
State v. O. C. Johnson: Establishing the Doctrine of Continuing Offense in Support Obligations

State v. O. C. Johnson: Establishing the Doctrine of Continuing Offense in Support Obligations

Date: Dec 2, 1937
State v. O. C. Johnson: Establishing the Doctrine of Continuing Offense in Support Obligations Introduction State v. O. C. Johnson (212 N.C. 566), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of North Carolina...
Reaffirming Judicial Discretion in Extradition Habeas Corpus: The Ray Bailey Decision

Reaffirming Judicial Discretion in Extradition Habeas Corpus: The Ray Bailey Decision

Date: Oct 2, 1932
Reaffirming Judicial Discretion in Extradition Habeas Corpus: The Ray Bailey Decision Introduction The case of Ray Bailey, alias Ray Keith versus the Supreme Court of North Carolina is a seminal...
Fiduciary Duty and Corporate Liability Established in Abitt v. Gregory & Davison Chemical Company

Fiduciary Duty and Corporate Liability Established in Abitt v. Gregory & Davison Chemical Company

Date: Nov 2, 1931
Fiduciary Duty and Corporate Liability Established in Abitt v. Gregory & Davison Chemical Company Introduction The case of J. L. Abitt v. Willis N. Gregory and Davison Chemical Company (1931) serves...
Strict Adherence to Procedural Rules in Appeals: Insights from Avery Pruitt et al. v. Neal Wood et al.

Strict Adherence to Procedural Rules in Appeals: Insights from Avery Pruitt et al. v. Neal Wood et al.

Date: Dec 2, 1930
Strict Adherence to Procedural Rules in Appeals: Insights from Avery Pruitt et al. v. Neal Wood et al. Introduction The case of Avery Pruitt et al. v. Neal Wood et al., decided by the Supreme Court...
Affirmation of Conspiracy Liability and Admissibility of Dying Declarations in Homicide Cases: STATE v. BEAL et al.

Affirmation of Conspiracy Liability and Admissibility of Dying Declarations in Homicide Cases: STATE v. BEAL et al.

Date: Aug 2, 1930
Affirmation of Conspiracy Liability and Admissibility of Dying Declarations in Homicide Cases: STATE v. BEAL et al. Introduction STATE v. FRED ERWIN BEAL, W. M. McGINNIS, LOUIS McLAUGHLIN, GEORGE...
Execution Against the Person in Cases of Wilful and Wanton Injury: Foster v. Hyman

Execution Against the Person in Cases of Wilful and Wanton Injury: Foster v. Hyman

Date: May 2, 1929
Execution Against the Person in Cases of Wilful and Wanton Injury: Foster v. Hyman Introduction Foster v. Hyman, a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of North Carolina on May 1, 1929,...
Compensation for Eminent Domain: Insights from Western Carolina Power Co. v. Hayes

Compensation for Eminent Domain: Insights from Western Carolina Power Co. v. Hayes

Date: Jan 2, 1927
Compensation for Eminent Domain: Insights from Western Carolina Power Co. v. Hayes Introduction The case of Western Carolina Power Company v. George W. Hayes and Sarah Hayes (193 N.C. 104, 1927)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert