Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

North Carolina Case Commentaries

State v. Kernen: North Carolina Supreme Court Invalidates Permit and Fee Requirements for Unconcealed Firearm Carrying

State v. Kernen: North Carolina Supreme Court Invalidates Permit and Fee Requirements for Unconcealed Firearm Carrying

Date: May 2, 1921
State v. Kernen: North Carolina Supreme Court Invalidates Permit and Fee Requirements for Unconcealed Firearm Carrying Introduction State v. O. W. Kernen, 181 N.C. 574 (1921), is a landmark decision...
STATE v. Ed Burnette: Mandating Open Court Proceedings for Enforcing Suspended Judgments

STATE v. Ed Burnette: Mandating Open Court Proceedings for Enforcing Suspended Judgments

Date: Feb 2, 1917
STATE v. Ed Burnette: Mandating Open Court Proceedings for Enforcing Suspended Judgments Introduction STATE v. Ed Burnette is a landmark 1917 decision by the Supreme Court of North Carolina that...
Prohibition of Unlawful Corporal Punishment in Prison Discipline: Analysis of STATE v. J. M. NIPPER AND JIM JOHNSON

Prohibition of Unlawful Corporal Punishment in Prison Discipline: Analysis of STATE v. J. M. NIPPER AND JIM JOHNSON

Date: Mar 2, 1914
Prohibition of Unlawful Corporal Punishment in Prison Discipline: Analysis of STATE v. J. M. NIPPER AND JIM JOHNSON Introduction The case of STATE v. J. M. NIPPER AND JIM JOHNSON (166 N.C. 272),...
Gross Negligence in Railway 'Flying Switch' Operations Affirmed: Johnson v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.

Gross Negligence in Railway 'Flying Switch' Operations Affirmed: Johnson v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.

Date: Oct 2, 1913
Gross Negligence in Railway 'Flying Switch' Operations Affirmed: Johnson v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co. Introduction In the landmark case of Clarence Johnson, by His Next Friend, v. Seaboard Air...
Extending Lien Protection to Purchasers with Notice: Raeford Lumber Co. v. Rockfish Trading Co.

Extending Lien Protection to Purchasers with Notice: Raeford Lumber Co. v. Rockfish Trading Co.

Date: Oct 2, 1913
Extending Lien Protection to Purchasers with Notice: Raeford Lumber Co. v. Rockfish Trading Co. Introduction The case of Raeford Lumber Company v. Rockfish Trading Company et al. adjudicated by the...
State v. Moore Gray: Establishing Comprehensive Self-Defense Standards in Home Invasion Cases

State v. Moore Gray: Establishing Comprehensive Self-Defense Standards in Home Invasion Cases

Date: Apr 2, 1913
State v. Moore Gray: Establishing Comprehensive Self-Defense Standards in Home Invasion Cases Introduction The case of State v. Moore Gray, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of North Carolina on April...
Mutual Intent and the Legality of Future Delivery Contracts: Insights from RODGERS, McCABE CO. v. J. H. BELL

Mutual Intent and the Legality of Future Delivery Contracts: Insights from RODGERS, McCABE CO. v. J. H. BELL

Date: Nov 2, 1911
Mutual Intent and the Legality of Future Delivery Contracts: Insights from RODGERS, McCABE CO. v. J. H. BELL Introduction The case of RODGERS, McCABE CO. v. J. H. BELL, adjudicated by the Supreme...
Discretionary Sentencing in Larceny: Insights from In Re Tinner Holley (154 N.C. 163)

Discretionary Sentencing in Larceny: Insights from In Re Tinner Holley (154 N.C. 163)

Date: Dec 2, 1910
Discretionary Sentencing in Larceny: Insights from In Re Tinner Holley (154 N.C. 163) Introduction In Re Tinner Holley, a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of North Carolina on December 23,...
Defining 'Mainland' in Float House Regulations: Insights from STATE v. W. L. BARCO

Defining 'Mainland' in Float House Regulations: Insights from STATE v. W. L. BARCO

Date: Feb 2, 1909
Defining 'Mainland' in Float House Regulations: Insights from STATE v. W. L. BARCO Introduction STATE v. W. L. BARCO (150 N.C. 792) is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of North...
Imprisonment for Debt Requires Jury-Determined Fraud: LEDFORD v. EMERSON

Imprisonment for Debt Requires Jury-Determined Fraud: LEDFORD v. EMERSON

Date: Dec 2, 1906
Imprisonment for Debt Requires Jury-Determined Fraud: LEDFORD v. EMERSON (143 N.C. 527) Introduction LEDFORD v. EMERSON is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of North Carolina, adjudicated on...
Theophilus White v. Ayer & Worth: Upholding Vested Rights of Public Officials

Theophilus White v. Ayer & Worth: Upholding Vested Rights of Public Officials

Date: May 2, 1900
Theophilus White v. Ayer & Worth: Upholding Vested Rights of Public Officials Introduction Theophilus White v. H. W. Ayer, State Auditor, and W. H. Worth, State Treasurer. (126 N.C. 570), decided by...
Horton v. Life Insurance Co.: Establishing the Principal-Agent Knowledge Doctrine in Insurance Contracts

Horton v. Life Insurance Co.: Establishing the Principal-Agent Knowledge Doctrine in Insurance Contracts

Date: Apr 2, 1898
Horton v. Life Insurance Co.: Establishing the Principal-Agent Knowledge Doctrine in Insurance Contracts Introduction In the landmark case of George P. Horton and Wife v. The Life Insurance Company...
Void Execution Sale Without Homestead Allotment: Insights from McG. Mobley v. Griffin and Waters

Void Execution Sale Without Homestead Allotment: Insights from McG. Mobley v. Griffin and Waters

Date: Sep 2, 1889
Void Execution Sale Without Homestead Allotment: Insights from McG. Mobley v. Griffin and Waters Introduction The Supreme Court of North Carolina's decision in McG. Mobley v. E. W. Griffin and D. T....
Establishing the Term of Office for Sheriffs under North Carolina Constitution: Loftin v. Sowers

Establishing the Term of Office for Sheriffs under North Carolina Constitution: Loftin v. Sowers

Date: Jan 2, 1871
Establishing the Term of Office for Sheriffs under North Carolina Constitution: Loftin v. Sowers Introduction David Loftin v. Jacob Sowers is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of North...
Supreme Court of North Carolina's Jurisdiction in Habeas Corpus Under Confederate Authority

Supreme Court of North Carolina's Jurisdiction in Habeas Corpus Under Confederate Authority

Date: Jun 2, 1863
Supreme Court of North Carolina's Jurisdiction in Habeas Corpus Under Confederate Authority Introduction In the landmark case, IN THE MATTER OF J. C. BRYAN. HABEAS CORPUS. (60 N.C. 1), decided on...
Previous
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert