Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

North Carolina Case Commentaries

Swink v. North Carolina: Clarifying Concurrent Sentencing and Commitment Validity

Swink v. North Carolina: Clarifying Concurrent Sentencing and Commitment Validity

Date: Nov 2, 1955
Swink v. North Carolina: Clarifying Concurrent Sentencing and Commitment Validity Introduction IN THE MATTER OF JOE SWINK (243 N.C. 86) is a landmark 1955 decision by the Supreme Court of North...
Inclusion of Lesser Offenses in Robbery Charges: Insights from STATE v. MARSHALL NORMAN HICKS

Inclusion of Lesser Offenses in Robbery Charges: Insights from STATE v. MARSHALL NORMAN HICKS

Date: Nov 2, 1954
Inclusion of Lesser Offenses in Robbery Charges: Insights from STATE v. MARSHALL NORMAN HICKS Introduction STATE v. MARSHALL NORMAN HICKS (241 N.C. 156), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of North...
Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations: Childress v. Abeles & Troutman

Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations: Childress v. Abeles & Troutman

Date: Oct 2, 1954
Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations: Childress v. Abeles & Troutman Introduction The case of Sid P. Childress v. Murray J. Abeles and Clarence A. Troutman, T/A Universal Company...
Strict Enforcement of Evidence Exclusion for Separate Offenses: Insights from State v. Betty McClain

Strict Enforcement of Evidence Exclusion for Separate Offenses: Insights from State v. Betty McClain

Date: Apr 2, 1954
Strict Enforcement of Evidence Exclusion for Separate Offenses: Insights from State v. Betty McClain Introduction State v. Betty McClain, 240 N.C. 171 (1954), is a seminal case adjudicated by the...
Establishing Criteria for Interlocutory Injunctions in Land Disputes: Huskins v. Yancey Hospital

Establishing Criteria for Interlocutory Injunctions in Land Disputes: Huskins v. Yancey Hospital

Date: Oct 2, 1953
Establishing Criteria for Interlocutory Injunctions in Land Disputes: Huskins v. Yancey Hospital Introduction The case of Sam J. Huskins and Wife, Mrs. Sam J. Huskins v. Yancey Hospital, Inc. (238...
Requiring Specificity in Bribery Indictments: STATE v. Greer

Requiring Specificity in Bribery Indictments: STATE v. Greer

Date: Oct 2, 1953
Requiring Specificity in Bribery Indictments: STATE v. Greer Introduction STATE v. Hubert Greer is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of North Carolina on October 14, 1953. The case...
Clarifying Certainty Requirements for Easement Descriptions: Insights from SUE AGNES BORDERS v. ELVA ELIZABETH YARBROUGH

Clarifying Certainty Requirements for Easement Descriptions: Insights from SUE AGNES BORDERS v. ELVA ELIZABETH YARBROUGH

Date: Apr 2, 1953
Clarifying Certainty Requirements for Easement Descriptions: Insights from Sue Agnes Borders v. Elva Elizabeth Yarbrough Introduction Sue Agnes Borders v. Elva Elizabeth Yarbrough, adjudicated by the...
Invalidation of Unauthorized Consent Judgments in Municipal Elections

Invalidation of Unauthorized Consent Judgments in Municipal Elections

Date: Sep 2, 1952
Invalidation of Unauthorized Consent Judgments in Municipal Elections Introduction The case of A. Corey et al. v. L. W. Hardison et al. adjudicated by the Supreme Court of North Carolina on September...
Broad Discretion of Housing Authorities in Public Housing Site Selection: IN RE HOUSING AUTHORITY of Salisbury

Broad Discretion of Housing Authorities in Public Housing Site Selection: IN RE HOUSING AUTHORITY of Salisbury

Date: Apr 2, 1952
Broad Discretion of Housing Authorities in Public Housing Site Selection: IN RE HOUSING AUTHORITY of Salisbury Introduction In the landmark case In Re: Housing Authority of the City of Salisbury,...
Mandatory Deduction of Penalties in Agricultural Quota Systems: Insights from Puckett & McCollum v. Sellars

Mandatory Deduction of Penalties in Agricultural Quota Systems: Insights from Puckett & McCollum v. Sellars

Date: Mar 2, 1952
Mandatory Deduction of Penalties in Agricultural Quota Systems: Insights from Puckett & McCollum v. Sellars Introduction The case of C.W. Puckett and F.L. McCollum, Co-Partners Trading as Farmers...
Comprehensive Commentary on Watson Industries, Inc. v. Shaw: Application of Sales and Use Tax on Building Materials

Comprehensive Commentary on Watson Industries, Inc. v. Shaw: Application of Sales and Use Tax on Building Materials

Date: Mar 2, 1952
Application of Sales and Use Tax on Building Materials: Watson Industries, Inc. v. Shaw Introduction The case of Watson Industries, Inc. v. Eugene G. Shaw, Commissioner of Revenue of North Carolina...
Governmental Immunity in Educational and Park Administration: North Carolina Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in Everett Smith v. C.F. Hefner et al.

Governmental Immunity in Educational and Park Administration: North Carolina Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in Everett Smith v. C.F. Hefner et al.

Date: Feb 2, 1952
Governmental Immunity in Educational and Park Administration: North Carolina Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in Everett Smith v. C.F. Hefner et al. Introduction The case of Everett Smith,...
Limitation on Municipal Taxicab Fees: Victory Cab Company v. City of Charlotte

Limitation on Municipal Taxicab Fees: Victory Cab Company v. City of Charlotte

Date: Dec 2, 1951
Limitation on Municipal Taxicab Fees: Victory Cab Company v. City of Charlotte Introduction The case of Victory Cab Company, A Corporation, et al. v. City of Charlotte addresses the legality of...
Contempt Proceedings in Consent Judgment Refusals: An Analysis of MARY BEAN LUTHER v. ERVIN CHARLIE LUTHER

Contempt Proceedings in Consent Judgment Refusals: An Analysis of MARY BEAN LUTHER v. ERVIN CHARLIE LUTHER

Date: Nov 2, 1951
Contempt Proceedings in Consent Judgment Refusals: An Analysis of MARY BEAN LUTHER v. ERVIN CHARLIE LUTHER Introduction The case of Mary Bean Luther v. Ervin Charlie Luther (234 N.C. 429) adjudicated...
Discretionary Trustee Powers and Abuse: Woodard v. Mordecai

Discretionary Trustee Powers and Abuse: Woodard v. Mordecai

Date: Nov 2, 1951
Discretionary Trustee Powers and Abuse: Woodard v. Mordecai Introduction The case of Elizabeth G. Woodard and Bessie W. Campbell v. W. G. Mordecai, Co-Trustee of the Estate of Moses W. Woodard,...
State v. John Henry Rogers: Establishing Precedents in First-Degree Murder and Evidence Admissibility

State v. John Henry Rogers: Establishing Precedents in First-Degree Murder and Evidence Admissibility

Date: Apr 2, 1951
State v. John Henry Rogers: Establishing Precedents in First-Degree Murder and Evidence Admissibility Introduction State v. John Henry Rogers (233 N.C. 390), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of North...
Defining Disability in Workmen's Compensation: Wage-Earning Capacity vs. Physical Impairment

Defining Disability in Workmen's Compensation: Wage-Earning Capacity vs. Physical Impairment

Date: Mar 2, 1951
Defining Disability in Workmen's Compensation: Wage-Earning Capacity vs. Physical Impairment Introduction The case of Tommy Anderson, Employee, v. Northwestern Motor Company, Employer, and...
Fraud in Fiduciary Relationships and Statute of Limitations: Analysis of Vail v. Vail

Fraud in Fiduciary Relationships and Statute of Limitations: Analysis of Vail v. Vail

Date: Feb 2, 1951
Fraud in Fiduciary Relationships and Statute of Limitations: Analysis of Vail v. Vail Introduction The case of ROBERT E. VAIL, WILLIAM C. VAIL, S. PERRY VAIL, AND WINNIE VAIL YOW versus V. B. VAIL...
Voluntary Parting with Possession in Insurance Policies: McDowell Motor Company v. New York Underwriters Insurance Company

Voluntary Parting with Possession in Insurance Policies: McDowell Motor Company v. New York Underwriters Insurance Company

Date: Feb 2, 1951
Voluntary Parting with Possession in Insurance Policies: McDowell Motor Company v. New York Underwriters Insurance Company Introduction McDowell Motor Company, Inc., v. New York Underwriters...
Reversing Contributory Negligence: Holderfield v. Rummage Brothers Trucking Company

Reversing Contributory Negligence: Holderfield v. Rummage Brothers Trucking Company

Date: Nov 2, 1950
Reversing Contributory Negligence: Holderfield v. Rummage Brothers Trucking Company Introduction Holderfield v. Rummage Brothers Trucking Company, decided by the Supreme Court of North Carolina on...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert