Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New York Case Commentaries

Maintaining the Homeowner’s Exemption Despite Unity of Ownership: Cadena v. Kupferstein and the Scope of “Direction or Control” under Labor Law § 241(6)

Maintaining the Homeowner’s Exemption Despite Unity of Ownership: Cadena v. Kupferstein and the Scope of “Direction or Control” under Labor Law § 241(6)

Date: May 22, 2025
Maintaining the Homeowner’s Exemption Despite Unity of Ownership: Cadena v. Kupferstein (2025) and the Scope of “Direction or Control” under Labor Law § 241(6) Introduction Cadena v. Kupferstein, 238...
Serial Frivolous Appeals and the Appellate Expansion of 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 Sanctions: A Commentary on Matter of Ruth S. (2025 NY Slip Op 03072)

Serial Frivolous Appeals and the Appellate Expansion of 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 Sanctions: A Commentary on Matter of Ruth S. (2025 NY Slip Op 03072)

Date: May 22, 2025
Serial Frivolous Appeals and the Appellate Expansion of 22 NYCRR 130-1.1 Sanctions: A Commentary on Matter of Ruth S. (2025 NY Slip Op 03072) 1. Introduction Matter of Ruth S. is the latest chapter...
Separate Applications, Separate Clocks: Camarda v. Ubert Clarifies the 30-Day Limitations Period for Article 78 Review of Village ZBA Decisions

Separate Applications, Separate Clocks: Camarda v. Ubert Clarifies the 30-Day Limitations Period for Article 78 Review of Village ZBA Decisions

Date: May 22, 2025
Separate Applications, Separate Clocks: Camarda v. Ubert Clarifies the 30-Day Limitations Period for Article 78 Review of Village ZBA Decisions 1. Introduction Matter of Camarda v. Ubert (2025 NY...
Feeney v. Giannetti (2025): Mandatory Evidentiary Hearings on Receiver Accountings and Reinforced 5-Percent Cap on Commissions

Feeney v. Giannetti (2025): Mandatory Evidentiary Hearings on Receiver Accountings and Reinforced 5-Percent Cap on Commissions

Date: May 22, 2025
Feeney v. Giannetti (2025): Mandatory Evidentiary Hearings on Receiver Accountings and Reinforced 5-Percent Cap on Commissions 1. Introduction Feeney v. Giannetti, 238 A.D.3d 991 (2d Dep’t 2025),...
Rosenfeld v. Brody (2025): Pleading Standards for Fraudulent Conveyance Claims under New York’s Uniform Voidable Transactions Act

Rosenfeld v. Brody (2025): Pleading Standards for Fraudulent Conveyance Claims under New York’s Uniform Voidable Transactions Act

Date: May 22, 2025
Rosenfeld v. Brody (2025): Pleading Standards for Fraudulent Conveyance Claims under New York’s Uniform Voidable Transactions Act 1. Introduction Parties & Background: Yaakov Rosenfeld (“Plaintiff”)...
Espinosa v. Attorney Grievance Committee (2025): Non-Retroactivity of Reciprocal Suspensions and Deference to Foreign Sanctions

Espinosa v. Attorney Grievance Committee (2025): Non-Retroactivity of Reciprocal Suspensions and Deference to Foreign Sanctions

Date: May 21, 2025
Espinosa v. Attorney Grievance Committee (2025): Non-Retroactivity of Reciprocal Suspensions and Deference to Foreign Sanctions 1. Introduction Matter of Espinosa (2025 NY Slip Op 03017) addresses...
Expanded Reciprocal Discipline and the Diligence Imperative – A Commentary on Matter of DeMaio (2025)

Expanded Reciprocal Discipline and the Diligence Imperative – A Commentary on Matter of DeMaio (2025)

Date: May 21, 2025
Expanded Reciprocal Discipline and the Diligence Imperative – A Commentary on Matter of DeMaio (2025) 1. Introduction Matter of DeMaio, 2025 NY Slip Op 03016, is the First Department’s latest...
“One Request Is Enough” – The Immediate-Inquiry Rule for Pro-Se Demands after People v. Lewis (2025)

“One Request Is Enough” – The Immediate-Inquiry Rule for Pro-Se Demands after People v. Lewis (2025)

Date: May 21, 2025
“One Request Is Enough” – The Immediate-Inquiry Rule for Pro-Se Demands after People v. Lewis (2025) Introduction The New York Court of Appeals’ decision in People v. Lewis, 2025 NY Slip Op 03011,...
“Jurisdiction Yes, Standing No” – New York Re-Anchors the Internal Affairs Doctrine in Ezrasons, Inc. v. Rudd (2025)

“Jurisdiction Yes, Standing No” – New York Re-Anchors the Internal Affairs Doctrine in Ezrasons, Inc. v. Rudd (2025)

Date: May 21, 2025
“Jurisdiction Yes, Standing No” – New York Re-Anchors the Internal Affairs Doctrine in Ezrasons, Inc. v. Rudd (2025) 1. Introduction In Ezrasons, Inc. v. Rudd, 2025 NY Slip Op 03008, the New York...
The “Holmes-Austin Rule”: Temporal Defects in an Indictment May Be Cured by Related Counts and Bills of Particulars

The “Holmes-Austin Rule”: Temporal Defects in an Indictment May Be Cured by Related Counts and Bills of Particulars

Date: May 21, 2025
The “Holmes-Austin Rule”: Temporal Defects in an Indictment May Be Cured by Related Counts and Bills of Particulars Introduction People v. Holmes-Austin (2025 NY Slip Op 03021) was decided by the...
No Blanket Mootness Exception for Permanency Hearing Appeals – A Commentary on Matter of Joshua J. (Tameka J.)

No Blanket Mootness Exception for Permanency Hearing Appeals – A Commentary on Matter of Joshua J. (Tameka J.)

Date: May 21, 2025
No Blanket Mootness Exception for Permanency Hearing Appeals – A Commentary on Matter of Joshua J. (Tameka J.), 2025 NY Slip Op 03010 1. Introduction The New York Court of Appeals, in Matter of...
People v. Cruz: Endorsing Nonevidentiary Remittal Hearings and Expanded Deference to Trial-Court Demeanor Findings in Batson Step-Three Analysis

People v. Cruz: Endorsing Nonevidentiary Remittal Hearings and Expanded Deference to Trial-Court Demeanor Findings in Batson Step-Three Analysis

Date: May 16, 2025
People v. Cruz: Endorsing Nonevidentiary Remittal Hearings and Expanded Deference to Trial-Court Demeanor Findings in Batson Step-Three Analysis Introduction In People v. Cruz, 238 A.D.3d 1327 (3d...
Union Standing Beyond Active Membership & Retiree Grievance Exemption: The Precedential Effect of Chappaqua Congress of Teachers v. Board of Education (2025)

Union Standing Beyond Active Membership & Retiree Grievance Exemption: The Precedential Effect of Chappaqua Congress of Teachers v. Board of Education (2025)

Date: May 15, 2025
Union Standing Beyond Active Membership & Retiree Grievance Exemption: The Precedential Effect of Chappaqua Congress of Teachers v. Board of Education (2025) 1. Introduction The Appellate Division,...
People v. Thomison (2025): Strengthening the “Basis-of-Knowledge” Requirement for Informant Tips and Re-limiting Intrusive Detentions Following Routine Traffic Stops

People v. Thomison (2025): Strengthening the “Basis-of-Knowledge” Requirement for Informant Tips and Re-limiting Intrusive Detentions Following Routine Traffic Stops

Date: May 15, 2025
People v. Thomison (2025): Strengthening the “Basis-of-Knowledge” Requirement for Informant Tips and Re-limiting Intrusive Detentions Following Routine Traffic Stops Introduction People v. Thomison,...
Notice of Pendency Insufficient to Upset Good-Faith Foreclosure Purchaser’s Title after Reversal – A Commentary on Yesmin v. Aliobaba, LLC (2025)

Notice of Pendency Insufficient to Upset Good-Faith Foreclosure Purchaser’s Title after Reversal – A Commentary on Yesmin v. Aliobaba, LLC (2025)

Date: May 15, 2025
“Lis Pendens versus Good-Faith Foreclosure Purchaser” – The New Rule from Yesmin v. Aliobaba, LLC 1. Introduction Yesmin v. Aliobaba, LLC, 2025 NY Slip Op 02964, presented the New York Appellate...
Williams v. Levine: Elevating XLIF to Accepted Neurosurgical Practice and Tightening Expert‐Affidavit Standards on Summary Judgment

Williams v. Levine: Elevating XLIF to Accepted Neurosurgical Practice and Tightening Expert‐Affidavit Standards on Summary Judgment

Date: May 15, 2025
Williams v. Levine: Elevating XLIF to Accepted Neurosurgical Practice and Tightening Expert-Affidavit Standards on Summary Judgment Introduction In Williams v. Levine, 2025 NY Slip Op 02962, the...
Weekes v. Tishman Technologies Corp.: Construction-Manager Liability and Ancillary Scaffold Removal under New York Labor Law §240(1)

Weekes v. Tishman Technologies Corp.: Construction-Manager Liability and Ancillary Scaffold Removal under New York Labor Law §240(1)

Date: May 15, 2025
Weekes v. Tishman Technologies Corp.: Construction-Manager Liability and Ancillary Scaffold Removal under New York Labor Law §240(1) I. Introduction In Weekes v. Tishman Technologies Corporation, 238...

        “A Legal Nullity Without Leave” –  
        Raiola v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn and the Dual Thresholds for (1) Adding New Defendants and (2) CPLR 3211(a)(7) Dismissals

“A Legal Nullity Without Leave” – Raiola v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn and the Dual Thresholds for (1) Adding New Defendants and (2) CPLR 3211(a)(7) Dismissals

Date: May 15, 2025
“A Legal Nullity Without Leave” – Raiola v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Brooklyn and the Dual Thresholds for (1) Adding New Defendants and (2) CPLR 3211(a)(7) Dismissals Introduction Raiola v. Roman...
“Harassment Is Not Fraud”: People v. Wilson and the Refined Standard for Intent to Defraud under N.Y. Penal Law § 175.10

“Harassment Is Not Fraud”: People v. Wilson and the Refined Standard for Intent to Defraud under N.Y. Penal Law § 175.10

Date: May 15, 2025
“Harassment Is Not Fraud”: People v. Wilson and the Refined Standard for Intent to Defraud under N.Y. Penal Law § 175.10 Introduction People v. Wilson (2025 NY Slip Op 02940) arises from a modern...
Routine Services, Routine Fees: The Second Department’s Clarification on Compensation for Court-Appointed Accountants in Article 81 Guardianships

Routine Services, Routine Fees: The Second Department’s Clarification on Compensation for Court-Appointed Accountants in Article 81 Guardianships

Date: May 15, 2025
Routine Services, Routine Fees: The Second Department’s Clarification on Compensation for Court-Appointed Accountants in Article 81 Guardianships Introduction Matter of Silda E.H. (Henderson), 238...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert