Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New Jersey Case Commentaries

Attorney’s Duty to Non-Client Third Parties in Negligent Misrepresentation: A New N.J. Precedent

Attorney’s Duty to Non-Client Third Parties in Negligent Misrepresentation: A New N.J. Precedent

Date: Mar 30, 1995
Attorney’s Duty to Non-Client Third Parties in Negligent Misrepresentation: A New N.J. Precedent Introduction Lisa Petrillo v. William G. Bachenberg, Jr., Trustee, "The Trust", Bachenberg Bachenberg,...
NJ Supreme Court Affirms Negligence Standard in Business Defamation, Requires Actual Malice for Consumer Fraud Cases

NJ Supreme Court Affirms Negligence Standard in Business Defamation, Requires Actual Malice for Consumer Fraud Cases

Date: Mar 16, 1995
New Jersey Supreme Court Affirms Negligence Standard in Business Defamation, Requires Actual Malice for Consumer Fraud Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Turf Lawnmower Repair, Inc. v. Bergen...
Clarifying the Threshold for Domestic Violence Orders: Insights from Corrente v. Corrente

Clarifying the Threshold for Domestic Violence Orders: Insights from Corrente v. Corrente

Date: Mar 9, 1995
Clarifying the Threshold for Domestic Violence Orders: Insights from Corrente v. Corrente Introduction Anne M. Corrente v. John D. Corrente, 281 N.J. Super. 243 (1995), adjudicated by the Superior...
Affirming Prosecutorial Discretion in Pretrial Intervention: State of New Jersey v. Nwobu et al.

Affirming Prosecutorial Discretion in Pretrial Intervention: State of New Jersey v. Nwobu et al.

Date: Feb 9, 1995
Affirming Prosecutorial Discretion in Pretrial Intervention: State of New Jersey v. Nwobu et al. Introduction State of New Jersey v. Daniel Nwobu, James Callender, Bryan Harris, and James Overby is a...
Reaffirming Procedural Due Process in Prison Disciplinary Hearings: Gallimore McDonald v. Pinchak

Reaffirming Procedural Due Process in Prison Disciplinary Hearings: Gallimore McDonald v. Pinchak

Date: Jan 26, 1995
Reaffirming Procedural Due Process in Prison Disciplinary Hearings: Gallimore McDonald v. Pinchak 1. Introduction Gallimore McDonald v. Steven Pinchak, 139 N.J. 188 (1995), is a pivotal case...
Harmless Error Doctrine Applied to 24-Hour Notice Violations in NJ Prison Disciplinary Hearings

Harmless Error Doctrine Applied to 24-Hour Notice Violations in NJ Prison Disciplinary Hearings

Date: Jan 26, 1995
Harmless Error Doctrine Applied to 24-Hour Notice Violations in NJ Prison Disciplinary Hearings Introduction In the landmark case of Al-Tariq Jacobs v. Robert Stephens, 139 N.J. 212 (1995), the...
Adoption of Continuous-Trigger Theory with Risk-Based Allocation in Asbestos-Related Insurance Coverage: Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Insurance Co.

Adoption of Continuous-Trigger Theory with Risk-Based Allocation in Asbestos-Related Insurance Coverage: Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Insurance Co.

Date: Dec 23, 1994
Adoption of Continuous-Trigger Theory with Risk-Based Allocation in Asbestos-Related Insurance Coverage Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey, in Owens-Illinois, Inc. v. United Insurance Co.,...
Unanimity in Jury Determinations for Death Penalty Eligibility: State v. Brown – New Jersey Supreme Court Establishes Critical Precedents

Unanimity in Jury Determinations for Death Penalty Eligibility: State v. Brown – New Jersey Supreme Court Establishes Critical Precedents

Date: Dec 22, 1994
Unanimity in Jury Determinations for Death Penalty Eligibility: State v. Brown – New Jersey Supreme Court Establishes Critical Precedents Introduction In the seminal case of State of New Jersey v....
Strict Compliance with Consent of Surety Requirements in Public Bidding: Meadowbrook Carting Co. v. Borough of Island Heights

Strict Compliance with Consent of Surety Requirements in Public Bidding: Meadowbrook Carting Co. v. Borough of Island Heights

Date: Dec 8, 1994
Strict Compliance with Consent of Surety Requirements in Public Bidding Introduction The case of Meadowbrook Carting Company, Inc. v. Borough of Island Heights and Consolidated Waste Services, Inc....
Intrusion on Seclusion as an Injury to the Person: RUMBAUSKAS v. CANTOR

Intrusion on Seclusion as an Injury to the Person: RUMBAUSKAS v. CANTOR

Date: Dec 1, 1994
Intrusion on Seclusion as an Injury to the Person: RUMBAUSKAS v. CANTOR Introduction John Rumbauskas v. Edward A. Cantor is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of New Jersey on November 30,...
N.J. Supreme Court Limits Personal Jurisdiction Through Territory-of-Coverage Clauses

N.J. Supreme Court Limits Personal Jurisdiction Through Territory-of-Coverage Clauses

Date: Oct 14, 1994
N.J. Supreme Court Limits Personal Jurisdiction Through Territory-of-Coverage Clauses Introduction In the landmark case of Waste Management, Inc. et al. v. The Admiral Insurance Company et al.,...
Cox v. Sears Roebuck Company: Establishing Enhanced Consumer Protection under the Consumer Fraud Act

Cox v. Sears Roebuck Company: Establishing Enhanced Consumer Protection under the Consumer Fraud Act

Date: Sep 16, 1994
Cox v. Sears Roebuck Company: Establishing Enhanced Consumer Protection under the Consumer Fraud Act Introduction The case of Albert Cox, Executor of the Estate of William Cox v. Sears Roebuck...
Limits on Enforceable Liquidated Damages Clauses in Municipal Leases: Wasserman's Inc. v. Township of Middletown

Limits on Enforceable Liquidated Damages Clauses in Municipal Leases: Wasserman's Inc. v. Township of Middletown

Date: Aug 3, 1994
Limits on Enforceable Liquidated Damages Clauses in Municipal Leases: Wasserman's Inc. v. Township of Middletown Introduction Wasserman's Inc. and Jo-Ro, Inc. v. Township of Middletown, 137 N.J. 238...
Clarifying the Requirements for Charging Lesser-Included Offenses: State of NJ v. Charles Brent

Clarifying the Requirements for Charging Lesser-Included Offenses: State of NJ v. Charles Brent

Date: Jul 28, 1994
Clarifying the Requirements for Charging Lesser-Included Offenses: State of New Jersey v. Charles Brent Introduction The case of State of New Jersey v. Charles Brent, 137 N.J. 107 (1994), serves as a...
State v. DiFrisco: Affirmation of Death Penalty and Clarification of Juror Selection Standards

State v. DiFrisco: Affirmation of Death Penalty and Clarification of Juror Selection Standards

Date: Jul 28, 1994
State v. DiFrisco: Affirmation of Death Penalty and Clarification of Juror Selection Standards Introduction State v. Anthony DiFrisco (137 N.J. 434, 1994) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
CRAWN v. CAMPO: Establishing the Recklessness Standard in Informal Sports

CRAWN v. CAMPO: Establishing the Recklessness Standard in Informal Sports

Date: Jul 22, 1994
Recklessness Standard Applied to Informal Sports: Analysis of CRAWN v. CAMPO Introduction CRAWN v. CAMPO, 136 N.J. 494 (1994), is a pivotal case in New Jersey jurisprudence concerning the liability...
Supreme Court of New Jersey Limits on Mandatory Project Labor Agreements in Public Bidding

Supreme Court of New Jersey Limits on Mandatory Project Labor Agreements in Public Bidding

Date: Jul 8, 1994
Supreme Court of New Jersey Limits on Mandatory Project Labor Agreements in Public Bidding Introduction In the landmark case George Harms Construction Co., Inc. v. New Jersey Turnpike Authority (137...
Net Income Burden in Personal Injury Damages: Caldwell v. Kehlers Establishes Plaintiff's Duty

Net Income Burden in Personal Injury Damages: Caldwell v. Kehlers Establishes Plaintiff's Duty

Date: Jul 7, 1994
Net Income Burden in Personal Injury Damages: Caldwell v. Kehlers Establishes Plaintiff's Duty Introduction In the landmark case of Paul Caldwell v. Deloris Haynes, Todd Kehlers, and Alice S. Kehler...
Implied Employment Contracts from Employee Manuals: The Witkowski v. Lipton Decision

Implied Employment Contracts from Employee Manuals: The Witkowski v. Lipton Decision

Date: Jul 1, 1994
Implied Employment Contracts from Employee Manuals: The Witkowski v. Lipton Decision Introduction The case of Edward B. Witkowski and Janice M. Witkowski v. Thomas J. Lipton, Inc., Josephdiraddo, and...
Nicosia v. Wakefern: Implied Employment Contracts and Effective Disclaimers

Nicosia v. Wakefern: Implied Employment Contracts and Effective Disclaimers

Date: Jul 1, 1994
Nicosia v. Wakefern: Implied Employment Contracts and Effective Disclaimers Introduction Anthony Nicosia v. Wakefern Food Corporation, 136 N.J. 401 (1994), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert