Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New Jersey Case Commentaries

Extension of Absolute Privilege to Private Investigators in Judicial Proceedings

Extension of Absolute Privilege to Private Investigators in Judicial Proceedings

Date: Jul 28, 1995
Extension of Absolute Privilege to Private Investigators in Judicial Proceedings Introduction In the landmark case of Linda Hawkins v. Brian Harris et al. (141 N.J. 207, 1995), the Supreme Court of...
Establishing Constitutional Parameters for Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification in New Jersey

Establishing Constitutional Parameters for Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification in New Jersey

Date: Jul 26, 1995
Establishing Constitutional Parameters for Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification in New Jersey Introduction In the landmark case of John Doe v. Deborah Poritz, Attorney General of the...
Establishing Contingency Enhancements in Attorney's Fee Awards Under New Jersey's Law Against Discrimination (LAD)

Establishing Contingency Enhancements in Attorney's Fee Awards Under New Jersey's Law Against Discrimination (LAD)

Date: Jul 25, 1995
Establishing Contingency Enhancements in Attorney's Fee Awards Under New Jersey's Law Against Discrimination (LAD) Introduction The case of Candy Rendine and Bernadette Lorestani v. Edward Pantzer...
Contingent Fee Agreements Do Not Cap Statutory Fee Awards: Insights from Szczepanski v. Newcomb Medical Center

Contingent Fee Agreements Do Not Cap Statutory Fee Awards: Insights from Szczepanski v. Newcomb Medical Center

Date: Jul 25, 1995
Contingent Fee Agreements Do Not Cap Statutory Fee Awards: Insights from Szczepanski v. Newcomb Medical Center Introduction Szczepanski v. Newcomb Medical Center, Inc., decided by the Supreme Court...
Clarifying RICO Elements: The New Jersey Supreme Court in STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. Patrick Ball et al.

Clarifying RICO Elements: The New Jersey Supreme Court in STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. Patrick Ball et al.

Date: Jul 21, 1995
Clarifying RICO Elements: The New Jersey Supreme Court in STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. Patrick Ball et al. Introduction The case of STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. PATRICK BALL AND BIG APPLE LEASING...
Suburban Cablevision Retaliatory Discharge Standing Established

Suburban Cablevision Retaliatory Discharge Standing Established

Date: Jul 14, 1995
Suburban Cablevision Retaliatory Discharge Standing Established Introduction The case of Craig, Chapman, Denino, and Marsillo v. Suburban Cablevision, Inc. presented before the Supreme Court of New...
State v. Harris: Establishing Standards for Capital Prosecution and Jury Instructions in New Jersey

State v. Harris: Establishing Standards for Capital Prosecution and Jury Instructions in New Jersey

Date: Jul 13, 1995
State v. Harris: Establishing Standards for Capital Prosecution and Jury Instructions in New Jersey Introduction State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Joseph Harris, Defendant-Appellant, 141...
Clarifying the Scope of CEPA's Waiver Provision: Affirmation of Distinct Common-Law Claims

Clarifying the Scope of CEPA's Waiver Provision: Affirmation of Distinct Common-Law Claims

Date: Jul 12, 1995
Clarifying the Scope of CEPA's Waiver Provision: Affirmation of Distinct Common-Law Claims Introduction The case of Dr. William B. Young v. Schering Corporation and Dr. Edwin S. Brokken (141 N.J. 16,...
Establishing the Primary Caretaker: A Comprehensive Analysis of PASCALE v. PASCALE

Establishing the Primary Caretaker: A Comprehensive Analysis of PASCALE v. PASCALE

Date: Jul 11, 1995
Establishing the Primary Caretaker: A Comprehensive Analysis of PASCALE v. PASCALE Introduction Debra Pascale v. James Pascale, 140 N.J. 583, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of New Jersey on July...
Broad Immunity for Police in High-Speed Pursuits Established in Fielder v. Stonack

Broad Immunity for Police in High-Speed Pursuits Established in Fielder v. Stonack

Date: Jul 7, 1995
Broad Immunity for Police in High-Speed Pursuits Established in Fielder v. Stonack Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey's decision in Fielder v. Stonack, 141 N.J. 101 (1995), marks a...
Inclusion of Underinsured Motorist Coverage in Umbrella Policies: Doto v. Utica Mutual Insurance Co.

Inclusion of Underinsured Motorist Coverage in Umbrella Policies: Doto v. Utica Mutual Insurance Co.

Date: Jun 30, 1995
Inclusion of Underinsured Motorist Coverage in Umbrella Policies: Doto v. Utica Mutual Insurance Co. Introduction The case of Gerard Doto and Maria Doto, His Wife v. Anthony Russo and Russo Agency,...
Ownership of Equitably Distributed Pension and Medicaid Eligibility: New Precedent in L.M. v. State of New Jersey

Ownership of Equitably Distributed Pension and Medicaid Eligibility: New Precedent in L.M. v. State of New Jersey

Date: Jun 8, 1995
Ownership of Equitably Distributed Pension and Medicaid Eligibility: New Precedent in L.M. v. State of New Jersey Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey, in L.M. v. State of New Jersey, 140...
Affirming Municipal Zoning Authority: Consistency with Master Plans and Defining Permitted Uses

Affirming Municipal Zoning Authority: Consistency with Master Plans and Defining Permitted Uses

Date: Jun 7, 1995
Affirming Municipal Zoning Authority: Consistency with Master Plans and Defining Permitted Uses Introduction In the landmark case Manalapan Realty, L.P. v. Township Committee of The Township of...
Reaffirming the Waiver of Physician-Patient Privilege for Causation Testimony in Litigation

Reaffirming the Waiver of Physician-Patient Privilege for Causation Testimony in Litigation

Date: Jun 1, 1995
Reaffirming the Waiver of Physician-Patient Privilege for Causation Testimony in Litigation Introduction The case of Jessica STIGLIANO v. CONNAUGHT LABORATORIES, Inc. is a pivotal decision by the...
Reaffirmation of Post-Conviction Relief Standards in State v. D.D.M.

Reaffirmation of Post-Conviction Relief Standards in State v. D.D.M.

Date: May 5, 1995
Reaffirmation of Post-Conviction Relief Standards in State of New Jersey v. D.D.M. Introduction State of New Jersey v. D.D.M. (140 N.J. 83) is a seminal judgment delivered by the Supreme Court of New...
Admissibility of Modus Operandi Expert Testimony in Drug-Distribution Cases: New Precedent Established in State v. Berry & STATE v. CANNON

Admissibility of Modus Operandi Expert Testimony in Drug-Distribution Cases: New Precedent Established in State v. Berry & STATE v. CANNON

Date: May 5, 1995
Admissibility of Modus Operandi Expert Testimony in Drug-Distribution Cases: New Precedent Established in State v. Berry & STATE v. CANNON Introduction In the landmark decision of State of New Jersey...
Duty to Disclose Off-Site Hazardous Conditions in Real Estate Transactions: STRAWN v. CANUSO

Duty to Disclose Off-Site Hazardous Conditions in Real Estate Transactions: STRAWN v. CANUSO

Date: Apr 26, 1995
Duty to Disclose Off-Site Hazardous Conditions in Real Estate Transactions: STRAWN v. CANUSO Introduction STRAWN v. CANUSO is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of New Jersey on April...
Enforcement of Rule 4:23-2(b)(3): Dismissal with Prejudice for Willful Discovery Misconduct in ABTRAX Pharmaceuticals v. Elkins-Sinn

Enforcement of Rule 4:23-2(b)(3): Dismissal with Prejudice for Willful Discovery Misconduct in ABTRAX Pharmaceuticals v. Elkins-Sinn

Date: Apr 11, 1995
Enforcement of Rule 4:23-2(b)(3): Dismissal with Prejudice for Willful Discovery Misconduct in ABTRAX Pharmaceuticals v. Elkins-Sinn Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey, in the landmark case...
Public Reprimand for Attorney Convicted of Domestic Violence: In re Principato

Public Reprimand for Attorney Convicted of Domestic Violence: In re Principato

Date: Apr 1, 1995
Public Reprimand for Attorney Convicted of Domestic Violence: In re Principato Introduction In the Matter of Salvatore Principato, An Attorney at Law (139 N.J. 456) is a landmark decision by the...
Public Reprimand as Disciplinary Action for Attorneys Convicted of Domestic Violence: Insights from In re Lawrence G. Magid

Public Reprimand as Disciplinary Action for Attorneys Convicted of Domestic Violence: Insights from In re Lawrence G. Magid

Date: Apr 1, 1995
Public Reprimand as Disciplinary Action for Attorneys Convicted of Domestic Violence: Insights from In re Lawrence G. Magid Introduction In the landmark case of In the Matter of Lawrence G. Magid, an...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert