Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New Jersey Case Commentaries

Affirmation of General Jury Instructions on Eyewitness Identification in STATE v. ROBINSON

Affirmation of General Jury Instructions on Eyewitness Identification in STATE v. ROBINSON

Date: Jul 25, 2000
Affirmation of General Jury Instructions on Eyewitness Identification in STATE v. ROBINSON Introduction The case of State of New Jersey v. Edward Robinson (165 N.J. 32, 2000) presents a significant...
Extending CEPA Protections: NJ Supreme Court Upholds Whistleblower Rights in ROACH v. TRW, INC.

Extending CEPA Protections: NJ Supreme Court Upholds Whistleblower Rights in ROACH v. TRW, INC.

Date: Jul 20, 2000
Extending CEPA Protections: NJ Supreme Court Upholds Whistleblower Rights in ROACH v. TRW, INC. Introduction The case of Estate of Frank L. ROACH v. TRW, INC. represents a significant development in...
Establishing 'Permanent Loss of Bodily Function' for Pain and Suffering Damages under NJ Tort Claims Act in Gilhooley v. County of Union

Establishing 'Permanent Loss of Bodily Function' for Pain and Suffering Damages under NJ Tort Claims Act in Gilhooley v. County of Union

Date: Jul 12, 2000
Establishing 'Permanent Loss of Bodily Function' for Pain and Suffering Damages under NJ Tort Claims Act in Gilhooley v. County of Union Introduction In Gilhooley v. County of Union, 164 N.J. 533...
Beauchamp v. Amedio: Establishing Legal Confusion as 'Extraordinary Circumstances' for Late Filing Under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9

Beauchamp v. Amedio: Establishing Legal Confusion as 'Extraordinary Circumstances' for Late Filing Under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9

Date: Jun 9, 2000
Beauchamp v. Amedio: Establishing Legal Confusion as 'Extraordinary Circumstances' for Late Filing Under N.J.S.A. 59:8-9 Introduction Beauchamp v. Amedio, 164 N.J. 111 (2000), is a seminal case in...
Reinforcing the Marital Standard of Living in Alimony Modification: Crews v. Crews

Reinforcing the Marital Standard of Living in Alimony Modification: Crews v. Crews

Date: Jun 1, 2000
Reinforcing the Marital Standard of Living in Alimony Modification: Crews v. Crews Introduction Crews v. Crews (164 N.J. 11, Supreme Court of New Jersey, May 31, 2000) is a pivotal case that...
Velazquez v. Portadin: Establishing Standards for Tailored Medical Judgment Jury Instructions in Malpractice Cases

Velazquez v. Portadin: Establishing Standards for Tailored Medical Judgment Jury Instructions in Malpractice Cases

Date: May 19, 2000
Velazquez v. Portadin: Establishing Standards for Tailored Medical Judgment Jury Instructions in Malpractice Cases Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey, in Velazquez v. Portadin, has set a...
Automobile Exception in New Jersey Requires Probable Cause and Exigent Circumstances: State v. Cooke

Automobile Exception in New Jersey Requires Probable Cause and Exigent Circumstances: State v. Cooke

Date: May 18, 2000
Automobile Exception in New Jersey Requires Probable Cause and Exigent Circumstances: State v. Cooke Introduction State of New Jersey v. Alfred Cooke, 163 N.J. 657 (2000), is a landmark decision by...
State of New Jersey v. PeterPapasavvas: Upholding Death Penalty Procedures

State of New Jersey v. PeterPapasavvas: Upholding Death Penalty Procedures

Date: May 17, 2000
State of New Jersey v. PeterPapasavvas: Upholding Death Penalty Procedures Introduction State of New Jersey v. PeterPapasavvas is a landmark decision rendered by the Supreme Court of New Jersey on...
Inverse Condemnation Claims Exempt from New Jersey Tort Claims Act Notice Requirements

Inverse Condemnation Claims Exempt from New Jersey Tort Claims Act Notice Requirements

Date: May 16, 2000
Inverse Condemnation Claims Exempt from New Jersey Tort Claims Act Notice Requirements Introduction The case of GREENWAY DEVELOPMENT CO., INC. and GREENWAY CORPORATION INC. v. BOROUGH OF PARAMUS,...
Presumption of Biological Parent Custody in Post-Custodial Parent Death Cases: Insights from WATKINS v. NELSON

Presumption of Biological Parent Custody in Post-Custodial Parent Death Cases: Insights from WATKINS v. NELSON

Date: Apr 7, 2000
Presumption of Biological Parent Custody in Post-Custodial Parent Death Cases: Insights from WATKINS v. NELSON Introduction The landmark case of Lawrence Watkins, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant v. Beverly...
Recognition of Psychological Parenthood in Custody Proceedings: Insights from V.C. v. M.J.B.

Recognition of Psychological Parenthood in Custody Proceedings: Insights from V.C. v. M.J.B.

Date: Apr 7, 2000
Recognition of Psychological Parenthood in Custody Proceedings: Insights from V.C. v. M.J.B. Introduction In the landmark case of V.C. v. M.J.B. (163 N.J. 200), the Supreme Court of New Jersey...
State v. Presha: Establishing the Totality of Circumstances Standard for Voluntariness of Juvenile Confessions in New Jersey

State v. Presha: Establishing the Totality of Circumstances Standard for Voluntariness of Juvenile Confessions in New Jersey

Date: Mar 24, 2000
State v. Presha: Establishing the Totality of Circumstances Standard for Voluntariness of Juvenile Confessions in New Jersey Introduction The case of State of New Jersey v. Phillip Presha marks a...
Clarifying Qualified Immunity Standards in Section 1983 Cases: Insights from SCHNEIDER v. SIMONINI

Clarifying Qualified Immunity Standards in Section 1983 Cases: Insights from SCHNEIDER v. SIMONINI

Date: Mar 7, 2000
Clarifying Qualified Immunity Standards in Section 1983 Cases: Insights from SCHNEIDER v. SIMONINI (163 N.J. 336) Introduction SCHNEIDER v. SIMONINI, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of New Jersey on...
State Law Failure-to-Warn Claims Impliedly Preempted by Comprehensive FDA Regulation: Abbott Laboratories v. R.F. and R.F.

State Law Failure-to-Warn Claims Impliedly Preempted by Comprehensive FDA Regulation: Abbott Laboratories v. R.F. and R.F.

Date: Mar 1, 2000
State Law Failure-to-Warn Claims Impliedly Preempted by Comprehensive FDA Regulation: Abbott Laboratories v. R.F. and R.F. Introduction Abbott Laboratories v. R.F. and R.F. is a landmark decision by...
Reaffirming Clear Jury Instructions in Burden-Shifting Analysis for Sex Discrimination Under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination

Reaffirming Clear Jury Instructions in Burden-Shifting Analysis for Sex Discrimination Under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination

Date: Feb 17, 2000
Reaffirming Clear Jury Instructions in Burden-Shifting Analysis for Sex Discrimination Under the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination Introduction The case of Martha Mogull v. CB Commercial Real...
Preventing Double-Counting in Sentencing: Insights from STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. Kromphold

Preventing Double-Counting in Sentencing: Insights from STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. Kromphold

Date: Feb 2, 2000
Preventing Double-Counting in Sentencing: Insights from STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. Kromphold Introduction STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. THOMAS F. KROMPHOLD, 162 N.J. 345 (2000), is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Dual Limitation Periods for PIP Benefit Claims Established under the No Fault Insurance Act

Dual Limitation Periods for PIP Benefit Claims Established under the No Fault Insurance Act

Date: Feb 2, 2000
Dual Limitation Periods for PIP Benefit Claims Established under the No Fault Insurance Act Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey's decision in Rosa Aponte-Correa v. Allstate Insurance Company...
Defining Probable Cause in Domestic Violence Arrests: Analysis of WILDONER v. BOROUGH OF RAMSEY

Defining Probable Cause in Domestic Violence Arrests: Analysis of WILDONER v. BOROUGH OF RAMSEY

Date: Feb 1, 2000
Defining Probable Cause in Domestic Violence Arrests: Analysis of WILDONER v. BOROUGH OF RAMSEY Introduction WILDONER v. BOROUGH OF RAMSEY is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of New Jersey,...
Potential Attorney Conflict of Interest Does Not Render Sentence Illegal Under Rule 3:22-12 – STATE v. MURRAY

Potential Attorney Conflict of Interest Does Not Render Sentence Illegal Under Rule 3:22-12 – STATE v. MURRAY

Date: Jan 26, 2000
Potential Attorney Conflict of Interest Does Not Render Sentence Illegal Under Rule 3:22-12 – State of New Jersey v. Murray Introduction In State of New Jersey v. Murray (162 N.J. 240, 2000), the...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: A Comprehensive Analysis of STATE v. BEY

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: A Comprehensive Analysis of STATE v. BEY

Date: Aug 12, 1999
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: A Comprehensive Analysis of State of New Jersey v. Marko Bey Introduction State of New Jersey v. Marko Bey, decided by the Supreme Court of New...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert