Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New Jersey Case Commentaries

Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Franchise Pricing: Analysis of ALBAN WILSON et al. v. AMERADA HESS CORPORATION et al.

Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Franchise Pricing: Analysis of ALBAN WILSON et al. v. AMERADA HESS CORPORATION et al.

Date: Jun 15, 2001
Implied Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Franchise Pricing: Analysis of ALBAN WILSON et al. v. AMERADA HESS CORPORATION et al. Introduction In the landmark case ALBAN WILSON, CHARLES A....
Arbitration Clause Ambiguity Preserves Statutory Rights under the LAD: Garfinkel v. Morristown Obstetrics Gynecology Associates

Arbitration Clause Ambiguity Preserves Statutory Rights under the LAD: Garfinkel v. Morristown Obstetrics Gynecology Associates

Date: Jun 14, 2001
Arbitration Clause Ambiguity Preserves Statutory Rights under the LAD: Garfinkel v. Morristown Obstetrics Gynecology Associates Introduction In Garfinkel v. Morristown Obstetrics Gynecology...
New Precedents on Jury Instructions and Capital Sentencing: Analysis of State of New Jersey v. Koskovich

New Precedents on Jury Instructions and Capital Sentencing: Analysis of State of New Jersey v. Koskovich

Date: Jun 8, 2001
New Precedents on Jury Instructions and Capital Sentencing: Analysis of State of New Jersey v. Koskovich (168 N.J. 448) Introduction State of New Jersey v. Koskovich is a landmark decision by the...
Prohibition of Race-Based Field Inquiries Under the Fourth Amendment: Analysis of State of New Jersey v. Marlon A. Maryland

Prohibition of Race-Based Field Inquiries Under the Fourth Amendment: Analysis of State of New Jersey v. Marlon A. Maryland

Date: Jun 6, 2001
Prohibition of Race-Based Field Inquiries Under the Fourth Amendment: Analysis of State of New Jersey v. Marlon A. Maryland Introduction In the landmark case of State of New Jersey v. Marlon A....
Attorneys' Fees in Attorney Misconduct Cases: Insights from Packers-Bamberger Co. v. Collier et al.

Attorneys' Fees in Attorney Misconduct Cases: Insights from Packers-Bamberger Co. v. Collier et al.

Date: May 31, 2001
Attorneys' Fees in Attorney Misconduct Cases: Insights from Packard-Bamberger Co., Inc. v. Collier et al. Introduction The case of Packard-Bamberger Co., Inc. v. Collier et al. (167 N.J. 427) is a...
Affirmation of the Six-Year Statute of Limitations for Legal Malpractice in New Jersey

Affirmation of the Six-Year Statute of Limitations for Legal Malpractice in New Jersey

Date: May 25, 2001
Affirmation of the Six-Year Statute of Limitations for Legal Malpractice in New Jersey Introduction In the landmark case of McGROGAN v. TILL, 167 N.J. 414 (2001), the Supreme Court of New Jersey...
Lamorte Burns Co. v. Walters et al.: Affirming Duty of Loyalty and Protecting Confidential Client Information in Employee Competitive Practices

Lamorte Burns Co. v. Walters et al.: Affirming Duty of Loyalty and Protecting Confidential Client Information in Employee Competitive Practices

Date: May 15, 2001
Lamorte Burns Co. v. Walters et al.: Affirming Duty of Loyalty and Protecting Confidential Client Information in Employee Competitive Practices Introduction The case of Lamorte Burns Co., Inc. v....
Substantial Compliance in Affidavit of Merit: Galik v. Maass Medical Center

Substantial Compliance in Affidavit of Merit: Galik v. Maass Medical Center

Date: May 11, 2001
Substantial Compliance in Affidavit of Merit: Galik v. Maass Medical Center Introduction The case of Simone Galik v. Clara Maass Medical Center addresses the critical issue of compliance with the...
State v. Smith: New Precedent on Prosecutorial Comments on Defense Experts’ Compensation

State v. Smith: New Precedent on Prosecutorial Comments on Defense Experts’ Compensation

Date: May 9, 2001
State v. Smith: New Precedent on Prosecutorial Comments on Defense Experts’ Compensation Introduction State of New Jersey v. Robert Smith, 167 N.J. 158 (2001), is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Baure v. Lewis: Establishing New Standards for Child Relocation in Custody Cases

Baure v. Lewis: Establishing New Standards for Child Relocation in Custody Cases

Date: Apr 24, 2001
Baure v. Lewis: Establishing New Standards for Child Relocation in Custody Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Baure v. Lewis, the Supreme Court of New Jersey addressed the complex issue of...
Fraudulent Concealment and Spoliation of Evidence in Medical Malpractice: Rosenblit v. Zimmerman

Fraudulent Concealment and Spoliation of Evidence in Medical Malpractice: Rosenblit v. Zimmerman

Date: Feb 27, 2001
Fraudulent Concealment and Spoliation of Evidence in Medical Malpractice: Rosenblit v. Zimmerman Introduction The case of Erin Rosenblit v. John F. Zimmerman, Jr., D.C. and Health First Chiropractic...
Affidavit of Merit Statute Timeliness Under NJ Law

Affidavit of Merit Statute Timeliness Under NJ Law

Date: Feb 27, 2001
Affidavit of Merit Statute Timeliness Under NJ Law Introduction The BURNS v. BELAFSKY case, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of New Jersey on February 26, 2001, serves as a pivotal examination of the...
Equitable Tolling in Wrongful Death Claims for Minors: LaFage v. Dually

Equitable Tolling in Wrongful Death Claims for Minors: LaFage v. Dually

Date: Feb 23, 2001
Equitable Tolling in Wrongful Death Claims for Minors: LaFage v. Dually Introduction In LaFage v. Dually, decided on February 22, 2001, by the Supreme Court of New Jersey, the court addressed a...
Ensuring Procedural Safeguards in Juvenile Delinquency Pleas: Insights from State v. In the Interest of T.M.

Ensuring Procedural Safeguards in Juvenile Delinquency Pleas: Insights from State v. In the Interest of T.M.

Date: Feb 7, 2001
Ensuring Procedural Safeguards in Juvenile Delinquency Pleas: Insights from State of New Jersey, In the Interest of T.M. (166 N.J. 319) Introduction The case of State of New Jersey, In the Interest...
Ambiguity in UM Endorsements: Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. v. Hurley Establishes Favorable Interpretation for Insureds

Ambiguity in UM Endorsements: Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. v. Hurley Establishes Favorable Interpretation for Insureds

Date: Jan 30, 2001
Ambiguity in UM Endorsements: Progressive Cas. Ins. Co. v. Hurley Establishes Favorable Interpretation for Insureds Introduction In the landmark case of Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v....
Caravaggio v. D’Agostini: Clarifying the Commencement of the Statute of Limitations under the Discovery Rule in Medical Malpractice Cases

Caravaggio v. D’Agostini: Clarifying the Commencement of the Statute of Limitations under the Discovery Rule in Medical Malpractice Cases

Date: Jan 23, 2001
Caravaggio v. D’Agostini: Clarifying the Commencement of the Statute of Limitations under the Discovery Rule in Medical Malpractice Cases Introduction Caravaggio v. D’Agostini is a landmark decision...
Reaffirming Parole Standards: The Importance of Substantial Evidence and Comprehensive Review in Thomas Trantino’s Case

Reaffirming Parole Standards: The Importance of Substantial Evidence and Comprehensive Review in Thomas Trantino’s Case

Date: Jan 19, 2001
Reaffirming Parole Standards: The Importance of Substantial Evidence and Comprehensive Review in Thomas Trantino’s Case Introduction The case of Thomas Trantino v. New Jersey Department of...
Rejection of Fraud-on-the-Market Theory in Common-Law Fraud Actions: KAUFMAN v. I-STAT CORPoration

Rejection of Fraud-on-the-Market Theory in Common-Law Fraud Actions: KAUFMAN v. I-STAT CORPoration

Date: Jul 28, 2000
Rejection of Fraud-on-the-Market Theory in Common-Law Fraud Actions: KAUFMAN v. I-STAT CORPoration Introduction KAUFMAN v. I-STAT CORPoration, 165 N.J. 94 (2000), is a landmark decision by the...
Affirmation of General Jury Instructions on Eyewitness Identification in STATE v. ROBINSON

Affirmation of General Jury Instructions on Eyewitness Identification in STATE v. ROBINSON

Date: Jul 25, 2000
Affirmation of General Jury Instructions on Eyewitness Identification in STATE v. ROBINSON Introduction The case of State of New Jersey v. Edward Robinson (165 N.J. 32, 2000) presents a significant...
Extending CEPA Protections: NJ Supreme Court Upholds Whistleblower Rights in ROACH v. TRW, INC.

Extending CEPA Protections: NJ Supreme Court Upholds Whistleblower Rights in ROACH v. TRW, INC.

Date: Jul 20, 2000
Extending CEPA Protections: NJ Supreme Court Upholds Whistleblower Rights in ROACH v. TRW, INC. Introduction The case of Estate of Frank L. ROACH v. TRW, INC. represents a significant development in...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert