Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New Jersey Case Commentaries

Clarifying 'Ascertainable Loss' under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act: THIEDEMANN v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA

Clarifying 'Ascertainable Loss' under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act: THIEDEMANN v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA

Date: May 19, 2005
Clarifying 'Ascertainable Loss' under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act: THIEDEMANN v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA Introduction The case of THIEDEMANN v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC addresses crucial issues...
Marital Fault and Alimony in New Jersey: Mani v. Mani Establishes New Precedent

Marital Fault and Alimony in New Jersey: Mani v. Mani Establishes New Precedent

Date: Apr 7, 2005
Marital Fault and Alimony in New Jersey: Mani v. Mani Establishes New Precedent Introduction The landmark case of Brenda Mani v. James J. Mani, decided by the Supreme Court of New Jersey on April 6,...
Silence 'At or Near' Arrest Constitutes Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: State v. Muhammed

Silence 'At or Near' Arrest Constitutes Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: State v. Muhammed

Date: Mar 16, 2005
Silence 'At or Near' Arrest Constitutes Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: State v. Muhammed Introduction In the landmark case of State of New Jersey v. Naseem Abdul Muhammad (182 N.J. 551, 2005),...
Limitations on the 'Cost of Doing Business' Aggravating Factor in First-Degree Robbery Sentencing

Limitations on the 'Cost of Doing Business' Aggravating Factor in First-Degree Robbery Sentencing

Date: Mar 4, 2005
Limitations on the 'Cost of Doing Business' Aggravating Factor in First-Degree Robbery Sentencing Introduction The case of State of New Jersey v. Daniel J. Dalziel (182 N.J. 494) presents a...
Limitations on Discretionary Immunity: NJ Supreme Court in COYNE v. STATE

Limitations on Discretionary Immunity: NJ Supreme Court in COYNE v. STATE

Date: Mar 3, 2005
Limitations on Discretionary Immunity: NJ Supreme Court in COYNE v. STATE Introduction In COYNE v. STATE, the Supreme Court of New Jersey addressed critical issues concerning the application of...
Objective Qualification Suffices for Prima Facie Case in LAD Termination Claims

Objective Qualification Suffices for Prima Facie Case in LAD Termination Claims

Date: Feb 25, 2005
Objective Qualification Suffices for Prima Facie Case in LAD Termination Claims Introduction The case Stewart Zive v. Stanley Roberts, Inc., decided by the Supreme Court of New Jersey on February 24,...
State v. Cotto: Upholding Identification Procedures and Clarifying Hearsay Exceptions in New Jersey

State v. Cotto: Upholding Identification Procedures and Clarifying Hearsay Exceptions in New Jersey

Date: Feb 2, 2005
State v. Cotto: Upholding Identification Procedures and Clarifying Hearsay Exceptions in New Jersey Introduction State of New Jersey vs. Nathan Cotto is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Reaffirming Defendants' Confrontation Rights: Limits on Hearsay and Excited Utterance Exceptions in State v. Alexander Branch

Reaffirming Defendants' Confrontation Rights: Limits on Hearsay and Excited Utterance Exceptions in State v. Alexander Branch

Date: Feb 2, 2005
Reaffirming Defendants' Confrontation Rights: Limits on Hearsay and Excited Utterance Exceptions in State v. Alexander Branch Introduction State of New Jersey v. Alexander Branch is a pivotal...
Imputing Income in High-Income Child Support Cases: Insights from CAPLAN v. CAPLAN

Imputing Income in High-Income Child Support Cases: Insights from CAPLAN v. CAPLAN

Date: Jan 28, 2005
Imputing Income in High-Income Child Support Cases: Insights from CAPLAN v. CAPLAN Introduction CAPLAN v. CAPLAN, 182 N.J. 250 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2005), addresses the critical issue of...
Mandatory Disclosure of Parole Supervision under NERA in State v. Johnson

Mandatory Disclosure of Parole Supervision under NERA in State v. Johnson

Date: Jan 27, 2005
Mandatory Disclosure of Parole Supervision under NERA in State of New Jersey v. Kaa'wone Johnson Introduction State of New Jersey v. Kaa'wone Johnson (182 N.J. 232, 852 A.2d 191) is a landmark...
Enforcement of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Commercial Lease Options: Insights from Brunswick Hills Racquet Club v. Route 18 Shopping Center Associates

Enforcement of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Commercial Lease Options: Insights from Brunswick Hills Racquet Club v. Route 18 Shopping Center Associates

Date: Jan 26, 2005
Enforcement of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Commercial Lease Options: Insights from Brunswick Hills Racquet Club, Inc. v. Route 18 Shopping Center Associates 1. Introduction The...
Employer Directive in Non-Standard Activities Falls Within Course of Employment for Workers' Compensation

Employer Directive in Non-Standard Activities Falls Within Course of Employment for Workers' Compensation

Date: Dec 22, 2004
Employer Directive in Non-Standard Activities Falls Within Course of Employment for Workers' Compensation Introduction The case of Robert Sager v. O.A. Peterson Construction Co., adjudicated by the...
Prohibition of Generic Prosecutorial Accusations of Tailoring in Summations

Prohibition of Generic Prosecutorial Accusations of Tailoring in Summations

Date: Dec 15, 2004
Prohibition of Generic Prosecutorial Accusations of Tailoring in Summations Introduction In State of New Jersey v. Ahmad Daniels (2004), the Supreme Court of New Jersey addressed a critical issue...
Reaffirmation of Joint Tortfeasor Contribution Standards: CHERRY HILL MANOR ASSOCIATES v. FAUGNO

Reaffirmation of Joint Tortfeasor Contribution Standards: CHERRY HILL MANOR ASSOCIATES v. FAUGNO

Date: Dec 7, 2004
Reaffirmation of Joint Tortfeasor Contribution Standards: CHERRY HILL MANOR ASSOCIATES v. FAUGNO Introduction The case of CHERRY HILL MANOR ASSOCIATES v. FAUGNO, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Replacement Value as Ascertainable Loss under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act in Furst v. Einstein-Moomjy, Inc.

Replacement Value as Ascertainable Loss under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act in Furst v. Einstein-Moomjy, Inc.

Date: Nov 16, 2004
Replacement Value as Ascertainable Loss under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act: Insights from Furst v. Einstein-Moomjy, Inc. Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey's decision in Furst v....
Enhancing Fairness in Capital Sentencing: NJ Supreme Court Establishes Mandatory Standby Counsel for Pro Se Defendants in Death Penalty Cases

Enhancing Fairness in Capital Sentencing: NJ Supreme Court Establishes Mandatory Standby Counsel for Pro Se Defendants in Death Penalty Cases

Date: Nov 11, 2004
Enhancing Fairness in Capital Sentencing: NJ Supreme Court Establishes Mandatory Standby Counsel for Pro Se Defendants in Death Penalty Cases Introduction The case of State of New Jersey v. Charles...
State of New Jersey v. Harris (181 N.J. 391): Upholding Capital Sentencing Integrity through de Novo Appellate Review of Post-Conviction Claims

State of New Jersey v. Harris (181 N.J. 391): Upholding Capital Sentencing Integrity through de Novo Appellate Review of Post-Conviction Claims

Date: Oct 20, 2004
State of New Jersey v. Harris (181 N.J. 391): Upholding Capital Sentencing Integrity through de Novo Appellate Review of Post-Conviction Claims Introduction In the landmark case of State of New...
Tarr v. Ciasulli: Broadening Emotional Distress Damages under New Jersey's Law Against Discrimination

Tarr v. Ciasulli: Broadening Emotional Distress Damages under New Jersey's Law Against Discrimination

Date: Aug 10, 2004
Tarr v. Ciasulli: Broadening Emotional Distress Damages under New Jersey's Law Against Discrimination Introduction In Tarr v. Bob Ciasulli and Bob Ciasulli's MackAuto Mall, Inc., the Supreme Court of...
Ambiguity in Claims-Made Insurance Policies: PRESIDENT v. JENKINS

Ambiguity in Claims-Made Insurance Policies: PRESIDENT v. JENKINS

Date: Aug 5, 2004
Ambiguity in Claims-Made Insurance Policies: PRESIDENT v. JENKINS Introduction The case of Deborah President and Perry President v. Dr. Reginald Jenkins addresses pivotal issues in the realm of...
Interpretation of 'Any Person' in Second-Degree Eluding: Inclusion of the Defendant Affirmed

Interpretation of 'Any Person' in Second-Degree Eluding: Inclusion of the Defendant Affirmed

Date: Aug 4, 2004
Interpretation of 'Any Person' in Second-Degree Eluding: Inclusion of the Defendant Affirmed Introduction In the case of State of New Jersey v. Davon Bunch (180 N.J. 534, 2004), the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert