Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New Jersey Case Commentaries

PUDER v. BUECHEL: Judicial Estoppel and the Finality of Settlements in Legal Malpractice Claims

PUDER v. BUECHEL: Judicial Estoppel and the Finality of Settlements in Legal Malpractice Claims

Date: Jun 8, 2005
PUDER v. BUECHEL: Judicial Estoppel and the Finality of Settlements in Legal Malpractice Claims 1. Introduction In the landmark case of PUDER v. BUECHEL, 183 N.J. 428 (2005), the Supreme Court of New...
State of New Jersey v. R.B.: Upholding Tender Years Exception and CSAAS Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

State of New Jersey v. R.B.: Upholding Tender Years Exception and CSAAS Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

Date: May 24, 2005
State of New Jersey v. R.B.: Upholding Tender Years Exception and CSAAS Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Cases Introduction State of New Jersey v. R.B. is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court...
Clarifying 'Ascertainable Loss' under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act: THIEDEMANN v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA

Clarifying 'Ascertainable Loss' under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act: THIEDEMANN v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA

Date: May 19, 2005
Clarifying 'Ascertainable Loss' under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act: THIEDEMANN v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA Introduction The case of THIEDEMANN v. MERCEDES-BENZ USA, LLC addresses crucial issues...
Marital Fault and Alimony in New Jersey: Mani v. Mani Establishes New Precedent

Marital Fault and Alimony in New Jersey: Mani v. Mani Establishes New Precedent

Date: Apr 7, 2005
Marital Fault and Alimony in New Jersey: Mani v. Mani Establishes New Precedent Introduction The landmark case of Brenda Mani v. James J. Mani, decided by the Supreme Court of New Jersey on April 6,...
Silence 'At or Near' Arrest Constitutes Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: State v. Muhammed

Silence 'At or Near' Arrest Constitutes Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: State v. Muhammed

Date: Mar 16, 2005
Silence 'At or Near' Arrest Constitutes Privilege Against Self-Incrimination: State v. Muhammed Introduction In the landmark case of State of New Jersey v. Naseem Abdul Muhammad (182 N.J. 551, 2005),...
Limitations on the 'Cost of Doing Business' Aggravating Factor in First-Degree Robbery Sentencing

Limitations on the 'Cost of Doing Business' Aggravating Factor in First-Degree Robbery Sentencing

Date: Mar 4, 2005
Limitations on the 'Cost of Doing Business' Aggravating Factor in First-Degree Robbery Sentencing Introduction The case of State of New Jersey v. Daniel J. Dalziel (182 N.J. 494) presents a...
Limitations on Discretionary Immunity: NJ Supreme Court in COYNE v. STATE

Limitations on Discretionary Immunity: NJ Supreme Court in COYNE v. STATE

Date: Mar 3, 2005
Limitations on Discretionary Immunity: NJ Supreme Court in COYNE v. STATE Introduction In COYNE v. STATE, the Supreme Court of New Jersey addressed critical issues concerning the application of...
Objective Qualification Suffices for Prima Facie Case in LAD Termination Claims

Objective Qualification Suffices for Prima Facie Case in LAD Termination Claims

Date: Feb 25, 2005
Objective Qualification Suffices for Prima Facie Case in LAD Termination Claims Introduction The case Stewart Zive v. Stanley Roberts, Inc., decided by the Supreme Court of New Jersey on February 24,...
State v. Cotto: Upholding Identification Procedures and Clarifying Hearsay Exceptions in New Jersey

State v. Cotto: Upholding Identification Procedures and Clarifying Hearsay Exceptions in New Jersey

Date: Feb 2, 2005
State v. Cotto: Upholding Identification Procedures and Clarifying Hearsay Exceptions in New Jersey Introduction State of New Jersey vs. Nathan Cotto is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Reaffirming Defendants' Confrontation Rights: Limits on Hearsay and Excited Utterance Exceptions in State v. Alexander Branch

Reaffirming Defendants' Confrontation Rights: Limits on Hearsay and Excited Utterance Exceptions in State v. Alexander Branch

Date: Feb 2, 2005
Reaffirming Defendants' Confrontation Rights: Limits on Hearsay and Excited Utterance Exceptions in State v. Alexander Branch Introduction State of New Jersey v. Alexander Branch is a pivotal...
Imputing Income in High-Income Child Support Cases: Insights from CAPLAN v. CAPLAN

Imputing Income in High-Income Child Support Cases: Insights from CAPLAN v. CAPLAN

Date: Jan 28, 2005
Imputing Income in High-Income Child Support Cases: Insights from CAPLAN v. CAPLAN Introduction CAPLAN v. CAPLAN, 182 N.J. 250 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2005), addresses the critical issue of...
Mandatory Disclosure of Parole Supervision under NERA in State v. Johnson

Mandatory Disclosure of Parole Supervision under NERA in State v. Johnson

Date: Jan 27, 2005
Mandatory Disclosure of Parole Supervision under NERA in State of New Jersey v. Kaa'wone Johnson Introduction State of New Jersey v. Kaa'wone Johnson (182 N.J. 232, 852 A.2d 191) is a landmark...
Enforcement of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Commercial Lease Options: Insights from Brunswick Hills Racquet Club v. Route 18 Shopping Center Associates

Enforcement of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Commercial Lease Options: Insights from Brunswick Hills Racquet Club v. Route 18 Shopping Center Associates

Date: Jan 26, 2005
Enforcement of the Covenant of Good Faith and Fair Dealing in Commercial Lease Options: Insights from Brunswick Hills Racquet Club, Inc. v. Route 18 Shopping Center Associates 1. Introduction The...
Employer Directive in Non-Standard Activities Falls Within Course of Employment for Workers' Compensation

Employer Directive in Non-Standard Activities Falls Within Course of Employment for Workers' Compensation

Date: Dec 22, 2004
Employer Directive in Non-Standard Activities Falls Within Course of Employment for Workers' Compensation Introduction The case of Robert Sager v. O.A. Peterson Construction Co., adjudicated by the...
Prohibition of Generic Prosecutorial Accusations of Tailoring in Summations

Prohibition of Generic Prosecutorial Accusations of Tailoring in Summations

Date: Dec 15, 2004
Prohibition of Generic Prosecutorial Accusations of Tailoring in Summations Introduction In State of New Jersey v. Ahmad Daniels (2004), the Supreme Court of New Jersey addressed a critical issue...
Reaffirmation of Joint Tortfeasor Contribution Standards: CHERRY HILL MANOR ASSOCIATES v. FAUGNO

Reaffirmation of Joint Tortfeasor Contribution Standards: CHERRY HILL MANOR ASSOCIATES v. FAUGNO

Date: Dec 7, 2004
Reaffirmation of Joint Tortfeasor Contribution Standards: CHERRY HILL MANOR ASSOCIATES v. FAUGNO Introduction The case of CHERRY HILL MANOR ASSOCIATES v. FAUGNO, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Replacement Value as Ascertainable Loss under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act in Furst v. Einstein-Moomjy, Inc.

Replacement Value as Ascertainable Loss under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act in Furst v. Einstein-Moomjy, Inc.

Date: Nov 16, 2004
Replacement Value as Ascertainable Loss under the New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act: Insights from Furst v. Einstein-Moomjy, Inc. Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey's decision in Furst v....
Enhancing Fairness in Capital Sentencing: NJ Supreme Court Establishes Mandatory Standby Counsel for Pro Se Defendants in Death Penalty Cases

Enhancing Fairness in Capital Sentencing: NJ Supreme Court Establishes Mandatory Standby Counsel for Pro Se Defendants in Death Penalty Cases

Date: Nov 11, 2004
Enhancing Fairness in Capital Sentencing: NJ Supreme Court Establishes Mandatory Standby Counsel for Pro Se Defendants in Death Penalty Cases Introduction The case of State of New Jersey v. Charles...
State of New Jersey v. Harris (181 N.J. 391): Upholding Capital Sentencing Integrity through de Novo Appellate Review of Post-Conviction Claims

State of New Jersey v. Harris (181 N.J. 391): Upholding Capital Sentencing Integrity through de Novo Appellate Review of Post-Conviction Claims

Date: Oct 20, 2004
State of New Jersey v. Harris (181 N.J. 391): Upholding Capital Sentencing Integrity through de Novo Appellate Review of Post-Conviction Claims Introduction In the landmark case of State of New...
Tarr v. Ciasulli: Broadening Emotional Distress Damages under New Jersey's Law Against Discrimination

Tarr v. Ciasulli: Broadening Emotional Distress Damages under New Jersey's Law Against Discrimination

Date: Aug 10, 2004
Tarr v. Ciasulli: Broadening Emotional Distress Damages under New Jersey's Law Against Discrimination Introduction In Tarr v. Bob Ciasulli and Bob Ciasulli's MackAuto Mall, Inc., the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert