Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New Jersey Case Commentaries

Reaffirmation of Rule 4:9-3 and CEPA Waiver Implications in Employment Litigation: Notte & Pantano v. Merchants Mutual Insurance Company and William Wolfe

Reaffirmation of Rule 4:9-3 and CEPA Waiver Implications in Employment Litigation: Notte & Pantano v. Merchants Mutual Insurance Company and William Wolfe

Date: Jan 13, 2006
Reaffirmation of Rule 4:9-3 and CEPA Waiver Implications in Employment Litigation Introduction In the landmark case Theresa Notte and Robert Pantano v. Merchants Mutual Insurance Company and William...
Reaffirming the Permissibility of Expert Testimony and Hypothetical Scenarios in Drug Distribution Cases: Analysis of State v. Nesbitt

Reaffirming the Permissibility of Expert Testimony and Hypothetical Scenarios in Drug Distribution Cases: Analysis of State v. Nesbitt

Date: Jan 13, 2006
Reaffirming the Permissibility of Expert Testimony and Hypothetical Scenarios in Drug Distribution Cases: Analysis of State of New Jersey v. Anthony Nesbitt Introduction The case of State of New...
Continuing Nuisance and Procedural Compliance under the New Jersey Tort Claims Act: Lyons v. Township of Wayne

Continuing Nuisance and Procedural Compliance under the New Jersey Tort Claims Act: Lyons v. Township of Wayne

Date: Dec 29, 2005
Continuing Nuisance and Procedural Compliance under the New Jersey Tort Claims Act: Lyons v. Township of Wayne Introduction Lyons v. Township of Wayne is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Admissibility of Differential Diagnosis in Expert Testimony Affirmed in Creanga v. Jardal

Admissibility of Differential Diagnosis in Expert Testimony Affirmed in Creanga v. Jardal

Date: Dec 9, 2005
Admissibility of Differential Diagnosis in Expert Testimony Affirmed in Creanga v. Jardal Introduction The case of Mihaela Creanga and Radu Creanga v. John R. Jardal, Jr., and Lucent Technologies,...
Exclusionary Rule Applied to Unconstitutional DWI Checkpoints: STATE v. BADESSA

Exclusionary Rule Applied to Unconstitutional DWI Checkpoints: STATE v. BADESSA

Date: Nov 11, 2005
Exclusionary Rule Applied to Unconstitutional DWI Checkpoints: State of New Jersey v. James Badessa Introduction State of New Jersey v. James Badessa is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Res Ipsa Loquitur and Common Knowledge: New Precedent in Jerista v. Murray

Res Ipsa Loquitur and Common Knowledge: New Precedent in Jerista v. Murray

Date: Oct 13, 2005
Res Ipsa Loquitur and Common Knowledge: New Precedent in Jerista v. Murray Introduction In the landmark case of Jerista v. Murray, the Supreme Court of New Jersey addressed the application of the res...
Strict Enforcement of Plaintiff's Testimonial Duties: Antonio Gonzalez v. Safe and Sound Security Corp.

Strict Enforcement of Plaintiff's Testimonial Duties: Antonio Gonzalez v. Safe and Sound Security Corp.

Date: Sep 20, 2005
Strict Enforcement of Plaintiff's Testimonial Duties: Antonio Gonzalez v. Safe and Sound Security Corp. 1. Introduction Antonio Gonzalez v. Safe and Sound Security Corp. is a landmark case decided by...
Exemption of Specialty Acute Care Children’s Hospitals from Certificate of Need Requirements: NJ Supreme Court Decision

Exemption of Specialty Acute Care Children’s Hospitals from Certificate of Need Requirements: NJ Supreme Court Decision

Date: Aug 12, 2005
Exemption of Specialty Acute Care Children’s Hospitals from Certificate of Need Requirements: NJ Supreme Court Decision Introduction The case of Saint Peter's University Hospital v. Clifton R. Lacy,...
Clarifying the Merger Doctrine: Insights from Jock v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Wall Township

Clarifying the Merger Doctrine: Insights from Jock v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Wall Township

Date: Aug 5, 2005
Clarifying the Merger Doctrine: Insights from Jock v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Wall Township Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey's decision in Jock v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the...
Probable Cause Established Through Informant Reliability and Controlled Buy: State of New Jersey v. Edwin Keyes

Probable Cause Established Through Informant Reliability and Controlled Buy: State of New Jersey v. Edwin Keyes

Date: Aug 4, 2005
Probable Cause Established Through Informant Reliability and Controlled Buy: State of New Jersey v. Edwin Keyes Introduction The case of State of New Jersey v. Edwin Keyes (184 N.J. 541) revolves...
Natalie v. State of New Jersey: Eliminating Presumptive Sentencing to Uphold Sixth Amendment Rights

Natalie v. State of New Jersey: Eliminating Presumptive Sentencing to Uphold Sixth Amendment Rights

Date: Aug 3, 2005
Natalie v. State of New Jersey: Eliminating Presumptive Sentencing to Uphold Sixth Amendment Rights Introduction In Natalie v. State of New Jersey, 184 N.J. 458 (2005), the Supreme Court of New...
STATE v. ABDULLAH: Strengthening Jury Protections in Sentencing under the Sixth Amendment

STATE v. ABDULLAH: Strengthening Jury Protections in Sentencing under the Sixth Amendment

Date: Aug 3, 2005
STATE v. ABDULLAH: Strengthening Jury Protections in Sentencing under the Sixth Amendment Introduction State of New Jersey v. Abdul A. Abdullah is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of New...
State of New Jersey v. Arthur: Reinforcing Deference to Defense Counsel’s Strategic Decisions in Ineffective Assistance Claims

State of New Jersey v. Arthur: Reinforcing Deference to Defense Counsel’s Strategic Decisions in Ineffective Assistance Claims

Date: Jul 20, 2005
State of New Jersey v. Arthur: Reinforcing Deference to Defense Counsel’s Strategic Decisions in Ineffective Assistance Claims Introduction State of New Jersey v. Michael Arthur (184 N.J. 307),...
New Jersey Supreme Court Limits 'Creditor Fraud' Claims: Implications for Attorney Liability under UFTA

New Jersey Supreme Court Limits 'Creditor Fraud' Claims: Implications for Attorney Liability under UFTA

Date: Jun 28, 2005
New Jersey Supreme Court Limits 'Creditor Fraud' Claims: Implications for Attorney Liability under UFTA Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey, in Banco Popular North America v. Gandi (184 N.J....
Supreme Court of New Jersey Limits CEPA Claims for Superseded County Prosecutors

Supreme Court of New Jersey Limits CEPA Claims for Superseded County Prosecutors

Date: Jun 23, 2005
Supreme Court of New Jersey Limits CEPA Claims for Superseded County Prosecutors Introduction In the landmark case Andrew N. Yurick, plaintiff-respondent, v. State of New Jersey et al. (184 N.J. 70,...
Admissibility of Gang-Related Expert Testimony: Insights from State v. Torres

Admissibility of Gang-Related Expert Testimony: Insights from State v. Torres

Date: Jun 17, 2005
Admissibility of Gang-Related Expert Testimony: Insights from State v. Torres Introduction State of New Jersey v. Obed Torres is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of New Jersey on June...
No 'Serious Life Impact' Requirement Under AICRA for Noneconomic Damages: DiProspero v. Penn and Turner

No 'Serious Life Impact' Requirement Under AICRA for Noneconomic Damages: DiProspero v. Penn and Turner

Date: Jun 15, 2005
No 'Serious Life Impact' Requirement Under AICRA for Noneconomic Damages: DiProspero v. Penn and Turner Introduction In Christina Diprospero v. Barbara J. Penn and Martha Turner, 183 N.J. 477 (2005),...
Reaffirming the Totality of Circumstances in Assessing Miranda Voluntariness: State v. Knight

Reaffirming the Totality of Circumstances in Assessing Miranda Voluntariness: State v. Knight

Date: Jun 9, 2005
Reaffirming the Totality of Circumstances in Assessing Miranda Voluntariness: State v. Knight Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey's decision in State of New Jersey v. Shamsid Knight serves...
PUDER v. BUECHEL: Judicial Estoppel and the Finality of Settlements in Legal Malpractice Claims

PUDER v. BUECHEL: Judicial Estoppel and the Finality of Settlements in Legal Malpractice Claims

Date: Jun 8, 2005
PUDER v. BUECHEL: Judicial Estoppel and the Finality of Settlements in Legal Malpractice Claims 1. Introduction In the landmark case of PUDER v. BUECHEL, 183 N.J. 428 (2005), the Supreme Court of New...
State of New Jersey v. R.B.: Upholding Tender Years Exception and CSAAS Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

State of New Jersey v. R.B.: Upholding Tender Years Exception and CSAAS Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Cases

Date: May 24, 2005
State of New Jersey v. R.B.: Upholding Tender Years Exception and CSAAS Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Cases Introduction State of New Jersey v. R.B. is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert