Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New Jersey Case Commentaries

Dishonesty as Grounds for Medical License Revocation: Analyzing New Jersey's Supreme Court Decision in Zahl v. State

Dishonesty as Grounds for Medical License Revocation: Analyzing New Jersey's Supreme Court Decision in Zahl v. State

Date: Apr 27, 2006
Dishonesty as Grounds for Medical License Revocation: Analyzing New Jersey's Supreme Court Decision in Zahl v. State Introduction The case of In the Matter of the Suspension or Revocation of the...
Expanding Premises Liability: The Olivo v. Exxon Mobil Decision

Expanding Premises Liability: The Olivo v. Exxon Mobil Decision

Date: Apr 25, 2006
Expanding Premises Liability: The Olivo v. Exxon Mobil Decision Introduction The landmark case of Anthony Olivo, Executor of the Estate of Eleanor Olivo, Deceased, and in His Own Right v. Exxon Mobil...
Preponderance of Evidence Standard Established Under the Insurance Fraud Prevention Act

Preponderance of Evidence Standard Established Under the Insurance Fraud Prevention Act

Date: Mar 15, 2006
Preponderance of Evidence Standard Established Under the Insurance Fraud Prevention Act Introduction The case of Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. Rose Land and Frank Land, and Steven Budge (186...
Right to Appointed Counsel in Child Support Enforcement Proceedings Established

Right to Appointed Counsel in Child Support Enforcement Proceedings Established

Date: Mar 9, 2006
Right to Appointed Counsel in Child Support Enforcement Proceedings Established Introduction The case of Anne Pasqua, Ray Tolbert, and Michael Anthony v. Hon. Gerald J. Council and Hon. F. Lee...
Enforcement of Arrears in Homeowners' Associations: Key Insights from Highland Lakes CCASA v. Franzino

Enforcement of Arrears in Homeowners' Associations: Key Insights from Highland Lakes CCASA v. Franzino

Date: Mar 7, 2006
Enforcement of Arrears in Homeowners' Associations: Key Insights from Highland Lakes CCASA v. Franzino Introduction The case of Highland Lakes Country Club Community Association v. Robert Franzino...
Non-Modifiable Equitable Distribution in Divorce Settlements: Insights from Larbig v. Larbig

Non-Modifiable Equitable Distribution in Divorce Settlements: Insights from Larbig v. Larbig

Date: Feb 3, 2006
Non-Modifiable Equitable Distribution in Divorce Settlements: Insights from Larbig v. Larbig Introduction Ivette Larbig, the Plaintiff-Respondent, appealed against her ex-husband, Roland Larbig, the...
Disgorgement as Remedy for Unjust Enrichment in Public Contract Bribery Cases: County of Essex v. First Union National Bank

Disgorgement as Remedy for Unjust Enrichment in Public Contract Bribery Cases: County of Essex v. First Union National Bank

Date: Jan 27, 2006
Disgorgement as Remedy for Unjust Enrichment in Public Contract Bribery Cases: County of Essex v. First Union National Bank Introduction The case County of Essex, Plaintiff-Respondent and...
Litigation Privilege Affirmed as Absolute Immunity in § 1983 Civil Rights Actions: Loigman v. Middletown Township

Litigation Privilege Affirmed as Absolute Immunity in § 1983 Civil Rights Actions: Loigman v. Middletown Township

Date: Jan 19, 2006
Litigation Privilege Affirmed as Absolute Immunity in § 1983 Civil Rights Actions: Loigman v. Middletown Township Introduction The landmark case of Loigman v. Township of Middletown addressed...
Reaffirmation of Rule 4:9-3 and CEPA Waiver Implications in Employment Litigation: Notte & Pantano v. Merchants Mutual Insurance Company and William Wolfe

Reaffirmation of Rule 4:9-3 and CEPA Waiver Implications in Employment Litigation: Notte & Pantano v. Merchants Mutual Insurance Company and William Wolfe

Date: Jan 13, 2006
Reaffirmation of Rule 4:9-3 and CEPA Waiver Implications in Employment Litigation Introduction In the landmark case Theresa Notte and Robert Pantano v. Merchants Mutual Insurance Company and William...
Reaffirming the Permissibility of Expert Testimony and Hypothetical Scenarios in Drug Distribution Cases: Analysis of State v. Nesbitt

Reaffirming the Permissibility of Expert Testimony and Hypothetical Scenarios in Drug Distribution Cases: Analysis of State v. Nesbitt

Date: Jan 13, 2006
Reaffirming the Permissibility of Expert Testimony and Hypothetical Scenarios in Drug Distribution Cases: Analysis of State of New Jersey v. Anthony Nesbitt Introduction The case of State of New...
Continuing Nuisance and Procedural Compliance under the New Jersey Tort Claims Act: Lyons v. Township of Wayne

Continuing Nuisance and Procedural Compliance under the New Jersey Tort Claims Act: Lyons v. Township of Wayne

Date: Dec 29, 2005
Continuing Nuisance and Procedural Compliance under the New Jersey Tort Claims Act: Lyons v. Township of Wayne Introduction Lyons v. Township of Wayne is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Admissibility of Differential Diagnosis in Expert Testimony Affirmed in Creanga v. Jardal

Admissibility of Differential Diagnosis in Expert Testimony Affirmed in Creanga v. Jardal

Date: Dec 9, 2005
Admissibility of Differential Diagnosis in Expert Testimony Affirmed in Creanga v. Jardal Introduction The case of Mihaela Creanga and Radu Creanga v. John R. Jardal, Jr., and Lucent Technologies,...
Exclusionary Rule Applied to Unconstitutional DWI Checkpoints: STATE v. BADESSA

Exclusionary Rule Applied to Unconstitutional DWI Checkpoints: STATE v. BADESSA

Date: Nov 11, 2005
Exclusionary Rule Applied to Unconstitutional DWI Checkpoints: State of New Jersey v. James Badessa Introduction State of New Jersey v. James Badessa is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Res Ipsa Loquitur and Common Knowledge: New Precedent in Jerista v. Murray

Res Ipsa Loquitur and Common Knowledge: New Precedent in Jerista v. Murray

Date: Oct 13, 2005
Res Ipsa Loquitur and Common Knowledge: New Precedent in Jerista v. Murray Introduction In the landmark case of Jerista v. Murray, the Supreme Court of New Jersey addressed the application of the res...
Strict Enforcement of Plaintiff's Testimonial Duties: Antonio Gonzalez v. Safe and Sound Security Corp.

Strict Enforcement of Plaintiff's Testimonial Duties: Antonio Gonzalez v. Safe and Sound Security Corp.

Date: Sep 20, 2005
Strict Enforcement of Plaintiff's Testimonial Duties: Antonio Gonzalez v. Safe and Sound Security Corp. 1. Introduction Antonio Gonzalez v. Safe and Sound Security Corp. is a landmark case decided by...
Exemption of Specialty Acute Care Children’s Hospitals from Certificate of Need Requirements: NJ Supreme Court Decision

Exemption of Specialty Acute Care Children’s Hospitals from Certificate of Need Requirements: NJ Supreme Court Decision

Date: Aug 12, 2005
Exemption of Specialty Acute Care Children’s Hospitals from Certificate of Need Requirements: NJ Supreme Court Decision Introduction The case of Saint Peter's University Hospital v. Clifton R. Lacy,...
Clarifying the Merger Doctrine: Insights from Jock v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Wall Township

Clarifying the Merger Doctrine: Insights from Jock v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Wall Township

Date: Aug 5, 2005
Clarifying the Merger Doctrine: Insights from Jock v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of Wall Township Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey's decision in Jock v. Zoning Board of Adjustment of the...
Probable Cause Established Through Informant Reliability and Controlled Buy: State of New Jersey v. Edwin Keyes

Probable Cause Established Through Informant Reliability and Controlled Buy: State of New Jersey v. Edwin Keyes

Date: Aug 4, 2005
Probable Cause Established Through Informant Reliability and Controlled Buy: State of New Jersey v. Edwin Keyes Introduction The case of State of New Jersey v. Edwin Keyes (184 N.J. 541) revolves...
Natalie v. State of New Jersey: Eliminating Presumptive Sentencing to Uphold Sixth Amendment Rights

Natalie v. State of New Jersey: Eliminating Presumptive Sentencing to Uphold Sixth Amendment Rights

Date: Aug 3, 2005
Natalie v. State of New Jersey: Eliminating Presumptive Sentencing to Uphold Sixth Amendment Rights Introduction In Natalie v. State of New Jersey, 184 N.J. 458 (2005), the Supreme Court of New...
STATE v. ABDULLAH: Strengthening Jury Protections in Sentencing under the Sixth Amendment

STATE v. ABDULLAH: Strengthening Jury Protections in Sentencing under the Sixth Amendment

Date: Aug 3, 2005
STATE v. ABDULLAH: Strengthening Jury Protections in Sentencing under the Sixth Amendment Introduction State of New Jersey v. Abdul A. Abdullah is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of New...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert