Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New Jersey Case Commentaries

J.D. v. M.D.F.: Upholding Due Process in Domestic Violence Proceedings

J.D. v. M.D.F.: Upholding Due Process in Domestic Violence Proceedings

Date: Jul 29, 2011
J.D. v. M.D.F.: Upholding Due Process in Domestic Violence Proceedings Introduction The case of J.D. v. M.D.F., decided by the Supreme Court of New Jersey on July 28, 2011, addresses critical issues...
Residential vs Commercial Property Liability for Sidewalk Maintenance: Analysis of LUCHEJKO v. CITY OF HOBOKEN

Residential vs Commercial Property Liability for Sidewalk Maintenance: Analysis of LUCHEJKO v. CITY OF HOBOKEN

Date: Jul 28, 2011
Residential vs Commercial Property Liability for Sidewalk Maintenance: Analysis of LUCHEJKO v. CITY OF HOBOKEN Introduction In LUCHEJKO v. CITY OF HOBOKEN, the Supreme Court of New Jersey reaffirmed...
Pomerantz Paper Corp. v. New Community Corporation: Reinforcing the Perfect Tender Rule under UCC

Pomerantz Paper Corp. v. New Community Corporation: Reinforcing the Perfect Tender Rule under UCC

Date: Jul 26, 2011
Pomerantz Paper Corp. v. New Community Corporation: Reinforcing the Perfect Tender Rule under UCC Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey's decision in Pomerantz Paper Corporation v. New...
Effective Assistance of Counsel and Plea Agreement Restrictions: STATE v. HESS

Effective Assistance of Counsel and Plea Agreement Restrictions: STATE v. HESS

Date: Jul 22, 2011
Effective Assistance of Counsel and Plea Agreement Restrictions: STATE v. HESS Introduction Case: State of New Jersey v. Marie Hess (207 N.J. 123) Court: Supreme Court of New Jersey Date: July 21,...
Limiting Collateral Estoppel Between Title Nine and Title Thirty Proceedings: Insights from New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services v. R.D.

Limiting Collateral Estoppel Between Title Nine and Title Thirty Proceedings: Insights from New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services v. R.D.

Date: Jul 21, 2011
Limiting Collateral Estoppel Between Title Nine and Title Thirty Proceedings: Insights from New Jersey Division of Youth and Family Services v. R.D. Introduction The case of New Jersey Division of...
Individual Liability Under New Jersey's Consumer Fraud Act: Insights from ALLEN v. V AND A BROTHERS, INC.

Individual Liability Under New Jersey's Consumer Fraud Act: Insights from ALLEN v. V AND A BROTHERS, INC.

Date: Jul 8, 2011
Individual Liability Under New Jersey's Consumer Fraud Act: Insights from ALLEN v. V AND A BROTHERS, INC. Introduction The landmark case William W. Allen and Vivian ALLEN v. V AND A BROTHERS, INC....
STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DWAYNE GILLISPIE: Upholding the Harmless Error Standard in Admissibility of Other-Crimes Evidence under N.J.R.E. 404(b)

STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DWAYNE GILLISPIE: Upholding the Harmless Error Standard in Admissibility of Other-Crimes Evidence under N.J.R.E. 404(b)

Date: Jun 10, 2011
STATE OF NEW JERSEY v. DWAYNE GILLISPIE: Upholding the Harmless Error Standard in Admissibility of Other-Crimes Evidence under N.J.R.E. 404(b) Introduction In the landmark case of State of New Jersey...
State of New Jersey v. Zarik Rose: Abolishing Res Gestae in Favor of Rule 404(b)

State of New Jersey v. Zarik Rose: Abolishing Res Gestae in Favor of Rule 404(b)

Date: Jun 9, 2011
State of New Jersey v. Zarik Rose: Abolishing Res Gestae in Favor of Rule 404(b) Introduction In the landmark case of State of New Jersey v. Zarik Rose (206 N.J. 141, 2011), the Supreme Court of New...
Supreme Court of New Jersey Clarifies Rule 3:21-8 on Jail Credits in Multi-Indictment Sentencing

Supreme Court of New Jersey Clarifies Rule 3:21-8 on Jail Credits in Multi-Indictment Sentencing

Date: Jun 9, 2011
Supreme Court of New Jersey Clarifies Rule 3:21-8 on Jail Credits in Multi-Indictment Sentencing Introduction In the landmark decision of State of New Jersey v. Andrea Hernandez and State of New...
Risko v. Thompson Muller Automotive Group: Reinforcing the Integrity of Jury Deliberations in Damage Awards

Risko v. Thompson Muller Automotive Group: Reinforcing the Integrity of Jury Deliberations in Damage Awards

Date: Jun 8, 2011
Risko v. Thompson Muller Automotive Group: Reinforcing the Integrity of Jury Deliberations in Damage Awards Introduction The case of Risko v. Thompson Muller Automotive Group, Inc. (206 N.J. 506)...
Reynolds v. Kent Motor Cars: Strengthening Party Joinder Sanctions and Clarifying STEO Insurance Coverage

Reynolds v. Kent Motor Cars: Strengthening Party Joinder Sanctions and Clarifying STEO Insurance Coverage

Date: May 19, 2011
Reynolds v. Kent Motor Cars: Strengthening Party Joinder Sanctions and Clarifying STEO Insurance Coverage Introduction In the case of Kent Motor Cars, Inc. d/b/a Honda of Princeton, Sports and...
Russo v. Board of Trustees: Establishing Objective Reasonableness in Accidental Disability Claims

Russo v. Board of Trustees: Establishing Objective Reasonableness in Accidental Disability Claims

Date: May 18, 2011
Russo v. Board of Trustees: Establishing Objective Reasonableness in Accidental Disability Claims Introduction The case of Gregory Russo v. Board of Trustees, Police and Firemen's Retirement System,...
State of New Jersey v. W.B.: Reinforcing Limitations on CSAAS Testimony and Establishing Adverse Inference for Destroyed Investigative Notes

State of New Jersey v. W.B.: Reinforcing Limitations on CSAAS Testimony and Establishing Adverse Inference for Destroyed Investigative Notes

Date: Apr 28, 2011
State of New Jersey v. W.B.: Reinforcing Limitations on CSAAS Testimony and Establishing Adverse Inference for Destroyed Investigative Notes Introduction State of New Jersey v. W.B. is a pivotal case...
dispatcher-induced Unreasonable Searches: STATE v. HANDY Establishes Strict Suppression Standards

dispatcher-induced Unreasonable Searches: STATE v. HANDY Establishes Strict Suppression Standards

Date: Apr 27, 2011
Dispatcher-Induced Unreasonable Searches: State of New Jersey v. Handy Establishes Strict Suppression Standards Introduction In State of New Jersey v. Germaine A. Handy, 206 N.J. 39 (2011), the...
Progressive Discipline and Appellate Review in Public Employment: IN RE STALLWORTH

Progressive Discipline and Appellate Review in Public Employment: IN RE STALLWORTH

Date: Apr 13, 2011
Progressive Discipline and Appellate Review in Public Employment: IN RE STALLWORTH Introduction In the Matter of Anthony Stallworth, Camden County Municipal Utilities Authority (208 N.J. 182) is a...
McLean v. State of New Jersey: Limiting Lay Opinion in Narcotics Prosecutions

McLean v. State of New Jersey: Limiting Lay Opinion in Narcotics Prosecutions

Date: Apr 1, 2011
McLean v. State of New Jersey: Limiting Lay Opinion in Narcotics Prosecutions Introduction In the case of State of New Jersey v. Kelvin L. McLean, decided by the Supreme Court of New Jersey on March...
Right to Counsel in Motions to Withdraw Guilty Pleas: Insights from STATE v. HAYES

Right to Counsel in Motions to Withdraw Guilty Pleas: Insights from STATE v. HAYES

Date: Apr 1, 2011
Right to Counsel in Motions to Withdraw Guilty Pleas: Insights from STATE v. HAYES Introduction State of New Jersey v. Michael Hayes, 205 N.J. 522 (2011), is a seminal case that delves into the...
Disclosure Sufficiency in Business Judgment Rule: Insights from Seidman v. Clifton Savings Bank

Disclosure Sufficiency in Business Judgment Rule: Insights from Seidman v. Clifton Savings Bank

Date: Mar 17, 2011
Disclosure Sufficiency in Business Judgment Rule: Insights from Seidman v. Clifton Savings Bank Introduction Seidman v. Clifton Savings Bank, S.L.A. is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Comprehensive Commentary on Kieffer v. Best Buy: Indemnification Clauses Under Scrutiny

Comprehensive Commentary on Kieffer v. Best Buy: Indemnification Clauses Under Scrutiny

Date: Mar 16, 2011
Kieffer v. Best Buy: Redefining the Boundaries of Indemnification Agreements Introduction The case of Tina Kieffer and Kevin Kieffer v. Best Buy reached the Supreme Court of New Jersey in 2011,...
Establishing Guidelines for Playback of Video Testimony and Sentencing Analysis: State of New Jersey v. Dashawn Miller

Establishing Guidelines for Playback of Video Testimony and Sentencing Analysis: State of New Jersey v. Dashawn Miller

Date: Mar 15, 2011
Establishing Guidelines for Playback of Video Testimony and Sentencing Analysis State of New Jersey v. Dashawn Miller, 205 N.J. 109 (2011) Introduction In the landmark case State of New Jersey v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert