Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

New Jersey Case Commentaries

Empowering the Jury in Evaluating Party-Opponent Hearsay Statements: Insights from Konop v. Rosen

Empowering the Jury in Evaluating Party-Opponent Hearsay Statements: Insights from Konop v. Rosen

Date: Apr 26, 2012
Empowering the Jury in Evaluating Party-Opponent Hearsay Statements: Insights from Konop v. Rosen Introduction In the landmark case of Adele Konop and Richard Konop v. Ellen J. Rosen, M.D. (425 N.J....
Enhanced Immunity for 911 Operators Under N.J.S.A. 52:17C–10

Enhanced Immunity for 911 Operators Under N.J.S.A. 52:17C–10

Date: Mar 9, 2012
Enhanced Immunity for 911 Operators Under N.J.S.A. 52:17C–10 Introduction The case of Paris Wilson, an infant by his Guardian Ad Litem, Sonya Manzano, and D'Artagnan Manzano, Indi v. City of Jersey...
Non-Delegable Duty in Care of Developmentally Disabled: Devereux v. Davis

Non-Delegable Duty in Care of Developmentally Disabled: Devereux v. Davis

Date: Mar 1, 2012
Non-Delegable Duty in Care of Developmentally Disabled: Devereux v. Davis Introduction The case of Vandella Davis, as Guardian Ad Litem for Roland DAVIS v. DEVEREUX FOUNDATION et al. was adjudicated...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Immigration Consequences: The State of New Jersey v. Frensel Gaitan & Rohan Goulbourne

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Immigration Consequences: The State of New Jersey v. Frensel Gaitan & Rohan Goulbourne

Date: Feb 29, 2012
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Immigration Consequences: The State of New Jersey v. Frensel Gaitan & Rohan Goulbourne Introduction In the landmark decision of State of New Jersey v. Frensel...
Affirming the Actual Malice Standard in Defamation Claims: Durando and Dotoli v. The Nutley Sun

Affirming the Actual Malice Standard in Defamation Claims: Durando and Dotoli v. The Nutley Sun

Date: Feb 29, 2012
Affirming the Actual Malice Standard in Defamation Claims: Durando and Dotoli v. The Nutley Sun Introduction In the seminal case of Durando and Dotoli v. The Nutley Sun, the Supreme Court of New...
Strict Compliance with Fair Foreclosure Act Notice Requirements Affirmed and Expanded

Strict Compliance with Fair Foreclosure Act Notice Requirements Affirmed and Expanded

Date: Feb 28, 2012
Strict Compliance with Fair Foreclosure Act Notice Requirements Affirmed and Expanded Introduction In the landmark case US Bank National Association, as Trustee for CSAB Mortgage–Backed Pass–Through...
Admissibility of Remote Criminal Convictions via Intervening Disorderly Offenses – STATE v. HARRIS

Admissibility of Remote Criminal Convictions via Intervening Disorderly Offenses – STATE v. HARRIS

Date: Feb 28, 2012
Admissibility of Remote Criminal Convictions via Intervening Disorderly Offenses – STATE v. HARRIS Introduction State v. Derrick Harris, Sr. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of New...
Limitation on Multiple Extended-Term Sentences in Separate Proceedings Established in STATE of New Jersey v. Hudson

Limitation on Multiple Extended-Term Sentences in Separate Proceedings Established in STATE of New Jersey v. Hudson

Date: Feb 7, 2012
Limitation on Multiple Extended-Term Sentences in Separate Proceedings Established in STATE of New Jersey v. Hudson Introduction In the landmark decision of STATE of New Jersey v. Hudson, 209 N.J....
Premises Liability: Reaffirming Duty to Licensee Police Officers in Unsafe Conditions

Premises Liability: Reaffirming Duty to Licensee Police Officers in Unsafe Conditions

Date: Feb 3, 2012
Premises Liability: Reaffirming Duty to Licensee Police Officers in Unsafe Conditions Introduction The case of Willie C. Rowe and Karen Rowe v. Mazel Thirty, LLC and 40–50 Lenox Realty Associates,...
Admissibility of Police Officer Testimony in Photo Arrays: Clarification Post Lazo

Admissibility of Police Officer Testimony in Photo Arrays: Clarification Post Lazo

Date: Feb 2, 2012
Admissibility of Police Officer Testimony in Photo Arrays: Clarification Post Lazo 1. Introduction The case of State of New Jersey v. Danny Lazo (209 N.J. 9, 2012) marks a significant development in...
Limitations on Physician Assistants' Authority to Perform Electrodiagnostic Tests: Insights from Selective Insurance Company of America v. Arthur C. Rothman

Limitations on Physician Assistants' Authority to Perform Electrodiagnostic Tests: Insights from Selective Insurance Company of America v. Arthur C. Rothman

Date: Jan 20, 2012
Limitations on Physician Assistants' Authority to Perform Electrodiagnostic Tests: Insights from Selective Insurance Company of America v. Arthur C. Rothman Introduction The case of Selective...
Supreme Court Sets Clear Standards for Public Entity Liability under New Jersey Tort Claims Act

Supreme Court Sets Clear Standards for Public Entity Liability under New Jersey Tort Claims Act

Date: Jan 19, 2012
Supreme Court Sets Clear Standards for Public Entity Liability under New Jersey Tort Claims Act Introduction The Supreme Court of New Jersey, in the landmark decision of Donald T. POLZO v. COUNTY OF...
Totality of Circumstances Approach Affirmed for Determining Invocation of Right to Silence

Totality of Circumstances Approach Affirmed for Determining Invocation of Right to Silence

Date: Jan 13, 2012
Totality of Circumstances Approach Affirmed for Determining Invocation of Right to Silence Introduction In the landmark case of State of New Jersey v. Demetrius Diaz-Bridges, (208 N.J. 544, 2012),...
Reaffirmation of Strict Notice Requirements Under N.J. Tort Claims Act: Insights from McDADE v. SIAZON

Reaffirmation of Strict Notice Requirements Under N.J. Tort Claims Act: Insights from McDADE v. SIAZON

Date: Dec 23, 2011
Reaffirmation of Strict Notice Requirements Under N.J. Tort Claims Act: Insights from McDADE v. SIAZON Introduction McDade and McDADE v. SIAZON et al. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Affirmation of In Pari Delicto Defense in Corporate Fraud: Parmalat v. Citigroup

Affirmation of In Pari Delicto Defense in Corporate Fraud: Parmalat v. Citigroup

Date: Dec 23, 2011
Affirmation of In Pari Delicto Defense in Corporate Fraud: Parmalat v. Citigroup Introduction The judicial decision in Dr. Enrico Bondi v. Citigroup, Inc. serves as a pivotal case in understanding...
Neglect Findings and Parental Drug Use: Insights from New Jersey Appellate Division’s R.S. v. Division of Youth and Family Services Decision

Neglect Findings and Parental Drug Use: Insights from New Jersey Appellate Division’s R.S. v. Division of Youth and Family Services Decision

Date: Dec 22, 2011
Neglect Findings and Parental Drug Use: Insights from New Jersey Appellate Division’s R.S. v. Division of Youth and Family Services Decision Introduction The case of New Jersey Division of Youth and...
Interpreting N.J.S.A. 39:4-88(b): Distinct Offenses for Lane Maintenance and Safe Lane Changing

Interpreting N.J.S.A. 39:4-88(b): Distinct Offenses for Lane Maintenance and Safe Lane Changing

Date: Dec 15, 2011
Interpreting N.J.S.A. 39:4-88(b): Distinct Offenses for Lane Maintenance and Safe Lane Changing Introduction The case of State of New Jersey v. Reynold Regis (208 N.J. 439) presents a pivotal...
State v. Yough: Upholding Trial Court Discretion in Preventing Unnecessary Mistrials

State v. Yough: Upholding Trial Court Discretion in Preventing Unnecessary Mistrials

Date: Dec 1, 2011
State v. Yough: Upholding Trial Court Discretion in Preventing Unnecessary Mistrials Introduction The case of State of New Jersey v. Stanford Yough (208 N.J. 385) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Revising Eyewitness Identification Procedures: NJ Supreme Court in STATE v. HENDERSON

Revising Eyewitness Identification Procedures: NJ Supreme Court in STATE v. HENDERSON

Date: Aug 25, 2011
Revising Eyewitness Identification Procedures: NJ Supreme Court in STATE v. HENDERSON Introduction In State of New Jersey v. Larry R. Henderson (208 N.J. 208), decided on August 24, 2011, the Supreme...
Clarifying 'Minimum Degree of Care' in Child Neglect: NJ Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Clarifying 'Minimum Degree of Care' in Child Neglect: NJ Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Date: Aug 9, 2011
Clarifying 'Minimum Degree of Care' in Child Neglect: NJ Supreme Court Sets New Precedent Introduction In the landmark decision of Department of Children and Families, Division of Youth and Family...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert