Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Missouri Case Commentaries


        Anna Borgstede v. William Waldbauer: Establishing the Scope of Employment and Negligence Standards Under the Humanitarian Doctrine

Anna Borgstede v. William Waldbauer: Establishing the Scope of Employment and Negligence Standards Under the Humanitarian Doctrine

Date: Nov 21, 1935
Anna Borgstede v. William Waldbauer: Establishing the Scope of Employment and Negligence Standards Under the Humanitarian Doctrine Introduction The case Anna Borgstede v. William Waldbauer and G.H....
Dempsey v. Horton: Establishing Standards for Negligence and Jury Instructions in Missouri

Dempsey v. Horton: Establishing Standards for Negligence and Jury Instructions in Missouri

Date: Jul 12, 1935
Dempsey v. Horton: Establishing Standards for Negligence and Jury Instructions in Missouri Introduction The case of Joseph Dempsey v. G.M. Horton and Western Union Telegraph Company was adjudicated...
Clarifying Liability in Railroad Crossing Accidents: Insights from Frank Hoelzel v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Clarifying Liability in Railroad Crossing Accidents: Insights from Frank Hoelzel v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.

Date: Jul 10, 1935
Clarifying Liability in Railroad Crossing Accidents: Insights from Frank Hoelzel v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Company Introduction The case of Frank Hoelzel v. Chicago, Rock Island &...
State v. McGee: Juror Conduct and Evidence Admissibility Standards Established

State v. McGee: Juror Conduct and Evidence Admissibility Standards Established

Date: Apr 26, 1935
State v. McGee: Juror Conduct and Evidence Admissibility Standards Established Introduction In the landmark case of State v. Walter H. McGee, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Missouri, Division...
Missouri Supreme Court Establishes Criteria for Employee vs. Independent Contractor Status under the Workmen's Compensation Act

Missouri Supreme Court Establishes Criteria for Employee vs. Independent Contractor Status under the Workmen's Compensation Act

Date: Apr 18, 1935
Missouri Supreme Court Establishes Criteria for Employee vs. Independent Contractor Status under the Workmen's Compensation Act Introduction In the landmark case of Fannie Maltz, dependent of Harry...
Res Ipsa Loquitur Doctrine Affirmed in Fred Harke v. Christ E. Haase

Res Ipsa Loquitur Doctrine Affirmed in Fred Harke v. Christ E. Haase

Date: Oct 23, 1934
Res Ipsa Loquitur Doctrine Affirmed in Fred Harke v. Christ E. Haase Introduction The case of Fred Harke v. Christ E. Haase, decided by the Supreme Court of Missouri, Division One on October 22,...
Clarence Elkin v. St. Louis Public Service Company: Redefining the Humanitarian Doctrine in Streetcar Collisions

Clarence Elkin v. St. Louis Public Service Company: Redefining the Humanitarian Doctrine in Streetcar Collisions

Date: Sep 19, 1934
Clarence Elkin v. St. Louis Public Service Company: Redefining the Humanitarian Doctrine in Streetcar Collisions Introduction The case of Clarence Elkin v. St. Louis Public Service Company (335 Mo....
Kimmie v. Terminal Railroad Association: Establishing the Necessity of Substantial Evidence in Causation of Medical Conditions

Kimmie v. Terminal Railroad Association: Establishing the Necessity of Substantial Evidence in Causation of Medical Conditions

Date: Dec 23, 1933
Kimmie v. Terminal Railroad Association: Establishing the Necessity of Substantial Evidence in Causation of Medical Conditions Introduction George Kimmie, an engineer employed by the Terminal...
Brunk v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.: Establishing Employer Liability in Tort Actions

Brunk v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.: Establishing Employer Liability in Tort Actions

Date: Dec 23, 1933
Brunk v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.: Establishing Employer Liability in Tort Actions Introduction Brunk v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Company is a landmark 1933 decision by the Supreme Court of Missouri,...
Affirming Minor Children's Rights in Wrongful Death Claims: Wesley Cummins v. Kansas City Public Service Company

Affirming Minor Children's Rights in Wrongful Death Claims: Wesley Cummins v. Kansas City Public Service Company

Date: Dec 23, 1933
Affirming Minor Children's Rights in Wrongful Death Claims: Wesley Cummins v. Kansas City Public Service Company Introduction The landmark case of Wesley Cummins, by Next Friend et al., Appellants,...
Negligence and Proximate Cause in Railway Derailment: Insights from Young v. Wheellock & Bierd (1933)

Negligence and Proximate Cause in Railway Derailment: Insights from Young v. Wheellock & Bierd (1933)

Date: Oct 20, 1933
Negligence and Proximate Cause in Railway Derailment: Insights from Young v. Wheellock & Bierd (1933) 1. Introduction Younger v. Wheellock & Bierd is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Permanent Injury Damages Require Clear and Definite Evidence: Insights from Adelsberger v. Sheehey

Permanent Injury Damages Require Clear and Definite Evidence: Insights from Adelsberger v. Sheehey

Date: Apr 21, 1933
Permanent Injury Damages Require Clear and Definite Evidence: Insights from Adelsberger v. Sheehey Introduction Adelsberger v. Sheehey is a landmark decision rendered by the Supreme Court of Missouri...
LESLIE V. FREEMAN: Redefining Humanitarian Negligence and Witness Eligibility Standards

LESLIE V. FREEMAN: Redefining Humanitarian Negligence and Witness Eligibility Standards

Date: Apr 21, 1933
LESLIE V. FREEMAN: Redefining Humanitarian Negligence and Witness Eligibility Standards Introduction The case of LeSlie v. Freeman (332 Mo. 831) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Missouri in April...
McDonald v. Kansas City Gas Company: Jurisdictional Principles and Evaluation of Negligence Evidence Upholding Legal Standards

McDonald v. Kansas City Gas Company: Jurisdictional Principles and Evaluation of Negligence Evidence Upholding Legal Standards

Date: Mar 17, 1933
McDonald v. Kansas City Gas Company: Jurisdictional Principles and Evaluation of Negligence Evidence Upholding Legal Standards Introduction The case of Fern McDonald, represented by her next friend,...
Res Ipsa Loquitur and the Burden of Proof: A Landmark Missouri Supreme Court Decision

Res Ipsa Loquitur and the Burden of Proof: A Landmark Missouri Supreme Court Decision

Date: Feb 7, 1932
Res Ipsa Loquitur and the Burden of Proof: A Landmark Missouri Supreme Court Decision Introduction The case of Edward McCloskey, an Infant, by Leo McCloskey, His Next Friend, v. Harry Koplar and Sam...
Establishment of Humanitarian Rule and Rejection of Contributory Negligence as a Barrier to Recovery: Smith v. Kansas City Public Service Company

Establishment of Humanitarian Rule and Rejection of Contributory Negligence as a Barrier to Recovery: Smith v. Kansas City Public Service Company

Date: Nov 18, 1931
Establishment of Humanitarian Rule and Rejection of Contributory Negligence as a Barrier to Recovery Smith v. Kansas City Public Service Company, 328 Mo. 979 (1931) Introduction In the landmark case...
Erroneous Jury Instructions and Co-Defendants' Rights: Insights from Frances Barr v. Nafziger Baking Company (1931)

Erroneous Jury Instructions and Co-Defendants' Rights: Insights from Frances Barr v. Nafziger Baking Company (1931)

Date: Jul 29, 1931
Erroneous Jury Instructions and Co-Defendants' Rights: Insights from Frances Barr v. Nafziger Baking Company (1931) Introduction The case of Frances Barr v. Nafziger Baking Company, Appellant....
Reassessment of Evidence Credibility in Collision Liability: Cluck v. Abe

Reassessment of Evidence Credibility in Collision Liability: Cluck v. Abe

Date: Jun 25, 1931
Reassessment of Evidence Credibility in Collision Liability: Cluck v. Abe Introduction The case of John P. Cluck v. Albert C. Abe, decided by the Supreme Court of Missouri, Division One, on June 24,...
Liability Under the Missouri Compensation Act: Leilich v. Chevrolet Motor Company

Liability Under the Missouri Compensation Act: Leilich v. Chevrolet Motor Company

Date: Jun 25, 1931
Liability Under the Missouri Compensation Act: Leilich v. Chevrolet Motor Company Introduction Leilich v. Chevrolet Motor Company is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of Missouri, Division...
Establishing the Limitations of Res Ipsa Loquitur in Negligence Cases

Establishing the Limitations of Res Ipsa Loquitur in Negligence Cases

Date: Sep 5, 1930
Establishing the Limitations of Res Ipsa Loquitur in Negligence Cases Introduction The case of Wilbur E. Conduitt, Executor of Estate of M. Jessie Conduitt, v. Trenton Gas Electric Company delineates...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert