Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Missouri Case Commentaries

Due Process Requires Notice and Hearing Before Vacating Verdict: ALBERT J. HOPPE, INC. v. ST. LOUIS PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY

Due Process Requires Notice and Hearing Before Vacating Verdict: ALBERT J. HOPPE, INC. v. ST. LOUIS PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY

Date: Jan 9, 1951
Due Process Requires Notice and Hearing Before Vacating Verdict: ALBERT J. HOPPE, INC. v. ST. LOUIS PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY Introduction The case of ALBERT J. HOPPE, INC. v. ST. LOUIS PUBLIC SERVICE...
Supreme Court of Missouri Limits Appellate Jurisdiction in Municipal Eminent Domain Cases

Supreme Court of Missouri Limits Appellate Jurisdiction in Municipal Eminent Domain Cases

Date: Apr 12, 1949
Supreme Court of Missouri Limits Appellate Jurisdiction in Municipal Eminent Domain Cases Introduction The case of The City of St. Louis v. Butler Company et al. presented a pivotal legal question...
Seabaugh v. Garver Lumber Manufacturing Company: Reinforcing the Burden of Proof in Workmen's Compensation Death Claims

Seabaugh v. Garver Lumber Manufacturing Company: Reinforcing the Burden of Proof in Workmen's Compensation Death Claims

Date: Mar 11, 1947
Seabaugh v. Garver Lumber Manufacturing Company: Reinforcing the Burden of Proof in Workmen's Compensation Death Claims Introduction The case of In re Claim of Dependents of Wiley Tom Seabaugh,...
Missouri Supreme Court Establishes One-Year Limitation for Wrongful Death Claims in Baysinger v. Hanser

Missouri Supreme Court Establishes One-Year Limitation for Wrongful Death Claims in Baysinger v. Hanser

Date: Feb 11, 1947
Missouri Supreme Court Establishes One-Year Limitation for Wrongful Death Claims in Baysinger v. Hanser Introduction Case: O.S. Baysinger, Appellant, v. Otto C. Hanser Court: Supreme Court of...
Expanded Appellate Review Standards for Workmen's Compensation under Missouri’s 1945 Constitution

Expanded Appellate Review Standards for Workmen's Compensation under Missouri’s 1945 Constitution

Date: Nov 12, 1946
Expanded Appellate Review Standards for Workmen's Compensation under Missouri’s 1945 Constitution Introduction The case of W.D. Wood v. Wagner Electric Corporation et al. (355 Mo. 670), adjudicated...
Broad Interpretation of "Arising Out of Use" in Automobile Liability Insurance

Broad Interpretation of "Arising Out of Use" in Automobile Liability Insurance

Date: Sep 6, 1944
Broad Interpretation of "Arising Out of Use" in Automobile Liability Insurance Introduction In the landmark case of Harvey Schmidt v. Utilities Insurance Company, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Limits of Humanitarian Negligence Liability for Railroads in Wrongful Death Cases: MOLLY KNORP v. MO PAC RAILROAD

Limits of Humanitarian Negligence Liability for Railroads in Wrongful Death Cases: MOLLY KNORP v. MO PAC RAILROAD

Date: Dec 7, 1943
Limits of Humanitarian Negligence Liability for Railroads in Wrongful Death Cases Introduction MOLLY KNORP v. GUY A. THOMPSON, Trustee of the MISSOURI PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY was a significant case...
Absolute Privilege in Judicial Proceedings: Laun v. Union Electric Company of Missouri and North American Company

Absolute Privilege in Judicial Proceedings: Laun v. Union Electric Company of Missouri and North American Company

Date: Jan 5, 1943
Absolute Privilege in Judicial Proceedings: Laun v. Union Electric Company of Missouri and North American Company Introduction Albert C. Laun v. The Union Electric Company of Missouri and The North...
Peculiarly Available Witnesses and Unfavorable Inferences: Insights from STATE v. Rufus Collins

Peculiarly Available Witnesses and Unfavorable Inferences: Insights from STATE v. Rufus Collins

Date: Nov 13, 1942
Peculiarly Available Witnesses and Unfavorable Inferences: Insights from STATE v. Rufus Collins Introduction The case of State v. Rufus Collins (350 Mo. 291, 1942) serves as a pivotal precedent in...
Establishing Specific Acts of Negligence and Causal Connection in Municipal Liability: Guthrie v. City of St. Charles

Establishing Specific Acts of Negligence and Causal Connection in Municipal Liability: Guthrie v. City of St. Charles

Date: Jun 11, 1941
Establishing Specific Acts of Negligence and Causal Connection in Municipal Liability: Guthrie v. City of St. Charles Introduction James Leonard Guthrie, a minor represented by his next friend Meril...
Paisley v. Lucas: Clarifying Commission Entitlements in Open Territories

Paisley v. Lucas: Clarifying Commission Entitlements in Open Territories

Date: Sep 19, 1940
Paisley v. Lucas: Clarifying Commission Entitlements in Open Territories Introduction George F. Paisley, the appellant, entered into an insurance agency contract with the International Life Insurance...
Establishing Boundaries of the Humanitarian Doctrine in Automobile Accident Liability

Establishing Boundaries of the Humanitarian Doctrine in Automobile Accident Liability

Date: Sep 29, 1938
Establishing Boundaries of the Humanitarian Doctrine in Automobile Accident Liability Introduction The case of Mildred Buehler v. Festus Mercantile Company, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Clarifying the Humanitarian Negligence Doctrine in Automobile Collisions: Insights from Smithers v. Barker

Clarifying the Humanitarian Negligence Doctrine in Automobile Collisions: Insights from Smithers v. Barker

Date: Dec 15, 1937
Clarifying the Humanitarian Negligence Doctrine in Automobile Collisions: Insights from Smithers v. Barker Introduction Case: Charles W. Smithers v. John T. Barker, Appellant (341 Mo. 1017) Court:...
Reaffirmation of the Humanitarian Doctrine in Negligence Cases: Narcissa Crews v. Kansas City Public Service Company

Reaffirmation of the Humanitarian Doctrine in Negligence Cases: Narcissa Crews v. Kansas City Public Service Company

Date: Dec 15, 1937
Reaffirmation of the Humanitarian Doctrine in Negligence Cases: Narcissa Crews v. Kansas City Public Service Company Introduction In the landmark case of Narcissa Crews v. Kansas City Public Service...
Clarifying Contributory Negligence at Railroad Crossings: Missouri Supreme Court Sets Precedent

Clarifying Contributory Negligence at Railroad Crossings: Missouri Supreme Court Sets Precedent

Date: Jun 6, 1937
Clarifying Contributory Negligence at Railroad Crossings: Missouri Supreme Court Sets Precedent Introduction The case of State of Missouri at the relation of Kansas City Southern Railway Company v....
Priority of Recorded Liens and Protection of Bona Fide Purchasers in Fraudulent Conveyances: Castorina v. Herrmann

Priority of Recorded Liens and Protection of Bona Fide Purchasers in Fraudulent Conveyances: Castorina v. Herrmann

Date: Apr 22, 1937
Priority of Recorded Liens and Protection of Bona Fide Purchasers in Fraudulent Conveyances: Castorina v. Herrmann Introduction The case of Pasquale Castorina v. Arthur Herrmann, reported in 340 Mo....
Humanitarian Negligence in Railroad Crossing Incidents: Analyzing Perkins v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis

Humanitarian Negligence in Railroad Crossing Incidents: Analyzing Perkins v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis

Date: Mar 25, 1937
Humanitarian Negligence in Railroad Crossing Incidents: Analyzing Perkins v. Terminal Railroad Association of St. Louis Introduction The case of John Perkins v. Terminal Railroad Association of St....
Legislative Authority to Regulate Unauthorized Practice of Law: Insights from Clark v. Austin (1937)

Legislative Authority to Regulate Unauthorized Practice of Law: Insights from Clark v. Austin (1937)

Date: Feb 9, 1937
Legislative Authority to Regulate Unauthorized Practice of Law: Insights from Clark v. Austin (1937) Introduction The case of Boyle G. Clark, General Chairman of the Bar Committees of the State Bar,...
Enforceability of Postnuptial Separation Contracts: Maud I. North v. Emmett P. North

Enforceability of Postnuptial Separation Contracts: Maud I. North v. Emmett P. North

Date: Dec 15, 1936
Enforceability of Postnuptial Separation Contracts: Maud I. North v. Emmett P. North Introduction The case of Maud I. North v. Emmett P. North (339 Mo. 1226), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Appellate Standards for Evidence Sufficiency and Witness Credibility in State v. Gregory

Appellate Standards for Evidence Sufficiency and Witness Credibility in State v. Gregory

Date: Jul 1, 1936
Appellate Standards for Evidence Sufficiency and Witness Credibility in State v. Gregory Introduction State v. Walter Gregory, 339 Mo. 133 (1936), is a significant appellate decision by the Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert