Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Mississippi Case Commentaries

Permissible Extensions in Timber Contracts: Insights from Sumter Lumber Co. v. Skipper

Permissible Extensions in Timber Contracts: Insights from Sumter Lumber Co. v. Skipper

Date: Nov 8, 1938
Permissible Extensions in Timber Contracts: Insights from Sumter Lumber Co., Inc. v. Skipper Introduction The case of Sumter Lumber Co., Inc. v. Skipper et al., adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Sufficiency of Evidence: Probabilities Over Possibilities in TECHE LINES, INC. v. BOUNDS (1938)

Sufficiency of Evidence: Probabilities Over Possibilities in TECHE LINES, INC. v. BOUNDS (1938)

Date: Mar 22, 1938
Sufficiency of Evidence: Probabilities Over Possibilities in Teche Lines, Inc. v. Bounds (1938) Introduction Teche Lines, Inc. v. Bounds, decided by the Supreme Court of Mississippi, Division B, on...
Constitutionality of Municipal Taxation for Private Industrial Bonds: ALBRITTON v. CITY OF WINONA Analysis

Constitutionality of Municipal Taxation for Private Industrial Bonds: ALBRITTON v. CITY OF WINONA Analysis

Date: Feb 8, 1938
Constitutionality of Municipal Taxation for Private Industrial Bonds: ALBRITTON v. CITY OF WINONA (1938) Introduction ALBRITTON v. CITY OF WINONA is a landmark 1938 decision by the Supreme Court of...
Clarifying the Last Clear Chance Doctrine and Evidentiary Standards: Analysis of YAZOO M.V.R. Co. v. LAMENSDORF et al.

Clarifying the Last Clear Chance Doctrine and Evidentiary Standards: Analysis of YAZOO M.V.R. Co. v. LAMENSDORF et al.

Date: Nov 30, 1937
Clarifying the Last Clear Chance Doctrine and Evidentiary Standards: Analysis of YAZOO M.V.R. Co. v. LAMENSDORF et al. (180 Miss. 426) Introduction The case YAZOO M.V.R. Co. v. LAMENSDORF et al. was...
Graves v. Johnson (179 Miss. 465): Establishing the Duty of Highway Contractors to Provide Adequate Warnings and Barricades

Graves v. Johnson (179 Miss. 465): Establishing the Duty of Highway Contractors to Provide Adequate Warnings and Barricades

Date: Nov 16, 1937
Graves v. Johnson (179 Miss. 465): Establishing the Duty of Highway Contractors to Provide Adequate Warnings and Barricades Introduction Graves et al. v. Johnson et al. is a landmark case decided by...
Respondeat Superior and Agency Limitations in Slander Claims: An In-Depth Commentary on GREAT ATLANTIC PACIFIC TEA CO. et al. v. MAJURE

Respondeat Superior and Agency Limitations in Slander Claims: An In-Depth Commentary on GREAT ATLANTIC PACIFIC TEA CO. et al. v. MAJURE

Date: Apr 21, 1936
Respondeat Superior and Agency Limitations in Slander Claims: An In-Depth Commentary on GREAT ATLANTIC PACIFIC TEA CO. et al. v. MAJURE Introduction The case of GREAT ATLANTIC PACIFIC TEA CO. et al....
Negligence and the Burden of Proof: Insights from Columbus G.R. Co. v. Coleman

Negligence and the Burden of Proof: Insights from Columbus G.R. Co. v. Coleman

Date: Mar 12, 1935
Negligence and the Burden of Proof: Insights from Columbus G.R. Co. v. Coleman Introduction Columbus G.R. Co. v. Coleman is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Mississippi, Division...
Judicial Notice of Automobile Door Latch Mechanisms and Operator Liability for Injuries: Williams v. Lumpkin

Judicial Notice of Automobile Door Latch Mechanisms and Operator Liability for Injuries: Williams v. Lumpkin

Date: Mar 20, 1934
Judicial Notice of Automobile Door Latch Mechanisms and Operator Liability for Injuries: Williams v. Lumpkin Introduction The case of Williams v. Lumpkin, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Floyd v. State: Admissibility of Prior Assaults and Expert Testimony

Floyd v. State: Admissibility of Prior Assaults and Expert Testimony

Date: May 9, 1933
Floyd v. State: Admissibility of Prior Assaults and Expert Testimony Introduction Floyd v. State, 166 Miss. 15, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Mississippi in 1933, is a pivotal case that...
Tarver v. Lindsey: Affirming the Standard for Contract-Based Claims for Board and Lodging in Estate Law

Tarver v. Lindsey: Affirming the Standard for Contract-Based Claims for Board and Lodging in Estate Law

Date: Oct 27, 1931
Tarver v. Lindsey: Affirming the Standard for Contract-Based Claims for Board and Lodging in Estate Law 1. Introduction Tarver v. Lindsey is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Control as the Determining Factor in Master-Servant Relationships: Insights from Kisner v. Jackson (1931)

Control as the Determining Factor in Master-Servant Relationships: Insights from Kisner v. Jackson (1931)

Date: Mar 10, 1931
Control as the Determining Factor in Master-Servant Relationships: Insights from Kisner v. Jackson (1931) Introduction Kisner v. Jackson, decided by the Supreme Court of Mississippi, Division A, on...
Slander Limitations: W.T. Farley, Inc. v. Bufkin Establishes Boundaries of Actionable Per Se Defamation

Slander Limitations: W.T. Farley, Inc. v. Bufkin Establishes Boundaries of Actionable Per Se Defamation

Date: Feb 17, 1931
Slander Limitations: W.T. Farley, Inc. v. Bufkin Establishes Boundaries of Actionable Per Se Defamation Introduction W.T. Farley, Inc., et al. v. Bufkin, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Due Process in Parental Custody Cases: Sinquefield v. Valentine (159 Miss. 144)

Due Process in Parental Custody Cases: Sinquefield v. Valentine (159 Miss. 144)

Date: Jan 27, 1931
Due Process in Parental Custody Cases: Sinquefield v. Valentine (159 Miss. 144) Introduction The case of Sinquefield v. Valentine (159 Miss. 144), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Mississippi,...
Substantial Testimony and Reasonable Damages in Negligence Cases: Insights from S.H. Kress Co. v. Sharp

Substantial Testimony and Reasonable Damages in Negligence Cases: Insights from S.H. Kress Co. v. Sharp

Date: Mar 18, 1930
Substantial Testimony and Reasonable Damages in Negligence Cases: Insights from S.H. Kress Co. v. Sharp Introduction S.H. Kress Co. v. Sharp is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Establishing Employer Liability for Unsecured Workplace Equipment: Nelms Blum Co. v. Fink (1930)

Establishing Employer Liability for Unsecured Workplace Equipment: Nelms Blum Co. v. Fink (1930)

Date: Jan 13, 1930
Establishing Employer Liability for Unsecured Workplace Equipment: Nelms Blum Co. v. Fink (1930) Introduction Nelms Blum Co. v. Fink is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Mississippi in...
Fisher v. State (1926): Strengthening Protections Against Involuntary Confessions and Ensuring Fair Trials

Fisher v. State (1926): Strengthening Protections Against Involuntary Confessions and Ensuring Fair Trials

Date: Nov 16, 1926
Fisher v. State (1926): Strengthening Protections Against Involuntary Confessions and Ensuring Fair Trials Introduction Fisher v. State, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Mississippi on November...
Previous
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert