Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Mississippi Case Commentaries

Establishing Causal Connection in Workmen’s Compensation: Ingalls Shipbuilding Corp. v. Howell

Establishing Causal Connection in Workmen’s Compensation: Ingalls Shipbuilding Corp. v. Howell

Date: Oct 19, 1954
Establishing Causal Connection in Workmen’s Compensation: Ingalls Shipbuilding Corp. v. Howell Introduction Ingalls Shipbuilding Corporation, et al. v. Howell is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme...
Burden of Proof in Workmen's Compensation Cases: Analysis of Smith v. St. Catherine Gravel Co.

Burden of Proof in Workmen's Compensation Cases: Analysis of Smith v. St. Catherine Gravel Co.

Date: Mar 23, 1954
Burden of Proof in Workmen's Compensation Cases: Analysis of Smith v. St. Catherine Gravel Co. Introduction The case of Smith, et al. v. St. Catherine Gravel Co., et al. (220 Miss. 462; 1954) was...
Expanding the Scope of Workmen's Compensation: Insights from Cowart v. Pearl River Tung Co.

Expanding the Scope of Workmen's Compensation: Insights from Cowart v. Pearl River Tung Co.

Date: Oct 20, 1953
Expanding the Scope of Workmen's Compensation: Insights from Cowart v. Pearl River Tung Co. Introduction Case: Cowart v. Pearl River Tung Co., et al. (218 Miss. 472) Court: Supreme Court of...
Defamation in Political Context: Clarifying 'Reflection on Integrity' in Libel Cases

Defamation in Political Context: Clarifying 'Reflection on Integrity' in Libel Cases

Date: Feb 24, 1953
Defamation in Political Context: Clarifying 'Reflection on Integrity' in Libel Cases Introduction Manasco v. Walley, 216 Miss. 614 (1953), is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Mississippi Supreme Court Validates Coverage for Putative Widows and Illegitimate Dependents in Workmen's Compensation Law

Mississippi Supreme Court Validates Coverage for Putative Widows and Illegitimate Dependents in Workmen's Compensation Law

Date: Jan 27, 1953
Mississippi Supreme Court Validates Coverage for Putative Widows and Illegitimate Dependents in Workmen's Compensation Law Introduction The landmark case of Pathfinder Coach Division of Superior...
Defining Employee Status under Workmen's Compensation: Insights from Sones v. Southern Lumber Company

Defining Employee Status under Workmen's Compensation: Insights from Sones v. Southern Lumber Company

Date: Oct 14, 1952
Defining Employee Status under Workmen's Compensation: Insights from Sones v. Southern Lumber Company Introduction The case of Sones v. Southern Lumber Company, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Strict Compliance Required for Valid School Bond Elections: Insights from Tedder v. Board of Supervisors of Bolivar County

Strict Compliance Required for Valid School Bond Elections: Insights from Tedder v. Board of Supervisors of Bolivar County

Date: Jun 10, 1952
Strict Compliance Required for Valid School Bond Elections: Insights from Tedder v. Board of Supervisors of Bolivar County Introduction Tedder, et al. v. Board of Supervisors of Bolivar County is a...
Negligence Standards and Jury Instructions: A Comprehensive Analysis of BELK v. ROSAMOND

Negligence Standards and Jury Instructions: A Comprehensive Analysis of BELK v. ROSAMOND

Date: Mar 18, 1952
Negligence Standards and Jury Instructions: A Comprehensive Analysis of BELK v. ROSAMOND Introduction Belk, et al. v. Rosamond, et al., 213 Miss. 633 (1952), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Dependent Parenthood in Workmen's Compensation: Deemer Lumber Co. v. Hamilton

Dependent Parenthood in Workmen's Compensation: Deemer Lumber Co. v. Hamilton

Date: May 15, 1951
Dependent Parenthood in Workmen's Compensation: Deemer Lumber Co. v. Hamilton Introduction Deemer Lumber Co., et al. v. Hamilton is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Mississippi in 1951....
Comprehensive Interpretation of Hernia Claims under Workers' Compensation: LUCEDALE VENEER CO. v. ROGERS

Comprehensive Interpretation of Hernia Claims under Workers' Compensation: LUCEDALE VENEER CO. v. ROGERS

Date: Oct 24, 1950
Comprehensive Interpretation of Hernia Claims under Workers' Compensation: LUCEDALE VENEER CO. v. ROGERS Introduction The case of LUCEDALE VENEER CO. v. ROGERS (211 Miss. 613), adjudicated by the...
Mandatory Election Requirements for School District Bond Issuance: Insights from In re Savannah Special Consolidated School District of Pearl River County

Mandatory Election Requirements for School District Bond Issuance: Insights from In re Savannah Special Consolidated School District of Pearl River County

Date: Feb 28, 1950
Mandatory Election Requirements for School District Bond Issuance: Insights from In re Savannah Special Consolidated School District of Pearl River County Introduction The case of In re Savannah...
Proper Allocation of Burden of Proof in Estate Administration: Reedy v. Alexander (1947)

Proper Allocation of Burden of Proof in Estate Administration: Reedy v. Alexander (1947)

Date: Sep 23, 1947
Proper Allocation of Burden of Proof in Estate Administration: Reedy v. Alexander (1947) Introduction Reedy et al. v. Alexander is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of Mississippi's...
Affirmation of Fee Simple Interest in Mineral Deeds: Insights from KOENIG v. CALCOTE et ux.

Affirmation of Fee Simple Interest in Mineral Deeds: Insights from KOENIG v. CALCOTE et ux.

Date: Apr 23, 1946
Affirmation of Fee Simple Interest in Mineral Deeds: Insights from KOENIG v. CALCOTE et ux. Introduction The case of KOENIG v. CALCOTE et ux., decided by the Supreme Court of Mississippi on April 22,...
CROWELL v. STATE: Proper Jury Instructions and Sentencing for Receiving Stolen Goods

CROWELL v. STATE: Proper Jury Instructions and Sentencing for Receiving Stolen Goods

Date: Nov 9, 1943
CROWELL v. STATE: Proper Jury Instructions and Sentencing for Receiving Stolen Goods Introduction CROWELL v. STATE is a landmark 1943 decision by the Supreme Court of Mississippi that addresses...
Termination of Duty and Proximate Cause in Common Carrier Liability: Insights from MISSISSIPPI CITY LINES, INC. v. BULLOCK

Termination of Duty and Proximate Cause in Common Carrier Liability: Insights from MISSISSIPPI CITY LINES, INC. v. BULLOCK

Date: Apr 13, 1943
Termination of Duty and Proximate Cause in Common Carrier Liability: Insights from MISSISSIPPI CITY LINES, INC. v. BULLOCK Introduction The landmark case of Mississippi City Lines, Inc. v. Bullock et...
Resulting Trust in Joint Adventures: SAMPLE et al. v. ROMINE, 193 Miss. 706 (1942)

Resulting Trust in Joint Adventures: SAMPLE et al. v. ROMINE, 193 Miss. 706 (1942)

Date: Sep 22, 1942
Resulting Trust in Joint Adventures: SAMPLE et al. v. ROMINE, 193 Miss. 706 (1942) Introduction SAMPLE et al. v. ROMINE is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Mississippi in 1942. The...
Mississippi State Highway Commission v. Hillman et al.: Defining Damages Measurement in Eminent Domain

Mississippi State Highway Commission v. Hillman et al.: Defining Damages Measurement in Eminent Domain

Date: Nov 12, 1940
Mississippi State Highway Commission v. Hillman et al.: Defining Damages Measurement in Eminent Domain Introduction In the landmark case of Mississippi State Highway Commission v. Hillman et al. (189...
Faulkner v. Middleton: Affirming Employer Liability and Setting Standards for Damages in Occupational Injury

Faulkner v. Middleton: Affirming Employer Liability and Setting Standards for Damages in Occupational Injury

Date: May 16, 1939
Faulkner v. Middleton: Affirming Employer Liability and Setting Standards for Damages in Occupational Injury Introduction Faulkner et al. v. Middleton, decided on May 15, 1939, by the Supreme Court...
Causation in Negligence: Establishing Liability Without Mere Possibility - Kramer Service, Inc. v. Wilkins

Causation in Negligence: Establishing Liability Without Mere Possibility - Kramer Service, Inc. v. Wilkins

Date: Feb 21, 1939
Causation in Negligence: Establishing Liability Without Mere Possibility Introduction Kramer Service, Inc. v. Wilkins is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Mississippi in 1939. The...
Interpreting Defamatory Statements in Employment Contexts: Taylor v. Standard Oil Co.

Interpreting Defamatory Statements in Employment Contexts: Taylor v. Standard Oil Co.

Date: Feb 7, 1939
Interpreting Defamatory Statements in Employment Contexts: Taylor v. Standard Oil Co. Introduction Taylor v. Standard Oil Co. is a landmark 1939 decision by the Supreme Court of Mississippi that...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert