Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Mississippi Case Commentaries

Reynolds v. State of Mississippi: Upholding Plea Validity and Effective Counsel Standards

Reynolds v. State of Mississippi: Upholding Plea Validity and Effective Counsel Standards

Date: Mar 10, 1988
Reynolds v. State of Mississippi: Upholding Plea Validity and Effective Counsel Standards Introduction Leroy M. Reynolds v. State of Mississippi, 521 So.2d 914 (Miss. 1988), is a pivotal case...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Premises Liability Case: Proximate Cause Not Established

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Premises Liability Case: Proximate Cause Not Established

Date: Feb 18, 1988
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Premises Liability Case: Proximate Cause Not Established Introduction The case of Mabeline Grisham v. John Q. Long V.F.W. Post, No. 4057, Inc. delves into issues...
Affirmation of Fondling Conviction: Robert Milford CrenSHAW v. STATE of Mississippi

Affirmation of Fondling Conviction: Robert Milford CrenSHAW v. STATE of Mississippi

Date: Feb 11, 1988
Affirmation of Fondling Conviction: Robert Milford CrenSHAW v. STATE of Mississippi Introduction The case of Robert Milford CrenSHAW v. STATE of Mississippi (520 So. 2d 131), adjudicated by the...
LOCKETT v. STATE of Mississippi: Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction

LOCKETT v. STATE of Mississippi: Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction

Date: Jan 14, 1988
LOCKETT v. STATE of Mississippi: Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction Introduction LOCKETT v. STATE of Mississippi is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Mississippi, rendered on January...
Representative Jury and Equal Protection in LOCKETT v. STATE of Mississippi

Representative Jury and Equal Protection in LOCKETT v. STATE of Mississippi

Date: Jan 14, 1988
Representative Jury and Equal Protection in LOCKETT v. STATE of Mississippi Introduction Carl Daniel LOCKETT v. STATE of Mississippi, 517 So.2d 1346 (Miss. 1988), is a pivotal case in Mississippi's...
WEST v. STATE of Mississippi: Judicial Impartiality and Right to a Fair Trial Reinforced

WEST v. STATE of Mississippi: Judicial Impartiality and Right to a Fair Trial Reinforced

Date: Jan 14, 1988
WEST v. STATE of Mississippi: Judicial Impartiality and Right to a Fair Trial Reinforced Introduction Samuel Tony West, a/k/a Tony Wells WEST v. STATE of Mississippi (519 So. 2d 418) is a pivotal...
Enhanced Standards for Impeachment Evidence: Henry Peterson v. State of Mississippi

Enhanced Standards for Impeachment Evidence: Henry Peterson v. State of Mississippi

Date: Dec 17, 1987
Enhanced Standards for Impeachment Evidence: Henry Peterson v. State of Mississippi Introduction Henry Peterson a/k/a Nene v. State of Mississippi, 518 So. 2d 632 (Supreme Court of Mississippi,...
Mandating Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law under Mississippi Rule 52(a): Insights from Tricon Metals Services, Inc. v. Jim Topp

Mandating Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law under Mississippi Rule 52(a): Insights from Tricon Metals Services, Inc. v. Jim Topp

Date: Dec 10, 1987
Mandating Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law under Mississippi Rule 52(a): Insights from Tricon Metals Services, Inc. v. Jim Topp Introduction Tricon Metals Services, Inc. v. Jim Topp, 516 So....
Galloway v. Travelers Insurance: Establishing the Business Purpose Exception to Usury Laws

Galloway v. Travelers Insurance: Establishing the Business Purpose Exception to Usury Laws

Date: Dec 3, 1987
Galloway v. Travelers Insurance: Establishing the Business Purpose Exception to Usury Laws Introduction Galloway and Lake George Plantation, Inc. v. Travelers Insurance Company is a landmark case...
Clarifying Undue Influence and Mental Competence Standards: Mullins v. Ratcliff

Clarifying Undue Influence and Mental Competence Standards: Mullins v. Ratcliff

Date: Nov 26, 1987
Clarifying Undue Influence and Mental Competence Standards: Mullins v. Ratcliff Introduction The case of A. Dee Lewis Mullins, et al. v. Mary Ratcliff, et al. examined complex issues surrounding...
Capital Murder Statute Validated: Rejection of the Merger Doctrine in Felonious Child Abuse

Capital Murder Statute Validated: Rejection of the Merger Doctrine in Felonious Child Abuse

Date: Nov 13, 1987
Capital Murder Statute Validated: Rejection of the Merger Doctrine in Felonious Child Abuse Introduction Lazaro Faraga v. State of Mississippi (514 So. 2d 295) represents a pivotal case adjudicated...
Preservation of Batson Challenges in Capital Cases Affirmed: Analysis of JONES v. STATE of Mississippi

Preservation of Batson Challenges in Capital Cases Affirmed: Analysis of JONES v. STATE of Mississippi

Date: Oct 1, 1987
Preservation of Batson Challenges in Capital Cases Affirmed: Analysis of JONES v. STATE of Mississippi Introduction In the landmark case of Gregory Montecarlo JONES v. STATE of Mississippi (517 So....
Reeves v. ANB Pump Truck Service: Establishing Grounds for Vacating Foreign Default Judgments Due to Extrinsic Fraud

Reeves v. ANB Pump Truck Service: Establishing Grounds for Vacating Foreign Default Judgments Due to Extrinsic Fraud

Date: Oct 1, 1987
Reeves v. ANB Pump Truck Service: Establishing Grounds for Vacating Foreign Default Judgments Due to Extrinsic Fraud Introduction The case of Reeves Royalty Company, Limited and D. Preston Reeves v....
Davis v. State of Mississippi: Ensuring Impartial Jury Selection and Admittance of Mitigating Evidence in Capital Cases

Davis v. State of Mississippi: Ensuring Impartial Jury Selection and Admittance of Mitigating Evidence in Capital Cases

Date: Sep 24, 1987
Davis v. State of Mississippi: Ensuring Impartial Jury Selection and Admittance of Mitigating Evidence in Capital Cases Introduction Danny Ray Davis v. State of Mississippi is a pivotal 1987 decision...
Authoritative Clarification on Management Contract Termination: UHS-Qualicare v. Gulf Coast Community Hospital

Authoritative Clarification on Management Contract Termination: UHS-Qualicare v. Gulf Coast Community Hospital

Date: Aug 20, 1987
Authoritative Clarification on Management Contract Termination: UHS-Qualicare v. Gulf Coast Community Hospital Introduction The case of UHS-Qualicare, Inc., et al. v. Gulf Coast Community Hospital,...
Confrontation Clause Violation Leads to Reversal of Death Sentence in Williamson Case

Confrontation Clause Violation Leads to Reversal of Death Sentence in Williamson Case

Date: Aug 13, 1987
Confrontation Clause Violation Leads to Reversal of Death Sentence in Williamson Case Introduction In the landmark case of Cecilia Ann Williamson v. State of Mississippi (512 So. 2d 868), the Supreme...
Separate Indictments for Murder and Rape Do Not Invoke Double Jeopardy: Comprehensive Affirmation in McFEE v. STATE

Separate Indictments for Murder and Rape Do Not Invoke Double Jeopardy: Comprehensive Affirmation in McFEE v. STATE

Date: Jul 23, 1987
Separate Indictments for Murder and Rape Do Not Invoke Double Jeopardy: Comprehensive Affirmation in McFEE v. STATE Introduction The case of David Michael McFEE v. STATE of Mississippi, adjudicated...
DETHLEFS v. BEAU MAISON DEVELOPMENT CORP.: Clarifying Easement Acquisition and Slander of Title

DETHLEFS v. BEAU MAISON DEVELOPMENT CORP.: Clarifying Easement Acquisition and Slander of Title

Date: Jul 16, 1987
DETHLEFS v. BEAU MAISON DEVELOPMENT CORP.: Clarifying Easement Acquisition and Slander of Title Introduction The case of Sylvia A.B. Dethlefs and Opal Brandenburg v. Beau Maison Development...
Enhancing Confrontation Rights: Foster v. State of Mississippi Establishes New Precedent

Enhancing Confrontation Rights: Foster v. State of Mississippi Establishes New Precedent

Date: May 28, 1987
Enhancing Confrontation Rights: Foster v. State of Mississippi Establishes New Precedent Introduction Foster v. State of Mississippi (508 So. 2d 1111) is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Employment At-Will Doctrine in Mississippi: Willis L. Perry v. Sears, Roebuck Co.

Affirmation of Employment At-Will Doctrine in Mississippi: Willis L. Perry v. Sears, Roebuck Co.

Date: May 28, 1987
Affirmation of Employment At-Will Doctrine in Mississippi: Willis L. Perry v. Sears, Roebuck Co. Introduction The case of Willis L. Perry v. Sears, Roebuck Co., decided by the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert