Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Mississippi Case Commentaries

Clarifying the Knowledge Standard for Capital Murder: Wheeler v. State of Mississippi

Clarifying the Knowledge Standard for Capital Murder: Wheeler v. State of Mississippi

Date: Dec 15, 1988
Clarifying the Knowledge Standard for Capital Murder: Wheeler v. State of Mississippi Introduction The case of Noah Wheeler v. State of Mississippi serves as a pivotal moment in Mississippi’s legal...
Strict Enforcement of Speedy Trial Rights: Patricia Vickery v. State of Mississippi

Strict Enforcement of Speedy Trial Rights: Patricia Vickery v. State of Mississippi

Date: Dec 1, 1988
Strict Enforcement of Speedy Trial Rights: Patricia Vickery v. State of Mississippi Introduction Patricia Vickery v. State of Mississippi is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Nixon v. State of Mississippi: Upholding Capital Murder Convictions and Sentencing

Nixon v. State of Mississippi: Upholding Capital Murder Convictions and Sentencing

Date: Dec 1, 1988
Nixon v. State of Mississippi: Upholding Capital Murder Convictions and Sentencing Introduction John B. Nixon, Sr. v. State of Mississippi is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Multi-Count Indictments and Death Penalty: Paul E. v. Woodward

Affirmation of Multi-Count Indictments and Death Penalty: Paul E. v. Woodward

Date: Nov 24, 1988
Affirmation of Multi-Count Indictments and Death Penalty: Paul E. v. Woodward Introduction In the landmark case of Paul E. v. Woodward (533 So.2d 418), the Supreme Court of Mississippi upheld the...
Mississippi Supreme Court Establishes Strict Evidentiary Standards for Capital Sentencing under § 99-19-101(7)

Mississippi Supreme Court Establishes Strict Evidentiary Standards for Capital Sentencing under § 99-19-101(7)

Date: Nov 17, 1988
Mississippi Supreme Court Establishes Strict Evidentiary Standards for Capital Sentencing under § 99-19-101(7) Introduction Willie Lee WHITE v. STATE of Mississippi, 532 So. 2d 1207 (Miss. 1988), is...
Improper Use of Psychiatric Evidence in Sentencing Phase Violates Sixth Amendment Rights: Johnny Rufus Lanier v. State of Mississippi

Improper Use of Psychiatric Evidence in Sentencing Phase Violates Sixth Amendment Rights: Johnny Rufus Lanier v. State of Mississippi

Date: Nov 3, 1988
Improper Use of Psychiatric Evidence in Sentencing Phase Violates Sixth Amendment Rights: Johnny Rufus Lanier v. State of Mississippi Introduction In Johnny Rufus Lanier v. State of Mississippi (533...
Application of the Sullivan Standard to Editorial Opinion in Defamation Cases

Application of the Sullivan Standard to Editorial Opinion in Defamation Cases

Date: Oct 6, 1988
Application of the Sullivan Standard to Editorial Opinion in Defamation Cases Introduction Sarah H. Johnson v. Delta-Democrat Publishing Company, 531 So.2d 811, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Admissibility of Prior Abuse Evidence and Discovery Violations in Capital Murder: Houston v. State of Mississippi

Admissibility of Prior Abuse Evidence and Discovery Violations in Capital Murder: Houston v. State of Mississippi

Date: Sep 8, 1988
Admissibility of Prior Abuse Evidence and Discovery Violations in Capital Murder: Houston v. State of Mississippi Introduction The case of Judy Lane Houston v. State of Mississippi addressed critical...
Davis v. State of Mississippi (1988): Comprehensive Analysis of Jury Instructions and Evidentiary Standards in Armed Robbery Cases

Davis v. State of Mississippi (1988): Comprehensive Analysis of Jury Instructions and Evidentiary Standards in Armed Robbery Cases

Date: Aug 18, 1988
Davis v. State of Mississippi (1988): Comprehensive Analysis of Jury Instructions and Evidentiary Standards in Armed Robbery Cases Introduction Davis v. State of Mississippi (530 So.2d 694) is a...
Restricting Punitive Damages in Insurance Bad Faith: Analysis of Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. Bristow

Restricting Punitive Damages in Insurance Bad Faith: Analysis of Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. Bristow

Date: Aug 11, 1988
Restricting Punitive Damages in Insurance Bad Faith: Analysis of Life Casualty Ins. Co. of Tennessee v. Bristow Introduction Life Casualty Insurance Company of Tennessee v. Henry Edward Bristow is a...
Reaffirming Due Process: Admissibility of Regulatory Safety Notices and Proper Jury Instructions in Product Liability Litigation

Reaffirming Due Process: Admissibility of Regulatory Safety Notices and Proper Jury Instructions in Product Liability Litigation

Date: Aug 11, 1988
Reaffirming Due Process: Admissibility of Regulatory Safety Notices and Proper Jury Instructions in Product Liability Litigation Introduction The case of Maranda Ann Whittley, a Minor, et al. v. City...
West Cole v. Mississippi: Upholding Procedural Defaults and Discovery Obligations in Capital Murder Trials

West Cole v. Mississippi: Upholding Procedural Defaults and Discovery Obligations in Capital Murder Trials

Date: Jun 4, 1988
West Cole v. Mississippi: Upholding Procedural Defaults and Discovery Obligations in Capital Murder Trials Introduction In West Cole v. State of Mississippi, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Post-Conviction Relief and the Right to Testify: Howard Monte v. Neale

Post-Conviction Relief and the Right to Testify: Howard Monte v. Neale

Date: Jun 4, 1988
Post-Conviction Relief and the Right to Testify: Howard Monte v. Neale Introduction Howard Monteville Neale v. State of Mississippi, 525 So. 2d 1279 (Miss. 1988), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Reevaluation of Death Penalty Culpability: Mississippi Supreme Court's Application of ENMUND v. FLORIDA in Crawford Bullock, Jr. Case

Reevaluation of Death Penalty Culpability: Mississippi Supreme Court's Application of ENMUND v. FLORIDA in Crawford Bullock, Jr. Case

Date: Jun 4, 1988
Reevaluation of Death Penalty Culpability: Mississippi Supreme Court's Application of ENMUND v. FLORIDA in Crawford Bullock, Jr. Case Introduction Crawford Bullock, Jr. v. State of Mississippi is a...
Severability of Search Warrants and the Exclusionary Rule: Insights from Charles E. Carney v. State

Severability of Search Warrants and the Exclusionary Rule: Insights from Charles E. Carney v. State

Date: Jun 4, 1988
Severability of Search Warrants and the Exclusionary Rule: Insights from Charles E. Carney v. State Introduction Charles E. Carney v. State of Mississippi is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Racial Neutrality in Peremptory Challenges and Due Process in Expert Assistance in Johnson v. Mississippi

Affirmation of Racial Neutrality in Peremptory Challenges and Due Process in Expert Assistance in Johnson v. Mississippi

Date: May 19, 1988
Affirmation of Racial Neutrality in Peremptory Challenges and Due Process in Expert Assistance in Johnson v. Mississippi Introduction Leon JOHNSON v. STATE of Mississippi is a pivotal case...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Insights from Frank Cabello, Sr. v. State of Mississippi

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Insights from Frank Cabello, Sr. v. State of Mississippi

Date: Apr 28, 1988
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Insights from Frank Cabello, Sr. v. State of Mississippi Introduction Frank Cabello, Sr. v. State of Mississippi, 524 So. 2d 313 (Miss. 1988), is a...
Affirmation of Fair Trial Standards Under the Voucher Rule in James Williams, Jr. v. State of Mississippi

Affirmation of Fair Trial Standards Under the Voucher Rule in James Williams, Jr. v. State of Mississippi

Date: Apr 14, 1988
Affirmation of Fair Trial Standards Under the Voucher Rule in James Williams, Jr. v. State of Mississippi Introduction James Williams, Jr. v. State of Mississippi, 522 So.2d 201 (Miss. 1988), is a...
Respondeat Superior and Control: Affirming Employer Liability Standards in Fruchter v. Lynch Oil Company

Respondeat Superior and Control: Affirming Employer Liability Standards in Fruchter v. Lynch Oil Company

Date: Apr 14, 1988
Respondeat Superior and Control: Affirming Employer Liability Standards in Fruchter v. Lynch Oil Company Introduction The case of Elaine G. Fruchter v. Lynch Oil Company is a pivotal personal injury...
Work Connection Requirement for Mental Disability in Workers' Compensation: Elza Fought v. Stuart C. Irby Co.

Work Connection Requirement for Mental Disability in Workers' Compensation: Elza Fought v. Stuart C. Irby Co.

Date: Apr 7, 1988
Work Connection Requirement for Mental Disability in Workers' Compensation: Elza Fought v. Stuart C. Irby Co. Introduction Elza Fought v. Stuart C. Irby Company, and Liberty Mutual Insurance Company...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert