Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Strict Interpretation of Postconviction Relief Exceptions: GASSLER v. STATE Establishes Mutual Exclusivity of Statutory Exceptions

Strict Interpretation of Postconviction Relief Exceptions: GASSLER v. STATE Establishes Mutual Exclusivity of Statutory Exceptions

Date: Sep 3, 2010
Strict Interpretation of Postconviction Relief Exceptions: GASSLER v. STATE Establishes Mutual Exclusivity of Statutory Exceptions Introduction The landmark case of Robert Daniel Gassler, Jr. v....
Aitken v. Minnesota Supreme Court: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Attorney Conduct and Cooperation in Disciplinary Proceedings

Aitken v. Minnesota Supreme Court: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Attorney Conduct and Cooperation in Disciplinary Proceedings

Date: Jul 30, 2010
Aitken v. Minnesota Supreme Court: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Attorney Conduct and Cooperation in Disciplinary Proceedings Introduction The case of In re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION...
Pro Rata Enforcement of Blanket Mechanic's Liens Under Minn. Stat. § 514.09

Pro Rata Enforcement of Blanket Mechanic's Liens Under Minn. Stat. § 514.09

Date: Jul 23, 2010
Pro Rata Enforcement of Blanket Mechanic's Liens Under Minn. Stat. § 514.09 Introduction Premier Bank, Appellant, v. Becker Development, LLC, et al. is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Reaffirmation of Franks Test Application and Circumstantial Evidence Standards in First-Degree Murder Appeals

Reaffirmation of Franks Test Application and Circumstantial Evidence Standards in First-Degree Murder Appeals

Date: Jul 1, 2010
Reaffirmation of Franks Test Application and Circumstantial Evidence Standards in First-Degree Murder Appeals Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Eugene Andersen (784 N.W.2d 320)...
State of Minnesota v. Prtine: Enhancing Juror Impartiality and Counsel Responsibilities

State of Minnesota v. Prtine: Enhancing Juror Impartiality and Counsel Responsibilities

Date: Jul 1, 2010
State of Minnesota v. Prtine: Enhancing Juror Impartiality and Counsel Responsibilities Introduction State of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Andy William Prtine, Appellant (784 N.W.2d 303) is a pivotal...
Establishing the Objective 'Reasonable Officer' Standard in Right to Counsel Invocations: Minnesota v. Chavarria-Cruz

Establishing the Objective 'Reasonable Officer' Standard in Right to Counsel Invocations: Minnesota v. Chavarria-Cruz

Date: Jul 1, 2010
Establishing the Objective 'Reasonable Officer' Standard in Right to Counsel Invocations: Minnesota v. Chavarria-Cruz Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Jose Miguel Chavarria-Cruz, the Supreme...
Affirmation of Consecutive Life Sentences in State v. Jenkins: A Comprehensive Legal Analysis

Affirmation of Consecutive Life Sentences in State v. Jenkins: A Comprehensive Legal Analysis

Date: May 21, 2010
Affirmation of Consecutive Life Sentences in State v. Jenkins: A Comprehensive Legal Analysis Introduction In the seminal case of State of Minnesota v. Philander Dermont Jenkins, 782 N.W.2d 211...
Impact of Mediated Settlement Agreements on Joint Tortfeasors: Insights from Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co.

Impact of Mediated Settlement Agreements on Joint Tortfeasors: Insights from Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co.

Date: May 14, 2010
Impact of Mediated Settlement Agreements on Joint Tortfeasors: Insights from Dykes v. Sukup Manufacturing Co. Introduction The case of Virgil Dykes and Connie Dykes d/b/a Dykes Farms vs. Sukup...
Establishing the Significance of First-Degree Domestic-Abuse Murder: Insights from STATE of Minnesota v. Zachery Otis MATTHEWS

Establishing the Significance of First-Degree Domestic-Abuse Murder: Insights from STATE of Minnesota v. Zachery Otis MATTHEWS

Date: Mar 19, 2010
Establishing the Significance of First-Degree Domestic-Abuse Murder: Insights from STATE of Minnesota v. Zachery Otis MATTHEWS Introduction STATE of Minnesota v. Zachery Otis MATTHEWS is a landmark...
Reaffirming Mandatory Insurance Coverage Limits in Dram Shop Laws: Ste v. n BRUA

Reaffirming Mandatory Insurance Coverage Limits in Dram Shop Laws: Ste v. n BRUA

Date: Feb 12, 2010
Reaffirming Mandatory Insurance Coverage Limits in Dram Shop Laws: Ste v. n BRUA Introduction In the landmark case of Ste v. n BRUA, et al., decided on February 11, 2010, by the Supreme Court of...
Minnesota Supreme Court Reinforces Standards for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas in Raleigh v. State

Minnesota Supreme Court Reinforces Standards for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas in Raleigh v. State

Date: Feb 5, 2010
Minnesota Supreme Court Reinforces Standards for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas in Raleigh v. State Introduction State of Minnesota v. Rashad Arthur Raleigh is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Affirmation of Aiding and Abetting Murder under Gang-Related Statutes in McDaniel v. State

Affirmation of Aiding and Abetting Murder under Gang-Related Statutes in McDaniel v. State

Date: Jan 22, 2010
Affirmation of Aiding and Abetting Murder under Gang-Related Statutes in McDaniel v. State 1. Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Jonard Brandon McDaniel (777 N.W.2d 739, 2010), the Supreme Court...
Affirmation of Circumstantial Evidence Sufficiency in Burglary Convictions: An Analysis of STATE v. Stein

Affirmation of Circumstantial Evidence Sufficiency in Burglary Convictions: An Analysis of STATE v. Stein

Date: Jan 8, 2010
Affirmation of Circumstantial Evidence Sufficiency in Burglary Convictions: An Analysis of STATE v. Stein Introduction STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Jeffrey Brian Alphonse Stein, Appellant (776...
Clarifying the Treatment of Pension Benefits in Spousal Maintenance: LEE v. LEE Establishes New Precedents

Clarifying the Treatment of Pension Benefits in Spousal Maintenance: LEE v. LEE Establishes New Precedents

Date: Dec 4, 2009
Clarifying the Treatment of Pension Benefits in Spousal Maintenance: LEE v. LEE Establishes New Precedents Case: In re the Matter of Elaine Irene LEE, Appellant, v. Raymond Michael LEE, Respondent....
State of Minnesota v. Edwards: Affirming the Multiple-Victims Exception for Upward Sentencing Departures

State of Minnesota v. Edwards: Affirming the Multiple-Victims Exception for Upward Sentencing Departures

Date: Nov 20, 2009
State of Minnesota v. Edwards: Affirming the Multiple-Victims Exception for Upward Sentencing Departures Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Christopher Edwards (774 N.W.2d 596) addressed...
Admissibility of Gang Expert Testimony and Confrontation Clause in State v. Meng Vang

Admissibility of Gang Expert Testimony and Confrontation Clause in State v. Meng Vang

Date: Oct 30, 2009
Admissibility of Gang Expert Testimony and Confrontation Clause in State of Minnesota v. Meng Vang Introduction State of Minnesota v. Meng Vang (774 N.W.2d 566) is a significant judicial decision by...
Affirmation of Aiding and Abetting Under Gang Benefit Statute in State v. Charles Yang

Affirmation of Aiding and Abetting Under Gang Benefit Statute in State v. Charles Yang

Date: Oct 30, 2009
Affirmation of Aiding and Abetting Under Gang Benefit Statute in State of Minnesota v. Charles Yang Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Charles Yang (774 N.W.2d 539, Minnesota Supreme Court, 2009),...
Clarifying the Role of 'Particular Cruelty' as a Sentencing Aggravating Factor in Minnesota: Rourke v. State

Clarifying the Role of 'Particular Cruelty' as a Sentencing Aggravating Factor in Minnesota: Rourke v. State

Date: Oct 23, 2009
Clarifying the Role of 'Particular Cruelty' as a Sentencing Aggravating Factor in Minnesota: Rourke v. State Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Chad Allen Rourke (773 N.W.2d 913) presents...
State of Minnesota v. Fardan: Clarifying Jurisprudence on Miranda Waivers and Spreigl Evidence in Juvenile Felony Murder Cases

State of Minnesota v. Fardan: Clarifying Jurisprudence on Miranda Waivers and Spreigl Evidence in Juvenile Felony Murder Cases

Date: Oct 23, 2009
State of Minnesota v. Fardan: Clarifying Jurisprudence on Miranda Waivers and Spreigl Evidence in Juvenile Felony Murder Cases Introduction State of Minnesota v. Amani Jamalludin Fardan is a landmark...
Minnesota Supreme Court Affirms Life Without Possibility of Release Sentencing for Juvenile and Upholds Race-Neutral Jury Selection in Martin v. State

Minnesota Supreme Court Affirms Life Without Possibility of Release Sentencing for Juvenile and Upholds Race-Neutral Jury Selection in Martin v. State

Date: Oct 9, 2009
Minnesota Supreme Court Affirms Life Without Possibility of Release Sentencing for Juvenile and Upholds Race-Neutral Jury Selection in Martin v. State Introduction In the landmark case of State of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert