Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Establishing Evidentiary Hearing Standards for Newly Discovered Evidence in Postconviction Relief: Insights from De–Aunteze Lavion Bobo v. STATE of Minnesota

Establishing Evidentiary Hearing Standards for Newly Discovered Evidence in Postconviction Relief: Insights from De–Aunteze Lavion Bobo v. STATE of Minnesota

Date: Sep 20, 2012
Establishing Evidentiary Hearing Standards for Newly Discovered Evidence in Postconviction Relief: Insights from De–Aunteze Lavion Bobo v. STATE of Minnesota Introduction The case of De–Aunteze...
Reaffirming Time-Barriers and Evidentiary Standards in Postconviction Relief: RILEY v. STATE of Minnesota

Reaffirming Time-Barriers and Evidentiary Standards in Postconviction Relief: RILEY v. STATE of Minnesota

Date: Aug 16, 2012
Reaffirming Time-Barriers and Evidentiary Standards in Postconviction Relief: RILEY v. STATE of Minnesota Introduction Riley Dominic Riley, also known as Amiri Abdul Rasheed–El, a resident of Rush...
Interpretation of Standard Debt-Payment Clauses in Trust Agreements: Insights from In re Stisser Trust

Interpretation of Standard Debt-Payment Clauses in Trust Agreements: Insights from In re Stisser Trust

Date: Aug 2, 2012
Interpretation of Standard Debt-Payment Clauses in Trust Agreements: Insights from In re Stisser Trust Introduction The Supreme Court of Minnesota's decision in In the Matter of the Pamela Andreas...
Repressed and Recovered Memory Excluded Under Rule 702: Impact on Statute of Limitations in Minnesota Abuse Litigation

Repressed and Recovered Memory Excluded Under Rule 702: Impact on Statute of Limitations in Minnesota Abuse Litigation

Date: Jul 26, 2012
Repressed and Recovered Memory Excluded Under Rule 702: Impact on Statute of Limitations in Minnesota Abuse Litigation Introduction In the landmark case of John Doe 76C v. Archdiocese of Saint Paul...
Due Process Protections in Forfeiture-of-Counsel Hearings: Insights from State v. Krause

Due Process Protections in Forfeiture-of-Counsel Hearings: Insights from State v. Krause

Date: Jul 26, 2012
Due Process Protections in Forfeiture-of-Counsel Hearings: Insights from State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Arthur Krause Introduction State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Arthur Krause, 817 N.W.2d 136 (Minn....
Carlton v. State of Minnesota: Upholding Statutory Time Limits for Postconviction Relief

Carlton v. State of Minnesota: Upholding Statutory Time Limits for Postconviction Relief

Date: Jul 19, 2012
Carlton v. State of Minnesota: Upholding Statutory Time Limits for Postconviction Relief Introduction In Carlton v. State of Minnesota (816 N.W.2d 590, 2012), the Supreme Court of Minnesota addressed...
Supreme Court of Minnesota Affirms 2-Year Limitation on Postconviction Relief under Minn.Stat. § 590.01, subd. 4(c)

Supreme Court of Minnesota Affirms 2-Year Limitation on Postconviction Relief under Minn.Stat. § 590.01, subd. 4(c)

Date: Jul 19, 2012
Supreme Court of Minnesota Affirms 2-Year Limitation on Postconviction Relief under Minn.Stat. § 590.01, subd. 4(c) Introduction In the landmark case of Jorge Alberto Sanchez, a/k/a Jorge Alberto...
Public Trial Rights and Courtroom Procedures: Insights from State of Minnesota v. Brown

Public Trial Rights and Courtroom Procedures: Insights from State of Minnesota v. Brown

Date: Jul 4, 2012
Public Trial Rights and Courtroom Procedures: Insights from State of Minnesota v. Brown Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Jerrell Michael Brown (815 N.W.2d 609) adjudicated by the...
University’s Authority to Sanction Social Media Conduct in Professional Programs: TATRO v. UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA

University’s Authority to Sanction Social Media Conduct in Professional Programs: TATRO v. UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA

Date: Jun 21, 2012
University’s Authority to Sanction Social Media Conduct in Professional Programs: TATRO v. UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA Introduction The Supreme Court of Minnesota's decision in Amanda TATRO v. UNIVERSITY...
Expansion of Traffic Stop Justified by Reasonable Suspicion: State v. Smith

Expansion of Traffic Stop Justified by Reasonable Suspicion: State v. Smith

Date: Jun 7, 2012
Expansion of Traffic Stop Justified by Reasonable Suspicion: State v. Brandon Ryan Smith Introduction In the case of State of Minnesota v. Brandon Ryan Smith (814 N.W.2d 346, Supreme Court of...
Minnesota Supreme Court Affirms MPLA Protections Based on Stating Qualifying Reason Without Express Invocation

Minnesota Supreme Court Affirms MPLA Protections Based on Stating Qualifying Reason Without Express Invocation

Date: May 31, 2012
Minnesota Supreme Court Affirms MPLA Protections Based on Stating Qualifying Reason Without Express Invocation Introduction The case of Kim Hansen v. Robert Half International, Inc. (813 N.W.2d 906)...
State v. Beecroft: Affirming Medical Examiner Autonomy and Limiting Prosecutorial Interference

State v. Beecroft: Affirming Medical Examiner Autonomy and Limiting Prosecutorial Interference

Date: May 24, 2012
State v. Beecroft: Affirming Medical Examiner Autonomy and Limiting Prosecutorial Interference 1. Introduction State of Minnesota v. Nicole Marie Beecroft is a landmark 2012 decision by the Supreme...
Renewed Waiver of Counsel Required When Maximum Punishment Doubles: Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent

Renewed Waiver of Counsel Required When Maximum Punishment Doubles: Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent

Date: May 24, 2012
Renewed Waiver of Counsel Required When Maximum Punishment Doubles: Minnesota Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Denon Anthony Rhoads (813 N.W.2d 880,...
Enhanced Standards for Judicial Disqualification: Minnesota Supreme Court in State v. Pratt

Enhanced Standards for Judicial Disqualification: Minnesota Supreme Court in State v. Pratt

Date: May 24, 2012
Enhanced Standards for Judicial Disqualification: Minnesota Supreme Court in State v. Pratt Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Marlon Terrell Pratt, 813 N.W.2d 868 (Minn. 2012), the Minnesota...
Collateral Consequences Exception Upholds Termination of Parental Rights Despite Death of Child

Collateral Consequences Exception Upholds Termination of Parental Rights Despite Death of Child

Date: May 22, 2012
Collateral Consequences Exception Upholds Termination of Parental Rights Despite Death of Child Introduction In the appellate case In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. and A.M.,...
State of Minnesota v. Carridine: Affirmation of Batson Standards in Racial Peremptory Challenges

State of Minnesota v. Carridine: Affirmation of Batson Standards in Racial Peremptory Challenges

Date: May 10, 2012
State of Minnesota v. Carridine: Affirmation of Batson Standards in Racial Peremptory Challenges Introduction In the landmark case of State of Minnesota v. Chaun Dubae Carridine, the Supreme Court of...
Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud: Enforcing Proportionate Liability under Minn.Stat. § 604.02(1)

Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud: Enforcing Proportionate Liability under Minn.Stat. § 604.02(1)

Date: Apr 19, 2012
Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud: Enforcing Proportionate Liability under Minn.Stat. § 604.02(1) Introduction Alice Ann Staab filed a civil lawsuit against the Diocese of St. Cloud after sustaining...
Defining Reinitiation of Interrogation Upon Waiver of Counsel: Minnesota Supreme Court's Decision in STATE v. ORTEGA (2012)

Defining Reinitiation of Interrogation Upon Waiver of Counsel: Minnesota Supreme Court's Decision in STATE v. ORTEGA (2012)

Date: Apr 19, 2012
Defining Reinitiation of Interrogation Upon Waiver of Counsel: Minnesota Supreme Court's Decision in STATE v. ORTEGA (2012) Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Danny Ortega, Sr. (813...
Limitation on Employer Liability for Out-of-State Medical Providers Under Minnesota Workers' Compensation Law

Limitation on Employer Liability for Out-of-State Medical Providers Under Minnesota Workers' Compensation Law

Date: Apr 12, 2012
Limitation on Employer Liability for Out-of-State Medical Providers Under Minnesota Workers' Compensation Law Introduction In the landmark case of Andrea A. Schatz, Relator, v. Interfaith Care Center...
Affirmation of Limited Third-Party Visitation Rights: ROHMILLER v. HART

Affirmation of Limited Third-Party Visitation Rights: ROHMILLER v. HART

Date: Mar 1, 2012
Affirmation of Limited Third-Party Visitation Rights: ROHMILLER v. HART Introduction The case of Kelli Rohmiller, et al. v. Andrew Hart, et al., decided by the Supreme Court of Minnesota on February...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert