Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Affirming Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Postconviction Relief – STATE v. RAINER

Affirming Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Postconviction Relief – STATE v. RAINER

Date: Jul 17, 1993
Affirming Standards for Effective Assistance of Counsel in Postconviction Relief – STATE v. RAINER Introduction In the landmark case of STATE v. RAINER, decided on July 16, 1993, the Supreme Court of...
E.D.J. v. State: Upholding Minnesota's Traditional 'Seizure' Standard Over Hodari

E.D.J. v. State: Upholding Minnesota's Traditional 'Seizure' Standard Over Hodari

Date: Jul 10, 1993
E.D.J. v. State: Upholding Minnesota's Traditional 'Seizure' Standard Over Hodari Introduction In the Matter of the WELFARE OF E.D.J. (502 N.W.2d 779) is a pivotal decision by the Supreme Court of...
Enforceability of Territorially Unlimited Restrictive Covenants: Insights from Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Jon C. Bloch

Enforceability of Territorially Unlimited Restrictive Covenants: Insights from Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Jon C. Bloch

Date: Jul 7, 1993
Enforceability of Territorially Unlimited Restrictive Covenants: Insights from Dynamic Air, Inc. v. Jon C. Bloch Introduction The case of Dynamic Air, Inc., Appellant, v. Jon C. Bloch, et al. (502...
Mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheets in Municipal Licensing: Insights from Bolander v. City of Minneapolis

Mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheets in Municipal Licensing: Insights from Bolander v. City of Minneapolis

Date: Jul 3, 1993
Mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheets in Municipal Licensing: Insights from Bolander v. City of Minneapolis Introduction In the landmark case of Carl Bolander Sons Company v. City of...
Affirmation of Preponderance of the Evidence Standard in Minnesota Consumer Fraud Litigation: State v. Alpine Air Products, Inc.

Affirmation of Preponderance of the Evidence Standard in Minnesota Consumer Fraud Litigation: State v. Alpine Air Products, Inc.

Date: May 22, 1993
Affirmation of Preponderance of the Evidence Standard in Minnesota Consumer Fraud Litigation: State of Minnesota v. Alpine Air Products, Inc. Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Alpine Air...
Prosecutorial Misconduct in Closing Arguments: State v. Salitros

Prosecutorial Misconduct in Closing Arguments: State v. Salitros

Date: May 15, 1993
Prosecutorial Misconduct in Closing Arguments: State v. Salitros Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. John George Salitros (499 N.W.2d 815) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Minnesota on...
Establishing Corpus Delicti: Admissibility of Other-Crime Evidence in Criminal Sexual Conduct Cases – STATE of Minnesota v. Thomas Wermerskirchen

Establishing Corpus Delicti: Admissibility of Other-Crime Evidence in Criminal Sexual Conduct Cases – STATE of Minnesota v. Thomas Wermerskirchen

Date: Mar 13, 1993
Establishing Corpus Delicti: Admissibility of Other-Crime Evidence in Criminal Sexual Conduct Cases – STATE of Minnesota v. Thomas Wermerskirchen Introduction The case of STATE of Minnesota,...
Supreme Court of Minnesota Upholds Constitutionality of Long-Arm Statute §543.19 in Valspar Corp. v. Lukken Color Corp.

Supreme Court of Minnesota Upholds Constitutionality of Long-Arm Statute §543.19 in Valspar Corp. v. Lukken Color Corp.

Date: Mar 3, 1993
Supreme Court of Minnesota Upholds Constitutionality of Long-Arm Statute §543.19 in Valspar Corp. v. Lukken Color Corp. Introduction The case of Valspar Corporation v. Lukken Color Corporation (495...
Miranda Violations and Spreigl Exceptions: An In-Depth Analysis of State v. Walsh

Miranda Violations and Spreigl Exceptions: An In-Depth Analysis of State v. Walsh

Date: Feb 20, 1993
Miranda Violations and Spreigl Exceptions: An In-Depth Analysis of State of Minnesota v. Patrick Thomas Walsh Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Patrick Thomas Walsh (495 N.W.2d 602) is a...
Comprehensive Commentary on In re the Marriage of Thomas H. Bliss v. Mary G. Bliss

Comprehensive Commentary on In re the Marriage of Thomas H. Bliss v. Mary G. Bliss

Date: Feb 13, 1993
Reevaluation of Child Support and Spousal Maintenance Guidelines in In re the Marriage of Thomas H. Bliss v. Mary G. Bliss Introduction The case of In re the Marriage of Thomas H. Bliss, Petitioner,...
Equal Procedural Protections for Mentally Retarded and Mentally Ill Patients: Analysis of In the Matter of Lorraine Blilie

Equal Procedural Protections for Mentally Retarded and Mentally Ill Patients: Analysis of In the Matter of Lorraine Blilie

Date: Jan 23, 1993
Equal Procedural Protections for Mentally Retarded and Mentally Ill Patients: Analysis of In the Matter of Lorraine Blilie Introduction In the Matter of Lorraine Blilie, 494 N.W.2d 877 (Min. 1993),...
Official and Discretionary Immunity in High-Speed Police Pursuits: PLETAN v. GAINES

Official and Discretionary Immunity in High-Speed Police Pursuits: PLETAN v. GAINES

Date: Jan 1, 1993
Official and Discretionary Immunity in High-Speed Police Pursuits: PLETAN v. GAINES Introduction The case of Brian A. Pletan and Pamela J. Pletan, as Trustees for the heirs of Shawn L. Pletan,...
Affirmation of Defensive Rights and Judicial Discretion in Self-Representation: Minnesota v. Richards

Affirmation of Defensive Rights and Judicial Discretion in Self-Representation: Minnesota v. Richards

Date: Jan 1, 1993
Affirmation of Defensive Rights and Judicial Discretion in Self-Representation Minnesota v. Leonard Joseph Richards Introduction State of Minnesota v. Leonard Joseph Richards is a pivotal case...
Superseding Cause in Legal Malpractice: Insights from Norman WARTNICK v. MOSS BARNETT

Superseding Cause in Legal Malpractice: Insights from Norman WARTNICK v. MOSS BARNETT

Date: Dec 10, 1992
Superseding Cause in Legal Malpractice: Insights from Norman WARTNICK v. MOSS BARNETT Introduction The case of Norman WARTNICK v. MOSS BARNETT, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Minnesota on...
Termination of Parental Rights Established in R.T.B. Case

Termination of Parental Rights Established in R.T.B. Case

Date: Nov 11, 1992
Termination of Parental Rights Established in In the Matter of the Welfare of R.T.B. (492 N.W.2d 1) Introduction The case of In the Matter of the Welfare of R.T.B., Child. (492 N.W.2d 1) adjudicated...
Admissibility of Psychiatric Testimony in Mens Rea Determination: Minnesota v. Provost

Admissibility of Psychiatric Testimony in Mens Rea Determination: Minnesota v. Provost

Date: Oct 3, 1992
Admissibility of Psychiatric Testimony in Mens Rea Determination: Minnesota v. Provost Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Robert Provost, Jr., 490 N.W.2d 93 (1992), the Supreme Court of Minnesota...
Negligent Misrepresentation in Adoption Proceedings: Caritas Family Services v. M.H. and J.L.H.

Negligent Misrepresentation in Adoption Proceedings: Caritas Family Services v. M.H. and J.L.H.

Date: Aug 22, 1992
Negligent Misrepresentation in Adoption Proceedings: Caritas Family Services v. M.H. and J.L.H. Introduction In the landmark case of M.H. and J.L.H. v. Caritas Family Services, adjudicated by the...
Exclusive Use of Writ of Certiorari for Judicial Review of County Employment Terminations: DIETZ v. DODGE COUNTY

Exclusive Use of Writ of Certiorari for Judicial Review of County Employment Terminations: DIETZ v. DODGE COUNTY

Date: Aug 1, 1992
Exclusive Use of Writ of Certiorari for Judicial Review of County Employment Terminations: DIETZ v. DODGE COUNTY Introduction DIETZ v. DODGE COUNTY, 487 N.W.2d 237 (Mn. 1992), is a landmark case...
Indefinite Suspension with Minimum Term: Disciplinary Actions in Legal Practice

Indefinite Suspension with Minimum Term: Disciplinary Actions in Legal Practice

Date: Jun 20, 1992
Indefinite Suspension with Minimum Term: Disciplinary Actions in Legal Practice Introduction The case of In re Petition for DISCIPLINARY ACTION AGAINST Peter J. Ruffenach, III serves as a pivotal...
Reinforcing Progressive Discipline as a Contractual Obligation: FEGES v. PERKINS RESTAURANTS, INC.

Reinforcing Progressive Discipline as a Contractual Obligation: FEGES v. PERKINS RESTAURANTS, INC.

Date: Jun 17, 1992
Reinforcing Progressive Discipline as a Contractual Obligation: FEGES v. PERKINS RESTAURANTS, INC. Introduction Patricia Feges, a seasoned employee at Perkins Restaurants, Inc., initiated legal...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert