Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

Krosch v. State of Minnesota: Due Process and Evidentiary Obligations

Krosch v. State of Minnesota: Due Process and Evidentiary Obligations

Date: May 3, 2002
Krosch v. State of Minnesota: Due Process and Evidentiary Obligations Introduction State of Minnesota v. Andrew Joseph Krosch, 642 N.W.2d 713 (Mn. 2002), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
KAISER v. STATE of Minnesota: Classification of Predatory Offender Registration as a Collateral Consequence

KAISER v. STATE of Minnesota: Classification of Predatory Offender Registration as a Collateral Consequence

Date: Apr 19, 2002
KAISER v. STATE of Minnesota: Classification of Predatory Offender Registration as a Collateral Consequence Introduction KAISER v. STATE of Minnesota (641 N.W.2d 900, 2002) is a landmark decision by...
Proper Approval of Breath-Testing Instruments: James O. Jasper v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Proper Approval of Breath-Testing Instruments: James O. Jasper v. Commissioner of Public Safety

Date: Apr 19, 2002
Proper Approval of Breath-Testing Instruments: James O. Jasper v. Commissioner of Public Safety Introduction The case of James O. Jasper v. Commissioner of Public Safety (642 N.W.2d 435) adjudicated...
Interpretation of CGL Policy Exclusions for Third-Party Property Damage: Thommes v. Milwaukee Insurance Co.

Interpretation of CGL Policy Exclusions for Third-Party Property Damage: Thommes v. Milwaukee Insurance Co.

Date: Apr 19, 2002
Interpretation of CGL Policy Exclusions for Third-Party Property Damage: Thommes v. Milwaukee Insurance Co. Introduction Parties Involved: Respondent: John Thommes, individually and doing business as...
State of Minnesota v. Mark Arthur Ihle: Refined Interpretation of Obstructing Legal Process

State of Minnesota v. Mark Arthur Ihle: Refined Interpretation of Obstructing Legal Process

Date: Mar 29, 2002
State of Minnesota v. Mark Arthur Ihle: Refined Interpretation of Obstructing Legal Process Introduction In the landmark case of State of Minnesota v. Mark Arthur Ihle (640 N.W.2d 910, 2002), the...
Res Judicata Precludes ReLitigation of Insurance Coverage Defenses: Analysis of State of Minnesota v. Joseph (2001)

Res Judicata Precludes ReLitigation of Insurance Coverage Defenses: Analysis of State of Minnesota v. Joseph (2001)

Date: Dec 7, 2001
Res Judicata Precludes ReLitigation of Insurance Coverage Defenses: Analysis of State of Minnesota v. Joseph (2001) Introduction State of Minnesota v. Barbara Mae Joseph, et al. (636 N.W.2d 322,...
Affirmation of 60-Day Deadline for Conditional Use Permits under Minn. Stat. § 15.99

Affirmation of 60-Day Deadline for Conditional Use Permits under Minn. Stat. § 15.99

Date: Dec 7, 2001
Affirmation of 60-Day Deadline for Conditional Use Permits under Minn. Stat. § 15.99 Introduction The case of American Tower, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, Respondent, APT Minneapolis, Inc.,...
Clarifying Premises Liability: Duty of Care Beyond Special Relationships in Louis v. Louis

Clarifying Premises Liability: Duty of Care Beyond Special Relationships in Louis v. Louis

Date: Dec 7, 2001
Clarifying Premises Liability: Duty of Care Beyond Special Relationships in Louis v. Louis Introduction Steven Louis, et al., Respondents v. Robert Louis, Petitioner, Appellant is a pivotal case...
Biological Gender-Based Restroom Policies Held Not to Constitute Sexual Orientation Discrimination Under MHRA

Biological Gender-Based Restroom Policies Held Not to Constitute Sexual Orientation Discrimination Under MHRA

Date: Nov 30, 2001
Biological Gender-Based Restroom Policies Held Not to Constitute Sexual Orientation Discrimination Under MHRA Introduction In the landmark case Julienne GOINS v. WEST GROUP, 635 N.W.2d 717 (Minn....
Supreme Court of Minnesota Upholds Jurisdiction Despite Missed Time Frames in Domestic Abuse Protection Orders

Supreme Court of Minnesota Upholds Jurisdiction Despite Missed Time Frames in Domestic Abuse Protection Orders

Date: Aug 31, 2001
Supreme Court of Minnesota Upholds Jurisdiction Despite Missed Time Frames in Domestic Abuse Protection Orders Introduction The case of Linda Rae Burkstrand vs. Steven Glen Burkstrand (632 N.W.2d...
Admission of Spreigl Evidence and Plain Error Standard in Minnesota Supreme Court

Admission of Spreigl Evidence and Plain Error Standard in Minnesota Supreme Court

Date: Aug 31, 2001
Admission of Spreigl Evidence and Plain Error Standard in Minnesota Supreme Court Introduction The case State of Minnesota v. Edwin Olaf Vick, reported at 632 N.W.2d 676, was adjudicated by the...
No Duty to Protect Tenants from Third-Party Crimes: Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp.

No Duty to Protect Tenants from Third-Party Crimes: Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp.

Date: Aug 24, 2001
No Duty to Protect Tenants from Third-Party Crimes: Funchess v. Cecil Newman Corp. Introduction In the case of Janice Funchess, Trustee for the Heirs of J.W. Haynes, decedent, vs. Cecil Newman Corp.,...
Separation of Powers and Public Trial Rights in Courtroom Spectator Regulations: State v. Lindsey

Separation of Powers and Public Trial Rights in Courtroom Spectator Regulations: State v. Lindsey

Date: Aug 24, 2001
Separation of Powers and Public Trial Rights in Courtroom Spectator Regulations: State v. Lindsey Introduction State of Minnesota v. Charles Edward Lindsey, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
State of Minnesota v. Ture: Establishing Standards for Warrantless Vehicle Searches and Evidence Admissibility

State of Minnesota v. Ture: Establishing Standards for Warrantless Vehicle Searches and Evidence Admissibility

Date: Aug 17, 2001
State of Minnesota v. Ture: Establishing Standards for Warrantless Vehicle Searches and Evidence Admissibility Introduction State of Minnesota v. Joseph D. Ture is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
State of Minnesota v. McDonough: Upholding Conviction Amid Right to Counsel and Juror Strike Challenges

State of Minnesota v. McDonough: Upholding Conviction Amid Right to Counsel and Juror Strike Challenges

Date: Aug 3, 2001
State of Minnesota v. McDonough: Upholding Conviction Amid Right to Counsel and Juror Strike Challenges Introduction In State of Minnesota v. William Jeffrey McDonough, 631 N.W.2d 373 (2001), the...
Supreme Court of Minnesota Limits Vicarious Liability for Employee Trade Secret Misappropriation under UTSA

Supreme Court of Minnesota Limits Vicarious Liability for Employee Trade Secret Misappropriation under UTSA

Date: Aug 3, 2001
Supreme Court of Minnesota Limits Vicarious Liability for Employee Trade Secret Misappropriation under UTSA Introduction The case of Paul J. Hagen v. Burmeister Associates, Inc., American Agency Inc....
Comprehensive Commentary on State v. Burr Crowsbreast, III: Affirming Jury Instructions in Domestic Abuse Homicide Cases

Comprehensive Commentary on State v. Burr Crowsbreast, III: Affirming Jury Instructions in Domestic Abuse Homicide Cases

Date: Jul 13, 2001
Affirming Jury Instructions in Domestic Abuse Homicide Cases: Insights from State v. Burr Crowsbreast, III Introduction State of Minnesota v. Burr Crowsbreast, III, 629 N.W.2d 433 (Supreme Court of...
State v. Gillam: Precedents on Substitute Counsel and Defendant Conduct

State v. Gillam: Precedents on Substitute Counsel and Defendant Conduct

Date: Jul 13, 2001
State v. Gillam: Precedents on Substitute Counsel and Defendant Conduct Introduction State of Minnesota v. Rodney Dwight Gillam is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Minnesota on...
Defining 'Accident' in Insurance Coverage: Insights from American Family Insurance Co. v. Walser

Defining 'Accident' in Insurance Coverage: Insights from American Family Insurance Co. v. Walser

Date: Jul 6, 2001
Defining 'Accident' in Insurance Coverage: Insights from American Family Insurance Co. v. Walser Introduction In the landmark case of American Family Insurance Company v. Andy Walser et al. (628...
Promissory Estoppel as an Equitable Doctrine: Implications from Olson v. Synergistic Technologies

Promissory Estoppel as an Equitable Doctrine: Implications from Olson v. Synergistic Technologies

Date: Jun 29, 2001
Promissory Estoppel as an Equitable Doctrine: Implications from Olson v. Synergistic Technologies Introduction Judith M. Olson appealed a decision from the District Court of Hennepin County,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert