Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Minnesota Case Commentaries

State of Minnesota v. Vong Chomnarith: Upholding Premeditated Murder Conviction and Evidentiary Standards on Witness Identification

State of Minnesota v. Vong Chomnarith: Upholding Premeditated Murder Conviction and Evidentiary Standards on Witness Identification

Date: Jan 3, 2003
State of Minnesota v. Vong Chomnarith: Upholding Premeditated Murder Conviction and Evidentiary Standards on Witness Identification Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Vong Chomnarith, 654...
State v. Powers: Upholding Defendant Joinder and Trial Court’s Discretion in Criminal Proceedings

State v. Powers: Upholding Defendant Joinder and Trial Court’s Discretion in Criminal Proceedings

Date: Jan 3, 2003
State v. Powers: Upholding Defendant Joinder and Trial Court’s Discretion in Criminal Proceedings Introduction In the landmark case of State of Minnesota v. Vernon Neal Powers (654 N.W.2d 667), the...
Retroactive Application of 'No Duty to Retreat' in Home Self-Defense Affirmed in STATE v. BAIRD

Retroactive Application of 'No Duty to Retreat' in Home Self-Defense Affirmed in STATE v. BAIRD

Date: Dec 6, 2002
Retroactive Application of 'No Duty to Retreat' in Home Self-Defense Affirmed in STATE v. BAIRD Introduction State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Warren Baird, 654 N.W.2d 105 (2002), represents a...
Navarre v. South Washington County Schools: Clarifying MGDPA's Scope on Personnel Data Disclosure

Navarre v. South Washington County Schools: Clarifying MGDPA's Scope on Personnel Data Disclosure

Date: Oct 11, 2002
Navarre v. South Washington County Schools: Clarifying MGDPA's Scope on Personnel Data Disclosure Introduction The case of Katherine Navarre v. South Washington County Schools addresses critical...
Enhanced Protections Against Hearsay and Improper Evidentiary Rulings in Controlled Substance Cases: Analysis of State v. Litzau

Enhanced Protections Against Hearsay and Improper Evidentiary Rulings in Controlled Substance Cases: Analysis of State v. Litzau

Date: Aug 31, 2002
Enhanced Protections Against Hearsay and Improper Evidentiary Rulings in Controlled Substance Cases: Analysis of State v. Litzau Introduction State of Minnesota v. Kevin Richard Litzau, 650 N.W.2d...
Affirmation of State v. Robert Marlyn Taylor: Reinforcing Standards in Batson Challenges

Affirmation of State v. Robert Marlyn Taylor: Reinforcing Standards in Batson Challenges

Date: Aug 31, 2002
Affirmation of State of Minnesota v. Robert Marlyn Taylor: Reinforcing Standards in Batson Challenges Introduction State of Minnesota v. Robert Marlyn Taylor, 650 N.W.2d 190 (Minn. 2002), adjudicated...
Ensuring Fair Trials: Admissibility of Evidence and Jury Instructions in State v. Strommen

Ensuring Fair Trials: Admissibility of Evidence and Jury Instructions in State v. Strommen

Date: Aug 9, 2002
Ensuring Fair Trials: Admissibility of Evidence and Jury Instructions in State v. Strommen Introduction State of Minnesota v. Douglas Alan Strommen is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Clarifying 'Termination for Cause' in Employment Bonus Plans: Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.

Clarifying 'Termination for Cause' in Employment Bonus Plans: Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc.

Date: Aug 2, 2002
Clarifying 'Termination for Cause' in Employment Bonus Plans: Hilligoss v. Cargill, Inc. Introduction Hilligoss v. Cargill, Incorporated, et al., 649 N.W.2d 142 (Minn. 2002) is a significant judicial...
Reaffirming Landlord Liability: GRADJELICK v. HANCE Establishes Distinct Standards for Negligence Per Se and Ordinary Negligence

Reaffirming Landlord Liability: GRADJELICK v. HANCE Establishes Distinct Standards for Negligence Per Se and Ordinary Negligence

Date: Jun 28, 2002
Reaffirming Landlord Liability: GRADJELICK v. HANCE Establishes Distinct Standards for Negligence Per Se and Ordinary Negligence Introduction In GRADJELICK v. HANCE, 646 N.W.2d 225 (Minn. 2002), the...
Recognition of Marital Interest in Appreciation of Pre-Marital Properties: Application of Schmitz Formula

Recognition of Marital Interest in Appreciation of Pre-Marital Properties: Application of Schmitz Formula

Date: Jun 14, 2002
Recognition of Marital Interest in Appreciation of Pre-Marital Properties: Application of Schmitz Formula 1. Introduction The case of In Re the Marriage of Richard Dennis Antone vs. Debra Kay Antone...
Imputed Income and Voluntary Unemployment: Establishing Precedent in Ben-Yehuda v. County of Benton

Imputed Income and Voluntary Unemployment: Establishing Precedent in Ben-Yehuda v. County of Benton

Date: Jun 14, 2002
Imputed Income and Voluntary Unemployment: Establishing Precedent in Ben-Yehuda v. County of Benton Introduction The Supreme Court of Minnesota's decision in In Re: Paul Daniel Putz, n/k/a Paul...
Reinterpreting Employment Misconduct: Minnesota Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in Houston v. International Data Transfer Corp.

Reinterpreting Employment Misconduct: Minnesota Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in Houston v. International Data Transfer Corp.

Date: Jun 14, 2002
Reinterpreting Employment Misconduct: Minnesota Supreme Court's Landmark Decision in Houston v. International Data Transfer Corp. Introduction The case of Linda D. Houston v. International Data...
Revisiting Burglary: The Limits of Orders for Protection in Establishing First-Degree Burglary

Revisiting Burglary: The Limits of Orders for Protection in Establishing First-Degree Burglary

Date: Jun 14, 2002
Revisiting Burglary: The Limits of Orders for Protection in Establishing First-Degree Burglary Introduction State of Minnesota v. Peter Allen Colvin is a seminal case that scrutinizes the boundaries...
Minnesota Supreme Court Revises Larrison Test for Newly-Discovered Falsified Testimony in Ferguson v. State

Minnesota Supreme Court Revises Larrison Test for Newly-Discovered Falsified Testimony in Ferguson v. State

Date: Jun 14, 2002
Minnesota Supreme Court Revises Larrison Test for Newly-Discovered Falsified Testimony in Ferguson v. State Introduction In the landmark case of Alonzo Ferguson v. State of Minnesota, 645 N.W.2d 437...
Minnesota Supreme Court Rules Reasonable Suspicion Required for Narcotics-Dog Sniffs During Routine Traffic Stops

Minnesota Supreme Court Rules Reasonable Suspicion Required for Narcotics-Dog Sniffs During Routine Traffic Stops

Date: Jun 14, 2002
Minnesota Supreme Court Rules Reasonable Suspicion Required for Narcotics-Dog Sniffs During Routine Traffic Stops Introduction The case of State of Minnesota v. Rolan Wiegand et al., decided by the...
Precedent on Corroboration of Accomplice Testimony: State v. Pippitt

Precedent on Corroboration of Accomplice Testimony: State v. Pippitt

Date: Jun 14, 2002
Precedent on Corroboration of Accomplice Testimony: State v. Pippitt Introduction In State of Minnesota v. Brian Keith Pippitt, 645 N.W.2d 87 (2002), the Supreme Court of Minnesota addressed critical...
Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Substantial Evidence Standard in Environmental Impact Statement Decisions

Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Substantial Evidence Standard in Environmental Impact Statement Decisions

Date: May 24, 2002
Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Substantial Evidence Standard in Environmental Impact Statement Decisions Introduction In the landmark case of Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Minnesota...
Schmidgall v. FilmTec Corp: Affirmation on Employment Misconduct and Unemployment Benefits

Schmidgall v. FilmTec Corp: Affirmation on Employment Misconduct and Unemployment Benefits

Date: May 24, 2002
Schmidgall v. FilmTec Corp: Employment Misconduct and Unemployment Benefits Introduction Wanda J. Schmidgall was employed by FilmTec Corporation, a manufacturing company specializing in water...
Materiality of Undisclosed Information in Legal Representation: Minnesota's STAR Centers v. Faegre Benson Decision

Materiality of Undisclosed Information in Legal Representation: Minnesota's STAR Centers v. Faegre Benson Decision

Date: May 17, 2002
Materiality of Undisclosed Information in Legal Representation: Minnesota's STAR Centers v. Faegre Benson Decision Introduction The Supreme Court of Minnesota, in the landmark case STAR Centers, Inc....
Plea Agreements Insufficient for Sentencing Departures: Analysis of STATE v. MISQUADACE

Plea Agreements Insufficient for Sentencing Departures: Analysis of STATE v. MISQUADACE

Date: May 10, 2002
Plea Agreements Insufficient for Sentencing Departures: Analysis of State of Minnesota v. Keith Edward Misquadace Introduction State of Minnesota v. Keith Edward Misquadace, 644 N.W.2d 65 (Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert