Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Kansas Case Commentaries

Imposition of Consecutive Sentences Based on Defendant's Statements and Preservation of Objections: Analysis of State v. Green

Imposition of Consecutive Sentences Based on Defendant's Statements and Preservation of Objections: Analysis of State v. Green

Date: Mar 12, 2022
Imposition of Consecutive Sentences Based on Defendant's Statements and Preservation of Objections: Analysis of State of Kansas v. Dion Jamal Green. Introduction In the landmark case of State of...
Establishing Procedural Standards for Habeas Corpus Petitions under K.S.A. 60-1501: Denney v. Norwood

Establishing Procedural Standards for Habeas Corpus Petitions under K.S.A. 60-1501: Denney v. Norwood

Date: Mar 12, 2022
Establishing Procedural Standards for Habeas Corpus Petitions under K.S.A. 60-1501: Denney v. Norwood Introduction The Kansas Supreme Court's decision in Dale M.L. Denney v. Joe Norwood, 2022-03-11,...
STATE v. MITCHELL: Scope of Illegal Sentence Correction and Strictures on K.S.A. 60-1507 Motions in Kansas Law

STATE v. MITCHELL: Scope of Illegal Sentence Correction and Strictures on K.S.A. 60-1507 Motions in Kansas Law

Date: Mar 12, 2022
STATE v. MITCHELL: Scope of Illegal Sentence Correction and Strictures on K.S.A. 60-1507 Motions in Kansas Law Introduction State of Kansas v. Robert E. Mitchell is a pivotal judgment rendered by the...
Reaffirmation of Strickland Standards in Evaluating Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims in State v. Evans

Reaffirmation of Strickland Standards in Evaluating Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims in State v. Evans

Date: Feb 26, 2022
Reaffirmation of Strickland Standards in Evaluating Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims in State of Kansas v. Brandon T. Evans Introduction State of Kansas v. Brandon T. Evans is a pivotal case...
Kansas Supreme Court Sets Precedent on DUI Sentencing and Ex Post Facto Application in State v. Patton

Kansas Supreme Court Sets Precedent on DUI Sentencing and Ex Post Facto Application in State v. Patton

Date: Feb 12, 2022
Kansas Supreme Court Sets Precedent on DUI Sentencing and Ex Post Facto Application in State v. Patton Introduction State of Kansas v. Dwayne Lynn Patton (315 Kan. 1) is a landmark decision by the...
Admission of Autopsy Photographs and Prosecutorial Conduct: Insights from State v. Alfaro-Valleda

Admission of Autopsy Photographs and Prosecutorial Conduct: Insights from State v. Alfaro-Valleda

Date: Jan 8, 2022
Admission of Autopsy Photographs and Prosecutorial Conduct: Insights from State v. Alfaro-Valleda Introduction In the landmark case of State of Kansas v. Denis Antonio Alfaro-Valleda, the Supreme...
Clarification of Mental States in Felony Murder Under Kansas Law: State v. Rhoiney

Clarification of Mental States in Felony Murder Under Kansas Law: State v. Rhoiney

Date: Dec 31, 2021
Clarification of Mental States in Felony Murder Under Kansas Law: State v. Rhoiney Introduction In the landmark case of State of Kansas v. Andre Clark Rhoiney Jr., the Supreme Court of Kansas...
State of Kansas v. Michael J. Pearce Jr.: Affirmation of Felony Murder in Drug Distribution and Judicial Authority on Sentencing

State of Kansas v. Michael J. Pearce Jr.: Affirmation of Felony Murder in Drug Distribution and Judicial Authority on Sentencing

Date: Dec 18, 2021
State of Kansas v. Michael J. Pearce Jr.: Affirmation of Felony Murder in Drug Distribution and Judicial Authority on Sentencing Introduction In the landmark case State of Kansas v. Michael J. Pearce...
Kansas Supreme Court Establishes State Law as Governing Res Judicata, Overruling Stanfield and Rhoten

Kansas Supreme Court Establishes State Law as Governing Res Judicata, Overruling Stanfield and Rhoten

Date: Dec 18, 2021
Kansas Supreme Court Establishes State Law Res Judicata Standard, Overruling Stanfield and Rhoten Introduction In the landmark case Herington v. City of Wichita, the Supreme Court of Kansas addressed...
Burden of Proof in Criminal History Challenges on Direct Appeal: Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Precedent

Burden of Proof in Criminal History Challenges on Direct Appeal: Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Precedent

Date: Nov 20, 2021
Burden of Proof in Criminal History Challenges on Direct Appeal: Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Precedent Introduction In the landmark case of State of Kansas v. J'Mario D. Roberts, 498 P.3d 725...
Strengthening the Preservation Doctrine: Kansas Supreme Court in State of Kansas v. Janet M. Allen

Strengthening the Preservation Doctrine: Kansas Supreme Court in State of Kansas v. Janet M. Allen

Date: Nov 6, 2021
Strengthening the Preservation Doctrine: Kansas Supreme Court in State of Kansas v. Janet M. Allen Introduction State of Kansas v. Janet M. Allen is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Kansas Supreme Court Upholds Restitution Without Jury Trial: Implications and Analysis

Kansas Supreme Court Upholds Restitution Without Jury Trial: Implications and Analysis

Date: Oct 16, 2021
Kansas Supreme Court Upholds Restitution Without Jury Trial: Implications and Analysis Introduction The Kansas Supreme Court, in the case State of Kansas v. Robert James Robison III (2021), addressed...
State v. Owens: Affirmation of Felony Murder Conviction and Clarification of Hearsay Exceptions in Kansas Law

State v. Owens: Affirmation of Felony Murder Conviction and Clarification of Hearsay Exceptions in Kansas Law

Date: Oct 16, 2021
State v. Owens: Affirmation of Felony Murder Conviction and Clarification of Hearsay Exceptions in Kansas Law Introduction In the landmark case of State of Kansas v. Dane Owens, 496 P.3d 902 (2021),...
Restitution and the Right to a Jury Trial: Kansas Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent in State v. Arnett

Restitution and the Right to a Jury Trial: Kansas Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent in State v. Arnett

Date: Oct 16, 2021
Restitution and the Right to a Jury Trial: Kansas Supreme Court Establishes New Precedent in State of Kansas v. Taylor Arnett Introduction The State of Kansas v. Taylor Arnett case, adjudicated by...
STATE v. HILLard: Affirming the Necessity of a Clear Distribution Agreement in Conspiracy to Distribute Cases

STATE v. HILLard: Affirming the Necessity of a Clear Distribution Agreement in Conspiracy to Distribute Cases

Date: Jul 24, 2021
STATE v. HILLard: Affirming the Necessity of a Clear Distribution Agreement in Conspiracy to Distribute Cases Introduction In the landmark case of State of Kansas v. Heidi L. Hillard (491 P.3d 1223),...
Affirmed Standards for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas and the Role of Compulsion Defense in Felony Murder

Affirmed Standards for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas and the Role of Compulsion Defense in Felony Murder

Date: Jul 10, 2021
Affirmed Standards for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas and the Role of Compulsion Defense in Felony Murder Introduction State of Kansas v. Matthew Douglas Hutto, 490 P.3d 43 (2021), adjudicated by the...
Standing as a Jurisdictional Barrier in KORA Cases: An Analysis of Baker v. Hayden

Standing as a Jurisdictional Barrier in KORA Cases: An Analysis of Baker v. Hayden

Date: Jul 3, 2021
Standing as a Jurisdictional Barrier in KORA Cases: An Analysis of Baker v. Hayden Introduction The case of Linus Baker v. Calvin Hayden, et al. (490 P.3d 1164) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Kansas Supreme Court Upholds KSGA's Judicial Role in Criminal History Findings: STATE OF KANSAS v. ANITA JO ALBANO

Kansas Supreme Court Upholds KSGA's Judicial Role in Criminal History Findings: STATE OF KANSAS v. ANITA JO ALBANO

Date: May 29, 2021
Kansas Supreme Court Upholds KSGA's Judicial Role in Criminal History Findings: STATE OF KANSAS v. ANITA JO ALBANO Introduction The case of STATE OF KANSAS v. ANITA JO ALBANO, reported at 487 P.3d...
Reaffirming Appellate Jurisdiction for Illegal Sentences in Kansas: State v. Clark

Reaffirming Appellate Jurisdiction for Illegal Sentences in Kansas: State v. Clark

Date: May 15, 2021
Reaffirming Appellate Jurisdiction for Illegal Sentences in Kansas: State v. Clark Introduction State of Kansas v. Sidney W. Clark is a pivotal 2021 decision by the Kansas Supreme Court that...
Effective Assistance of Counsel: Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Rigorous Standards in Khalil-Alsalaami v. State

Effective Assistance of Counsel: Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Rigorous Standards in Khalil-Alsalaami v. State

Date: May 15, 2021
Effective Assistance of Counsel: Kansas Supreme Court Establishes Rigorous Standards in Khalil-Alsalaami v. State Introduction The case of Ziad K. Khalil-Alsalaami v. State of Kansas, decided by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert