Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Illinois Case Commentaries

Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Brownell: Procedural Safeguards in Capital Sentencing

Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Brownell: Procedural Safeguards in Capital Sentencing

Date: Mar 22, 1980
Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Brownell: Procedural Safeguards in Capital Sentencing Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. Curtis J. Brownell (79 Ill. 2d 508), adjudicated by the...
Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Born Alive Rule, Limits Murder Charges to Live-Born Individuals

Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Born Alive Rule, Limits Murder Charges to Live-Born Individuals

Date: Feb 23, 1980
Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Born Alive Rule, Limits Murder Charges to Live-Born Individuals Introduction The case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Alan Greer (79 Ill.2d 103) presents a...
Non-Stackable Uninsured Motorist Coverage: MENKE v. COUNTRY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.

Non-Stackable Uninsured Motorist Coverage: MENKE v. COUNTRY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO.

Date: Feb 23, 1980
Non-Stackable Uninsured Motorist Coverage: MENKE v. COUNTRY MUTUAL INSURANCE CO. Introduction Ervin Menke, Administrator and Appellant, filed a lawsuit against Country Mutual Insurance Company, the...
Knowledge Requirement in Strict Liability Failure-to-Warn Cases: An Analysis of WOODILL v. PARKE DAVIS CO.

Knowledge Requirement in Strict Liability Failure-to-Warn Cases: An Analysis of WOODILL v. PARKE DAVIS CO.

Date: Feb 23, 1980
Knowledge Requirement in Strict Liability Failure-to-Warn Cases: An Analysis of WOODILL v. PARKE DAVIS CO. Introduction The Supreme Court of Illinois, in the landmark case of Robert E. Woodill et al....
Limits on Admitting Collateral Crimes Evidence: PEOPLE v. LINDGREN

Limits on Admitting Collateral Crimes Evidence: PEOPLE v. LINDGREN

Date: Feb 23, 1980
Limits on Admitting Collateral Crimes Evidence: PEOPLE v. LINDGREN Introduction The People of the State of Illinois v. Charles Lindgren (79 Ill. 2d 129, 1980) represents a pivotal case in Illinois...
Constructive Trust and Tolling of the Statute of Limitations in Fiduciary Breach Cases: Analysis of The Chicago Park District v. Kenroy, Inc.

Constructive Trust and Tolling of the Statute of Limitations in Fiduciary Breach Cases: Analysis of The Chicago Park District v. Kenroy, Inc.

Date: Feb 2, 1980
Constructive Trust and Tolling of the Statute of Limitations in Fiduciary Breach Cases: Analysis of The Chicago Park District v. Kenroy, Inc. Introduction The Chicago Park District et al. v. Kenroy,...
Clarence E. Thomas v. The Levy Company: Scope of Arbitrator Authority in Workmen's Compensation Claims

Clarence E. Thomas v. The Levy Company: Scope of Arbitrator Authority in Workmen's Compensation Claims

Date: Jan 24, 1980
Clarence E. Thomas v. The Levy Company: Scope of Arbitrator Authority in Workmen's Compensation Claims Introduction The case of Clarence E. Thomas v. The Levy Company adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Judicial Commentary: Trial as Adult for Juvenile Offender & Jury Instruction on Attempted Murder

Judicial Commentary: Trial as Adult for Juvenile Offender & Jury Instruction on Attempted Murder

Date: Dec 21, 1979
Trial as Adult for Juvenile Offender & Jury Instruction on Attempted Murder: Analysis of THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS v. RONALD JONES (81 Ill. 2d 1) Introduction THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF...
Establishing Duty of Care for Housing Authorities and Independent Security Contractors: Commentary on Mollie PIPPIN v. CHICAGO HOUSING AUTHORITY

Establishing Duty of Care for Housing Authorities and Independent Security Contractors: Commentary on Mollie PIPPIN v. CHICAGO HOUSING AUTHORITY

Date: Dec 4, 1979
Establishing Duty of Care for Housing Authorities and Independent Security Contractors: Commentary on Mollie PIPPIN v. CHICAGO HOUSING AUTHORITY Introduction The case of Mollie Pippin, Adm'r,...
Prosecutorial Discretion in Capital Sentencing Upheld: Analysis of The People ex rel. Bernard Carey v. William Cousins, Jr.

Prosecutorial Discretion in Capital Sentencing Upheld: Analysis of The People ex rel. Bernard Carey v. William Cousins, Jr.

Date: Nov 22, 1979
Prosecutorial Discretion in Capital Sentencing Upheld: Analysis of The People ex rel. Bernard Carey v. William Cousins, Jr. Introduction In the landmark case of The People ex rel. Bernard Carey v....
Quantum Meruit for Attorney's Fees in Client's Timely Discharge: Insights from Rhoades v. Norfolk and Western Railway Company

Quantum Meruit for Attorney's Fees in Client's Timely Discharge: Insights from Rhoades v. Norfolk and Western Railway Company

Date: Oct 20, 1979
Quantum Meruit for Attorney's Fees in Client's Timely Discharge: Insights from Rhoades v. Norfolk and Western Railway Company Introduction The case of William D. Rhoades et al. v. Norfolk and Western...
Requirement of Malice or Lack of Justification in Tortious Interference: SWAGER v. COURI

Requirement of Malice or Lack of Justification in Tortious Interference: SWAGER v. COURI

Date: Oct 3, 1979
Requirement of Malice or Lack of Justification in Tortious Interference: SWAGER v. COURI Introduction The case of Eugene C. Swager et al. v. Peter J. Couri et al. (77 Ill. 2d 173), adjudicated by the...
Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Specialized Limitation Period for Medical Malpractice: Implications and Analysis

Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Specialized Limitation Period for Medical Malpractice: Implications and Analysis

Date: Oct 3, 1979
Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Specialized Limitation Period for Medical Malpractice: Implications and Analysis Introduction The Supreme Court of Illinois, in the landmark case Anderson et al. v....
Illinois Supreme Court Establishes Individual Representation Standards in Public Defender Offices

Illinois Supreme Court Establishes Individual Representation Standards in Public Defender Offices

Date: Oct 3, 1979
Illinois Supreme Court Establishes Individual Representation Standards in Public Defender Offices Introduction The Supreme Court of Illinois addressed critical questions regarding conflicts of...
Establishing Misdemeanor Theft as a Crime Involving Dishonesty for Impeachment Purposes: The People v. Lester Spates

Establishing Misdemeanor Theft as a Crime Involving Dishonesty for Impeachment Purposes: The People v. Lester Spates

Date: Oct 3, 1979
Establishing Misdemeanor Theft as a Crime Involving Dishonesty for Impeachment Purposes: The People v. Lester Spates Introduction The case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Lester Spates is a...
Reaffirmation of Evidence Sufficiency and Admissibility Standards in Homicide Prosecutions

Reaffirmation of Evidence Sufficiency and Admissibility Standards in Homicide Prosecutions

Date: Jun 30, 1979
Reaffirmation of Evidence Sufficiency and Admissibility Standards in Homicide Prosecutions Introduction The case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Sidney Foster (76 Ill. 2d 365) presents a...
Affirmation of Juvenile Transfer Statute Under Due Process Standards in Taylor v. People

Affirmation of Juvenile Transfer Statute Under Due Process Standards in Taylor v. People

Date: Jun 9, 1979
Affirmation of Juvenile Transfer Statute Under Due Process Standards in Taylor v. People Introduction Taylor v. People, 76 Ill. 2d 289 (1979), is a landmark case in Illinois law where the Supreme...
Establishing Judicial Recusal Standards: The Supreme Court of Illinois in People v. Vance

Establishing Judicial Recusal Standards: The Supreme Court of Illinois in People v. Vance

Date: May 25, 1979
Establishing Judicial Recusal Standards: The Supreme Court of Illinois in People v. Vance Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. Jeffrey Vance is a pivotal judicial decision rendered by the...
Defining Feasibility in Design Defect Liability and Restricting Post-Judgment Loan Agreements: Sanford KERNS v. ENGELKE

Defining Feasibility in Design Defect Liability and Restricting Post-Judgment Loan Agreements: Sanford KERNS v. ENGELKE

Date: May 25, 1979
Defining Feasibility in Design Defect Liability and Restricting Post-Judgment Loan Agreements: Sanford KERNS v. ENGELKE Introduction Sanford Kerns v. Gustav Engelke et al., decided by the Supreme...
Admissibility of Secondary Evidence and Prosecutorial Conduct in Criminal Trials: Insights from PEOPLE v. BAPTIST (1979)

Admissibility of Secondary Evidence and Prosecutorial Conduct in Criminal Trials: Insights from PEOPLE v. BAPTIST (1979)

Date: May 19, 1979
Admissibility of Secondary Evidence and Prosecutorial Conduct in Criminal Trials: Insights from PEOPLE v. BAPTIST (1979) Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. Elijah Baptist, 76 Ill. 2d 19...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert