Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Illinois Case Commentaries

Clarifying the Doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur in Medical Malpractice: KOLAKOWSKI v. VORIS et al.

Clarifying the Doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur in Medical Malpractice: KOLAKOWSKI v. VORIS et al.

Date: Dec 20, 1980
Clarifying the Doctrine of Res Ipsa Loquitur in Medical Malpractice: KOLAKOWSKI v. VORIS et al. Introduction In the landmark case of Edward Kolakowski et al. v. David C. Voris et al., decided by the...
Clarifying the Impeachment Rule for Prior Convictions: Warmack v. People of Illinois

Clarifying the Impeachment Rule for Prior Convictions: Warmack v. People of Illinois

Date: Dec 2, 1980
Clarifying the Impeachment Rule for Prior Convictions: Warmack v. People of Illinois Introduction The case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Glenn D. Warmack, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Defining "Dangerous Weapon" in Armed Robbery: Insights from PEOPLE v. SKELTON

Defining "Dangerous Weapon" in Armed Robbery: Insights from PEOPLE v. SKELTON

Date: Dec 2, 1980
Defining "Dangerous Weapon" in Armed Robbery: Insights from PEOPLE v. SKELTON Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Ricky Skelton, decided on December 1, 1980,...
Specificity in Post-Trial Motions: Insights from BROWN v. DECATUR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

Specificity in Post-Trial Motions: Insights from BROWN v. DECATUR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

Date: Dec 2, 1980
Specificity in Post-Trial Motions: Insights from BROWN v. DECATUR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL Introduction In Lawrence A. BROWN v. DECATUR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, 83 Ill. 2d 344 (1980), the Supreme Court of...
Mandatory Presentence Investigation Reports Upholding Judicial and Executive Functions: Analysis of THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS v. HENRY YOUNGBEY et al.

Mandatory Presentence Investigation Reports Upholding Judicial and Executive Functions: Analysis of THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS v. HENRY YOUNGBEY et al.

Date: Nov 19, 1980
Mandatory Presentence Investigation Reports Upholding Judicial and Executive Functions: Analysis of The People of the State of Illinois v. Henry Youngbey et al. Introduction The People of the State...
Affirmation of Voluntary Manslaughter Instructions in Self-Defense Homicides: People v. Jerome Lockett

Affirmation of Voluntary Manslaughter Instructions in Self-Defense Homicides: People v. Jerome Lockett

Date: Nov 19, 1980
Affirmation of Voluntary Manslaughter Instructions in Self-Defense Homicides: People v. Jerome Lockett Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. Jerome Lockett is a landmark decision by the...
Judicial Independence in Sentencing Appeals Confirmed in Cox v. Illinois

Judicial Independence in Sentencing Appeals Confirmed in Cox v. Illinois

Date: Oct 18, 1980
Judicial Independence in Sentencing Appeals Confirmed in Cox v. Illinois Introduction The People of the State of Illinois v. Craig Lee Cox et al., 82 Ill. 2d 268 (1980), represents a pivotal moment...
Expanding the State's Right to Appeal Pretrial Suppression Orders: Analysis of PEOPLE v. YOUNG

Expanding the State's Right to Appeal Pretrial Suppression Orders: Analysis of PEOPLE v. YOUNG

Date: Oct 18, 1980
Expanding the State's Right to Appeal Pretrial Suppression Orders: Analysis of PEOPLE v. YOUNG Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. Michael Young (82 Ill. 2d 234) is a landmark judgment by...
Community Involvement in Principal Selection: Interpretation of Section 34-8.2 in Maiter v. Chicago Board of Education

Community Involvement in Principal Selection: Interpretation of Section 34-8.2 in Maiter v. Chicago Board of Education

Date: Oct 18, 1980
Community Involvement in Principal Selection: Interpretation of Section 34-8.2 in Maiter et al. v. Chicago Board of Education Introduction The landmark case of Iris M. Maiter et al. v. Chicago Board...
Preclusion of Malicious Prosecution Claims through Compromise Agreements: Joiner v. Benton Community Bank

Preclusion of Malicious Prosecution Claims through Compromise Agreements: Joiner v. Benton Community Bank

Date: Sep 30, 1980
Preclusion of Malicious Prosecution Claims through Compromise Agreements: Joiner v. Benton Community Bank Introduction Joiner v. Benton Community Bank is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Admissibility of Extrajudicial Identification: Analysis of The People of Illinois v. Keith Douglas Rogers

Admissibility of Extrajudicial Identification: Analysis of The People of Illinois v. Keith Douglas Rogers

Date: Sep 30, 1980
Admissibility of Extrajudicial Identification: Analysis of The People of Illinois v. Keith Douglas Rogers Introduction The People of the State of Illinois v. Keith Douglas Rogers, 81 Ill. 2d 571...
Meeks v. Illinois: Upholding Sentencing Discretion and Presentence Report Compliance

Meeks v. Illinois: Upholding Sentencing Discretion and Presentence Report Compliance

Date: Sep 16, 1980
Meeks v. Illinois: Upholding Sentencing Discretion and Presentence Report Compliance Introduction Meeks v. Illinois (81 Ill. 2d 524, 1980) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Duty of School Districts to Provide Protective Equipment in School-Connected Activities: Lynch v. Board of Education of Collinsville

Duty of School Districts to Provide Protective Equipment in School-Connected Activities: Lynch v. Board of Education of Collinsville

Date: Sep 16, 1980
Duty of School Districts to Provide Protective Equipment in School-Connected Activities: Lynch v. Board of Education of Collinsville Introduction Lynch et al. v. The Board of Education of...
Exclusivity of Workmen's Compensation Act in Tort Claims: VERN COLLIER v. WAGNER CASTINGS COMPANY

Exclusivity of Workmen's Compensation Act in Tort Claims: VERN COLLIER v. WAGNER CASTINGS COMPANY

Date: Jun 21, 1980
Exclusivity of Workmen's Compensation Act in Tort Claims: VERN COLLIER et al. v. WAGNER CASTINGS COMPANY et al. Introduction In VERN COLLIER et al. v. WAGNER CASTINGS COMPANY et al. (81 Ill. 2d 229),...
Exigent Circumstances Justify Warrantless Home Entry for Felony Arrest: Analysis of The People v. William Abney

Exigent Circumstances Justify Warrantless Home Entry for Felony Arrest: Analysis of The People v. William Abney

Date: Jun 21, 1980
Exigent Circumstances Justify Warrantless Home Entry for Felony Arrest: Analysis of The People v. William Abney Introduction In The People of the State of Illinois v. William Abney (81 Ill. 2d 159,...
Establishing the "Submission Theory" in Real Estate Commission Disputes

Establishing the "Submission Theory" in Real Estate Commission Disputes

Date: Jun 21, 1980
Establishing the "Submission Theory" in Real Estate Commission Disputes Introduction The case of John G. Kokinis v. Edward Kotrich et al., decided by the Supreme Court of Illinois on June 20, 1980,...
Prohibiting Unilateral Pro Rata Reductions in Child Support Agreements: FINLEY v. FINLEY Analysis

Prohibiting Unilateral Pro Rata Reductions in Child Support Agreements: FINLEY v. FINLEY Analysis

Date: May 31, 1980
Prohibiting Unilateral Pro Rata Reductions in Child Support Agreements: FINLEY v. FINLEY Analysis Introduction The case of Ethel Finley v. Bill Finley (81 Ill. 2d 317) heard by the Supreme Court of...
Illinois Supreme Court Establishes Due Process Standards for Controlled Substances Penalties

Illinois Supreme Court Establishes Due Process Standards for Controlled Substances Penalties

Date: Apr 19, 1980
Illinois Supreme Court Establishes Due Process Standards for Controlled Substances Penalties Introduction In the landmark decision of THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS v. Rodney Bradley et al. (79...
Mitigating Factors in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of People v. Carlson

Mitigating Factors in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of People v. Carlson

Date: Apr 19, 1980
Mitigating Factors in Capital Sentencing: Analysis of People v. Carlson Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. Robert K. Carlson, Sr. is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Admissibility of Plea-Related Statements and Right to Counsel: Illinois Supreme Court in PEOPLE v. FRIEDMAN Establishes New Standards

Admissibility of Plea-Related Statements and Right to Counsel: Illinois Supreme Court in PEOPLE v. FRIEDMAN Establishes New Standards

Date: Mar 29, 1980
Admissibility of Plea-Related Statements and Right to Counsel: Illinois Supreme Court in PEOPLE v. FRIEDMAN Establishes New Standards Introduction In the landmark case of PEOPLE v. FRIEDMAN (79 Ill....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert