Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Illinois Case Commentaries

Affirming the Reliability of Single Eyewitness Identification and Neutron Activation Analysis in Criminal Convictions: People v. Johnson

Affirming the Reliability of Single Eyewitness Identification and Neutron Activation Analysis in Criminal Convictions: People v. Johnson

Date: Oct 18, 1986
Affirming the Reliability of Single Eyewitness Identification and Neutron Activation Analysis in Criminal Convictions: People v. Johnson Introduction The case of The People of the State of Illinois...
Due Diligence in Vacating Default Judgments: Insights from Smith v. Airoom, Inc.

Due Diligence in Vacating Default Judgments: Insights from Smith v. Airoom, Inc.

Date: Oct 18, 1986
Due Diligence in Vacating Default Judgments: Insights from Smith v. Airoom, Inc. Introduction Case: Wayne O. Smith et al. v. Airoom, Inc. (114 Ill. 2d 209) Court: Supreme Court of Illinois Date:...
Public Defender Rights and Jury Waiver in Capital Sentencing: An Analysis of People v. Hall, 114 Ill.2d 376 (1986)

Public Defender Rights and Jury Waiver in Capital Sentencing: An Analysis of People v. Hall, 114 Ill.2d 376 (1986)

Date: Oct 18, 1986
Public Defender Rights and Jury Waiver in Capital Sentencing: An Analysis of People v. Hall, 114 Ill.2d 376 (1986) Introduction People v. Anthony Hall is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court...
Strict Compliance Required for Substituted Service to Establish Personal Jurisdiction in Foreclosure Actions

Strict Compliance Required for Substituted Service to Establish Personal Jurisdiction in Foreclosure Actions

Date: Sep 18, 1986
Strict Compliance Required for Substituted Service to Establish Personal Jurisdiction in Foreclosure Actions Introduction The case of State Bank of Lake Zurich et al. v. Charles J. Thill, Jr., et al....
Sufficiency of Conditioned Insurance Coverage in Dramshop Liability Cases: Commentary on Charles Hester Enterprises v. Illinois Founders Insurance Company

Sufficiency of Conditioned Insurance Coverage in Dramshop Liability Cases: Commentary on Charles Hester Enterprises v. Illinois Founders Insurance Company

Date: Sep 18, 1986
Sufficiency of Conditioned Insurance Coverage in Dramshop Liability Cases Introduction The case of Charles Hester Enterprises, Inc., et al. v. Illinois Founders Insurance Company et al. (114 Ill. 2d...
Res Ipsa Loquitur and Comparative Negligence: Insights from DYBACK v. WEBER

Res Ipsa Loquitur and Comparative Negligence: Insights from DYBACK v. WEBER

Date: Sep 18, 1986
Res Ipsa Loquitur and Comparative Negligence: Insights from DYBACK v. WEBER Introduction Claudette Dyback v. Arthur J. Weber et al., 114 Ill. 2d 232 (1986), is a seminal case decided by the Supreme...
Limits on Aggravating Factors in Sentencing: Saldivar v. The People

Limits on Aggravating Factors in Sentencing: Saldivar v. The People

Date: Sep 18, 1986
Limits on Aggravating Factors in Sentencing: Saldivar v. The People Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Victor Saldivar (113 Ill. 2d 256, 1986), the Supreme...
Constitutional Validation of Illinois Public Act 84-7: A Comprehensive Analysis

Constitutional Validation of Illinois Public Act 84-7: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Jun 21, 1986
Constitutional Validation of Illinois Public Act 84-7: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction In the landmark case of Bernice Bernier v. Roland W. Burris, State Comptroller et al., the Supreme Court...
Clarifying Insanity Defense Standards: Admissibility of Miranda Responses and Expert Reliance on Psychiatric Records in People v. Anderson

Clarifying Insanity Defense Standards: Admissibility of Miranda Responses and Expert Reliance on Psychiatric Records in People v. Anderson

Date: Jun 21, 1986
Clarifying Insanity Defense Standards: Admissibility of Miranda Responses and Expert Reliance on Psychiatric Records in People v. Anderson Introduction People v. Clifford Anderson is a pivotal case...
Expansion of Duty of Care Beyond Privity: SCOTT FETZER CO. v. MONTGOMERY WARD Co.

Expansion of Duty of Care Beyond Privity: SCOTT FETZER CO. v. MONTGOMERY WARD Co.

Date: May 22, 1986
Expansion of Duty of Care Beyond Privity: SCOTT FETZER CO. v. MONTGOMERY WARD Co. Introduction In Scott Fetzer Company v. Montgomery Ward Company et al., the Supreme Court of Illinois addressed...
State-law Claims Not Preempted by the Federal Communications Act: S. Kellerman et al. v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.

State-law Claims Not Preempted by the Federal Communications Act: S. Kellerman et al. v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.

Date: May 22, 1986
State-law Claims Not Preempted by the Federal Communications Act: S. Kellerman et al. v. MCI Telecommunications Corp. Introduction In the landmark case S. Kellerman, et al. v. MCI Telecommunications...
Reaffirming the Primacy of Procedural Rules in Service of Process: Analysis of O'Connell v. St. Francis Hospital

Reaffirming the Primacy of Procedural Rules in Service of Process: Analysis of O'Connell v. St. Francis Hospital

Date: Apr 19, 1986
Reaffirming the Primacy of Procedural Rules in Service of Process: Analysis of O'Connell v. St. Francis Hospital Introduction The case of Thomas O'Connell v. St. Francis Hospital et al., adjudicated...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Circumstantial Evidence Context: People v. Perry Olinger

Affirmation of Death Sentence in Circumstantial Evidence Context: People v. Perry Olinger

Date: Apr 19, 1986
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Circumstantial Evidence Context: People v. Perry Olinger Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. Perry Olinger, 112 Ill. 2d 324 (1986), is a pivotal case...
Reaffirming the Economic Loss Doctrine: Punitive Damages Unavailable for Wilful Breaches of Contract in Illinois

Reaffirming the Economic Loss Doctrine: Punitive Damages Unavailable for Wilful Breaches of Contract in Illinois

Date: Apr 19, 1986
Reaffirming the Economic Loss Doctrine: Punitive Damages Unavailable for Wilful Breaches of Contract in Illinois Introduction Ronald E. Morrow et al. v. L.A. Goldschmidt Associates, Inc. et al. is a...
Affirmation of Death Penalty Procedure and Sentencing Standards in People v. Morgan

Affirmation of Death Penalty Procedure and Sentencing Standards in People v. Morgan

Date: Apr 19, 1986
Affirmation of Death Penalty Procedure and Sentencing Standards in People v. Morgan Introduction In the seminal case of People of the State of Illinois v. Samuel Morgan, 112 Ill. 2d 111 (1986), the...
Affirmation of Death Penalty Procedures in Ulece Montgomery Case

Affirmation of Death Penalty Procedures in Ulece Montgomery Case

Date: Apr 5, 1986
Affirmation of Death Penalty Procedures in Ulece Montgomery Case Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Ulece Montgomery, 112 Ill.2d 517 (1986), the Supreme Court...
Reaffirming Procedural Safeguards in Death Penalty Cases: Insights from People v. Edgar Hope, Jr.

Reaffirming Procedural Safeguards in Death Penalty Cases: Insights from People v. Edgar Hope, Jr.

Date: Feb 22, 1986
Reaffirming Procedural Safeguards in Death Penalty Cases: Insights from People v. Edgar Hope, Jr. Introduction People v. Edgar Hope, Jr., 116 Ill.2d 265 (1986), is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Balancing Treble and Punitive Damages: The Illinois Supreme Court's Ruling in Harris v. Manor Healthcare

Balancing Treble and Punitive Damages: The Illinois Supreme Court's Ruling in Harris v. Manor Healthcare

Date: Feb 22, 1986
Balancing Treble and Punitive Damages: The Illinois Supreme Court's Ruling in Harris v. Manor Healthcare Introduction In the landmark case Alma K. Harris v. Manor Healthcare Corporation, decided on...
Standard for Expert Witness Qualification in Medical Malpractice: Purtill v. Hess (1986)

Standard for Expert Witness Qualification in Medical Malpractice: Purtill v. Hess (1986)

Date: Feb 7, 1986
Standard for Expert Witness Qualification in Medical Malpractice: Purtill v. Hess (1986) Introduction Carol L. Purtill v. J.H. Hess et al. is a pivotal 1986 decision by the Supreme Court of Illinois...
Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Four-Year Repose Period in Medical Malpractice Cases

Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Four-Year Repose Period in Medical Malpractice Cases

Date: Feb 7, 1986
Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Four-Year Repose Period in Medical Malpractice Cases Introduction In the landmark decision of Dominic Mega, Appellee, v. Holy Cross Hospital, Appellant and Michael M....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert