Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Illinois Case Commentaries

Defining Coverage Triggers and Defense Obligations in Asbestos Litigation: Zurich v. Raymark Industries

Defining Coverage Triggers and Defense Obligations in Asbestos Litigation: Zurich v. Raymark Industries

Date: Sep 15, 1987
Defining Coverage Triggers and Defense Obligations in Asbestos Litigation: Zurich v. Raymark Industries Introduction The landmark case of Zurich Insurance Company et al., Appellants and...
Expanding the Definition of 'Home' for Warrantless Arrests: Insights from People v. Walter White

Expanding the Definition of 'Home' for Warrantless Arrests: Insights from People v. Walter White

Date: Aug 18, 1987
Expanding the Definition of 'Home' for Warrantless Arrests: Insights from People v. Walter White Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Walter White, 117 Ill. 2d...
Limiting the Learned Intermediary Doctrine: Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital et al. Analysis

Limiting the Learned Intermediary Doctrine: Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital et al. Analysis

Date: Jul 14, 1987
Limiting the Learned Intermediary Doctrine: Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital et al. Analysis Introduction Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital and Medical Center et al. (117 Ill. 2d 507) is a landmark case...
Employer Consent to Personal Activities Does Not Convert Personal Risks to Workers' Compensation Claims: ORSINI v. INDUSTRIAL COMmission

Employer Consent to Personal Activities Does Not Convert Personal Risks to Workers' Compensation Claims: ORSINI v. INDUSTRIAL COMmission

Date: Jun 11, 1987
Employer Consent to Personal Activities Does Not Convert Personal Risks to Workers' Compensation Claims: ORSINI v. INDUSTRIAL COMmission Introduction In the landmark case ORSINI v. INDUSTRIAL...
Affirmation of Probable Cause Standards in Warrantless Arrests: PEOPLE v. CABRERA

Affirmation of Probable Cause Standards in Warrantless Arrests: PEOPLE v. CABRERA

Date: Apr 17, 1987
Affirmation of Probable Cause Standards in Warrantless Arrests: PEOPLE v. CABRERA Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. William Cabrera (116 Ill. 2d 474, 1987) is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Silagy v. Illinois: Affirmation of Res Judicata and Limits on Post-Conviction Relief

Silagy v. Illinois: Affirmation of Res Judicata and Limits on Post-Conviction Relief

Date: Apr 17, 1987
Silagy v. Illinois: Affirmation of Res Judicata and Limits on Post-Conviction Relief Introduction Silagy v. Illinois is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Illinois on April 16, 1987....
Affirming Feticide and the Death Penalty: Insights from Shum v. The People of Illinois

Affirming Feticide and the Death Penalty: Insights from Shum v. The People of Illinois

Date: Apr 3, 1987
Affirming Feticide and the Death Penalty: Insights from Shum v. The People of Illinois Introduction In the landmark case THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, Appellee, v. KEITH SHUM, Appellant (117...
Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Confession Voluntariness in People v. Wilson

Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Confession Voluntariness in People v. Wilson

Date: Apr 3, 1987
Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard for Confession Voluntariness in People v. Wilson Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. Andrew Wilson (116 Ill. 2d 29, 1987) is a pivotal case adjudged...
Franks Hearing in Anonymous Informant Cases: Illinois Supreme Court Sets Precedent in Lucente v. The People

Franks Hearing in Anonymous Informant Cases: Illinois Supreme Court Sets Precedent in Lucente v. The People

Date: Feb 21, 1987
Franks Hearing in Anonymous Informant Cases: Illinois Supreme Court Sets Precedent in Lucente v. The People Introduction The case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Sam Lucente (116 Ill. 2d...
Affirmation of Capital Conviction and Rejection of Insanity Defense in State v. Christiansen

Affirmation of Capital Conviction and Rejection of Insanity Defense in State v. Christiansen

Date: Feb 21, 1987
Affirmation of Capital Conviction and Rejection of Insanity Defense in State v. Christiansen 1. Introduction The People of the State of Illinois v. Edgar Christiansen (116 Ill. 2d 96, 1987) is a...
Redefining "Accidental Injury" in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Peoria County Belwood Nursing Home v. Industrial Commission

Redefining "Accidental Injury" in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Peoria County Belwood Nursing Home v. Industrial Commission

Date: Feb 21, 1987
Redefining "Accidental Injury" in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Peoria County Belwood Nursing Home v. Industrial Commission Introduction The case of Peoria County Belwood Nursing Home v. The...
Admissibility of Uncorroborated Statements in Capital Sentencing: Illinois Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Admissibility of Uncorroborated Statements in Capital Sentencing: Illinois Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Date: Feb 21, 1987
Admissibility of Uncorroborated Statements in Capital Sentencing: Illinois Supreme Court Sets New Precedent Introduction In the landmark case People of the State of Illinois v. John E. Whitehead, 116...
Supreme Court of Illinois Establishes Enhanced Forum Non Conveniens Standard in Bland v. Norfolk and Western Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Illinois Establishes Enhanced Forum Non Conveniens Standard in Bland v. Norfolk and Western Railway Co.

Date: Feb 21, 1987
Supreme Court of Illinois Establishes Enhanced Forum Non Conveniens Standard in Bland v. Norfolk and Western Railway Co. Introduction Bland v. Norfolk and Western Railway Company is a landmark...
Duldulao v. St. Mary of Nazareth Hospital: Establishing Enforceable Contractual Rights Through Employee Handbooks

Duldulao v. St. Mary of Nazareth Hospital: Establishing Enforceable Contractual Rights Through Employee Handbooks

Date: Jan 31, 1987
Duldulao v. St. Mary of Nazareth Hospital: Establishing Enforceable Contractual Rights Through Employee Handbooks Introduction Duldulao v. St. Mary of Nazareth Hospital Center, 115 Ill. 2d 482...
Privity of Contract in Implied Warranty Claims: Insights from SZAJNA v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP.

Privity of Contract in Implied Warranty Claims: Insights from SZAJNA v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP.

Date: Dec 20, 1986
Privity of Contract in Implied Warranty Claims: Insights from SZAJNA v. GENERAL MOTORS CORP. Introduction In the landmark case John L. SZAJNA v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPoration (115 Ill. 2d 294), the...
Affirmation of Conviction and Stay of Death Sentence in Sanchez v. The People: Implications for Capital Sentencing and Evidentiary Hearings

Affirmation of Conviction and Stay of Death Sentence in Sanchez v. The People: Implications for Capital Sentencing and Evidentiary Hearings

Date: Dec 20, 1986
Affirmation of Conviction and Stay of Death Sentence in Sanchez v. The People: Implications for Capital Sentencing and Evidentiary Hearings Introduction Sanchez v. The People of the State of Illinois...
Economic Loss in Tort Law: Insights from Anderson Electric, Inc. v. Ledbetter Erection Corporation

Economic Loss in Tort Law: Insights from Anderson Electric, Inc. v. Ledbetter Erection Corporation

Date: Nov 21, 1986
Economic Loss in Tort Law: Insights from Anderson Electric, Inc. v. Ledbetter Erection Corporation Introduction Anderson Electric, Inc. v. Ledbetter Erection Corporation, reported in 115 Ill. 2d 146...
Sentencing Considerations: Evaluating a Defendant’s Protestation of Innocence – Insights from People v. James Ward

Sentencing Considerations: Evaluating a Defendant’s Protestation of Innocence – Insights from People v. James Ward

Date: Oct 18, 1986
Sentencing Considerations: Evaluating a Defendant’s Protestation of Innocence – Insights from People v. James Ward Introduction People v. James Ward, 113 Ill. 2d 516 (1986), is a pivotal case...
Inclusion of Lesser-Included Offenses and Circumstantial Evidence Instructions in Jury Deliberations: Insights from PEOPLE v. BRYANT

Inclusion of Lesser-Included Offenses and Circumstantial Evidence Instructions in Jury Deliberations: Insights from PEOPLE v. BRYANT

Date: Oct 18, 1986
Inclusion of Lesser-Included Offenses and Circumstantial Evidence Instructions in Jury Deliberations: Insights from PEOPLE v. BRYANT Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. Donald L. Bryant,...
Comprehensive Commentary on JOHN E. BALLWEG v. THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD et al.

Comprehensive Commentary on JOHN E. BALLWEG v. THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD et al.

Date: Oct 18, 1986
Establishing Presumptions in Wrongful Death: Insights from JOHN E. BALLWEG v. THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD et al. Introduction JOHN E. BALLWEG, Adm'r, Appellant, v. THE CITY OF SPRINGFIELD et al. is a...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert