Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Illinois Case Commentaries

Indemnification for Own Negligence: Supreme Court of Illinois Sets Broad Precedent in BUENZ v. FRONTLINE TRANSPORTATION COmpany

Indemnification for Own Negligence: Supreme Court of Illinois Sets Broad Precedent in BUENZ v. FRONTLINE TRANSPORTATION COmpany

Date: Jan 26, 2008
Indemnification for Own Negligence: Supreme Court of Illinois Sets Broad Precedent in BUENZ v. FRONTLINE TRANSPORTATION COmpany Introduction The landmark case of John Buenz, as Special Administrator...
Relation-Back Doctrine in Medical Malpractice: PORTER v. DECATUR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

Relation-Back Doctrine in Medical Malpractice: PORTER v. DECATUR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

Date: Jan 26, 2008
Relation-Back Doctrine in Medical Malpractice: PORTER v. DECATUR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL Introduction The Supreme Court of Illinois delivered a pivotal judgment in the case of Larry W. Porter, Jr. v....
Affirmation of the Manifest Weight Standard in Determining Severe Bodily Injury for Consecutive Sentencing

Affirmation of the Manifest Weight Standard in Determining Severe Bodily Injury for Consecutive Sentencing

Date: Jan 26, 2008
Affirmation of the Manifest Weight Standard in Determining Severe Bodily Injury for Consecutive Sentencing Introduction In the case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Miguel Deleon, 227 Ill....
Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Res Judicata in Claim Splitting: Hudson v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Res Judicata in Claim Splitting: Hudson v. City of Chicago

Date: Jan 26, 2008
Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Res Judicata in Claim Splitting: Hudson v. City of Chicago Introduction In the landmark case of GEORGE HUDSON, SR., Indiv. and on Behalf of the Estate of George Hudson,...
The Mohr Decision: Clarifying Jury Instructions on Provocation in Second Degree Murder Cases

The Mohr Decision: Clarifying Jury Instructions on Provocation in Second Degree Murder Cases

Date: Jan 26, 2008
The Mohr Decision: Clarifying Jury Instructions on Provocation in Second Degree Murder Cases Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Kenneth L. Mohr, 885 N.E.2d...
Affirmation of Summary Dismissal in Post-Conviction Proceedings: People v. Delton

Affirmation of Summary Dismissal in Post-Conviction Proceedings: People v. Delton

Date: Jan 26, 2008
Affirmation of Summary Dismissal in Post-Conviction Proceedings: People v. Delton Introduction The case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Clarence Delton, 882 N.E.2d 516 (Ill. 2008), presents...
Revisiting Statutes of Repose in Prenatal Injury Claims: Insights from BRUCKER v. MERCOLA

Revisiting Statutes of Repose in Prenatal Injury Claims: Insights from BRUCKER v. MERCOLA

Date: Dec 29, 2007
Revisiting Statutes of Repose in Prenatal Injury Claims: Insights from BRUCKER v. MERCOLA Introduction In the case of Anna Marie Brucker et al. v. Joseph M. Mercola, D.O., et al. (886 N.E.2d 306),...
Sentencing Credit for Void Probation: Analysis of PEOPLE v. WHITFIELD

Sentencing Credit for Void Probation: Analysis of PEOPLE v. WHITFIELD

Date: Dec 14, 2007
Sentencing Credit for Void Probation: Analysis of PEOPLE v. WHITFIELD Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Travis Whitfield (228 Ill. 2d 502, 2007), the Supreme...
Mandatory Allegations of Lack of Culpable Negligence in Untimely Postconviction Petitions under Rule 651(c)

Mandatory Allegations of Lack of Culpable Negligence in Untimely Postconviction Petitions under Rule 651(c)

Date: Nov 30, 2007
Mandatory Allegations of Lack of Culpable Negligence in Untimely Postconviction Petitions under Rule 651(c) Introduction In the case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Jahmal Perkins (229 Ill....
Illinois Supreme Court Establishes 'Puffery' as Non-Actionable Under Consumer Fraud Act in Barbara's Sales v. Intel

Illinois Supreme Court Establishes 'Puffery' as Non-Actionable Under Consumer Fraud Act in Barbara's Sales v. Intel

Date: Nov 30, 2007
Illinois Supreme Court Establishes 'Puffery' as Non-Actionable Under Consumer Fraud Act in Barbara's Sales v. Intel Introduction In Barbara's Sales, Inc., et al. v. Intel Corporation et al. (2007),...
Supreme Court of Illinois Establishes Michigan Law Governs Cross-State Product Liability in Personal Injury Cases

Supreme Court of Illinois Establishes Michigan Law Governs Cross-State Product Liability in Personal Injury Cases

Date: Nov 30, 2007
Supreme Court of Illinois Establishes Michigan Law Governs Cross-State Product Liability in Personal Injury Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Jacob Townsend et al. v. Sears, Roebuck and...
Reaffirming Harmless Error Review in Peremptory Challenges and Apprendi Violations: PEOPLE v. RIVERA

Reaffirming Harmless Error Review in Peremptory Challenges and Apprendi Violations: PEOPLE v. RIVERA

Date: Nov 30, 2007
Reaffirming Harmless Error Review in Peremptory Challenges and Apprendi Violations: PEOPLE v. RIVERA Introduction The People of the State of Illinois v. Michael Rivera, 879 N.E.2d 876 (Ill. 2007), is...
New Precedent on Disability Pension Certification: Wade v. City of North Chicago Police Pension Board

New Precedent on Disability Pension Certification: Wade v. City of North Chicago Police Pension Board

Date: Nov 2, 2007
New Precedent on Disability Pension Certification: Wade v. City of North Chicago Police Pension Board Introduction Wade v. City of North Chicago Police Pension Board is a landmark decision by the...
Res Ipsa Loquitur in Hospital Negligence: HEASTIE v. ROBERTS

Res Ipsa Loquitur in Hospital Negligence: HEASTIE v. ROBERTS

Date: Nov 2, 2007
Res Ipsa Loquitur in Hospital Negligence: HEASTIE v. ROBERTS Introduction HEASTIE v. ROBERTS, 226 Ill. 2d 515 is a landmark judgment by the Supreme Court of Illinois that delves into the application...
Affirmation of the No-Affirmative-Duty Rule in Negligence Claims: Indi v. Gross

Affirmation of the No-Affirmative-Duty Rule in Negligence Claims: Indi v. Gross

Date: Sep 21, 2007
Affirmation of the No-Affirmative-Duty Rule in Negligence Claims: Indi v. Gross Introduction The case of Mitchell M. Iseberg, Indi v. Sheldon Gross represents a pivotal affirmation by the Supreme...
Vacating Contempt Orders in Grandparent Visitation Cases: FELZAK v. HRUBY

Vacating Contempt Orders in Grandparent Visitation Cases: FELZAK v. HRUBY

Date: Sep 21, 2007
Vacating Contempt Orders in Grandparent Visitation Cases: FELZAK v. HRUBY Introduction The Supreme Court of Illinois addressed significant legal issues in the case of Geraldine Felzak v. Ralph Hruby...
Affirmation of Policy Limitations in Disability Insurance Claims: Rich v. Principal Life Insurance Company

Affirmation of Policy Limitations in Disability Insurance Claims: Rich v. Principal Life Insurance Company

Date: Sep 21, 2007
Affirmation of Policy Limitations in Disability Insurance Claims: Rich v. Principal Life Insurance Company Introduction Background: In the case of David Rich v. Principal Life Insurance Company, the...
Restricting 'Good Cause' Evaluations to Reasons for Noncompliance under Rule 183: Vision Point of Sale v. Haas

Restricting 'Good Cause' Evaluations to Reasons for Noncompliance under Rule 183: Vision Point of Sale v. Haas

Date: Sep 21, 2007
Restricting 'Good Cause' Evaluations to Reasons for Noncompliance under Rule 183: Vision Point of Sale, Inc. v. Ginger Haas Introduction In the landmark case of Vision Point of Sale, Inc. v. Ginger...
Explicit Waiver Required for Workers' Compensation Liens: Analysis of GALLAGHER v. LENART

Explicit Waiver Required for Workers' Compensation Liens: Analysis of GALLAGHER v. LENART

Date: Aug 10, 2007
Explicit Waiver Required for Workers' Compensation Liens: Analysis of GALLAGHER v. LENART Introduction In James Gallagher et al. v. Jaroslaw Robert Lenart et al., adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Remand for Reconstructing Voir Dire Records in Batson Claims: PEOPLE v. HOUSTON

Remand for Reconstructing Voir Dire Records in Batson Claims: PEOPLE v. HOUSTON

Date: Aug 3, 2007
Remand for Reconstructing Voir Dire Records in Batson Claims: PEOPLE v. HOUSTON Introduction In The People of the State of Illinois v. Aaron Jamar Houston, 226 Ill. 2d 135 (2007), the Supreme Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert