Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Illinois Case Commentaries

Termination of Parental Rights: Insights from In re Leona W., 888 N.E.2d 72

Termination of Parental Rights: Insights from In re Leona W., 888 N.E.2d 72

Date: Apr 4, 2008
Termination of Parental Rights: Insights from In re Leona W., 888 N.E.2d 72 Introduction In re Leona W. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Illinois that addresses the complexities...
Clarifying the Injury Requirement in Wrongful Death Claims: Analysis of MICHELLE WILLIAMS v. JOHN C. MANCHESTER

Clarifying the Injury Requirement in Wrongful Death Claims: Analysis of MICHELLE WILLIAMS v. JOHN C. MANCHESTER

Date: Apr 4, 2008
Clarifying the Injury Requirement in Wrongful Death Claims: Analysis of MICHELLE WILLIAMS v. JOHN C. MANCHESTER Introduction The case of MICHELLE WILLIAMS, Indiv. and as Special Adm'r of the Estate...
Defining Custodial Interrogation in Child Advocacy Settings: Slater v. People of Illinois

Defining Custodial Interrogation in Child Advocacy Settings: Slater v. People of Illinois

Date: Mar 21, 2008
Defining Custodial Interrogation in Child Advocacy Settings: Slater v. People of Illinois Introduction Slater v. People of Illinois is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Illinois that...
Eligibility to Run for Office in Municipal Elections: Insights from JOHN F. CINKUS v. THE VILLAGE OF STICKNEY

Eligibility to Run for Office in Municipal Elections: Insights from JOHN F. CINKUS v. THE VILLAGE OF STICKNEY

Date: Mar 21, 2008
Eligibility to Run for Office in Municipal Elections: Insights from JOHN F. CINKUS v. THE VILLAGE OF STICKNEY Introduction The case of John F. Cinkus v. The Village of Stickney Municipal Officers...
People v. Bew: A New Precedent for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Light of Caballes Decisions

People v. Bew: A New Precedent for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Light of Caballes Decisions

Date: Mar 21, 2008
People v. Bew: A New Precedent for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Light of Caballes Decisions Introduction People v. Bew is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Illinois that...
Passenger Identification and Warrant Checks During Lawful Traffic Stops: Insights from PEOPLE v. HARRIS

Passenger Identification and Warrant Checks During Lawful Traffic Stops: Insights from PEOPLE v. HARRIS

Date: Mar 21, 2008
Passenger Identification and Warrant Checks During Lawful Traffic Stops: Insights from PEOPLE v. HARRIS Introduction PEOPLE v. HARRIS, 886 N.E.2d 947 (Supreme Court of Illinois, 2008), addresses...
Recognition of Psychological Injury in Home Invasion Under Illinois Law

Recognition of Psychological Injury in Home Invasion Under Illinois Law

Date: Mar 21, 2008
Recognition of Psychological Injury in Home Invasion Under Illinois Law Introduction The People of the State of Illinois v. William A. Hudson (886 N.E.2d 964) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Jurisdictional Necessities for Appellate Review: Analysis of People v. Edward Smith (2008)

Jurisdictional Necessities for Appellate Review: Analysis of People v. Edward Smith (2008)

Date: Feb 23, 2008
Jurisdictional Necessities for Appellate Review: Analysis of People v. Edward Smith (2008) Introduction People of the State of Illinois vs. Edward Smith (885 N.E.2d 1053) is a pivotal case...
Court Affirms Mandatory Monetary Credit under Section 110-14 for Incarceration Periods

Court Affirms Mandatory Monetary Credit under Section 110-14 for Incarceration Periods

Date: Feb 8, 2008
Court Affirms Mandatory Monetary Credit under Section 110-14 for Incarceration Periods Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Eduardo Caballero (885 N.E.2d 1044),...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Failing to Advise on GBMI Pleas: Analysis of PEOPLE v. MANNING

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Failing to Advise on GBMI Pleas: Analysis of PEOPLE v. MANNING

Date: Feb 8, 2008
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Failing to Advise on GBMI Pleas: Analysis of PEOPLE v. MANNING Introduction People of the State of Illinois v. Patrick L. Manning, 883 N.E.2d 492 (2008), is a...
Indemnification for Own Negligence: Supreme Court of Illinois Sets Broad Precedent in BUENZ v. FRONTLINE TRANSPORTATION COmpany

Indemnification for Own Negligence: Supreme Court of Illinois Sets Broad Precedent in BUENZ v. FRONTLINE TRANSPORTATION COmpany

Date: Jan 26, 2008
Indemnification for Own Negligence: Supreme Court of Illinois Sets Broad Precedent in BUENZ v. FRONTLINE TRANSPORTATION COmpany Introduction The landmark case of John Buenz, as Special Administrator...
Relation-Back Doctrine in Medical Malpractice: PORTER v. DECATUR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

Relation-Back Doctrine in Medical Malpractice: PORTER v. DECATUR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

Date: Jan 26, 2008
Relation-Back Doctrine in Medical Malpractice: PORTER v. DECATUR MEMORIAL HOSPITAL Introduction The Supreme Court of Illinois delivered a pivotal judgment in the case of Larry W. Porter, Jr. v....
Affirmation of the Manifest Weight Standard in Determining Severe Bodily Injury for Consecutive Sentencing

Affirmation of the Manifest Weight Standard in Determining Severe Bodily Injury for Consecutive Sentencing

Date: Jan 26, 2008
Affirmation of the Manifest Weight Standard in Determining Severe Bodily Injury for Consecutive Sentencing Introduction In the case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Miguel Deleon, 227 Ill....
Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Res Judicata in Claim Splitting: Hudson v. City of Chicago

Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Res Judicata in Claim Splitting: Hudson v. City of Chicago

Date: Jan 26, 2008
Illinois Supreme Court Upholds Res Judicata in Claim Splitting: Hudson v. City of Chicago Introduction In the landmark case of GEORGE HUDSON, SR., Indiv. and on Behalf of the Estate of George Hudson,...
Affirmation of Summary Dismissal in Post-Conviction Proceedings: People v. Delton

Affirmation of Summary Dismissal in Post-Conviction Proceedings: People v. Delton

Date: Jan 26, 2008
Affirmation of Summary Dismissal in Post-Conviction Proceedings: People v. Delton Introduction The case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Clarence Delton, 882 N.E.2d 516 (Ill. 2008), presents...
The Mohr Decision: Clarifying Jury Instructions on Provocation in Second Degree Murder Cases

The Mohr Decision: Clarifying Jury Instructions on Provocation in Second Degree Murder Cases

Date: Jan 26, 2008
The Mohr Decision: Clarifying Jury Instructions on Provocation in Second Degree Murder Cases Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Kenneth L. Mohr, 885 N.E.2d...
Revisiting Statutes of Repose in Prenatal Injury Claims: Insights from BRUCKER v. MERCOLA

Revisiting Statutes of Repose in Prenatal Injury Claims: Insights from BRUCKER v. MERCOLA

Date: Dec 29, 2007
Revisiting Statutes of Repose in Prenatal Injury Claims: Insights from BRUCKER v. MERCOLA Introduction In the case of Anna Marie Brucker et al. v. Joseph M. Mercola, D.O., et al. (886 N.E.2d 306),...
Sentencing Credit for Void Probation: Analysis of PEOPLE v. WHITFIELD

Sentencing Credit for Void Probation: Analysis of PEOPLE v. WHITFIELD

Date: Dec 14, 2007
Sentencing Credit for Void Probation: Analysis of PEOPLE v. WHITFIELD Introduction In the landmark case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Travis Whitfield (228 Ill. 2d 502, 2007), the Supreme...
Mandatory Allegations of Lack of Culpable Negligence in Untimely Postconviction Petitions under Rule 651(c)

Mandatory Allegations of Lack of Culpable Negligence in Untimely Postconviction Petitions under Rule 651(c)

Date: Nov 30, 2007
Mandatory Allegations of Lack of Culpable Negligence in Untimely Postconviction Petitions under Rule 651(c) Introduction In the case of The People of the State of Illinois v. Jahmal Perkins (229 Ill....
Illinois Supreme Court Establishes 'Puffery' as Non-Actionable Under Consumer Fraud Act in Barbara's Sales v. Intel

Illinois Supreme Court Establishes 'Puffery' as Non-Actionable Under Consumer Fraud Act in Barbara's Sales v. Intel

Date: Nov 30, 2007
Illinois Supreme Court Establishes 'Puffery' as Non-Actionable Under Consumer Fraud Act in Barbara's Sales v. Intel Introduction In Barbara's Sales, Inc., et al. v. Intel Corporation et al. (2007),...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert