Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Hawaii Case Commentaries

De Novo Review Standard for Rule 40 Petitions and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from State v. Dan

De Novo Review Standard for Rule 40 Petitions and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from State v. Dan

Date: Aug 30, 1994
De Novo Review Standard for Rule 40 Petitions and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from State v. Dan Introduction In the landmark case State v. Dan, 76 Haw. 423 (1994), the Supreme Court...
Sanctions Under HAR 26 in Richardson v. Sport Shinko: A Comprehensive Analysis

Sanctions Under HAR 26 in Richardson v. Sport Shinko: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Aug 30, 1994
Sanctions Under HAR 26 in Richardson v. Sport Shinko: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction Renee M. Richardson and Thaddeus Richardson v. Sport Shinko (WaiKiki Corporation) is a pivotal case decided...
Affirmation of Whistleblower Protections in Public Employment Practices: Crosby v. State of Hawaii

Affirmation of Whistleblower Protections in Public Employment Practices: Crosby v. State of Hawaii

Date: Jul 19, 1994
Affirmation of Whistleblower Protections in Public Employment Practices: Crosby v. State of Hawaii Introduction In the landmark case of PETER A. CROSBY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. STATE OF HAWAII...
Prosecutorial Immunity and Municipal Liability in Civil Rights Litigation: Reed v. City and County of Honolulu

Prosecutorial Immunity and Municipal Liability in Civil Rights Litigation: Reed v. City and County of Honolulu

Date: May 14, 1994
Prosecutorial Immunity and Municipal Liability in Civil Rights Litigation: Reed v. City and County of Honolulu Introduction Reed v. City and County of Honolulu, 76 Haw. 219 (1994), is a landmark...
Ensuring Impartiality in Jury Trials: Insights from State of Hawaii v. Furutani

Ensuring Impartiality in Jury Trials: Insights from State of Hawaii v. Furutani

Date: Apr 28, 1994
Ensuring Impartiality in Jury Trials: Insights from State of Hawaii v. Furutani Introduction State of Hawaii v. Henry H. Furutani, 76 Haw. 172 (1994), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming Wright: Clarifying Appellate Jurisdiction and the Separate Judgment Requirement under HRCP 58

Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming Wright: Clarifying Appellate Jurisdiction and the Separate Judgment Requirement under HRCP 58

Date: Mar 15, 1994
Jenkins v. Cades Schutte Fleming Wright: Clarifying Appellate Jurisdiction and the Separate Judgment Requirement under HRCP 58 Introduction In the landmark case of Danny Harris Jenkins v. Cades...
Ordinance 91-95 Not Preempted by State Law: Hawaii Supreme Court Establishes Local Authority in Condominium Leasehold Conversions

Ordinance 91-95 Not Preempted by State Law: Hawaii Supreme Court Establishes Local Authority in Condominium Leasehold Conversions

Date: Mar 8, 1994
Ordinance 91-95 Not Preempted by State Law: Hawaii Supreme Court Establishes Local Authority in Condominium Leasehold Conversions Introduction In the landmark case of Richardson et al. v. City and...
Affirmation of Hawaii's Administrative Revocation Program for DUI Offenses

Affirmation of Hawaii's Administrative Revocation Program for DUI Offenses

Date: Aug 10, 1993
Affirmation of Hawaii's Administrative Revocation Program for DUI Offenses Introduction In the landmark case of CHARLES KERNAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. IRWIN TANAKA, decided on August 9, 1993, by...
Enhancing Defendants' Rights: Mandatory Competency Hearings and Limits on Police Deception in Confessions

Enhancing Defendants' Rights: Mandatory Competency Hearings and Limits on Police Deception in Confessions

Date: Apr 16, 1993
Enhancing Defendants' Rights: Mandatory Competency Hearings and Limits on Police Deception in Confessions 1. Introduction The case of State of Hawaii v. John Anthony Kelekolio (74 Haw. 479)...
Effective Assistance of Counsel and Proper Jury Instructions in Multi-Count Criminal Convictions: An Analysis of STATE v. BRIONES

Effective Assistance of Counsel and Proper Jury Instructions in Multi-Count Criminal Convictions: An Analysis of STATE v. BRIONES

Date: Apr 1, 1993
Effective Assistance of Counsel and Proper Jury Instructions in Multi-Count Criminal Convictions: An Analysis of STATE v. BRIONES Introduction STATE v. BRIONES, 74 Haw. 442 (1993), is a landmark...
Expanded Standing for Determining Unsuitability in Professional Negligence Claims: Insights from DOROTHY ZERESTA FRANKS v. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU

Expanded Standing for Determining Unsuitability in Professional Negligence Claims: Insights from DOROTHY ZERESTA FRANKS v. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU

Date: Jan 21, 1993
Expanded Standing for Determining Unsuitability in Professional Negligence Claims: Insights from DOROTHY ZERESTA FRANKS v. CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU Introduction The case of DOROTHY ZERESTA FRANKS...
Kealoha v. County of Hawaii: Establishing No Tort Duty for Helmet Use by Motorcyclists

Kealoha v. County of Hawaii: Establishing No Tort Duty for Helmet Use by Motorcyclists

Date: Jan 16, 1993
Kealoha v. County of Hawaii: Establishing No Tort Duty for Helmet Use by Motorcyclists Introduction Kealoha v. County of Hawaii is a landmark 1993 decision by the Supreme Court of Hawaii that...
Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Company: Establishing New Precedents in Indemnification Agreements

Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Company: Establishing New Precedents in Indemnification Agreements

Date: Oct 15, 1992
Amfac, Inc. v. Waikiki Beachcomber Investment Company: Establishing New Precedents in Indemnification Agreements Introduction Amfac, Inc., a Hawaii corporation, engaged in a legal dispute with...
Broadening Implied Warranty of Merchantability: Liability for Medical Device Defects and Mental Distress

Broadening Implied Warranty of Merchantability: Liability for Medical Device Defects and Mental Distress

Date: Oct 1, 1992
Broadening Implied Warranty of Merchantability: Liability for Medical Device Defects and Mental Distress Introduction In the landmark case of David W. Larsen and Shirley Larsen v. Pacesetter Systems,...
Hawaii Supreme Court Affirms Native Hawaiian Access Rights Under Article XII, §7

Hawaii Supreme Court Affirms Native Hawaiian Access Rights Under Article XII, §7

Date: Sep 29, 1992
Hawaii Supreme Court Affirms Native Hawaiian Access Rights Under Article XII, §7 Introduction In the landmark case of Pele Defense Fund (PDF) v. William Paty et al., the Supreme Court of Hawaii...
Negligence Liability of Publishers and Municipal Authorities: An Analysis of Birmingham v. Fodor's Travel Publications

Negligence Liability of Publishers and Municipal Authorities: An Analysis of Birmingham v. Fodor's Travel Publications

Date: Jul 21, 1992
Negligence Liability of Publishers and Municipal Authorities: An Analysis of Birmingham v. Fodor's Travel Publications Introduction Birmingham v. Fodor's Travel Publications, Inc. is a landmark case...
Reaffirming Principles of Criminal Liability through Commission and Omission in Second-Degree Murder: STATE v. BATSON

Reaffirming Principles of Criminal Liability through Commission and Omission in Second-Degree Murder: STATE v. BATSON

Date: Jun 5, 1992
Reaffirming Principles of Criminal Liability through Commission and Omission in Second-Degree Murder: STATE v. BATSON Introduction State of Hawaii v. William Batson, 73 Haw. 236 (1992), is a pivotal...
Reevaluation of Rape Shield Laws: State of Hawaii v. Carlos Calbero

Reevaluation of Rape Shield Laws: State of Hawaii v. Carlos Calbero

Date: Dec 29, 1989
Reevaluation of Rape Shield Laws: State of Hawaii v. Carlos Calbero Introduction State of Hawaii v. Carlos Calbero is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Hawaii on December 28, 1989....
Requiring Clear and Convincing Evidence for Punitive Damages: Establishing a New Standard in Hawaii’s Products Liability Jurisprudence

Requiring Clear and Convincing Evidence for Punitive Damages: Establishing a New Standard in Hawaii’s Products Liability Jurisprudence

Date: Sep 21, 1989
Requiring Clear and Convincing Evidence for Punitive Damages: Establishing a New Standard in Hawaii’s Products Liability Jurisprudence Introduction The case of Steven Masaki, Frank Masaki, and Sumiye...
Pinero v. State of Hawaii: Enhancing Fair Trial Protections through Strict Evidentiary and Instructional Protocols

Pinero v. State of Hawaii: Enhancing Fair Trial Protections through Strict Evidentiary and Instructional Protocols

Date: Jul 26, 1989
Pinero v. State of Hawaii: Enhancing Fair Trial Protections through Strict Evidentiary and Instructional Protocols Introduction Pinero v. State of Hawaii is a pivotal 1989 decision by the Supreme...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert