Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Hawaii Case Commentaries

Clarifying Duty of Care and Proximate Cause in Hotel Negligence: Knodle v. Waikiki Gateway Hotel

Clarifying Duty of Care and Proximate Cause in Hotel Negligence: Knodle v. Waikiki Gateway Hotel

Date: Sep 11, 1987
Clarifying Duty of Care and Proximate Cause in Hotel Negligence: Knodle v. Waikiki Gateway Hotel Introduction The case of John Knodle vs. Waikiki Gateway Hotel, Inc. is a landmark decision by the...
State of Hawaii v. Estrada: Reinforcing Defendants’ Rights to Fair Trial Through Comprehensive Discovery and Judicial Conduct Standards

State of Hawaii v. Estrada: Reinforcing Defendants’ Rights to Fair Trial Through Comprehensive Discovery and Judicial Conduct Standards

Date: Jun 9, 1987
State of Hawaii v. Estrada: Reinforcing Defendants’ Rights to Fair Trial Through Comprehensive Discovery and Judicial Conduct Standards Introduction In the landmark case of State of Hawaii v. James...
Enforcement of Appellate Deadlines: Insights from Bacon v. Karlin

Enforcement of Appellate Deadlines: Insights from Bacon v. Karlin

Date: Nov 19, 1986
Enforcement of Appellate Deadlines: Insights from Bacon v. Karlin Introduction The case of Kay Bacon, doing business as Kaanapali Royal Rentals, versus Joel M. Karlin, M.D. and the Association of...
Equitable Division of Separate Property Appreciation in Cassiday v. Cassiday

Equitable Division of Separate Property Appreciation in Cassiday v. Cassiday

Date: Mar 19, 1986
Equitable Division of Separate Property Appreciation in Cassiday v. Cassiday Introduction Cassiday v. Cassiday is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Hawaii, delivered on March 18, 1986. The...
Establishing Standards for Malice in Malicious Prosecution: Myers v. Cohen and Ryan

Establishing Standards for Malice in Malicious Prosecution: Myers v. Cohen and Ryan

Date: Oct 4, 1984
Establishing Standards for Malice in Malicious Prosecution: Myers v. Cohen and Ryan Introduction The case of Michael S. Myers v. Ronald B. Cohen and Patrick J. Ryan (67 Haw. 389) adjudicated by the...
Refining Miranda Protections in Traffic Stops and Upholding Field Sobriety Evidence: Insights from State of Hawaii v. Wyatt

Refining Miranda Protections in Traffic Stops and Upholding Field Sobriety Evidence: Insights from State of Hawaii v. Wyatt

Date: Aug 17, 1984
Refining Miranda Protections in Traffic Stops and Upholding Field Sobriety Evidence: Insights from State of Hawaii v. Wyatt Introduction State of Hawaii v. Jacqueline L. Wyatt (67 Haw. 293),...
Wilful Disregard and Unemployment Benefits: Insights from Camara v. Agsalud

Wilful Disregard and Unemployment Benefits: Insights from Camara v. Agsalud

Date: Jun 20, 1984
Wilful Disregard and Unemployment Benefits: Insights from Camara v. Agsalud Introduction The case of Steven M. Camara versus Joshua C. Agsalud, Director of the Department of Labor and Industrial...
Clarifying Insurer’s Duty to Defend Additional Insureds: First Insurance v. State of Hawaii

Clarifying Insurer’s Duty to Defend Additional Insureds: First Insurance v. State of Hawaii

Date: Jun 8, 1983
Clarifying Insurer’s Duty to Defend Additional Insureds: First Insurance Company of Hawaii v. State of Hawaii Introduction The case of First Insurance Company of Hawaii, Inc. v. State of Hawaii...
Recognition of the Public Policy Exception to At-Will Employment in Parnar v. Americana Hotels

Recognition of the Public Policy Exception to At-Will Employment in Parnar v. Americana Hotels

Date: Oct 29, 1982
Recognition of the Public Policy Exception to At-Will Employment in Parnar v. Americana Hotels Introduction Parnar v. Americana Hotels, Inc. is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Hawaii...
Establishing Judicial Immunity for Probation Officers and Limiting Firearm Seller Liability – Hulsman v. Hemmeter Development Corp.

Establishing Judicial Immunity for Probation Officers and Limiting Firearm Seller Liability – Hulsman v. Hemmeter Development Corp.

Date: Jul 1, 1982
Establishing Judicial Immunity for Probation Officers and Limiting Firearm Seller Liability – Hulsman v. Hemmeter Development Corp. Introduction The case of Ruth O. Hulsman v. Hemmeter Development...
Double Jeopardy Implications in State v. Moriwake: Upholding Judicial Discretion in Mistrial Situations

Double Jeopardy Implications in State v. Moriwake: Upholding Judicial Discretion in Mistrial Situations

Date: Jul 1, 1982
Double Jeopardy Implications in State of Hawaii v. Moriwake: Upholding Judicial Discretion in Mistrial Situations Introduction State of Hawaii v. Gilbert Masaru Moriwake is a landmark case...
Towse v. State of Hawaii: Establishing the 'Reasonable Man' Standard in Qualified Defamation Privilege for Government Officials

Towse v. State of Hawaii: Establishing the 'Reasonable Man' Standard in Qualified Defamation Privilege for Government Officials

Date: Jun 19, 1982
Towse v. State of Hawaii: Establishing the 'Reasonable Man' Standard in Qualified Defamation Privilege for Government Officials Introduction The case of Edward A. Towse, et al.,...
Application of Rule 48(b) in Speedy Trial: State of Hawaii v. Estencion

Application of Rule 48(b) in Speedy Trial: State of Hawaii v. Estencion

Date: Apr 1, 1981
Application of Rule 48(b) in Speedy Trial: State of Hawaii v. Estencion Introduction In State of Hawaii v. Aaron Ross Estencion (63 Haw. 264), the Supreme Court of Hawaii addressed critical issues...
Mootness Doctrine Clarified in Wong v. University of Hawaii

Mootness Doctrine Clarified in Wong v. University of Hawaii

Date: Aug 22, 1980
Mootness Doctrine Clarified in Wong v. University of Hawaii Introduction Creighton Wong v. Board of Regents, University of Hawaii is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Hawaii rendered on...
Effective Assistance of Counsel: Analyzing State v. James F. Antone

Effective Assistance of Counsel: Analyzing State v. James F. Antone

Date: Jul 18, 1980
Effective Assistance of Counsel: Analyzing State v. James F. Antone Introduction The State of Hawaii v. James F. Antone, 62 Haw. 346 (1980), is a pivotal case in Hawaii's legal history concerning the...
Fraud in Rental Agreements: The Landmark Case of Lawrence S.C. Kang v. W. Dewey Harrington

Fraud in Rental Agreements: The Landmark Case of Lawrence S.C. Kang v. W. Dewey Harrington

Date: Nov 14, 1978
Fraud in Rental Agreements: The Landmark Case of Lawrence S.C. Kang v. W. Dewey Harrington Introduction The case Lawrence S.C. Kang v. W. Dewey Harrington, decided by the Supreme Court of Hawaii on...
Rational Basis Upholds HRS § 12-6(4): Indigent Candidates’ Petition Requirements for Ballot Access

Rational Basis Upholds HRS § 12-6(4): Indigent Candidates’ Petition Requirements for Ballot Access

Date: Aug 17, 1978
Rational Basis Upholds HRS § 12-6(4): Indigent Candidates’ Petition Requirements for Ballot Access Introduction The case of Floyd Edward Nachtwey v. The Honorable Nelson K. Doi addresses the...
[Comprehensive Commentary] Food Pantry Ltd. v. Waikiki Business Plaza, Inc. - Establishing Boundaries on Lessor’s Consent in Lease Assignments

[Comprehensive Commentary] Food Pantry Ltd. v. Waikiki Business Plaza, Inc. - Establishing Boundaries on Lessor’s Consent in Lease Assignments

Date: Feb 11, 1978
Food Pantry Ltd. v. Waikiki Business Plaza, Inc.: Defining Lessor’s Rights in Lease Assignments Introduction In Food Pantry Ltd. v. Waikiki Business Plaza, Inc., the Supreme Court of Hawaii addressed...
Enforceability of Limitation of Liability Clauses: Insights from Earl M. Jorgensen Co. v. Mark Construction, Inc.

Enforceability of Limitation of Liability Clauses: Insights from Earl M. Jorgensen Co. v. Mark Construction, Inc.

Date: Oct 1, 1975
Enforceability of Limitation of Liability Clauses: Insights from Earl M. Jorgensen Co. v. Mark Construction, Inc. Introduction The case of Earl M. Jorgensen Co. v. Mark Construction, Inc., decided by...
Probable Cause Conclusively Established by Conviction in Malicious Prosecution and False Imprisonment: House v. Ane

Probable Cause Conclusively Established by Conviction in Malicious Prosecution and False Imprisonment: House v. Ane

Date: Jul 10, 1975
Probable Cause Conclusively Established by Conviction in Malicious Prosecution and False Imprisonment: House v. Ane Introduction House v. Ane, 56 Haw. 383 (1975) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert