Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Georgia Case Commentaries

Clarification of the "Stranger Doctrine" in Tortious Interference: Atlanta Market Center Management Co. v. McLane

Clarification of the "Stranger Doctrine" in Tortious Interference: Atlanta Market Center Management Co. v. McLane

Date: Jul 14, 1998
Clarification of the "Stranger Doctrine" in Tortious Interference: Atlanta Market Center Management Co. v. McLane Introduction The case Atlanta Market Center Management, Company et al. v. McLane et...
Overruling Maxwell: Redefining Admissibility of Prior Difficulties Evidence in Georgia

Overruling Maxwell: Redefining Admissibility of Prior Difficulties Evidence in Georgia

Date: Jun 2, 1998
Overruling Maxwell: Redefining Admissibility of Prior Difficulties Evidence in Georgia Introduction WALL v. THE STATE, 269 Ga. 506, decided on June 1, 1998, by the Supreme Court of Georgia, marks a...
Woodard v. The State: Equal Protection and the 1995 Amendment to the Child Hearsay Statute

Woodard v. The State: Equal Protection and the 1995 Amendment to the Child Hearsay Statute

Date: Mar 3, 1998
Woodard v. The State: Equal Protection and the 1995 Amendment to the Child Hearsay Statute Introduction Woodard v. The State is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Georgia on March 2,...
Davis v. The State: Admissibility of First Offender Plea in Felony Murder Charges

Davis v. The State: Admissibility of First Offender Plea in Felony Murder Charges

Date: Mar 3, 1998
Davis v. The State: Admissibility of First Offender Plea in Felony Murder Charges Introduction DAVIS v. THE STATE (269 Ga. 276) is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on March...
BARNES v. THE STATE: Expanded Scope of Mitigation Evidence in Capital Sentencing

BARNES v. THE STATE: Expanded Scope of Mitigation Evidence in Capital Sentencing

Date: Mar 3, 1998
BARNES v. THE STATE: Expanded Scope of Mitigation Evidence in Capital Sentencing Introduction BARNES v. THE STATE (269 Ga. 345), decided by the Supreme Court of Georgia on March 2, 1998, addressed...
ROBINSON v. KROGER COmpany: Reevaluating the Standard of Ordinary Care in Slip-and-Fall Premises Liability

ROBINSON v. KROGER COmpany: Reevaluating the Standard of Ordinary Care in Slip-and-Fall Premises Liability

Date: Dec 4, 1997
ROBINSON v. KROGER COmpany: Reevaluating the Standard of Ordinary Care in Slip-and-Fall Premises Liability Introduction In the landmark case of ROBINSON v. KROGER COmpany, the Supreme Court of...
DeYoung v. The State: Upholding Death Sentence and Reinforcing Juror Selection Standards

DeYoung v. The State: Upholding Death Sentence and Reinforcing Juror Selection Standards

Date: Nov 25, 1997
DeYoung v. The State: Upholding Death Sentence and Reinforcing Juror Selection Standards Introduction DeYoung v. The State is a pivotal Supreme Court of Georgia decision rendered on November 24,...
Assumption of Risk and Summary Judgment in Recreational Facility Injury: Desai v. Silver Dollar City

Assumption of Risk and Summary Judgment in Recreational Facility Injury: Desai v. Silver Dollar City

Date: Oct 16, 1997
Assumption of Risk and Summary Judgment in Recreational Facility Injury: Desai v. Silver Dollar City Introduction Desai et al. v. Silver Dollar City, Inc. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Court...
Goldrush II v. City of Marietta: Balancing Alcohol Regulation and Free Expression

Goldrush II v. City of Marietta: Balancing Alcohol Regulation and Free Expression

Date: Mar 18, 1997
Goldrush II et al. v. City of Marietta et al.: Balancing Alcohol Regulation and Free Expression Introduction In Goldrush II et al. v. City of Marietta et al., the Supreme Court of Georgia addressed...
Foreseeability in Premises Liability: Sturbridge Partners, Ltd. v. Walker

Foreseeability in Premises Liability: Sturbridge Partners, Ltd. v. Walker

Date: Mar 18, 1997
Foreseeability in Premises Liability: Sturbridge Partners, Ltd. v. Walker Introduction Sturbridge Partners, Ltd. et al. v. Walker, 267 Ga. 785 (1997), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Accrual of Cause of Action in Negligent Misrepresentation: Hardaway Co. v. Parsons et al.

Accrual of Cause of Action in Negligent Misrepresentation: Hardaway Co. v. Parsons et al.

Date: Jan 22, 1997
Accrual of Cause of Action in Negligent Misrepresentation: Hardaway Co. v. Parsons et al. Introduction Hardaway Company v. Parsons, Brinckerhoff, Quade Douglas, Inc., et al. is a landmark case...
McClain v. The State: Upholding Death Penalty with Overlapping Aggravating Factors and Evidentiary Standards

McClain v. The State: Upholding Death Penalty with Overlapping Aggravating Factors and Evidentiary Standards

Date: Nov 13, 1996
McClain v. The State: Upholding Death Penalty with Overlapping Aggravating Factors and Evidentiary Standards Introduction McClain v. The State is a pivotal 1996 decision by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Burgeson v. The State: Reinforcement of Evidentiary Standards and Fourth Amendment Protections

Affirmation of Burgeson v. The State: Reinforcement of Evidentiary Standards and Fourth Amendment Protections

Date: Sep 10, 1996
Affirmation of Burgeson v. The State: Reinforcement of Evidentiary Standards and Fourth Amendment Protections Introduction Burgeson v. The State is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Hurst v. Grange Mutual Casualty Company: Clarifying Coverage for Licensed Permission

Hurst v. Grange Mutual Casualty Company: Clarifying Coverage for Licensed Permission

Date: May 29, 1996
Hurst v. Grange Mutual Casualty Company: Clarifying Coverage for Licensed Permission Introduction Hurst v. Grange Mutual Casualty Company (266 Ga. 712) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Exclusive Grounds for Vacating Arbitration Awards: Greene v. Hundley

Exclusive Grounds for Vacating Arbitration Awards: Greene v. Hundley

Date: Apr 9, 1996
Exclusive Grounds for Vacating Arbitration Awards: Greene v. Hundley Introduction The case of Greene et al. v. Hundley et al. (266 Ga. 592), decided by the Supreme Court of Georgia on April 8, 1996,...
Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel in Wrongful Death Claims: Waldroup v. Greene County Hospital Authority

Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel in Wrongful Death Claims: Waldroup v. Greene County Hospital Authority

Date: Oct 25, 1995
Res Judicata and Collateral Estoppel in Wrongful Death Claims: Waldroup v. Greene County Hospital Authority Introduction Waldroup v. Greene County Hospital Authority is a landmark case decided by the...
Goodwin v. Cruz-Padillo: Upholding Strickland Standards in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

Goodwin v. Cruz-Padillo: Upholding Strickland Standards in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

Date: Jun 30, 1995
Goodwin v. Cruz-Padillo: Upholding Strickland Standards in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims Introduction Goodwin v. Cruz-Padillo, 265 Ga. 614 (1995), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Affirmation of Alford Plea Validity and Aggravating Circumstances in Georgia’s Death Penalty – Crowe v. The State

Affirmation of Alford Plea Validity and Aggravating Circumstances in Georgia’s Death Penalty – Crowe v. The State

Date: Jun 27, 1995
Affirmation of Alford Plea Validity and Aggravating Circumstances in Georgia’s Death Penalty – Crowe v. The State Introduction Crowe v. The State is a pivotal 1995 decision by the Supreme Court of...
BRIGHT v. THE STATE: Upholding Defendants' Right to State-Funded Expert Assistance at Sentencing Phase

BRIGHT v. THE STATE: Upholding Defendants' Right to State-Funded Expert Assistance at Sentencing Phase

Date: Mar 18, 1995
BRIGHT v. THE STATE: Upholding Defendants' Right to State-Funded Expert Assistance at Sentencing Phase Introduction Bright v. The State is a landmark decision delivered by the Supreme Court of...
Procedural Deficiency in Criminal Appeals: Insights from Rowland v. The State

Procedural Deficiency in Criminal Appeals: Insights from Rowland v. The State

Date: Jan 25, 1995
Procedural Deficiency in Criminal Appeals: Insights from Rowland v. The State Introduction Rowland v. The State and Starks v. The State are landmark cases adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert