Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Georgia Case Commentaries

Maddox v. Maddox: Establishing Clarity in Equitable Property Division in Divorce Proceedings

Maddox v. Maddox: Establishing Clarity in Equitable Property Division in Divorce Proceedings

Date: Nov 9, 2004
Maddox v. Maddox: Establishing Clarity in Equitable Property Division in Divorce Proceedings Introduction Maddox v. Maddox, 278 Ga. 606 (2004), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Georgia...
Affirmation of Proper Foreclosure Procedures and Rejection of Wrongful Foreclosure Claims: Heritage Creek Development Corporation v. Colonial Bank et al.

Affirmation of Proper Foreclosure Procedures and Rejection of Wrongful Foreclosure Claims: Heritage Creek Development Corporation v. Colonial Bank et al.

Date: Jul 8, 2004
Affirmation of Proper Foreclosure Procedures and Rejection of Wrongful Foreclosure Claims: Heritage Creek Development Corporation v. Colonial Bank et al. Introduction In the seminal case of Heritage...
Necessity Exception in Hearsay Admittance Confirmed in Williams v. The State

Necessity Exception in Hearsay Admittance Confirmed in Williams v. The State

Date: May 25, 2004
Necessity Exception in Hearsay Admittance Confirmed in Williams v. The State Introduction Williams v. The State, 277 Ga. 853 (2004), is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Georgia that...
Enhanced Due Process in Tax Sale Foreclosures: Hamilton v. Renewed Hope, Inc.

Enhanced Due Process in Tax Sale Foreclosures: Hamilton v. Renewed Hope, Inc.

Date: Nov 18, 2003
Enhanced Due Process in Tax Sale Foreclosures: Hamilton v. Renewed Hope, Inc. Introduction The case of Deborah Hamilton v. Renewed Hope, Inc. (277 Ga. 465) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia...
Georgia Upholds 'Beyond a Reasonable Doubt' Standard in Mental Retardation Claims for Death Penalty Cases: Head v. Hill

Georgia Upholds 'Beyond a Reasonable Doubt' Standard in Mental Retardation Claims for Death Penalty Cases: Head v. Hill

Date: Oct 7, 2003
Georgia Upholds 'Beyond a Reasonable Doubt' Standard in Mental Retardation Claims for Death Penalty Cases: Head v. Hill Introduction Head v. Hill, 277 Ga. 255 (2003), is a seminal case adjudicated by...
Zwiren v. Thompson: Affirming 'Reasonable Medical Certainty' in Medical Malpractice Jury Instructions

Zwiren v. Thompson: Affirming 'Reasonable Medical Certainty' in Medical Malpractice Jury Instructions

Date: Mar 28, 2003
Zwiren v. Thompson: Affirming 'Reasonable Medical Certainty' in Medical Malpractice Jury Instructions Introduction Zwiren et al. v. Thompson (276 Ga. 498), decided on March 27, 2003, by the Supreme...
Pfieffer v. Georgia Department of Transportation: Establishing Limits on Raising New Arguments on Appeal

Pfieffer v. Georgia Department of Transportation: Establishing Limits on Raising New Arguments on Appeal

Date: Nov 27, 2002
Pfeiffer v. Georgia Department of Transportation: Establishing Limits on Raising New Arguments on Appeal Introduction Pfeiffer v. Georgia Department of Transportation (275 Ga. 827, Supreme Court of...
Georgia Supreme Court Establishes Exception to the "Right for Any Reason" Rule in Summary Judgment Review

Georgia Supreme Court Establishes Exception to the "Right for Any Reason" Rule in Summary Judgment Review

Date: Nov 26, 2002
Georgia Supreme Court Establishes Exception to the "Right for Any Reason" Rule in Summary Judgment Review Introduction In CITY OF GAINESVILLE v. DODD et al. (275 Ga. 834), decided on November 25,...
Electrocution as a Method of Execution Declared Unconstitutional in Georgia

Electrocution as a Method of Execution Declared Unconstitutional in Georgia

Date: Oct 6, 2001
Electrocution as a Method of Execution Declared Unconstitutional in Georgia Introduction The case of Dawson v. The State and Moore v. The State (274 Ga. 327) represents a pivotal moment in Georgia's...
Cameron v. Lang: Establishing Qualified Immunity as a Threshold Issue in Law Enforcement Liability

Cameron v. Lang: Establishing Qualified Immunity as a Threshold Issue in Law Enforcement Liability

Date: Jun 26, 2001
Cameron v. Lang: Establishing Qualified Immunity as a Threshold Issue in Law Enforcement Liability Introduction The case Cameron et al. v. Lang et al. WILLIAMS v. SOLOMON et al., decided by the...
Georgia Supreme Court Upholds Best Interest Standard in Parent-Third Party Custody Disputes

Georgia Supreme Court Upholds Best Interest Standard in Parent-Third Party Custody Disputes

Date: Feb 17, 2001
Georgia Supreme Court Upholds Best Interest Standard in Parent-Third Party Custody Disputes Introduction In the landmark case of Clark et al. v. Wade et al. and Driver et al. v. Raines, the Supreme...
Attorney Fee Awards in Family Violence Cases: Insights from SUAREZ v. HALBERT

Attorney Fee Awards in Family Violence Cases: Insights from SUAREZ v. HALBERT

Date: Nov 17, 2000
Attorney Fee Awards in Family Violence Cases: Insights from SUAREZ et al. v. HALBERT et al. Introduction The case of Ernesto and Beatriz Suarez v. Michael and Beatriz Halbert addresses pivotal issues...
Strict Venue Proof Required in Criminal Trials: Insights from Gary Jones v. The State

Strict Venue Proof Required in Criminal Trials: Insights from Gary Jones v. The State

Date: Oct 3, 2000
Strict Venue Proof Required in Criminal Trials: Insights from Gary Jones v. The State Introduction Gary Jones v. The State is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Georgia on October 2,...
Establishing Co-Conspirator Liability in Capital Murder: Commentary on Gissendaner v. The State

Establishing Co-Conspirator Liability in Capital Murder: Commentary on Gissendaner v. The State

Date: Jul 6, 2000
Establishing Co-Conspirator Liability in Capital Murder: Commentary on Gissendaner v. The State Introduction Gissendaner v. The State is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of Georgia on...
Clarifying the Enumeration of Errors under OCGA § 5-6-40: Felix v. The State

Clarifying the Enumeration of Errors under OCGA § 5-6-40: Felix v. The State

Date: Oct 19, 1999
Clarifying the Enumeration of Errors under OCGA § 5-6-40: Felix v. The State Introduction Felix et al. v. The State (271 Ga. 534), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on October 18, 1999,...
Nash v. The State: Shifting the Burden of Proof in Recidivism Enhancements

Nash v. The State: Shifting the Burden of Proof in Recidivism Enhancements

Date: Jul 7, 1999
Nash v. The State: Shifting the Burden of Proof in Recidivism Enhancements Introduction Nash v. The State (271 Ga. 281) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Georgia that redefines the...
Martin v. Johnson-Lemon: Statutory Limits on Out-of-Possession Landlord Liability Under OCGA §44-7-14

Martin v. Johnson-Lemon: Statutory Limits on Out-of-Possession Landlord Liability Under OCGA §44-7-14

Date: May 4, 1999
Martin v. Johnson-Lemon: Statutory Limits on Out-of-Possession Landlord Liability Under OCGA §44-7-14 Introduction In the landmark case of John Martin v. Alice Johnson-Lemon, decided on May 3, 1999,...
Affirming Murder Conviction: Evidentiary Standards and Identification Procedures in Clark v. The State Storey

Affirming Murder Conviction: Evidentiary Standards and Identification Procedures in Clark v. The State Storey

Date: Apr 13, 1999
Affirming Murder Conviction: Evidentiary Standards and Identification Procedures in Clark v. The State Storey Introduction Clark v. The State Storey is a significant judgment delivered by the Supreme...
Establishing the Materiality Threshold for Newly Discovered Evidence: Chapel v. The State Analysis

Establishing the Materiality Threshold for Newly Discovered Evidence: Chapel v. The State Analysis

Date: Nov 17, 1998
Establishing the Materiality Threshold for Newly Discovered Evidence: Chapel v. The State Analysis Introduction Chapel v. The State is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on...
Strengthening Confrontation Clause Protections: Insights from Hanifa v. The State

Strengthening Confrontation Clause Protections: Insights from Hanifa v. The State

Date: Sep 22, 1998
Strengthening Confrontation Clause Protections: Insights from Hanifa v. The State Introduction The case of Hanifa v. The State, decided by the Supreme Court of Georgia on September 21, 1998, serves...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert