Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Georgia Case Commentaries

Cumulative Error Doctrine Reaffirmed in THE STATE v. LANE

Cumulative Error Doctrine Reaffirmed in THE STATE v. LANE

Date: Feb 11, 2020
Cumulative Error Doctrine Reaffirmed in THE STATE v. LANE Introduction In THE STATE v. LANE, 308 Ga. 10 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2020), the Supreme Court of Georgia addressed critical issues...
Admissibility of Prior Acts Evidence for Motive in Murder Cases: Flowers v. The State

Admissibility of Prior Acts Evidence for Motive in Murder Cases: Flowers v. The State

Date: Jan 14, 2020
Admissibility of Prior Acts Evidence for Motive in Murder Cases: Flowers v. The State Introduction Flowers v. The State, 307 Ga. 618 (2020), is a significant case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Felony Murder Cases: An In-Depth Analysis of Gaston v. State

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Felony Murder Cases: An In-Depth Analysis of Gaston v. State

Date: Jan 14, 2020
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Felony Murder Cases: An In-Depth Analysis of Gaston v. State Introduction In the landmark case of Gaston v. State (307 Ga. 634), the Supreme Court of Georgia...
Unit of Prosecution Analysis in Child Molestation Cases: Scott v. The State

Unit of Prosecution Analysis in Child Molestation Cases: Scott v. The State

Date: Aug 20, 2019
Unit of Prosecution Analysis in Child Molestation Cases: Scott v. The State Introduction Scott v. The State, 306 Ga. 507 (2019), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia that...
The Necessity of Unequivocal Assertion in Self-Representation: Analysis of Oliver v. The State

The Necessity of Unequivocal Assertion in Self-Representation: Analysis of Oliver v. The State

Date: Apr 30, 2019
The Necessity of Unequivocal Assertion in Self-Representation: Analysis of Oliver v. The State Introduction Oliver v. The State, 305 Ga. 678 (2019), presents a pivotal examination of a defendant's...
Supreme Court of Georgia Classifies 911 Charge as Tax, Restricting County Enforcement

Supreme Court of Georgia Classifies 911 Charge as Tax, Restricting County Enforcement

Date: Feb 19, 2019
Supreme Court of Georgia Classifies 911 Charge as Tax, Restricting County Enforcement Introduction In the pivotal case of Bellsouth Telecommunications, LLC et al. v. Cobb County et al. (305 Ga. 144),...
REINFORCING THE RIGHT AGAINST COMPELLED SELF-INCRIMINATION: GEORGIA SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS IN DUI BREATH TEST REFUSAL

REINFORCING THE RIGHT AGAINST COMPELLED SELF-INCRIMINATION: GEORGIA SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS CONSTITUTIONAL PROTECTIONS IN DUI BREATH TEST REFUSAL

Date: Feb 19, 2019
Reinforcing the Right Against Compelled Self-Incrimination: Georgia Supreme Court Upholds Constitutional Protections in DUI Breath Test Refusal Introduction In the landmark case of Elliott v. The...
Georgia Supreme Court Sets New Precedents on Verdict Merging and Juror Selection Standards in Willis v. The State

Georgia Supreme Court Sets New Precedents on Verdict Merging and Juror Selection Standards in Willis v. The State

Date: Oct 23, 2018
Georgia Supreme Court Sets New Precedents on Verdict Merging and Juror Selection Standards in Willis v. The State Introduction In the landmark case Willis v. The State (304 Ga. 686, 2018), the...
KIRBY v. THE STATE: Affirmation of Malice Murder Conviction and Evidentiary Standards

KIRBY v. THE STATE: Affirmation of Malice Murder Conviction and Evidentiary Standards

Date: Sep 25, 2018
KIRBY v. THE STATE: Affirmation of Malice Murder Conviction and Evidentiary Standards Introduction The case of KIRBY v. THE STATE (304 Ga. 472) revolves around the conviction of Phillip Scott Kirby,...
Affirmation of Malice Murder Conviction and Standards for Evidentiary Admissibility in BOZZIE v. STATE

Affirmation of Malice Murder Conviction and Standards for Evidentiary Admissibility in BOZZIE v. STATE

Date: Dec 12, 2017
Affirmation of Malice Murder Conviction and Standards for Evidentiary Admissibility in BOZZIE v. STATE Introduction Bozzie v. The State is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia...
Ensuring Fair Trials: Precedents on Prosecutorial and Juror Misconduct from Dixon v. The State

Ensuring Fair Trials: Precedents on Prosecutorial and Juror Misconduct from Dixon v. The State

Date: Dec 12, 2017
Ensuring Fair Trials: Precedents on Prosecutorial and Juror Misconduct from Dixon v. The State Introduction The case of Dixon v. The State, Camps v. The State, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Georgia Supreme Court Establishes Strict Timelines for Reforming Divorce Decrees in Lockamy v. Lockamy

Georgia Supreme Court Establishes Strict Timelines for Reforming Divorce Decrees in Lockamy v. Lockamy

Date: Sep 14, 2017
Georgia Supreme Court Establishes Strict Timelines for Reforming Divorce Decrees in Lockamy v. Lockamy Introduction Lockamy v. Lockamy, 805 S.E.2d 5 (Ga. 2017), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Supreme Court Establishes Uniform Appeal Process for Quasi-Judicial Zoning Decisions in City of Cumming v. Flowers et al.

Supreme Court Establishes Uniform Appeal Process for Quasi-Judicial Zoning Decisions in City of Cumming v. Flowers et al.

Date: Mar 7, 2017
Supreme Court Establishes Uniform Appeal Process for Quasi-Judicial Zoning Decisions in City of Cumming et al. v. Flowers et al. / Kerley Family Homes LLC et al. Introduction The case of City of...
Mosby v. The State: Affirmation of Self-Defense Rejection and Effective Counsel Standards

Mosby v. The State: Affirmation of Self-Defense Rejection and Effective Counsel Standards

Date: Jan 24, 2017
Mosby v. The State: Affirmation of Self-Defense Rejection and Effective Counsel Standards Introduction Mosby v. The State, 300 Ga. 450 (2017), presented a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme...
Strict Compliance Required for Foreclosure of Redemption Rights Under OCGA §48-4-45(a): Reliance Equities, LLC v. Lanier 5, LLC

Strict Compliance Required for Foreclosure of Redemption Rights Under OCGA §48-4-45(a): Reliance Equities, LLC v. Lanier 5, LLC

Date: Nov 1, 2016
Strict Compliance Required for Foreclosure of Redemption Rights Under OCGA §48-4-45(a): Reliance Equities, LLC v. Lanier 5, LLC Introduction In the landmark case of Reliance Equities, LLC v. Lanier...
High Threshold for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims Upheld: LANE v. The STATE

High Threshold for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims Upheld: LANE v. The STATE

Date: Oct 18, 2016
High Threshold for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims Upheld: LANE v. The STATE Introduction Lane v. The State is a significant case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on October 17,...
OlDS v. The State: Clarifying the Application of OCGA §24–4–404(b) in Admitting Evidence of Prior Acts

OlDS v. The State: Clarifying the Application of OCGA §24–4–404(b) in Admitting Evidence of Prior Acts

Date: May 24, 2016
OlDS v. The State: Clarifying the Application of OCGA §24–4–404(b) in Admitting Evidence of Prior Acts Introduction In OlDS v. The State, the Supreme Court of Georgia addressed the admissibility of...
Gates v. The State: Admissibility of Non-Hearsay Evidence and Plain Error Standards under Georgia's Evidence Code

Gates v. The State: Admissibility of Non-Hearsay Evidence and Plain Error Standards under Georgia's Evidence Code

Date: Jan 20, 2016
Gates v. The State: Admissibility of Non-Hearsay Evidence and Plain Error Standards under Georgia's Evidence Code Introduction Gates v. The State is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Metro Atlanta Task Force for the Homeless, Inc. v. Ichthus Community Trust et al.: Comprehensive Legal Analysis

Metro Atlanta Task Force for the Homeless, Inc. v. Ichthus Community Trust et al.: Comprehensive Legal Analysis

Date: Nov 24, 2015
Metro Atlanta Task Force for the Homeless, Inc. v. Ichthus Community Trust et al.: Comprehensive Legal Analysis Introduction The case of Metro Atlanta Task Force for the Homeless, Inc. v. Ichthus...
Martin v. The State: Upholding Sufficiency of Evidence and Ethical Counsel Disqualification in Capital Sentencing

Martin v. The State: Upholding Sufficiency of Evidence and Ethical Counsel Disqualification in Capital Sentencing

Date: Nov 3, 2015
Martin v. The State: Upholding Sufficiency of Evidence and Ethical Counsel Disqualification in Capital Sentencing Introduction In Martin v. The State (298 Ga. 259), the Supreme Court of Georgia...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert