Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Georgia Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Malice Murder Conviction: Sufficiency of Testimonial Evidence and Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel – Scott v. The State

Affirmation of Malice Murder Conviction: Sufficiency of Testimonial Evidence and Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel – Scott v. The State

Date: Sep 9, 2020
Affirmation of Malice Murder Conviction: Sufficiency of Testimonial Evidence and Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel – Scott v. The State Introduction The case of Scott v. The State (309...
Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses in Attorney-Client Agreements Affirmed

Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses in Attorney-Client Agreements Affirmed

Date: Sep 9, 2020
Enforceability of Arbitration Clauses in Attorney-Client Agreements Affirmed Introduction The case of Innovative Images, LLC v. James Darren Summerville, et al. (309 Ga. 675) addressed the...
Clarification on Rule 404(b) Admissibility and Sentencing Merger Errors: Hood v. The State

Clarification on Rule 404(b) Admissibility and Sentencing Merger Errors: Hood v. The State

Date: Aug 11, 2020
Clarification on Rule 404(b) Admissibility and Sentencing Merger Errors: Hood v. The State Introduction In the landmark case Hood v. The State (309 Ga. 493), the Supreme Court of Georgia addressed...
Georgia Supreme Court Ends Sua Sponte Sufficiency Review in Non-Death Penalty Murder Cases

Georgia Supreme Court Ends Sua Sponte Sufficiency Review in Non-Death Penalty Murder Cases

Date: Jul 3, 2020
Georgia Supreme Court Ends Sua Sponte Sufficiency Review in Non-Death Penalty Murder Cases Introduction In the landmark case Davenport v. The State (309 Ga. 385), the Supreme Court of Georgia...
Lofton v. The State: Establishing Standards for Party Liability in Felony Murder Cases

Lofton v. The State: Establishing Standards for Party Liability in Felony Murder Cases

Date: Jul 2, 2020
Lofton v. The State: Establishing Standards for Party Liability in Felony Murder Cases Introduction Lofton v. The State (309 Ga. 349), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on July 1, 2020, is...
Overruling Clemons: Redefining the Jurisdiction Over Untimely Motions for New Trial in Georgia

Overruling Clemons: Redefining the Jurisdiction Over Untimely Motions for New Trial in Georgia

Date: Jul 2, 2020
Overruling Clemons: Redefining the Jurisdiction Over Untimely Motions for New Trial in Georgia Introduction The case of Pounds v. The State, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on July 1,...
Improper Admission of Rule 404(b) Evidence Leads to Conviction Reversal in STRONG v. THE STATE

Improper Admission of Rule 404(b) Evidence Leads to Conviction Reversal in STRONG v. THE STATE

Date: Jun 30, 2020
Improper Admission of Rule 404(b) Evidence Leads to Conviction Reversal in STRONG v. THE STATE Introduction In the landmark case of STRONG v. THE STATE (309 Ga. 295, 2020), the Supreme Court of...
Reevaluation of Class Certification Standards in BOWDEN v. THE MEDICAL CENTER, INC.

Reevaluation of Class Certification Standards in BOWDEN v. THE MEDICAL CENTER, INC.

Date: Jun 30, 2020
Reevaluation of Class Certification Standards in Bowden et al. v. The Medical Center, Inc. Introduction The Supreme Court of Georgia's decision in Bowden et al. v. The Medical Center, Inc. (2020)...
Clarifying Implied Malice and Procedural Rights in Malice Murder Cases: BURNEY v. THE STATE

Clarifying Implied Malice and Procedural Rights in Malice Murder Cases: BURNEY v. THE STATE

Date: Jun 30, 2020
Clarifying Implied Malice and Procedural Rights in Malice Murder Cases: BURNEY v. THE STATE Introduction In the landmark case of BURREDY v. THE STATE (309 Ga. 273), the Supreme Court of Georgia...
Georgia Supreme Court Permits Service by Publication in In Rem Forfeiture Proceedings and Enforces Proper Procedure for More Definite Statement Motions

Georgia Supreme Court Permits Service by Publication in In Rem Forfeiture Proceedings and Enforces Proper Procedure for More Definite Statement Motions

Date: Jun 17, 2020
Georgia Supreme Court Permits Service by Publication in In Rem Forfeiture Proceedings and Enforces Proper Procedure for More Definite Statement Motions Introduction In the landmark case of Crowder v....
State v. Heard: Supreme Court of Georgia Rules Against Admissibility of Other-Acts Evidence under Rule 404(b)

State v. Heard: Supreme Court of Georgia Rules Against Admissibility of Other-Acts Evidence under Rule 404(b)

Date: Jun 17, 2020
State v. Heard: Supreme Court of Georgia Rules Against Admissibility of Other-Acts Evidence under Rule 404(b) Introduction Heard v. The State (844 S.E.2d 791) is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Comprehensive Analysis of Sullivan v. The State: Evaluating Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

Comprehensive Analysis of Sullivan v. The State: Evaluating Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

Date: Apr 21, 2020
Comprehensive Analysis of Sullivan v. The State: Evaluating Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims Introduction Sullivan v. The State, 842 S.E.2d 5, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on...
Affirmation of Felony Murder Conviction: Reinforcing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Evidentiary Rulings in Keller v. The State

Affirmation of Felony Murder Conviction: Reinforcing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Evidentiary Rulings in Keller v. The State

Date: Apr 21, 2020
Affirmation of Felony Murder Conviction: Reinforcing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Evidentiary Rulings in Keller v. The State Introduction Keller v. The State, decided on April...
Private Citizen's Enforcement of Open Meetings Act Civil Penalties: Insights from Williams v. DeKalb County

Private Citizen's Enforcement of Open Meetings Act Civil Penalties: Insights from Williams v. DeKalb County

Date: Mar 14, 2020
Private Citizen's Enforcement of Open Meetings Act Civil Penalties: Insights from Williams v. DeKalb County Introduction Williams v. DeKalb County, et al. (308 Ga. 265) is a landmark decision by the...
Finality and Statute of Limitations in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from STUBBS v. HALL

Finality and Statute of Limitations in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from STUBBS v. HALL

Date: Mar 14, 2020
Finality and Statute of Limitations in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from Stubbs v. Hall Introduction In the landmark case of Stubbs v. Hall, the Supreme Court of Georgia addressed critical...
Sufficiency of Evidence and Severance in Joint Trials: Insights from Smith v. The State

Sufficiency of Evidence and Severance in Joint Trials: Insights from Smith v. The State

Date: Feb 29, 2020
Sufficiency of Evidence and Severance in Joint Trials: Insights from Smith v. The State Introduction Smith v. The State, 308 Ga. 81 (2020), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia, serves as a...
Westbrook v. The State: Upholding Probable Cause and Evidentiary Standards in Criminal Convictions

Westbrook v. The State: Upholding Probable Cause and Evidentiary Standards in Criminal Convictions

Date: Feb 29, 2020
Westbrook v. The State: Upholding Probable Cause and Evidentiary Standards in Criminal Convictions Introduction Westbrook v. The State is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on...
Establishing Repugnant Verdicts in Criminal Trials: Insights from McElrath v. The State

Establishing Repugnant Verdicts in Criminal Trials: Insights from McElrath v. The State

Date: Feb 29, 2020
Establishing Repugnant Verdicts in Criminal Trials: Insights from McElrath v. The State Introduction The case of McElrath v. The State (308 Ga. 104), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia on...
Proper Case Ground for Opening Default Does Not Require Reasonable Explanation: Bowen v. Savoy

Proper Case Ground for Opening Default Does Not Require Reasonable Explanation: Bowen v. Savoy

Date: Feb 29, 2020
Proper Case Ground for Opening Default Does Not Require Reasonable Explanation: Bowen et al. v. Savoy et al. Introduction Bowen et al. v. Savoy et al. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Murder Conviction and Merger Correction in Howell v. The State

Affirmation of Murder Conviction and Merger Correction in Howell v. The State

Date: Feb 11, 2020
Affirmation of Murder Conviction and Merger Correction in Howell v. The State Introduction Howell v. The State, 307 Ga. 865 (2020), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Georgia, addresses significant...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert