Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Florida Case Commentaries

Extraterritorial Application of Florida's Fish Trap Law Requires Clear Legislative Intent

Extraterritorial Application of Florida's Fish Trap Law Requires Clear Legislative Intent

Date: Sep 11, 1984
Extraterritorial Application of Florida's Fish Trap Law Requires Clear Legislative Intent Introduction The case of Southeastern Fisheries Association, Inc., et al., Petitioners, v. Department of...
Affirmation of Death Penalty for Accomplice Liability under Florida Law: Davidson Joel James v. State of Florida

Affirmation of Death Penalty for Accomplice Liability under Florida Law: Davidson Joel James v. State of Florida

Date: Aug 31, 1984
Affirmation of Death Penalty for Accomplice Liability under Florida Law Introduction Davidson Joel James v. State of Florida is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Florida on August...
Enhanced Standards for Evaluating Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from DOWNS v. STATE of Florida

Enhanced Standards for Evaluating Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from DOWNS v. STATE of Florida

Date: Aug 29, 1984
Enhanced Standards for Evaluating Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from DOWNS v. STATE of Florida Introduction DOWNS v. STATE of Florida, 453 So. 2d 1102 (Fla. 1984), is a pivotal case...
Affirmation of Death Sentence Based on Aggravating Factors in BLANCO v. STATE of Florida

Affirmation of Death Sentence Based on Aggravating Factors in BLANCO v. STATE of Florida

Date: Jul 27, 1984
Affirmation of Death Sentence Based on Aggravating Factors in BLANCO v. STATE of Florida Introduction Omar BLANCO v. STATE of Florida, 452 So. 2d 520 (1984), is a significant case adjudicated by the...
Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Novak: Broadened Interpretation of 'Accident' in PIP Coverage

Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Novak: Broadened Interpretation of 'Accident' in PIP Coverage

Date: Jul 13, 1984
Government Employees Insurance Co. v. Novak: Broadened Interpretation of 'Accident' in PIP Coverage Introduction The case of Government Employees Insurance Company v. Daniel M. Novak represents a...
Piercing the Corporate Veil: Insights from Dania Jai-Alai Palace v. Sykes

Piercing the Corporate Veil: Insights from Dania Jai-Alai Palace v. Sykes

Date: Jun 28, 1984
Piercing the Corporate Veil: Insights from DANIA JAI-ALAI PALACE, INC. v. SYKES Introduction The case of Dania Jai-Alai Palace, Inc., Carrousel Concessions, Inc., and Saturday Corporation v. Gladys...
Limiting Fraud on the Court: Insights from DeCLAIRE v. Yohananan

Limiting Fraud on the Court: Insights from DeCLAIRE v. Yohananan

Date: Jun 8, 1984
Limiting Fraud on the Court: Insights from DeCLAIRE v. Yohananan Introduction The case of George F. DeCLAIRE v. Donna DeCLAIRE YOHANAN, decided by the Supreme Court of Florida on June 7, 1984 (453...
Discovery Privilege in Defamation Actions: Evelyn Holly v. Albert W. Auld Establishes Broad Scope

Discovery Privilege in Defamation Actions: Evelyn Holly v. Albert W. Auld Establishes Broad Scope

Date: May 4, 1984
Discovery Privilege in Defamation Actions: Evelyn Holly v. Albert W. Auld Establishes Broad Scope Introduction The case of Eugene Holly, M.D. v. Albert W. Auld, M.D., adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Admissibility of Collateral Crime Evidence for Establishing Motive: Heiney v. State

Admissibility of Collateral Crime Evidence for Establishing Motive: Heiney v. State

Date: Apr 20, 1984
Admissibility of Collateral Crime Evidence for Establishing Motive: Heiney v. State Introduction Heiney v. State, 447 So.2d 210 (Fla. 1984), is a landmark case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Establishing Reasonable Foreseeability in Aggravating Circumstances: Supreme Court of Florida in Lusk v. State

Establishing Reasonable Foreseeability in Aggravating Circumstances: Supreme Court of Florida in Lusk v. State

Date: Apr 11, 1984
Establishing Reasonable Foreseeability in Aggravating Circumstances: Supreme Court of Florida in Lusk v. State Introduction Lusk v. State, 446 So. 2d 1038 (Fla. 1984), is a landmark decision by the...
Mandatory Compliance with Sentencing Criteria for Juveniles: RHODEN v. STATE

Mandatory Compliance with Sentencing Criteria for Juveniles: RHODEN v. STATE

Date: Apr 6, 1984
Mandatory Compliance with Sentencing Criteria for Juveniles: RHODEN v. STATE Introduction The case of State of Florida v. LeArnath Rhoden, decided by the Supreme Court of Florida on April 5, 1984,...
Florida Supreme Court Upholds 'More Likely Than Not' Standard in Wrongful Death Actions

Florida Supreme Court Upholds 'More Likely Than Not' Standard in Wrongful Death Actions

Date: Mar 23, 1984
Florida Supreme Court Upholds 'More Likely Than Not' Standard in Wrongful Death Actions Introduction In the landmark case Gooding v. University Hospital Building, Inc. (445 So. 2d 1015), the Supreme...
Imposition of Special Costs on Indigent Defendants: Insights from JENKINS v. STATE

Imposition of Special Costs on Indigent Defendants: Insights from JENKINS v. STATE

Date: Jan 20, 1984
Imposition of Special Costs on Indigent Defendants: Insights from JENKINS v. STATE Introduction JENKINS v. STATE, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of Florida...
Inverse Condemnation and Res Judicata: ALBRECHT v. STATE of Florida Analysis

Inverse Condemnation and Res Judicata: ALBRECHT v. STATE of Florida Analysis

Date: Jan 13, 1984
Inverse Condemnation and Res Judicata: ALBRECHT v. STATE of Florida Analysis Introduction The case Albrecht, George, et al. v. State of Florida, 444 So.2d 8 (Fla. 1984), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Lack of Remorse Not Considered as Aggravating Factor in Capital Sentencing: Pope v. State of Florida

Lack of Remorse Not Considered as Aggravating Factor in Capital Sentencing: Pope v. State of Florida

Date: Jan 12, 1984
Lack of Remorse Not Considered as Aggravating Factor in Capital Sentencing: Pope v. State of Florida Introduction Case Citation: Thomas Dewey Pope, Appellant, v. State of Florida, Appellee. (441 So....
Enhanced Standards for Judicial Recusal: Livingston v. State of Florida

Enhanced Standards for Judicial Recusal: Livingston v. State of Florida

Date: Jan 12, 1984
Enhanced Standards for Judicial Recusal: Livingston v. State of Florida Introduction The case of Connie Moore Livingston v. State of Florida (441 So. 2d 1083, Supreme Court of Florida, 1984) presents...
Supreme Court of Florida Affirms Death Sentence in Ian Lightbourne v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida Affirms Death Sentence in Ian Lightbourne v. State of Florida

Date: Oct 27, 1983
Supreme Court of Florida Affirms Death Sentence in Ian Lightbourne v. State of Florida Introduction Parties Involved: Ian Lightbourne (Appellant) vs. State of Florida (Appellee). Case Overview: Ian...
BELL v. STATE of Florida: Reinforcing Double Jeopardy Protections in Multiple Convictions for Lesser Included Offenses

BELL v. STATE of Florida: Reinforcing Double Jeopardy Protections in Multiple Convictions for Lesser Included Offenses

Date: Oct 12, 1983
BELL v. STATE of Florida: Reinforcing Double Jeopardy Protections in Multiple Convictions for Lesser Included Offenses Introduction The Supreme Court of Florida's 1983 decision in Johnny Lee BELL v....
Insurance Coverage of Punitive Damages under Vicarious Liability: U.S. Concrete Pipe Co. v. Bould

Insurance Coverage of Punitive Damages under Vicarious Liability: U.S. Concrete Pipe Co. v. Bould

Date: Oct 12, 1983
Insurance Coverage of Punitive Damages under Vicarious Liability: U.S. Concrete Pipe Co. v. Bould Introduction The case of U.S. Concrete Pipe Company, etc., et al. versus Dorothy Bould and Edward...
Clarifying the Limits of Successive Motions under Rule 3.850: McCRAE v. STATE of Florida

Clarifying the Limits of Successive Motions under Rule 3.850: McCRAE v. STATE of Florida

Date: Sep 16, 1983
Clarifying the Limits of Successive Motions under Rule 3.850: McCRAE v. STATE of Florida Introduction McCRAE v. STATE of Florida (437 So. 2d 1388) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert