Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Florida Case Commentaries

Harvey v. Dugger: Establishing Standards for Effective Counsel in Capital Cases

Harvey v. Dugger: Establishing Standards for Effective Counsel in Capital Cases

Date: Jun 9, 1995
Harvey v. Dugger: Establishing Standards for Effective Counsel in Capital Cases Introduction Harold Lee Harvey, Jr. v. Richard L. Dugger, et al. is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO. v. LANGSTON: Refining the Boundaries of Relevant Discovery in Civil Litigation

ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO. v. LANGSTON: Refining the Boundaries of Relevant Discovery in Civil Litigation

Date: May 12, 1995
ALLSTATE INSURANCE CO. v. LANGSTON: Refining the Boundaries of Relevant Discovery in Civil Litigation Introduction The case of Allstate Insurance Company v. Joyce Langston (655 So. 2d 91) adjudicated...
Revisiting the Per Se Reversal Rule for Discovery Violations: Florida Supreme Court's Decision in SCHOPP v. STATE

Revisiting the Per Se Reversal Rule for Discovery Violations: Florida Supreme Court's Decision in SCHOPP v. STATE

Date: May 2, 1995
Revisiting the Per Se Reversal Rule for Discovery Violations: Florida Supreme Court's Decision in SCHOPP v. STATE Introduction In the landmark case of State of Florida v. Eric Schopp, 653 So. 2d 1016...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Inmate-On-Inmate Assault: Coney v. Florida

Affirmation of Death Penalty in Inmate-On-Inmate Assault: Coney v. Florida

Date: Apr 28, 1995
Affirmation of Death Penalty in Inmate-On-Inmate Assault: Coney v. Florida Introduction Jimmie Lee Coney v. State of Florida is a significant case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Florida on April...
Reyes v. State of Florida: Clarifying the Imposition of Probationary Costs

Reyes v. State of Florida: Clarifying the Imposition of Probationary Costs

Date: Mar 28, 1995
Reyes v. State of Florida: Clarifying the Imposition of Probationary Costs Introduction In the landmark case of Reyes v. State of Florida, 655 So. 2d 111 (1995), the District Court of Appeal of...
Strict Procedural Adherence in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from Williamson v. Dugger

Strict Procedural Adherence in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from Williamson v. Dugger

Date: Mar 15, 1995
Strict Procedural Adherence in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Insights from Williamson v. Dugger Introduction The case of Johnny Williamson v. Richard L. Dugger, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Florida...
Florida Supreme Court Upholds Impact Rule in Negligent HIV Diagnosis Cases

Florida Supreme Court Upholds Impact Rule in Negligent HIV Diagnosis Cases

Date: Mar 3, 1995
Florida Supreme Court Upholds Impact Rule in Negligent HIV Diagnosis Cases Introduction The case of R.J. and P.J. v. Humana of Florida, Inc., et al. (652 So. 2d 360) presented a crucial examination...
Clarifying Apparent Agency in Franchising: Mobil Oil Corp. v. Bransford

Clarifying Apparent Agency in Franchising: Mobil Oil Corp. v. Bransford

Date: Feb 18, 1995
Clarifying Apparent Agency in Franchising: Mobil Oil Corp. v. Bransford Introduction In the landmark case of MOBIL OIL CORPORATION v. JEREMY BRANSFORD (648 So. 2d 119), adjudicated by the Supreme...
Dominant Culpability Justifies Disparate Sentencing: Upholding Death Penalty in Ronald Heath v. State of Florida

Dominant Culpability Justifies Disparate Sentencing: Upholding Death Penalty in Ronald Heath v. State of Florida

Date: Jan 26, 1995
Dominant Culpability Justifies Disparate Sentencing: Upholding Death Penalty in Ronald Heath v. State of Florida Introduction Ronald Heath v. State of Florida is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme...
Clarifying the Balance between Heinousness and Mental Mitigation in Capital Sentencing: Spencer v. State of Florida

Clarifying the Balance between Heinousness and Mental Mitigation in Capital Sentencing: Spencer v. State of Florida

Date: Dec 7, 1994
Clarifying the Balance between Heinousness and Mental Mitigation in Capital Sentencing Spencer v. State of Florida, 645 So. 2d 377 (Fla. 1994) Introduction In Spencer v. State of Florida, the Supreme...
Establishing Fiduciary Duty in Bank-Customer Relationships: Capital Bank v. MVB, Inc.

Establishing Fiduciary Duty in Bank-Customer Relationships: Capital Bank v. MVB, Inc.

Date: Nov 24, 1994
Establishing Fiduciary Duty in Bank-Customer Relationships: Capital Bank v. MVB, Inc. Introduction The case of Capital Bank, a Florida Banking Corporation, versus MVB, Inc. and related parties,...
Presumption Against Retroactive Application in Employment Retaliation Cases: Arrow Air, Inc. v. Michael Walsh

Presumption Against Retroactive Application in Employment Retaliation Cases: Arrow Air, Inc. v. Michael Walsh

Date: Nov 18, 1994
Presumption Against Retroactive Application in Employment Retaliation Cases: Arrow Air, Inc. v. Michael Walsh Introduction The case of Arrow Air, Inc., Petitioner, v. Michael Walsh, Respondent (645...
Enhanced Clarity in Death Penalty Sentencing: The JACKSON v. STATE Decision

Enhanced Clarity in Death Penalty Sentencing: The JACKSON v. STATE Decision

Date: Oct 14, 1994
Enhanced Clarity in Death Penalty Sentencing: The JACKSON v. STATE Decision Introduction The case of Andrea Hicks JACKSON v. STATE of Florida, decided by the Supreme Court of Florida on October 13,...
Affirmation of Death Sentence and Convictions in Armada v. State of Florida: Standards for Witness Recantation and Sentencing

Affirmation of Death Sentence and Convictions in Armada v. State of Florida: Standards for Witness Recantation and Sentencing

Date: Sep 30, 1994
Affirmation of Death Sentence and Convictions in Armstrong v. State of Florida: Standards for Witness Recantation and Sentencing Introduction Armstrong v. State of Florida is a pivotal case...
Termination of Parental Rights Without Performance Agreements: A Landmark Florida Supreme Court Ruling

Termination of Parental Rights Without Performance Agreements: A Landmark Florida Supreme Court Ruling

Date: Sep 2, 1994
Termination of Parental Rights Without Performance Agreements: A Landmark Florida Supreme Court Ruling Introduction The case of In the Interest of T.M. and F.M., 641 So. 2d 410 (Fla. 1994),...
Affirmation of Death Penalty Based on Aggravating Factors and Jury Instruction Standards: WALLS v. STATE of Florida

Affirmation of Death Penalty Based on Aggravating Factors and Jury Instruction Standards: WALLS v. STATE of Florida

Date: Sep 1, 1994
Affirmation of Death Penalty Based on Aggravating Factors and Jury Instruction Standards: WALLS v. STATE of Florida Introduction WALLS v. STATE of Florida, 641 So. 2d 381, is a landmark decision by...
Expansion of Aggravated Child Abuse Definition to Include Omissions: Analysis of ANA CARDONA v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Expansion of Aggravated Child Abuse Definition to Include Omissions: Analysis of ANA CARDONA v. STATE OF FLORIDA

Date: Sep 1, 1994
Expansion of Aggravated Child Abuse Definition to Include Omissions: Analysis of ANA CARDONA v. STATE OF FLORIDA Introduction Ana Cardona v. State of Florida is a landmark decision by the Supreme...
Clarifying the Admissibility of Similar Fact Evidence under the Williams Rule: Griffin v. State of Florida

Clarifying the Admissibility of Similar Fact Evidence under the Williams Rule: Griffin v. State of Florida

Date: Jul 8, 1994
Clarifying the Admissibility of Similar Fact Evidence under the Williams Rule: Griffin v. State of Florida Introduction The case of Michael Allen Griffin v. State of Florida (639 So. 2d 966) presents...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Death Penalty Sentencing: Torres-Arboleda v. Dugger

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Death Penalty Sentencing: Torres-Arboleda v. Dugger

Date: Jun 7, 1994
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Death Penalty Sentencing: Torres-Arboleda v. Dugger Introduction Oscar Torres-Arboleda, a prisoner sentenced to death, appealed his conviction and sentencing in the...
Child Hearsay Admissibility Based on Incompetency: STATE v. TOWNSEND (1994)

Child Hearsay Admissibility Based on Incompetency: STATE v. TOWNSEND (1994)

Date: Apr 22, 1994
Child Hearsay Admissibility Based on Incompetency: STATE v. TOWNSEND (1994) Introduction The case of State of Florida v. Jack Timothy Townsend, decided by the Supreme Court of Florida on April 21,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert