Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Florida Case Commentaries

Double Jeopardy and Resentencing: Insights from ASHLEY v. STATE

Double Jeopardy and Resentencing: Insights from ASHLEY v. STATE

Date: Jan 10, 2003
Double Jeopardy and Resentencing: Insights from ASHLEY v. STATE Introduction The case of Columbus R. ASHLEY v. STATE of Florida (850 So. 2d 1265) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Florida on...
Affirming Procedural Barriers and Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Postconviction and Habeas Procedures: Spencer v. Florida

Affirming Procedural Barriers and Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Postconviction and Habeas Procedures: Spencer v. Florida

Date: Jan 10, 2003
Affirming Procedural Barriers and Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Postconviction and Habeas Procedures: Spencer v. Florida Introduction In the landmark case of SPENCER v. STATE of...
Clarifying Heinousness and Calculated Premeditation as Aggravators in Capital Sentencing: Lynch v. State

Clarifying Heinousness and Calculated Premeditation as Aggravators in Capital Sentencing: Lynch v. State

Date: Jan 10, 2003
Clarifying Heinousness and Calculated Premeditation as Aggravators in Capital Sentencing: Lynch v. State Introduction RICHARD LYNCH, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee is a landmark decision by...
Florida Supreme Court Expands Appellate Review and Attorney's Fee Claims in CAUFIELD v. CANTELE

Florida Supreme Court Expands Appellate Review and Attorney's Fee Claims in CAUFIELD v. CANTELE

Date: Dec 20, 2002
Florida Supreme Court Expands Appellate Review and Attorney's Fee Claims in CAUFIELD v. CANTELE Introduction The case of Edward B. Caufield, et al. v. Gino Cantele, et al. (837 So. 2d 371) presented...
Standard Jury Instructions and Fundamental Error: Reeves v. State of Florida

Standard Jury Instructions and Fundamental Error: Reeves v. State of Florida

Date: Dec 20, 2002
Standard Jury Instructions and Fundamental Error: Reed v. State of Florida Introduction In the landmark case of Reed v. State of Florida, 837 So. 2d 366 (Fla. 2002), the Supreme Court of Florida...
Florida Supreme Court Establishes Exception to the Impact Rule in Cases of Statutory Confidentiality Breaches by Psychotherapists

Florida Supreme Court Establishes Exception to the Impact Rule in Cases of Statutory Confidentiality Breaches by Psychotherapists

Date: Dec 20, 2002
Florida Supreme Court Establishes Exception to the Impact Rule in Cases of Statutory Confidentiality Breaches by Psychotherapists Introduction In the landmark case of GRACEY v. EAKER, decided on...
Florida Supreme Court Establishes Flexible Standards for Probation Revocation Due to Failure to File Reports

Florida Supreme Court Establishes Flexible Standards for Probation Revocation Due to Failure to File Reports

Date: Dec 6, 2002
Florida Supreme Court Establishes Flexible Standards for Probation Revocation Due to Failure to File Reports Introduction In State of Florida v. John H. Carter (835 So. 2d 259), the Supreme Court of...
Equitable Estoppel Tolling Statute of Limitations in State Tort Claims: Florida Dep't of Health v. S.A.P.

Equitable Estoppel Tolling Statute of Limitations in State Tort Claims: Florida Dep't of Health v. S.A.P.

Date: Nov 28, 2002
Equitable Estoppel Tolling Statute of Limitations in State Tort Claims: Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services v. S.A.P. Introduction In the landmark case of Florida Department of...
Florida Supreme Court Upholds Capital Sentencing in KING v. MOORE Amid RING v. ARIZONA Developments

Florida Supreme Court Upholds Capital Sentencing in KING v. MOORE Amid RING v. ARIZONA Developments

Date: Oct 25, 2002
Florida Supreme Court Upholds Capital Sentencing in KING v. MOORE Amid RING v. ARIZONA Developments Introduction In the landmark case Amos Lee King v. Michael W. Moore (831 So. 2d 143), the Supreme...
Florida Supreme Court Validates Capital Sentencing Procedures in BOTTOSON v. MOORE

Florida Supreme Court Validates Capital Sentencing Procedures in BOTTOSON v. MOORE

Date: Oct 25, 2002
Florida Supreme Court Validates Capital Sentencing Procedures in BOTTOSON v. MOORE Introduction In the landmark case Linroy Bottoson v. Michael W. Moore, et al., the Supreme Court of Florida...
Mandatory Time Limits in Civil Commitment Proceedings: STATE v. GOODE

Mandatory Time Limits in Civil Commitment Proceedings: STATE v. GOODE

Date: Oct 18, 2002
Mandatory Time Limits in Civil Commitment Proceedings: STATE v. GOODE Introduction State of Florida, Appellant, v. Darren Jerome Goode, Appellee. (830 So. 2d 817) is a landmark decision by the...
Comprehensive Commentary on WESTERHEIDE v. STATE of Florida: Upholding the Jimmy Ryce Act

Comprehensive Commentary on WESTERHEIDE v. STATE of Florida: Upholding the Jimmy Ryce Act

Date: Oct 18, 2002
Comprehensive Commentary on WESTERHEIDE v. STATE of Florida: Upholding the Jimmy Ryce Act Introduction WESTERHEIDE v. STATE of Florida, 831 So. 2d 93 (Fla. 2002), is a landmark case adjudicated by...
Supreme Court Clarifies 'No Cause' Determination Requirements under Florida Civil Rights Act in Woodham v. Blue Cross Blue Shield

Supreme Court Clarifies 'No Cause' Determination Requirements under Florida Civil Rights Act in Woodham v. Blue Cross Blue Shield

Date: Oct 11, 2002
Supreme Court Clarifies 'No Cause' Determination Requirements under Florida Civil Rights Act in Woodham v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Introduction Woodham v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida, Inc., 829...
Restricting Prior Bad Acts as Impeachment: ROBERTSON v. STATE

Restricting Prior Bad Acts as Impeachment: ROBERTSON v. STATE

Date: Oct 11, 2002
Restricting Prior Bad Acts as Impeachment: ROBERTSON v. STATE [829 So.2d 901] Introduction ROBERTSON v. STATE, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Florida on October 10, 2002, presents a significant...
Causation as a Coverage Question vs. Amount of Loss in Insurance Appraisals: Florida Supreme Court's Decision

Causation as a Coverage Question vs. Amount of Loss in Insurance Appraisals: Florida Supreme Court's Decision

Date: Sep 27, 2002
Causation as a Coverage Question vs. Amount of Loss in Insurance Appraisals: Florida Supreme Court's Decision Introduction The Florida Supreme Court's decision in PETER JOHNSON and CHRISTINE JOHNSON,...
Clarifying the Limits of Discretionary Jurisdiction in Per Curiam Denials: STALLWORTH v. MOORE and Consolidated Cases

Clarifying the Limits of Discretionary Jurisdiction in Per Curiam Denials: STALLWORTH v. MOORE and Consolidated Cases

Date: Sep 20, 2002
Clarifying the Limits of Discretionary Jurisdiction in Per Curiam Denials: STALLWORTH v. MOORE and Consolidated Cases Introduction The Supreme Court of Florida, in the consolidated cases of Fabian...
Establishing the Appellate Review Standards for Newly Discovered Evidence and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Postconviction Relief

Establishing the Appellate Review Standards for Newly Discovered Evidence and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Postconviction Relief

Date: Sep 13, 2002
Establishing the Appellate Review Standards for Newly Discovered Evidence and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Postconviction Relief Introduction In Tracy McLIN v. STATE of Florida, 827 So. 2d...
Brady Violation Reinforced in CARDONA v. STATE of Florida: A Landmark Decision

Brady Violation Reinforced in CARDONA v. STATE of Florida: A Landmark Decision

Date: Jul 12, 2002
Brady Violation Reinforced in CARDONA v. STATE of Florida: A Landmark Decision Introduction Ana Maria Cardona v. State of Florida, 826 So. 2d 968 (2002), is a pivotal case that underscores the...
Affirmation of Death Sentence: Evaluating the Heinous, Atrocious, or Cruel Aggravator and Identification Reliability in Rimmer v. State of Florida

Affirmation of Death Sentence: Evaluating the Heinous, Atrocious, or Cruel Aggravator and Identification Reliability in Rimmer v. State of Florida

Date: Jul 4, 2002
Affirmation of Death Sentence: Evaluating the Heinous, Atrocious, or Cruel Aggravator and Identification Reliability in Rimmer v. State of Florida Introduction Robert Rimmer, the appellant, was...
Affirmation of Legislated Sentencing Guidelines: A Comprehensive Analysis of HALL v. STATE

Affirmation of Legislated Sentencing Guidelines: A Comprehensive Analysis of HALL v. STATE

Date: Jul 4, 2002
Affirmation of Legislated Sentencing Guidelines: A Comprehensive Analysis of HALL v. STATE Introduction HALL v. STATE, 823 So. 2d 757 (Fla. 2002), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert