Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Delaware Case Commentaries

Clarifying the Displaced Worker Doctrine in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Breeding v. Contractors-One-Inc.

Clarifying the Displaced Worker Doctrine in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Breeding v. Contractors-One-Inc.

Date: Nov 4, 1988
Clarifying the Displaced Worker Doctrine in Workers' Compensation: Insights from Breeding v. Contractors-One-Inc. Introduction The case of Howard C. Breeding v. Contractors-One-Inc. (549 A.2d 1102)...
Substantial Interference and Admissibility of Prior Acts in Kidnapping and Intimidation: Insights from Weber v. Delaware

Substantial Interference and Admissibility of Prior Acts in Kidnapping and Intimidation: Insights from Weber v. Delaware

Date: Aug 24, 1988
Substantial Interference and Admissibility of Prior Acts in Kidnapping and Intimidation: Insights from Weber v. Delaware Introduction WEBER v. STATE of Delaware, 547 A.2d 948 (Del. 1988), is a...
Kramer v. Western Pacific Industries: Shareholder Standing in Post-Merger Derivative Suits

Kramer v. Western Pacific Industries: Shareholder Standing in Post-Merger Derivative Suits

Date: Aug 23, 1988
Kramer v. Western Pacific Industries: Shareholder Standing in Post-Merger Derivative Suits Introduction The case of Larry Kramer v. Western Pacific Industries, Inc. (546 A.2d 348) adjudicated by the...
Fiduciary Duties in Corporate Spin-Offs: Anadarko Petroleum Corp. v. Panhandle Eastern Corp. - A Comprehensive Analysis

Fiduciary Duties in Corporate Spin-Offs: Anadarko Petroleum Corp. v. Panhandle Eastern Corp. - A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Jun 24, 1988
Fiduciary Duties in Corporate Spin-Offs: Anadarko Petroleum Corp. v. Panhandle Eastern Corp. - A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction Anadarko Petroleum Corporation v. Panhandle Eastern Corporation is...
Affirmation of Plea Bargain Jurisdiction in Da v. Downer

Affirmation of Plea Bargain Jurisdiction in Da v. Downer

Date: Jun 23, 1988
Affirmation of Plea Bargain Jurisdiction in Da v. Downer Introduction The case of Da v. Downer (543 A.2d 309) adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Delaware on June 22, 1988, presents a pivotal...
Cinerama v. Technicolor: Affirming the Right of Minority Shareholders to Pursue Concurrent Appraisal and Fraud Claims

Cinerama v. Technicolor: Affirming the Right of Minority Shareholders to Pursue Concurrent Appraisal and Fraud Claims

Date: Jun 11, 1988
Cinerama v. Technicolor: Affirming the Right of Minority Shareholders to Pursue Concurrent Appraisal and Fraud Claims Introduction The case of CEDE CO. and Cinerama, Inc. v. Technicolor, Inc.,...
Restitution and Unjust Enrichment in Licensing Agreements: FLEER CORP. v. TOPPS CHEWING GUM, INC.

Restitution and Unjust Enrichment in Licensing Agreements: FLEER CORP. v. TOPPS CHEWING GUM, INC.

Date: Apr 7, 1988
Restitution and Unjust Enrichment in Licensing Agreements: FLEER CORP. v. TOPPS CHEWING GUM, INC. Introduction The case of Fleer Corporation v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc. adjudicated by the Supreme...
Probst v. State of Delaware: Ensuring Clarity in Jury Instructions for Principal and Accomplice Liability

Probst v. State of Delaware: Ensuring Clarity in Jury Instructions for Principal and Accomplice Liability

Date: Mar 24, 1988
Probst v. State of Delaware: Ensuring Clarity in Jury Instructions for Principal and Accomplice Liability Introduction Probst v. State of Delaware is a landmark judgment delivered by the Supreme...
Clarifying Demand Futility Standards in Derivative Suits: GROBOW v. PEROT

Clarifying Demand Futility Standards in Derivative Suits: GROBOW v. PEROT

Date: Mar 16, 1988
Clarifying Demand Futility Standards in Derivative Suits: GROBOW v. PEROT Introduction In the landmark case GROBOW v. PEROT, 539 A.2d 180 (Del. 1988), the Supreme Court of Delaware addressed critical...
Getz v. State of Delaware: Establishing Standards for Admissibility of Prior Sexual Misconduct Evidence under Rule 404(b)

Getz v. State of Delaware: Establishing Standards for Admissibility of Prior Sexual Misconduct Evidence under Rule 404(b)

Date: Mar 1, 1988
Getz v. State of Delaware: Establishing Standards for Admissibility of Prior Sexual Misconduct Evidence under Rule 404(b) Introduction In the landmark case of Charles R. Getz, Jr. v. State of...
Affirmation of the Entire Fairness Standard in Parent-Subsidiary Mergers: Bershad v. Curtiss-Wright

Affirmation of the Entire Fairness Standard in Parent-Subsidiary Mergers: Bershad v. Curtiss-Wright

Date: Dec 31, 1987
Affirmation of the Entire Fairness Standard in Parent-Subsidiary Mergers: Bershad v. Curtiss-Wright Introduction The landmark case of Bershad v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation, adjudicated by the Supreme...
Strategic Defense in Corporate Takeovers: A Comprehensive Analysis of Ivanhoe Partners v. Newmont Mining Corp.

Strategic Defense in Corporate Takeovers: A Comprehensive Analysis of Ivanhoe Partners v. Newmont Mining Corp.

Date: Nov 19, 1987
Strategic Defense in Corporate Takeovers: A Comprehensive Analysis of Ivanhoe Partners v. Newmont Mining Corp. Introduction The case of Ivanhoe Partners, a Texas general partnership, et al. v....
Delaware Supreme Court Recognizes Foreign Law in Internal Corporate Affairs: McDermott Inc. v. Lewis and Altman

Delaware Supreme Court Recognizes Foreign Law in Internal Corporate Affairs: McDermott Inc. v. Lewis and Altman

Date: Sep 17, 1987
Delaware Supreme Court Recognizes Foreign Law in Internal Corporate Affairs: McDermott Inc. v. Lewis and Altman Introduction The case of McDermott Incorporated, a Delaware Corporation, Defendant...
Reaffirming Chain of Custody Standards for Evidence Admissibility: Tricoche v. State of Delaware

Reaffirming Chain of Custody Standards for Evidence Admissibility: Tricoche v. State of Delaware

Date: May 6, 1987
Reaffirming Chain of Custody Standards for Evidence Admissibility: Tricoche v. State of Delaware Introduction The case of Nephtali Tricoche v. State of Delaware revolves around a defendant's...
Nicolet, Inc. v. Earl R. Nutt: Establishing Liability through Civil Conspiracy in Asbestos Litigation

Nicolet, Inc. v. Earl R. Nutt: Establishing Liability through Civil Conspiracy in Asbestos Litigation

Date: Apr 29, 1987
Nicolet, Inc. v. Earl R. Nutt: Establishing Liability through Civil Conspiracy in Asbestos Litigation Introduction Case: Nicolet, Inc., Defendant Below, Appellant, v. Earl R. Nutt, et al., Plaintiffs...
Landlord's Duty of Security and Punitive Damages in Jardel Co. v. Hughes

Landlord's Duty of Security and Punitive Damages in Jardel Co. v. Hughes

Date: Mar 24, 1987
Landlord's Duty of Security and Punitive Damages in Jardel Co. v. Hughes Introduction The case of Jardel Co., Inc., and John A. Robbins Co., Inc. v. Kathleen Hughes (523 A.2d 518) adjudicated by the...
Delaware Supreme Court Sets New Standards on Double Jeopardy and Sua Sponte Mistrials in BAILEY v. STATE

Delaware Supreme Court Sets New Standards on Double Jeopardy and Sua Sponte Mistrials in BAILEY v. STATE

Date: Mar 4, 1987
Delaware Supreme Court Sets New Standards on Double Jeopardy and Sua Sponte Mistrials in BAILEY v. STATE Introduction BAILEY v. STATE, 521 A.2d 1069 (Del. 1987), is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Recognition of Psychological Injuries in Workers' Compensation: Battista v. Chrysler Corp.

Recognition of Psychological Injuries in Workers' Compensation: Battista v. Chrysler Corp.

Date: Jul 22, 1986
Recognition of Psychological Injuries in Workers' Compensation: Battista v. Chrysler Corp. Introduction The case of Elio Battista v. Chrysler Corporation (517 A.2d 295), adjudicated by the Superior...
Persistent Course of Conduct as Basis for In Personam Jurisdiction: Analysis of LaNuova D B v. Bowe Company

Persistent Course of Conduct as Basis for In Personam Jurisdiction: Analysis of LaNuova D B v. Bowe Company

Date: Jun 25, 1986
Persistent Course of Conduct as Basis for In Personam Jurisdiction: Analysis of LaNuova D B v. Bowe Company Introduction The Supreme Court of Delaware's decision in LaNuova D B, S.p.A. and Dibiten...
Establishing Product Nexus and Conspiracy in Asbestos Litigation: Nutt v. A.C.S. Co.

Establishing Product Nexus and Conspiracy in Asbestos Litigation: Nutt v. A.C.S. Co.

Date: Jun 6, 1986
Establishing Product Nexus and Conspiracy in Asbestos Litigation: Nutt v. A.C.S. Co. Introduction Earl R. Nutt, et al. v. A.C. S. Co., Inc., et al. is a significant judicial decision rendered by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert