Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Delaware Case Commentaries

Reaffirming Finality and Non-Retroactivity in Criminal Postconviction Relief: State v. Flamer

Reaffirming Finality and Non-Retroactivity in Criminal Postconviction Relief: State v. Flamer

Date: Dec 22, 1990
Reaffirming Finality and Non-Retroactivity in Criminal Postconviction Relief: State v. Flamer Introduction In the case of William Henry FLAMER v. STATE of Delaware (585 A.2d 736), the Supreme Court...
Browne v. Robb: Affirmation of Qualified Immunity for Court-Appointed Counsel

Browne v. Robb: Affirmation of Qualified Immunity for Court-Appointed Counsel

Date: Nov 6, 1990
Browne v. Robb: Affirmation of Qualified Immunity for Court-Appointed Counsel Introduction Browne v. Robb, 583 A.2d 949 (Del. 1990), is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of Delaware...
Strict Construction of Stock Preferences Confirmed in Waggoner v. Laster (1990)

Strict Construction of Stock Preferences Confirmed in Waggoner v. Laster (1990)

Date: Oct 16, 1990
Strict Construction of Stock Preferences Confirmed in Waggoner v. Laster (1990) Introduction The case of Thomas R. Waggoner and Patricia L. Waggoner v. LaMar F. Laster et al., decided by the Supreme...
Application and Interpretation of Superior Court Criminal Rule 61 in Postconviction Relief: YOUNGER v. STATE of Delaware

Application and Interpretation of Superior Court Criminal Rule 61 in Postconviction Relief: YOUNGER v. STATE of Delaware

Date: Jul 28, 1990
Application and Interpretation of Superior Court Criminal Rule 61 in Postconviction Relief: YOUNGER v. STATE of Delaware Introduction Thomas B. Younger, the defendant, appeals pro se following the...
Reaffirming Unocal's Enhanced Scrutiny in Antitakeover Defense: El Paso v. The El Paso Co.

Reaffirming Unocal's Enhanced Scrutiny in Antitakeover Defense: El Paso v. The El Paso Co.

Date: May 17, 1990
Reaffirming Unocal's Enhanced Scrutiny in Antitakeover Defense: El Paso v. The El Paso Co. Introduction The case of Peter Gilbert, William Steiner, and Herbert Breitman, as sole Trustee of Ed...
Prejudicial Discovery Violations: Reversal of Conviction Due to Non-Disclosure of Co-Defendant Statements

Prejudicial Discovery Violations: Reversal of Conviction Due to Non-Disclosure of Co-Defendant Statements

Date: May 12, 1990
Prejudicial Discovery Violations: Reversal of Conviction Due to Non-Disclosure of Co-Defendant Statements Introduction The case of Edward L. Skinner, Alan T. Brooks, and Edward E. Sanders v. State of...
Delaware Supreme Court Affirmation of Business Judgment Rule in Derivative Actions

Delaware Supreme Court Affirmation of Business Judgment Rule in Derivative Actions

Date: Mar 20, 1990
Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Business Judgment Rule in Derivative Suits Following Proper Demand Procedures Introduction The case of Ted Spiegel v. Waste Management, Inc. (1990) serves as a pivotal...
Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion Based on Multiple Informant Tips: State v. Downs

Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion Based on Multiple Informant Tips: State v. Downs

Date: Jan 12, 1990
Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion Based on Multiple Informant Tips: State v. Downs Introduction State v. Phillip W. Downs is a pivotal case decided by the Supreme Court of Delaware on January 11,...
Reaffirmation of the Business Judgment Rule in Takeover Decisions: Citron v. Fairchild (1989)

Reaffirmation of the Business Judgment Rule in Takeover Decisions: Citron v. Fairchild (1989)

Date: Dec 23, 1989
Reaffirmation of the Business Judgment Rule in Takeover Decisions: Citron v. Fairchild (1989) Introduction In CITRON v. FAIRCHILD CAMERA AND INSTRUMENT CORPORATION, 569 A.2d 53 (Del. 1989), the...
Amsted Industries Settlement Approval: Upholding Fiduciary Duties and Settlement Fairness

Amsted Industries Settlement Approval: Upholding Fiduciary Duties and Settlement Fairness

Date: Dec 19, 1989
Amsted Industries Settlement Approval: Upholding Fiduciary Duties and Settlement Fairness 1. Introduction The case of Leonard Barkan v. Amsted Industries, Inc. is a significant judicial decision...
Enforcement of Mandatory Arbitration Clauses in Insurance Policies Under Delaware Law

Enforcement of Mandatory Arbitration Clauses in Insurance Policies Under Delaware Law

Date: Oct 17, 1989
Enforcement of Mandatory Arbitration Clauses in Insurance Policies Under Delaware Law Introduction The case of George Graham and Mary Jane Graham v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company...
Adoption of the 'Usual Exertion' Rule in Workmen's Compensation Law: Reversing the 'Unusual Exertion' Standard in Duvall v. Charles Connell Roofing

Adoption of the 'Usual Exertion' Rule in Workmen's Compensation Law: Reversing the 'Unusual Exertion' Standard in Duvall v. Charles Connell Roofing

Date: Sep 13, 1989
Adoption of the 'Usual Exertion' Rule in Workmen's Compensation Law: Reversing the 'Unusual Exertion' Standard in Duvall v. Charles Connell Roofing Introduction The case of William R. Duvall, Jr. v....
Delaware Supreme Court Establishes Preservation of Corporate Opportunity Claims in Appraisal Proceedings

Delaware Supreme Court Establishes Preservation of Corporate Opportunity Claims in Appraisal Proceedings

Date: Sep 6, 1989
Delaware Supreme Court Establishes Preservation of Corporate Opportunity Claims in Appraisal Proceedings Introduction The case of Cavalier Oil Corporation v. William J. Harnett (564 A.2d 1137,...
Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Defensive Measures in Time Inc. v. Paramount Communications: Clarifying Unocal and Revlon Duties

Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Defensive Measures in Time Inc. v. Paramount Communications: Clarifying Unocal and Revlon Duties

Date: Jul 25, 1989
Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Defensive Measures in Time Inc. v. Paramount Communications: Clarifying Unocal and Revlon Duties Introduction In the landmark case of Time Inc. v. Paramount...
Recognition of Individual Shareholder’s Right to Counsel Fees for Corporate Benefit in Litigation

Recognition of Individual Shareholder’s Right to Counsel Fees for Corporate Benefit in Litigation

Date: Jul 4, 1989
Recognition of Individual Shareholder’s Right to Counsel Fees for Corporate Benefit in Litigation Introduction The landmark case of Tandycrafts, Inc., et al. v. Initio Partners (562 A.2d 1162)...
Entire Fairness in Corporate Control Auctions: Delaware Supreme Court's Decision in Mills Acquisition Co. v. Macmillan, Inc.

Entire Fairness in Corporate Control Auctions: Delaware Supreme Court's Decision in Mills Acquisition Co. v. Macmillan, Inc.

Date: May 4, 1989
Entire Fairness in Corporate Control Auctions: Delaware Supreme Court's Decision in Mills Acquisition Co. v. Macmillan, Inc. Introduction In Mills Acquisition Co., a Delaware Corporation, et al., v....
Strict Adherence to Filing Deadlines: Delaware Supreme Court Upholds 30-Day Rule for Pro Se Incarcerated Appellants

Strict Adherence to Filing Deadlines: Delaware Supreme Court Upholds 30-Day Rule for Pro Se Incarcerated Appellants

Date: Feb 14, 1989
Strict Adherence to Filing Deadlines: Delaware Supreme Court Upholds 30-Day Rule for Pro Se Incarcerated Appellants Introduction The case of Bruce J. Carr v. State of Delaware (554 A.2d 778) presents...
Delaware Supreme Court Limits Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction: Dismissing Advisory Opinion Appeals

Delaware Supreme Court Limits Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction: Dismissing Advisory Opinion Appeals

Date: Jan 13, 1989
Delaware Supreme Court Limits Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction: Dismissing Advisory Opinion Appeals Introduction The case of W.B. Dixon Stroud, Jr., Morris W. Stroud, Agnes S. Peelle, and Anne S....
Strengthening Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Guilty Plea Challenges: Albury v. State of Delaware

Strengthening Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Guilty Plea Challenges: Albury v. State of Delaware

Date: Nov 29, 1988
Strengthening Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Guilty Plea Challenges: Albury v. State of Delaware Introduction James K. Albury, the defendant-appellant, appealed the denial of his...
Delaware Supreme Court Validates Express Statutory Consent for General Jurisdiction over Foreign Corporations: STERNBERG v. O'NEIL

Delaware Supreme Court Validates Express Statutory Consent for General Jurisdiction over Foreign Corporations: STERNBERG v. O'NEIL

Date: Nov 19, 1988
Delaware Supreme Court Validates Express Statutory Consent for General Jurisdiction over Foreign Corporations: STERNBERG v. O'NEIL Introduction Richard Sternberg, Plaintiff Below, Appellant, v....
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert