Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Delaware Case Commentaries

Delaware Supreme Court Establishes No Fiduciary Duty for Non-Profit Health Insurers

Delaware Supreme Court Establishes No Fiduciary Duty for Non-Profit Health Insurers

Date: Sep 23, 2003
Delaware Supreme Court Establishes No Fiduciary Duty for Non-Profit Health Insurers Introduction In the landmark case of Kester Crosse, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v....
Best Interests of the Child Must Be Explicitly Considered in Custody Modifications: Harper v. Harper

Best Interests of the Child Must Be Explicitly Considered in Custody Modifications: Harper v. Harper

Date: Jun 24, 2003
Best Interests of the Child Must Be Explicitly Considered in Custody Modifications: Harper v. Harper Introduction In the case of Mark A. Harper v. Carolyn Harper, decided by the Supreme Court of...
Encorp LLC v. H-M Wexford LLC: Establishing the Limits of Integration Clauses and the Protection of Directors Under the Business Judgment Rule

Encorp LLC v. H-M Wexford LLC: Establishing the Limits of Integration Clauses and the Protection of Directors Under the Business Judgment Rule

Date: May 28, 2003
Encorp LLC v. H-M Wexford LLC: Establishing the Limits of Integration Clauses and the Protection of Directors Under the Business Judgment Rule Introduction The case of H-M Wexford LLC v. Encorp, Inc....
Guttman v. Ltuang et al. (823 A.2d 492): Reaffirming Strict Pleading Standards for Demand Excusal in Delaware

Guttman v. Ltuang et al. (823 A.2d 492): Reaffirming Strict Pleading Standards for Demand Excusal in Delaware

Date: May 6, 2003
Guttman v. Ltuang et al. (823 A.2d 492): Reaffirming Strict Pleading Standards for Demand Excusal in Delaware Introduction The case of Guttman v. Ltuang et al. addresses critical issues surrounding...
Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies 'In Furtherance of' Requirement in Felony Murder for Burglary-related Cases

Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies 'In Furtherance of' Requirement in Felony Murder for Burglary-related Cases

Date: Dec 14, 2002
Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies 'In Furtherance of' Requirement in Felony Murder for Burglary-related Cases Introduction The Supreme Court of Delaware, in the case of Joseph Williams v. State of...
Reaffirming Notice Pleading Standards in Trade Secret Misappropriation Claims: Savor, Inc. v. FMR Corp.

Reaffirming Notice Pleading Standards in Trade Secret Misappropriation Claims: Savor, Inc. v. FMR Corp.

Date: Nov 26, 2002
Reaffirming Notice Pleading Standards in Trade Secret Misappropriation Claims: Savor, Inc. v. FMR Corp. Introduction The case of Savor, Inc. v. FMR Corp. addresses critical issues surrounding the...
Limiting Arbitration Clauses to Contractual Rights: Delaware Supreme Court's Decision in Parfi Holding AB v. Mirror Image Internet, Inc.

Limiting Arbitration Clauses to Contractual Rights: Delaware Supreme Court's Decision in Parfi Holding AB v. Mirror Image Internet, Inc.

Date: Nov 5, 2002
Limiting Arbitration Clauses to Contractual Rights: Delaware Supreme Court's Decision in Parfi Holding AB v. Mirror Image Internet, Inc. Introduction The Delaware Supreme Court's decision in Parfi...
Contractually Created Fiduciary Duties in Limited Partnerships: GOTHAM PARTNERS v. HALLWOOD REALTY Partners

Contractually Created Fiduciary Duties in Limited Partnerships: GOTHAM PARTNERS v. HALLWOOD REALTY Partners

Date: Aug 30, 2002
Contractually Created Fiduciary Duties in Limited Partnerships: GOTHAM PARTNERS v. HALLWOOD REALTY Partners Introduction The case of Gotham Partners, L.P. v. Hallwood Realty Partners, L.P. (817 A.2d...
Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Indemnification Scope and Statute of Limitations in Officer/Director Indemnification Claims

Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Indemnification Scope and Statute of Limitations in Officer/Director Indemnification Claims

Date: Jun 14, 2002
Delaware Supreme Court Clarifies Indemnification Scope and Statute of Limitations in Officer/Director Indemnification Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Stifel Financial Corporation v....
Delaware Supreme Court Sets New Standards on Directors' Fiduciary Duties and Summary Judgment in Derivative Actions

Delaware Supreme Court Sets New Standards on Directors' Fiduciary Duties and Summary Judgment in Derivative Actions

Date: Jun 8, 2002
Delaware Supreme Court Sets New Standards on Directors' Fiduciary Duties and Summary Judgment in Derivative Actions Introduction Telxon Corporation v. Robert F. Meyerson et al. is a landmark case...
Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Rule 35(b) Authority to Modify Sentences Post-Expiration Under Extraordinary Circumstances

Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Rule 35(b) Authority to Modify Sentences Post-Expiration Under Extraordinary Circumstances

Date: May 17, 2002
Delaware Supreme Court Upholds Rule 35(b) Authority to Modify Sentences Post-Expiration Under Extraordinary Circumstances Introduction In the landmark case of State of Delaware v. Roy Lewis, the...
Reformation of Merger Agreements: Delaware Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Reformation of Merger Agreements: Delaware Supreme Court Sets New Precedent

Date: Mar 14, 2002
Reformation of Merger Agreements: Delaware Supreme Court Sets New Precedent Introduction The case of CERBERUS INTERNATIONAL, LTD., CERBERUS PARTNERS, L.P., PEQUOD INVESTMENTS, L.P., and ULTRA...
Delaware Court Reaffirms Fiduciary Duty Standards in Orman v. Cullman

Delaware Court Reaffirms Fiduciary Duty Standards in Orman v. Cullman

Date: Feb 27, 2002
Delaware Court Reaffirms Fiduciary Duty Standards in Orman v. Cullman Introduction The case of Joseph Orman v. Edgar M. Cullman, Sr. et al., adjudicated by the Court of Chancery of Delaware in 2002,...
EMERALD PARTNERS v. BERLIN: Clarifying the Entire Fairness Standard in the Context of Section 102(b)(7) Provisions

EMERALD PARTNERS v. BERLIN: Clarifying the Entire Fairness Standard in the Context of Section 102(b)(7) Provisions

Date: Nov 29, 2001
EMERALD PARTNERS v. BERLIN: Clarifying the Entire Fairness Standard in the Context of Section 102(b)(7) Provisions Introduction Emerald Partners, a New Jersey limited partnership, Plaintiff Below,...
Clarifying 'Repair or Replace' Clauses: O’Brien v. Progressive Northern Affirms Exclusion of Diminished Value

Clarifying 'Repair or Replace' Clauses: O’Brien v. Progressive Northern Affirms Exclusion of Diminished Value

Date: Nov 10, 2001
Clarifying 'Repair or Replace' Clauses: O’Brien v. Progressive Northern Affirms Exclusion of Diminished Value Introduction The Supreme Court of Delaware, in the landmark case RANDY and EILEEN O'BRIEN...
Affirmation of Business Judgment Rule in Derivative Suit: White v. Panic

Affirmation of Business Judgment Rule in Derivative Suit: White v. Panic

Date: Oct 4, 2001
Affirmation of Business Judgment Rule in Derivative Suit: White v. Panic Introduction In Andrew White v. Milan Panic et al. (783 A.2d 543, Supreme Court of Delaware, 2001), the plaintiff, Andrew...
Caldwell v. State of Delaware: Establishing Limits on Pretextual Traffic Stops and the Exclusionary Rule

Caldwell v. State of Delaware: Establishing Limits on Pretextual Traffic Stops and the Exclusionary Rule

Date: Sep 14, 2001
Caldwell v. State of Delaware: Establishing Limits on Pretextual Traffic Stops and the Exclusionary Rule Introduction Caldwell v. State of Delaware is a seminal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Exculpatory Charter Provisions in Merger-Related Fiduciary Duty Claims

Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Exculpatory Charter Provisions in Merger-Related Fiduciary Duty Claims

Date: Aug 28, 2001
Delaware Supreme Court Affirms Exculpatory Charter Provisions in Merger-Related Fiduciary Duty Claims Introduction In the landmark case of LU v. Malpiede et al., decided by the Supreme Court of...
Reasonableness of Warrantless Searches Under the Fourth Amendment: Hunter v. State of Delaware

Reasonableness of Warrantless Searches Under the Fourth Amendment: Hunter v. State of Delaware

Date: Aug 23, 2001
Reasonableness of Warrantless Searches Under the Fourth Amendment: Hunter v. State of Delaware Introduction Case: Daniel Hunter, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE, Plaintiff Below,...
Capital Sentencing and Allocution: Analyzing the Supreme Court of Delaware's Affirmation in Thomas J. CAPANO v. STATE of Delaware

Capital Sentencing and Allocution: Analyzing the Supreme Court of Delaware's Affirmation in Thomas J. CAPANO v. STATE of Delaware

Date: Aug 11, 2001
Capital Sentencing and Allocution: Analyzing the Supreme Court of Delaware's Affirmation in Thomas J. CAPANO v. STATE of Delaware Introduction The Supreme Court of Delaware convened to hear the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert