Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

Colorado Case Commentaries

Accepting a Post–91-Day Restitution Hearing Date Waives the Statutory Deadline: Commentary on People v. Roberson, 2025 CO 30

Accepting a Post–91-Day Restitution Hearing Date Waives the Statutory Deadline: Commentary on People v. Roberson, 2025 CO 30

Date: Jun 24, 2025
Accepting a Post–91-Day Restitution Hearing Date Waives the Statutory Deadline: Commentary on People v. Roberson, 2025 CO 30 Introduction In People v. Roberson, 2025 CO 30, 569 P.3d 811, the Colorado...
Mens Rea Applies to Every Element of Colorado Securities Fraud: Advice-of-Counsel Evidence Is Admissible to Negate Willfulness

Mens Rea Applies to Every Element of Colorado Securities Fraud: Advice-of-Counsel Evidence Is Admissible to Negate Willfulness

Date: Jun 24, 2025
Mens Rea Applies to Every Element of Colorado Securities Fraud: Advice-of-Counsel Evidence Is Admissible to Negate Willfulness Introduction In People v. Schnorenberg, 2025 CO 43, 570 P.3d 1036 (Colo....
“Knowingly,” Not “Intentionally”: Colorado Supreme Court Clarifies Mens Rea for Soliciting for Child Prostitution under § 18-7-402(1)(a)–(b)

“Knowingly,” Not “Intentionally”: Colorado Supreme Court Clarifies Mens Rea for Soliciting for Child Prostitution under § 18-7-402(1)(a)–(b)

Date: Jun 24, 2025
“Knowingly,” Not “Intentionally”: Colorado Supreme Court Clarifies Mens Rea for Soliciting for Child Prostitution under § 18-7-402(1)(a)–(b) Introduction In Randolph v. People, 2025 CO 44, 570 P.3d...
Physical Access, Not Livestreams: Colorado Supreme Court Affirms that Virtual-Only Access Cannot Satisfy the Sixth Amendment Public Trial Right (People v. Bialas)

Physical Access, Not Livestreams: Colorado Supreme Court Affirms that Virtual-Only Access Cannot Satisfy the Sixth Amendment Public Trial Right (People v. Bialas)

Date: Jun 24, 2025
Physical Access, Not Livestreams: Colorado Supreme Court Affirms that Virtual-Only Access Cannot Satisfy the Sixth Amendment Public Trial Right Commentary on People v. Bialas, 2025 CO 45 (Colo. 2025)...
Restitution Deadlines Are Directory and Waivable: Johnson v. People Extends Non‑Jurisdictional Reading to § 18‑1.3‑603(2)(a) and Confirms Waiver by Plea and Conduct

Restitution Deadlines Are Directory and Waivable: Johnson v. People Extends Non‑Jurisdictional Reading to § 18‑1.3‑603(2)(a) and Confirms Waiver by Plea and Conduct

Date: Jun 24, 2025
Restitution Deadlines Are Directory and Waivable: Johnson v. People Extends Non‑Jurisdictional Reading to § 18‑1.3‑603(2)(a) and Confirms Waiver by Plea and Conduct Introduction In Johnson v. People,...
Tennyson v. People: Timeliness Challenges to Restitution Amounts Set Under § 18-1.3-603(1)(b) Are “Illegal Manner” Claims Subject to Crim. P. 35(b)’s Deadline

Tennyson v. People: Timeliness Challenges to Restitution Amounts Set Under § 18-1.3-603(1)(b) Are “Illegal Manner” Claims Subject to Crim. P. 35(b)’s Deadline

Date: Jun 24, 2025
Tennyson v. People: Timeliness Challenges to Restitution Amounts Set Under § 18-1.3-603(1)(b) Are “Illegal Manner” Claims Subject to Crim. P. 35(b)’s Deadline Introduction In 2025 CO 31 (569 P.3d...
People v. Ray: Colorado Declines to Extend Miller to Emerging Adults and Clarifies Post‑Rojas Treatment of Res Gestae and Related Evidence

People v. Ray: Colorado Declines to Extend Miller to Emerging Adults and Clarifies Post‑Rojas Treatment of Res Gestae and Related Evidence

Date: Jun 24, 2025
People v. Ray: Colorado Declines to Extend Miller to Emerging Adults and Clarifies Post‑Rojas Treatment of Res Gestae and Related Evidence Citation: People v. Ray, 2025 CO 42, No. 10SA157 (Colo. June...
Knowing Materiality: Colorado Supreme Court Holds “Willfully” Applies to Every Element of CSA § 11‑51‑501(1)(b) and (c), Making Advice‑of‑Counsel Evidence Relevant to Mens Rea

Knowing Materiality: Colorado Supreme Court Holds “Willfully” Applies to Every Element of CSA § 11‑51‑501(1)(b) and (c), Making Advice‑of‑Counsel Evidence Relevant to Mens Rea

Date: Jun 24, 2025
Knowing Materiality: Colorado Supreme Court Holds “Willfully” Applies to Every Element of CSA § 11‑51‑501(1)(b) and (c), Making Advice‑of‑Counsel Evidence Relevant to Mens Rea Introduction In People...
People v. Ray: Harmless-Error Review After Rojas, Strict CRE 606(b) Limits on Juror Impeachment, and Constitutional Validity of Adult LWOP Commutations

People v. Ray: Harmless-Error Review After Rojas, Strict CRE 606(b) Limits on Juror Impeachment, and Constitutional Validity of Adult LWOP Commutations

Date: Jun 24, 2025
People v. Ray: Harmless-Error Review After Rojas, Strict CRE 606(b) Limits on Juror Impeachment, and Constitutional Validity of Adult LWOP Commutations Introduction In People v. Ray, 2025 CO 42, the...
Colorado Supreme Court: Denial of Summary Judgment or Directed Verdict in Prior Litigation Is Only a Factor—Not a Rebuttable Presumption—of Probable Cause in Malicious Prosecution Actions

Colorado Supreme Court: Denial of Summary Judgment or Directed Verdict in Prior Litigation Is Only a Factor—Not a Rebuttable Presumption—of Probable Cause in Malicious Prosecution Actions

Date: Jun 17, 2025
Denial of Summary Judgment or Directed Verdict in Prior Litigation Is Only a Factor—Not a Rebuttable Presumption—of Probable Cause in Malicious Prosecution Actions Introduction In Cantafio v....
Colorado Supreme Court Adopts “Likelihood” Standard for Trinity Hearings and Clarifies Proximate-Cause Requirement for the CGIA Dangerous-Condition Waiver

Colorado Supreme Court Adopts “Likelihood” Standard for Trinity Hearings and Clarifies Proximate-Cause Requirement for the CGIA Dangerous-Condition Waiver

Date: Jun 17, 2025
Colorado Supreme Court Adopts “Likelihood” Standard for Trinity Hearings and Clarifies Proximate-Cause Requirement for the CGIA Dangerous-Condition Waiver Introduction In Jefferson County, Colorado...
Colorado Supreme Court Clarifies Probable Cause in Malicious Prosecution: Denials of Summary Judgment or Directed Verdict Are Factors, Not Presumptions (Cantafio v. Schnelle, 2025 CO 39)

Colorado Supreme Court Clarifies Probable Cause in Malicious Prosecution: Denials of Summary Judgment or Directed Verdict Are Factors, Not Presumptions (Cantafio v. Schnelle, 2025 CO 39)

Date: Jun 17, 2025
Denial of Summary Judgment or Directed Verdict in a Prior Case Is Only a Factor—Not a Rebuttable Presumption—of Probable Cause in Subsequent Malicious Prosecution Actions Introduction In Cantafio v....
Ghostwriting While Suspended Is Unauthorized Practice Warranting Disbarment; POME Defense Inapplicable Without Pro Se Status

Ghostwriting While Suspended Is Unauthorized Practice Warranting Disbarment; POME Defense Inapplicable Without Pro Se Status

Date: Jun 12, 2025
Ghostwriting While Suspended Is Unauthorized Practice Warranting Disbarment; POME Defense Inapplicable Without Pro Se Status Introduction This commentary analyzes the Amended Opinion of the Office of...
Venue for CCJRA Show-Cause Hearings Lies Where the Records Are Located; Ancillary Jurisdiction Unavailable When a Specific Statute Governs — Commentary on People v. Sotade, 2025 CO 38 (Colo.)

Venue for CCJRA Show-Cause Hearings Lies Where the Records Are Located; Ancillary Jurisdiction Unavailable When a Specific Statute Governs — Commentary on People v. Sotade, 2025 CO 38 (Colo.)

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Venue for CCJRA Show-Cause Hearings Lies Where the Records Are Located; Ancillary Jurisdiction Unavailable When a Specific Statute Governs — Commentary on People v. Sotade, 2025 CO 38 (Colo.) Case:...
Decoupling Due Process from Quasi‑Judicial Status: Colorado Supreme Court Confirms Absolute Privilege for Statements in Public School Title IX Investigations

Decoupling Due Process from Quasi‑Judicial Status: Colorado Supreme Court Confirms Absolute Privilege for Statements in Public School Title IX Investigations

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Decoupling Due Process from Quasi‑Judicial Status: Colorado Supreme Court Confirms Absolute Privilege for Statements in Public School Title IX Investigations Case: Hushen v. Gonzales, 570 P.3d 473,...
Colorado Supreme Court Adopts a “Likelihood” Burden for CGIA Waivers and Requires Negligent Causation of a “Dangerous Condition” — Jefferson County v. Dozier (2025 CO 36)

Colorado Supreme Court Adopts a “Likelihood” Burden for CGIA Waivers and Requires Negligent Causation of a “Dangerous Condition” — Jefferson County v. Dozier (2025 CO 36)

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Colorado Supreme Court Adopts a “Likelihood” Burden for CGIA Waivers and Requires Negligent Causation of a “Dangerous Condition” — Jefferson County v. Dozier (2025 CO 36) Introduction In Jefferson...
Defining “Quasi‑Judicial” Without Due Process Minimums: Absolute Privilege Applies to Statements in Public School Title IX Proceedings (Hushen v. Gonzales, 2025 CO 37)

Defining “Quasi‑Judicial” Without Due Process Minimums: Absolute Privilege Applies to Statements in Public School Title IX Proceedings (Hushen v. Gonzales, 2025 CO 37)

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Defining “Quasi‑Judicial” Without Due Process Minimums: Absolute Privilege Applies to Statements in Public School Title IX Proceedings Commentary on Hushen v. Gonzales, 2025 CO 37 (Colo. June 9,...
Mandatory Venue for CCJRA Show-Cause Hearings: Applications Must Be Filed Where the Records Reside, and Ancillary Jurisdiction Cannot Override a Specific Statutory Venue

Mandatory Venue for CCJRA Show-Cause Hearings: Applications Must Be Filed Where the Records Reside, and Ancillary Jurisdiction Cannot Override a Specific Statutory Venue

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Mandatory Venue for CCJRA Show-Cause Hearings: Applications Must Be Filed Where the Records Reside, and Ancillary Jurisdiction Cannot Override a Specific Statutory Venue Case: In re The People of the...
Colorado Supreme Court Adopts “Present-Parent” Rule: Post-Adoption, Parents of a Deceased Parent Lack Standing for Grandparent Visitation

Colorado Supreme Court Adopts “Present-Parent” Rule: Post-Adoption, Parents of a Deceased Parent Lack Standing for Grandparent Visitation

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Colorado Supreme Court Adopts “Present-Parent” Rule: Post-Adoption, Parents of a Deceased Parent Lack Standing for Grandparent Visitation Introduction In In re the Parental Responsibilities...
Colorado Supreme Court Narrows Grandparent Visitation Standing: Post‑Adoption, Parents of a Deceased Parent Are Not “Grandparents” Under the Children’s Code

Colorado Supreme Court Narrows Grandparent Visitation Standing: Post‑Adoption, Parents of a Deceased Parent Are Not “Grandparents” Under the Children’s Code

Date: Jun 10, 2025
Colorado Supreme Court Narrows Grandparent Visitation Standing: Post‑Adoption, Parents of a Deceased Parent Are Not “Grandparents” Under the Children’s Code Introduction In a closely divided decision...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert