Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Enforcement of Settlement Agreements: Personal Signatures Required under CCP §664.6 Introduction The case of Abraham Levy v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, reported at 10 Cal.4th 578...
Clarifying Third-Party Culpability Evidence under Evidence Code Section 1101: People v. Davis Introduction People v. Larry David Davis (10 Cal.4th 463) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Due Process in Reinstating Dismissed Appeals: Supreme Court of California’s Ruling in In re Frank Nicolas Serrano Introduction In re Frank Nicolas Serrano on Habeas Corpus (10 Cal.4th 447),...
Tolling of Statute of Limitations in Arbitration-Related Proceedings: Howard v. Thrifty Drug and Discount Stores Introduction In the landmark case of Arkita L. Howard v. Thrifty Drug and Discount...
Inverse Condemnation Not Applicable to Law Enforcement Actions Under California Constitution Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in the landmark case of Customer Company v. City of...
Limits on Exclusion of Third-Party Witness Testimony on Due Process Grounds and Confirmation of Marital Communication Privilege Requirements – People v. Badgett Introduction In the landmark case of...
Clarifying Judicial Standards for Sentencing Enhancements: People v. Wims Introduction People v. Clifton C. Wims et al. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California, rendered on June 5,...
UIPA Does Not Supersede Cartwright Act and Unfair Competition Act in Regulating Insurance Industry Practices Introduction The case of Manufacturers Life Insurance Company et al. v. Superior Court of...
Clarifying the Application of Habitual Offender Statute (Penal Code 667.7) to Murder Convictions Introduction The Supreme Court of California's decision in The People v. Robert Earl Jenkins, 10...
Ingestion of Illegal Drugs Does Not Negate Possession: Insights from THE PEOPLE v. PALASCHAK Introduction THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DOUGLAS ANDREW PALASCHAK is a landmark case...
Supreme Court Affirms Exclusive Extraordinary Writ Review for Public Records Act Disclosures Introduction The case of Donna R. Powers et al. v. City of Richmond addressed a critical issue regarding...
Reaffirmation of Strickland Standards in Capital Cases: An Analysis of In re Craig Anthony Ross Introduction In the landmark case of In re CRAIG ANTHONY ROSS on Habeas Corpus (10 Cal.4th 184),...
Reaffirmation of Strict Causation for Presentence Credit in Multiple Restraint Situations: People v. Bruner Introduction People v. Bruner, 9 Cal.4th 1178 (1995), is a seminal case in California law...
Attorney-Client Privilege in Post-Refusal Communications: Insights from The People v. Thomas Gionis Introduction The People v. Thomas Gionis (9 Cal.4th 1196, 1995) is a landmark decision by the...
Establishing Intent Requirements for First-Degree Felony Murder: People v. Tracy Cain Introduction The case of The People v. Tracy Dearl Cain (10 Cal.4th 1, 1995) revolved around the conviction of...
Enhancing Public Safety through Reasonable Conditions on Own Recognizance Releases Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in the landmark decision In re DAVID ANTHONY YORK et al. on Habeas...
Preserving Public Accessibility: California's Supreme Court Validates Santa Ana's Anti-Camping Ordinance Introduction In the landmark case of ARCHIE TOBE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF...
People v. Beeler: Juror Impairment and Capital Sentencing Procedures in California Introduction People v. Rodney Gene Beeler is a pivotal 1995 decision by the Supreme Court of California that delves...
Supreme Court of California Establishes Clear Entitlement to Attorney Fees Under Civil Code Section 1717 Introduction In the landmark case Chia-Lee Hsu et al. v. Maher J. Abbara et al., decided on...
Affirmation of Death Sentences in People v. Champion and Ross: Striking Duplicative Special Circumstances Introduction The landmark case, The People v. Steven Allen Champion and Craig Anthony Ross (9...