Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Enforcement of Settlement Agreements: Personal Signatures Required under CCP §664.6

Enforcement of Settlement Agreements: Personal Signatures Required under CCP §664.6

Date: Jun 23, 1995
Enforcement of Settlement Agreements: Personal Signatures Required under CCP §664.6 Introduction The case of Abraham Levy v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County, reported at 10 Cal.4th 578...
Clarifying Third-Party Culpability Evidence under Evidence Code Section 1101: People v. Davis

Clarifying Third-Party Culpability Evidence under Evidence Code Section 1101: People v. Davis

Date: Jun 20, 1995
Clarifying Third-Party Culpability Evidence under Evidence Code Section 1101: People v. Davis Introduction People v. Larry David Davis (10 Cal.4th 463) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Due Process in Reinstating Dismissed Appeals: Supreme Court of California’s Ruling in In re Frank Nicolas Serrano

Due Process in Reinstating Dismissed Appeals: Supreme Court of California’s Ruling in In re Frank Nicolas Serrano

Date: Jun 20, 1995
Due Process in Reinstating Dismissed Appeals: Supreme Court of California’s Ruling in In re Frank Nicolas Serrano Introduction In re Frank Nicolas Serrano on Habeas Corpus (10 Cal.4th 447),...
Tolling of Statute of Limitations in Arbitration-Related Proceedings: Howard v. Thrifty Drug and Discount Stores

Tolling of Statute of Limitations in Arbitration-Related Proceedings: Howard v. Thrifty Drug and Discount Stores

Date: Jun 16, 1995
Tolling of Statute of Limitations in Arbitration-Related Proceedings: Howard v. Thrifty Drug and Discount Stores Introduction In the landmark case of Arkita L. Howard v. Thrifty Drug and Discount...
Inverse Condemnation Not Applicable to Law Enforcement Actions Under California Constitution

Inverse Condemnation Not Applicable to Law Enforcement Actions Under California Constitution

Date: Jun 13, 1995
Inverse Condemnation Not Applicable to Law Enforcement Actions Under California Constitution Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in the landmark case of Customer Company v. City of...
Limits on Exclusion of Third-Party Witness Testimony on Due Process Grounds and Confirmation of Marital Communication Privilege Requirements – People v. Badgett

Limits on Exclusion of Third-Party Witness Testimony on Due Process Grounds and Confirmation of Marital Communication Privilege Requirements – People v. Badgett

Date: Jun 9, 1995
Limits on Exclusion of Third-Party Witness Testimony on Due Process Grounds and Confirmation of Marital Communication Privilege Requirements – People v. Badgett Introduction In the landmark case of...
Clarifying Judicial Standards for Sentencing Enhancements: People v. Wims

Clarifying Judicial Standards for Sentencing Enhancements: People v. Wims

Date: Jun 6, 1995
Clarifying Judicial Standards for Sentencing Enhancements: People v. Wims Introduction People v. Clifton C. Wims et al. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California, rendered on June 5,...
UIPA Does Not Supersede Cartwright Act and Unfair Competition Act in Regulating Insurance Industry Practices

UIPA Does Not Supersede Cartwright Act and Unfair Competition Act in Regulating Insurance Industry Practices

Date: Jun 2, 1995
UIPA Does Not Supersede Cartwright Act and Unfair Competition Act in Regulating Insurance Industry Practices Introduction The case of Manufacturers Life Insurance Company et al. v. Superior Court of...
Clarifying the Application of Habitual Offender Statute (Penal Code 667.7) to Murder Convictions

Clarifying the Application of Habitual Offender Statute (Penal Code 667.7) to Murder Convictions

Date: May 19, 1995
Clarifying the Application of Habitual Offender Statute (Penal Code 667.7) to Murder Convictions Introduction The Supreme Court of California's decision in The People v. Robert Earl Jenkins, 10...
Ingestion of Illegal Drugs Does Not Negate Possession: Insights from THE PEOPLE v. PALASCHAK

Ingestion of Illegal Drugs Does Not Negate Possession: Insights from THE PEOPLE v. PALASCHAK

Date: May 9, 1995
Ingestion of Illegal Drugs Does Not Negate Possession: Insights from THE PEOPLE v. PALASCHAK Introduction THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. DOUGLAS ANDREW PALASCHAK is a landmark case...
Supreme Court Affirms Exclusive Extraordinary Writ Review for Public Records Act Disclosures

Supreme Court Affirms Exclusive Extraordinary Writ Review for Public Records Act Disclosures

Date: May 9, 1995
Supreme Court Affirms Exclusive Extraordinary Writ Review for Public Records Act Disclosures Introduction The case of Donna R. Powers et al. v. City of Richmond addressed a critical issue regarding...
Reaffirmation of Strickland Standards in Capital Cases: An Analysis of In re Craig Anthony Ross

Reaffirmation of Strickland Standards in Capital Cases: An Analysis of In re Craig Anthony Ross

Date: May 9, 1995
Reaffirmation of Strickland Standards in Capital Cases: An Analysis of In re Craig Anthony Ross Introduction In the landmark case of In re CRAIG ANTHONY ROSS on Habeas Corpus (10 Cal.4th 184),...
Reaffirmation of Strict Causation for Presentence Credit in Multiple Restraint Situations: People v. Bruner

Reaffirmation of Strict Causation for Presentence Credit in Multiple Restraint Situations: People v. Bruner

Date: May 5, 1995
Reaffirmation of Strict Causation for Presentence Credit in Multiple Restraint Situations: People v. Bruner Introduction People v. Bruner, 9 Cal.4th 1178 (1995), is a seminal case in California law...
Attorney-Client Privilege in Post-Refusal Communications: Insights from The People v. Thomas Gionis

Attorney-Client Privilege in Post-Refusal Communications: Insights from The People v. Thomas Gionis

Date: May 5, 1995
Attorney-Client Privilege in Post-Refusal Communications: Insights from The People v. Thomas Gionis Introduction The People v. Thomas Gionis (9 Cal.4th 1196, 1995) is a landmark decision by the...
Establishing Intent Requirements for First-Degree Felony Murder: People v. Tracy Cain

Establishing Intent Requirements for First-Degree Felony Murder: People v. Tracy Cain

Date: May 5, 1995
Establishing Intent Requirements for First-Degree Felony Murder: People v. Tracy Cain Introduction The case of The People v. Tracy Dearl Cain (10 Cal.4th 1, 1995) revolved around the conviction of...
Enhancing Public Safety through Reasonable Conditions on Own Recognizance Releases

Enhancing Public Safety through Reasonable Conditions on Own Recognizance Releases

Date: Apr 28, 1995
Enhancing Public Safety through Reasonable Conditions on Own Recognizance Releases Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in the landmark decision In re DAVID ANTHONY YORK et al. on Habeas...
Preserving Public Accessibility: California's Supreme Court Validates Santa Ana's Anti-Camping Ordinance

Preserving Public Accessibility: California's Supreme Court Validates Santa Ana's Anti-Camping Ordinance

Date: Apr 25, 1995
Preserving Public Accessibility: California's Supreme Court Validates Santa Ana's Anti-Camping Ordinance Introduction In the landmark case of ARCHIE TOBE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF...
People v. Beeler: Juror Impairment and Capital Sentencing Procedures in California

People v. Beeler: Juror Impairment and Capital Sentencing Procedures in California

Date: Apr 11, 1995
People v. Beeler: Juror Impairment and Capital Sentencing Procedures in California Introduction People v. Rodney Gene Beeler is a pivotal 1995 decision by the Supreme Court of California that delves...
Supreme Court of California Establishes Clear Entitlement to Attorney Fees Under Civil Code Section 1717

Supreme Court of California Establishes Clear Entitlement to Attorney Fees Under Civil Code Section 1717

Date: Apr 7, 1995
Supreme Court of California Establishes Clear Entitlement to Attorney Fees Under Civil Code Section 1717 Introduction In the landmark case Chia-Lee Hsu et al. v. Maher J. Abbara et al., decided on...
Affirmation of Death Sentences in People v. Champion and Ross: Striking Duplicative Special Circumstances

Affirmation of Death Sentences in People v. Champion and Ross: Striking Duplicative Special Circumstances

Date: Apr 7, 1995
Affirmation of Death Sentences in People v. Champion and Ross: Striking Duplicative Special Circumstances Introduction The landmark case, The People v. Steven Allen Champion and Craig Anthony Ross (9...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert