Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Legitimate Grounds for Detention During Warrant Searches: Analysis of THE PEOPLE v. RONNY GLASER

Legitimate Grounds for Detention During Warrant Searches: Analysis of THE PEOPLE v. RONNY GLASER

Date: Oct 13, 1995
Legitimate Grounds for Detention During Warrant Searches: Analysis of THE PEOPLE v. RONNY GLASER Introduction THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. RONNY GLASER, Defendant and Appellant (11...
Establishing Wrongfulness in Tortious Interference: Della Penna v. Toyota Sets New Precedent

Establishing Wrongfulness in Tortious Interference: Della Penna v. Toyota Sets New Precedent

Date: Oct 13, 1995
Establishing Wrongfulness in Tortious Interference: Della Penna v. Toyota Sets New Precedent Introduction In the landmark case of John Della Penna v. Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc., adjudicated by...
Exemption of Local Public Entities from 10% Postjudgment Interest Rates Under Code of Civil Procedure

Exemption of Local Public Entities from 10% Postjudgment Interest Rates Under Code of Civil Procedure

Date: Oct 6, 1995
Exemption of Local Public Entities from 10% Postjudgment Interest Rates Under Code of Civil Procedure Introduction California Federal Savings and Loan Association et al. v. City of Los Angeles (11...
Attorney Litigants in Propria Persona Cannot Recover Reasonable Attorney’s Fees Under Civil Code Section 1717

Attorney Litigants in Propria Persona Cannot Recover Reasonable Attorney’s Fees Under Civil Code Section 1717

Date: Oct 3, 1995
Attorney Litigants in Propria Persona Cannot Recover Reasonable Attorney’s Fees Under Civil Code Section 1717 Introduction The case of Sorrell Trope et al. v. Bertram Bernard Katz (1995) addressed a...
Affirming Statutory Voter Approval Requirements for Special Taxes: Santa Clara County v. Guardino

Affirming Statutory Voter Approval Requirements for Special Taxes: Santa Clara County v. Guardino

Date: Sep 29, 1995
Affirming Statutory Voter Approval Requirements for Special Taxes: Santa Clara County v. Guardino Introduction Santa Clara County Local Transportation Authority v. Guardino is a landmark decision by...
Section 85 of the National Bank Act: Inclusion of Late Payment Fees under 'Interest' Definition

Section 85 of the National Bank Act: Inclusion of Late Payment Fees under 'Interest' Definition

Date: Sep 2, 1995
Section 85 of the National Bank Act: Inclusion of Late Payment Fees under 'Interest' Definition Introduction The case of Barbara Smiley v. Citibank (South Dakota) N.A. tackled the intricate interplay...
Overruling Seaman's: New Precedent on Tort Recovery in Commercial Contract Breaches

Overruling Seaman's: New Precedent on Tort Recovery in Commercial Contract Breaches

Date: Sep 1, 1995
Overruling Seaman's: New Precedent on Tort Recovery in Commercial Contract Breaches Introduction The case of Freeman Mills, Incorporated v. Belcher OilCompany represents a pivotal moment in...
Alliance Mortgage Co. v. Samuelrothwell: Affirmation of Fraud Claims Post-Full Credit Bid

Alliance Mortgage Co. v. Samuelrothwell: Affirmation of Fraud Claims Post-Full Credit Bid

Date: Aug 29, 1995
Alliance Mortgage Co. v. Samuelrothwell: Affirmation of Fraud Claims Post-Full Credit Bid Introduction In the landmark case Alliance Mortgage Company, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Laurie...
Defining Insurer's Duty to Defend Non-Covered Economic Torts in CGL Policies: Truck Insurance Exchange v. Waller

Defining Insurer's Duty to Defend Non-Covered Economic Torts in CGL Policies: Truck Insurance Exchange v. Waller

Date: Aug 29, 1995
No Duty to Defend under CGL Policies for Emotional Distress from Non-Covered Economic Losses: Truck Insurance Exchange v. Waller Introduction The case of Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc. v. Waller (11...
Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Hoffard: Expansion of Appellate Review in Guilty Plea Cases

Comprehensive Commentary on People v. Hoffard: Expansion of Appellate Review in Guilty Plea Cases

Date: Aug 22, 1995
People v. Hoffard: Expansion of Appellate Review in Guilty Plea Cases Introduction In The People v. Randall Eugene Hoffard (10 Cal.4th 1170, 1995), the Supreme Court of California addressed...
California Supreme Court Clarifies Directory Nature of Government Code Section 18671.1 in Personnel Appeals

California Supreme Court Clarifies Directory Nature of Government Code Section 18671.1 in Personnel Appeals

Date: Aug 18, 1995
California Supreme Court Clarifies Directory Nature of Government Code Section 18671.1 in Personnel Appeals 1. Introduction The case of California Correctional Peace Officers Association v. State...
Restitution as a Valid Condition of Probation in Hit-and-Run Offenses: Insights from People v. Carbajal

Restitution as a Valid Condition of Probation in Hit-and-Run Offenses: Insights from People v. Carbajal

Date: Aug 15, 1995
Restitution as a Valid Condition of Probation in Hit-and-Run Offenses: Insights from People v. Carbajal Introduction The case of People v. Carbajal, decided by the Supreme Court of California in...
Adoption of Michael H. v. Mark K.: Establishing the Limits of an Unwed Father's Constitutional Rights

Adoption of Michael H. v. Mark K.: Establishing the Limits of an Unwed Father's Constitutional Rights

Date: Aug 1, 1995
Adoption of Michael H. v. Mark K.: Establishing the Limits of an Unwed Father's Constitutional Rights Introduction The case Adoption of MICHAEL H., a Minor. JOHN S. et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants,...
Establishing Arming Enhancements in Continuing Felonies: People v. Bland

Establishing Arming Enhancements in Continuing Felonies: People v. Bland

Date: Jul 28, 1995
Establishing Arming Enhancements in Continuing Felonies: People v. Bland Introduction People v. Marvin Bland, 10 Cal.4th 991 (1995), is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California that...
Personal Immunity of Elected School Board Members Under Tort Claims Act in Caldwell v. Montoya

Personal Immunity of Elected School Board Members Under Tort Claims Act in Caldwell v. Montoya

Date: Jul 28, 1995
Personal Immunity of Elected School Board Members Under Tort Claims Act in Caldwell v. Montoya Introduction In Richard Caldwell v. Joseph Montoya et al. (10 Cal.4th 972, 1995), the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Multi-Murder Case: Procedures, Evidence, and Constitutional Considerations

Affirmation of Death Sentence in Multi-Murder Case: Procedures, Evidence, and Constitutional Considerations

Date: Jul 21, 1995
Affirmation of Death Sentence in Multi-Murder Case: Procedures, Evidence, and Constitutional Considerations Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Jeffrey Hawkins, the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction: Application of the 'Law of the Case' Doctrine in California

Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction: Application of the 'Law of the Case' Doctrine in California

Date: Jul 7, 1995
Affirmation of Capital Murder Conviction: Application of the 'Law of the Case' Doctrine in California Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Gerald Frank Stanley (10 Cal.4th 764, 1995),...
Interpretation of "Amenable to Process" in Service of Process under California Law

Interpretation of "Amenable to Process" in Service of Process under California Law

Date: Jul 7, 1995
Interpretation of "Amenable to Process" in Service of Process under California Law Introduction DOYLE WATTS et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. GERTRUDE CRAWFORD, Defendant and Respondent was a...
In re M.S., a Minor: Upholding California's Hate Crime Statutes

In re M.S., a Minor: Upholding California's Hate Crime Statutes

Date: Jul 4, 1995
In re M.S., a Minor: Upholding California's Hate Crime Statutes Introduction In re M.S., a Minor is a landmark 1995 judgment by the Supreme Court of California that addressed constitutional...
Adoption of "Continuous Injury" Trigger in Third Party Liability Insurance: Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral Ins. Co.

Adoption of "Continuous Injury" Trigger in Third Party Liability Insurance: Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral Ins. Co.

Date: Jul 4, 1995
Adoption of "Continuous Injury" Trigger in Third Party Liability Insurance: Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Admiral Ins. Co. Introduction The Supreme Court of California, in Montrose Chemical Corporation...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert