Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Determining Property Interests: Fee Simple vs. Easement in Railroad Conveyances

Determining Property Interests: Fee Simple vs. Easement in Railroad Conveyances

Date: Apr 26, 1996
Determining Property Interests: Fee Simple vs. Easement in Railroad Conveyances Introduction The case of City of Manhattan Beach v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County et al. revolves around a...
Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence in Prior Conviction Enhancements: Analysis of People v. Reed

Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence in Prior Conviction Enhancements: Analysis of People v. Reed

Date: Apr 26, 1996
Admissibility of Hearsay Evidence in Prior Conviction Enhancements: Analysis of People v. Reed Introduction People v. Reed (13 Cal.4th 217, 1996) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Juvenile Courts' Authority to Condition Visitation on Parental Counseling: An In-Depth Analysis of In re Chantal S.

Juvenile Courts' Authority to Condition Visitation on Parental Counseling: An In-Depth Analysis of In re Chantal S.

Date: Apr 23, 1996
Juvenile Courts' Authority to Condition Visitation on Parental Counseling: An In-Depth Analysis of In re Chantal S. Introduction In re Chantal S. is a landmark 1996 decision by the Supreme Court of...
Strict Compliance with Probable Cause and Waiver of Appellate Rights in Plea Bargains: Analysis of People v. Panizzon

Strict Compliance with Probable Cause and Waiver of Appellate Rights in Plea Bargains: Analysis of People v. Panizzon

Date: Apr 19, 1996
Strict Compliance with Probable Cause and Waiver of Appellate Rights in Plea Bargains: Analysis of People v. Panizzon Introduction People v. Panizzon is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of...
Legislative Delegation of Unpaid Furlough Days for Courts: Upholding Government Code Section 68108

Legislative Delegation of Unpaid Furlough Days for Courts: Upholding Government Code Section 68108

Date: Apr 19, 1996
Legislative Delegation of Unpaid Furlough Days for Courts: Upholding Government Code Section 68108 Introduction In the landmark case of THE SUPERIOR COURT OF MENDOCINO COUNTY, Plaintiff and...
Burgess v. Burgess: No Necessity Burden for Relocation in Custody Determination

Burgess v. Burgess: No Necessity Burden for Relocation in Custody Determination

Date: Apr 16, 1996
Burgess v. Burgess: No Necessity Burden for Relocation in Custody Determination Introduction In In re the Marriage of Burgess, 13 Cal.4th 25 (1996), the Supreme Court of California addressed a...
Affirmation of Capital Sentencing and Evidence Standards in THE PEOPLE v. PEDRO ARIAS

Affirmation of Capital Sentencing and Evidence Standards in THE PEOPLE v. PEDRO ARIAS

Date: Apr 12, 1996
Affirmation of Capital Sentencing and Evidence Standards in THE PEOPLE v. PEDRO ARIAS Introduction In the landmark case of THE PEOPLE v. PEDRO ARIAS, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on...
Jurisdictional Limitations in Sentencing under Penal Code Section 1203.2a: In re ROBERT HODDINOTT

Jurisdictional Limitations in Sentencing under Penal Code Section 1203.2a: In re ROBERT HODDINOTT

Date: Mar 26, 1996
Jurisdictional Limitations in Sentencing under Penal Code Section 1203.2a: In re ROBERT HODDINOTT Introduction The case of In re ROBERT HODDINOTT addresses critical issues surrounding sentencing...
Governmental Immunity Extended to Self-Inflicted Injuries by Escapees under Government Code Section 845.8

Governmental Immunity Extended to Self-Inflicted Injuries by Escapees under Government Code Section 845.8

Date: Mar 8, 1996
Governmental Immunity Extended to Self-Inflicted Injuries by Escapees under Government Code Section 845.8 Introduction In the landmark case of Kay Maureen Ladd, a Minor, etc., Plaintiff and...
Establishing the Materiality of False Prosecution Testimony in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: In re Kelvin Shelby Malone

Establishing the Materiality of False Prosecution Testimony in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: In re Kelvin Shelby Malone

Date: Mar 8, 1996
Establishing the Materiality of False Prosecution Testimony in Habeas Corpus Proceedings: In re Kelvin Shelby Malone Introduction In re Kelvin Shelby Malone is a pivotal 1996 decision by the Supreme...
EHRLICH v. CITY OF CULVER CITY: Extending Nollan-Dolan Standards to Monetary Exactions

EHRLICH v. CITY OF CULVER CITY: Extending Nollan-Dolan Standards to Monetary Exactions

Date: Mar 6, 1996
EHRLICH v. CITY OF CULVER CITY: Extending Nollan-Dolan Standards to Monetary Exactions Introduction EHRLICH v. CITY OF CULVER CITY is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California in...
Retroactive Application of Penal Code Amendments: People v. Nasalga

Retroactive Application of Penal Code Amendments: People v. Nasalga

Date: Mar 1, 1996
Retroactive Application of Penal Code Amendments: People v. Nasalga Introduction People v. Maria E. Nasalga (12 Cal.4th 784), decided by the Supreme Court of California on February 29, 1996,...
Clarifying Penalty Provisions in Attempted Murder: The People v. Bright Decision

Clarifying Penalty Provisions in Attempted Murder: The People v. Bright Decision

Date: Feb 6, 1996
Clarifying Penalty Provisions in Attempted Murder: The People v. Bright Decision Introduction In The People v. James Michael Bright, decided on February 5, 1996, the Supreme Court of California...
Establishing the Cumulative Impact of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: In re CARLOS JAMIE AVENA

Establishing the Cumulative Impact of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: In re CARLOS JAMIE AVENA

Date: Feb 6, 1996
Establishing the Cumulative Impact of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: In re CARLOS JAMIE AVENA Introduction In the landmark case of In re CARLOS JAMIE AVENA on Habeas Corpus, the...
Intent to Kill Required for Conspiracy to Commit Murder: People v. Swain et al., 12 Cal.4th 593

Intent to Kill Required for Conspiracy to Commit Murder: People v. Swain et al., 12 Cal.4th 593

Date: Jan 30, 1996
Intent to Kill Required for Conspiracy to Commit Murder: People v. Swain et al., 12 Cal.4th 593 Introduction People v. Swain et al. is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California rendered...
Affirmation of Promissory Fraud Claims in Employment Inducement: Clarifying the Path to Tort Action

Affirmation of Promissory Fraud Claims in Employment Inducement: Clarifying the Path to Tort Action

Date: Jan 30, 1996
Affirmation of Promissory Fraud Claims in Employment Inducement: Clarifying the Path to Tort Action Introduction The Supreme Court of California's decision in Andrew Lazar v. The Superior Court of...
Binding Nature of Pre-Recorded Subdivision Covenants Clarified in Citizens v. Anderson

Binding Nature of Pre-Recorded Subdivision Covenants Clarified in Citizens v. Anderson

Date: Dec 30, 1995
Binding Nature of Pre-Recorded Subdivision Covenants Clarified in Citizens for Covenant Compliance v. Anderson Introduction Citizens for Covenant Compliance et al. v. Jared A. Anderson et al. is a...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in People v. Lucas: Upholding Procedural Standards and Evidentiary Rules

Affirmation of Death Penalty in People v. Lucas: Upholding Procedural Standards and Evidentiary Rules

Date: Dec 30, 1995
Affirmation of Death Penalty in People v. Lucas: Upholding Procedural Standards and Evidentiary Rules Introduction People v. Lucas is a landmark decision delivered by the Supreme Court of California...
Appointment of Counsel for Respondent Parents in Custody Termination Appeals: In re Bryce C. Interprets Family Code §7895

Appointment of Counsel for Respondent Parents in Custody Termination Appeals: In re Bryce C. Interprets Family Code §7895

Date: Dec 27, 1995
Appointment of Counsel for Respondent Parents in Custody Termination Appeals: In re Bryce C. Interprets Family Code §7895 Introduction In the landmark case In re BRYCE C., a Minor.VERNON S.,...
Defining the Limits of Respondeat Superior: Hospital's Non-liability for Employee's Sexual Misconduct

Defining the Limits of Respondeat Superior: Hospital's Non-liability for Employee's Sexual Misconduct

Date: Dec 27, 1995
Defining the Limits of Respondeat Superior: Hospital's Non-liability for Employee's Sexual Misconduct Introduction In the landmark case of LISA M. v. HENRY MAYO NEWHALL MEMORIAL HOSPITAL (12 Cal.4th...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert