Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Reaffirmation of the Harris Rule in Cases of Deliberate Edwards Violations: The People v. Airreque Peevy

Reaffirmation of the Harris Rule in Cases of Deliberate Edwards Violations: The People v. Airreque Peevy

Date: May 8, 1998
Reaffirmation of the Harris Rule in Cases of Deliberate Edwards Violations: The People v. Airreque Peevy Introduction The People v. Airreque Peevy (17 Cal.4th 1184, 1998) is a landmark decision by...
Capital Conviction Affirmed: Miranda Compliance and Felony-Murder Considerations in THE PEOPLE v. JOSEPH MUSSELWHITE

Capital Conviction Affirmed: Miranda Compliance and Felony-Murder Considerations in THE PEOPLE v. JOSEPH MUSSELWHITE

Date: May 8, 1998
Capital Conviction Affirmed: Miranda Compliance and Felony-Murder Considerations in The People v. Joseph Musselwhite Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Joseph Musselwhite (17 Cal.4th...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in People v. Lee Max Barnett

Affirmation of Death Sentence in People v. Lee Max Barnett

Date: May 5, 1998
Affirmation of Death Sentence in People v. Lee Max Barnett Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Lee Max Barnett, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on May 4, 1998, the...
Cost Recovery in Consumer Warranty Litigation: Insights from Murillo v. Fleetwood Enterprises

Cost Recovery in Consumer Warranty Litigation: Insights from Murillo v. Fleetwood Enterprises

Date: Apr 28, 1998
Cost Recovery in Consumer Warranty Litigation: Insights from Murillo v. Fleetwood Enterprises Introduction Murillo v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc., et al. (17 Cal.4th 985, 1998) is a landmark decision...
Enforceability of Conditional Prepayment Fees: Ridgley v. Topa Thrift and Loan Association

Enforceability of Conditional Prepayment Fees: Ridgley v. Topa Thrift and Loan Association

Date: Apr 21, 1998
Enforceability of Conditional Prepayment Fees: Ridgley v. Topa Thrift and Loan Association Introduction Ridgley v. Topa Thrift and Loan Association, 17 Cal.4th 970 (1998), is a landmark case...
Tracing Reimbursement Rights in Community Property Acquisitions: Insights from Walrath v. Walrath

Tracing Reimbursement Rights in Community Property Acquisitions: Insights from Walrath v. Walrath

Date: Apr 7, 1998
Tracing Reimbursement Rights in Community Property Acquisitions: Insights from Walrath v. Walrath Introduction In re the Marriage of Gilbert A. and Gladys J. Walrath (1998) is a landmark decision by...
Enhancing Brady Obligations: In re John George Brown and the Duty to Disclose Exculpatory Evidence

Enhancing Brady Obligations: In re John George Brown and the Duty to Disclose Exculpatory Evidence

Date: Apr 3, 1998
Enhancing Brady Obligations: In re John George Brown and the Duty to Disclose Exculpatory Evidence Introduction In the landmark case In re JOHN GEORGE BROWN on Habeas Corpus (17 Cal.4th 873), decided...
Establishing Cumulative Prejudice Through Prosecutorial Misconduct: People v. Hill

Establishing Cumulative Prejudice Through Prosecutorial Misconduct: People v. Hill

Date: Mar 31, 1998
Establishing Cumulative Prejudice Through Prosecutorial Misconduct: People v. Hill Introduction People v. Hill (17 Cal.4th 800, 1998) marks a significant precedent in California jurisprudence,...
California Supreme Court Upholds Discipline for Prelicensure Misconduct in Architecture

California Supreme Court Upholds Discipline for Prelicensure Misconduct in Architecture

Date: Mar 27, 1998
California Supreme Court Upholds Discipline for Prelicensure Misconduct in Architecture Introduction In the landmark case Charles Scott Hughes v. Board of Architectural Examiners (17 Cal.4th 763,...
California Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Recovery of Attorney Fees After Voluntary Dismissal in Contractual Disputes

California Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Recovery of Attorney Fees After Voluntary Dismissal in Contractual Disputes

Date: Feb 27, 1998
California Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Recovery of Attorney Fees After Voluntary Dismissal in Contractual Disputes Introduction In the landmark case of Benjamin Santisas et al. v. Robert J.J....
Affirmation of Private Enforcement under California’s Unfair Competition Law in Penal Code Violations

Affirmation of Private Enforcement under California’s Unfair Competition Law in Penal Code Violations

Date: Feb 24, 1998
Affirmation of Private Enforcement under California’s Unfair Competition Law in Penal Code Violations Introduction The landmark case, Stop Youth Addiction, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc. (17 Cal.4th 553,...
Section 12022.9 Affirmed as Sentence Enhancement in Multiple Murder Cases

Section 12022.9 Affirmed as Sentence Enhancement in Multiple Murder Cases

Date: Feb 20, 1998
Section 12022.9 Affirmed as Sentence Enhancement in Multiple Murder Cases Introduction In the case of The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. William Michael Dennis, Defendant and Appellant (17...
Admissibility of Out-of-State Appellate Opinions in Determining Prior Convictions: People v. Woodell

Admissibility of Out-of-State Appellate Opinions in Determining Prior Convictions: People v. Woodell

Date: Feb 12, 1998
Admissibility of Out-of-State Appellate Opinions in Determining Prior Convictions: People v. Woodell Introduction In The People v. Russell D. Woodell, 17 Cal.4th 448 (1998), the Supreme Court of...
Independent Source Doctrine Affirmed in People v. Bennett: Upholding Fourth Amendment Protections

Independent Source Doctrine Affirmed in People v. Bennett: Upholding Fourth Amendment Protections

Date: Feb 3, 1998
Independent Source Doctrine Affirmed in People v. Bennett: Upholding Fourth Amendment Protections Introduction People v. Edwin Winslow Bennett is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Limitation of Civil Code Section 52.1 in Private Interference Cases: FLOYZELL JONES v. KMART CORPORATION

Limitation of Civil Code Section 52.1 in Private Interference Cases: FLOYZELL JONES v. KMART CORPORATION

Date: Jan 30, 1998
Limitation of Civil Code Section 52.1 in Private Interference Cases: Floydell Jones v. Kmart Corporation Introduction The case of Floydell Jones et al. v. Kmart Corporation et al. (17 Cal.4th 329)...
Reaffirmation of the Corpus Delicti Rule and Its Application in Capital Murder Cases: People v. Ronald Anthony Jones

Reaffirmation of the Corpus Delicti Rule and Its Application in Capital Murder Cases: People v. Ronald Anthony Jones

Date: Jan 30, 1998
Reaffirmation of the Corpus Delicti Rule and Its Application in Capital Murder Cases: People v. Ronald Anthony Jones Introduction In the landmark case of The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v....
Supreme Court of California Establishes State Representation of District Attorneys in Section 1983 Liability

Supreme Court of California Establishes State Representation of District Attorneys in Section 1983 Liability

Date: Jan 30, 1998
Supreme Court of California Establishes State Representation of District Attorneys in Section 1983 Liability Introduction In the landmark case of Ricky Lynn Pitts et al. v. County of Kern et al....
Discretionary Authority in Three Strikes Sentencing: Analysis of People v. Ramirez Rodriguez

Discretionary Authority in Three Strikes Sentencing: Analysis of People v. Ramirez Rodriguez

Date: Jan 16, 1998
Discretionary Authority in Three Strikes Sentencing: Analysis of People v. Ramirez Rodriguez Introduction People v. Ramirez Rodriguez, 17 Cal.4th 253 (1998), is a pivotal case in California's legal...
Implied Miranda Waiver in the Context of Minimal Mental Impairment: Insights from People v. Whitson

Implied Miranda Waiver in the Context of Minimal Mental Impairment: Insights from People v. Whitson

Date: Jan 16, 1998
Implied Miranda Waiver in the Context of Minimal Mental Impairment: Insights from People v. Whitson Introduction People v. Scott Alden Whitson, 17 Cal.4th 229 (1998), adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Good Faith Standard in Wrongful Termination: Ralph Cotran v. Rollins Hudig Hall International, Inc.

Good Faith Standard in Wrongful Termination: Ralph Cotran v. Rollins Hudig Hall International, Inc.

Date: Jan 6, 1998
Good Faith Standard in Wrongful Termination: Ralph Cotran v. Rollins Hudig Hall International, Inc. Introduction Ralph Cotran v. Rollins Hudig Hall International, Inc. is a landmark case decided by...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert