Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Reaffirmation of the Harris Rule in Cases of Deliberate Edwards Violations: The People v. Airreque Peevy Introduction The People v. Airreque Peevy (17 Cal.4th 1184, 1998) is a landmark decision by...
Capital Conviction Affirmed: Miranda Compliance and Felony-Murder Considerations in The People v. Joseph Musselwhite Introduction In the landmark case of The People v. Joseph Musselwhite (17 Cal.4th...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in People v. Lee Max Barnett Introduction In the landmark case of People v. Lee Max Barnett, adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on May 4, 1998, the...
Cost Recovery in Consumer Warranty Litigation: Insights from Murillo v. Fleetwood Enterprises Introduction Murillo v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc., et al. (17 Cal.4th 985, 1998) is a landmark decision...
Enforceability of Conditional Prepayment Fees: Ridgley v. Topa Thrift and Loan Association Introduction Ridgley v. Topa Thrift and Loan Association, 17 Cal.4th 970 (1998), is a landmark case...
Tracing Reimbursement Rights in Community Property Acquisitions: Insights from Walrath v. Walrath Introduction In re the Marriage of Gilbert A. and Gladys J. Walrath (1998) is a landmark decision by...
Enhancing Brady Obligations: In re John George Brown and the Duty to Disclose Exculpatory Evidence Introduction In the landmark case In re JOHN GEORGE BROWN on Habeas Corpus (17 Cal.4th 873), decided...
Establishing Cumulative Prejudice Through Prosecutorial Misconduct: People v. Hill Introduction People v. Hill (17 Cal.4th 800, 1998) marks a significant precedent in California jurisprudence,...
California Supreme Court Upholds Discipline for Prelicensure Misconduct in Architecture Introduction In the landmark case Charles Scott Hughes v. Board of Architectural Examiners (17 Cal.4th 763,...
California Supreme Court Establishes Limits on Recovery of Attorney Fees After Voluntary Dismissal in Contractual Disputes Introduction In the landmark case of Benjamin Santisas et al. v. Robert J.J....
Affirmation of Private Enforcement under California’s Unfair Competition Law in Penal Code Violations Introduction The landmark case, Stop Youth Addiction, Inc. v. Lucky Stores, Inc. (17 Cal.4th 553,...
Section 12022.9 Affirmed as Sentence Enhancement in Multiple Murder Cases Introduction In the case of The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. William Michael Dennis, Defendant and Appellant (17...
Admissibility of Out-of-State Appellate Opinions in Determining Prior Convictions: People v. Woodell Introduction In The People v. Russell D. Woodell, 17 Cal.4th 448 (1998), the Supreme Court of...
Independent Source Doctrine Affirmed in People v. Bennett: Upholding Fourth Amendment Protections Introduction People v. Edwin Winslow Bennett is a seminal case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Limitation of Civil Code Section 52.1 in Private Interference Cases: Floydell Jones v. Kmart Corporation Introduction The case of Floydell Jones et al. v. Kmart Corporation et al. (17 Cal.4th 329)...
Reaffirmation of the Corpus Delicti Rule and Its Application in Capital Murder Cases: People v. Ronald Anthony Jones Introduction In the landmark case of The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v....
Supreme Court of California Establishes State Representation of District Attorneys in Section 1983 Liability Introduction In the landmark case of Ricky Lynn Pitts et al. v. County of Kern et al....
Discretionary Authority in Three Strikes Sentencing: Analysis of People v. Ramirez Rodriguez Introduction People v. Ramirez Rodriguez, 17 Cal.4th 253 (1998), is a pivotal case in California's legal...
Implied Miranda Waiver in the Context of Minimal Mental Impairment: Insights from People v. Whitson Introduction People v. Scott Alden Whitson, 17 Cal.4th 229 (1998), adjudicated by the Supreme Court...
Good Faith Standard in Wrongful Termination: Ralph Cotran v. Rollins Hudig Hall International, Inc. Introduction Ralph Cotran v. Rollins Hudig Hall International, Inc. is a landmark case decided by...