Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

California Case Commentaries

Foster-Gardner v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.: Defining "Suit" in CGL Policies for Environmental Orders

Foster-Gardner v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.: Defining "Suit" in CGL Policies for Environmental Orders

Date: Aug 4, 1998
Foster-Gardner v. National Union Fire Insurance Co.: Defining "Suit" in CGL Policies for Environmental Orders Introduction In Foster-Gardner, Inc. v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of...
In Re Malcolm J. Robbins: Refinement of Timeliness Standards in Capital Habeas Corpus Petitions

In Re Malcolm J. Robbins: Refinement of Timeliness Standards in Capital Habeas Corpus Petitions

Date: Aug 4, 1998
In Re Malcolm J. Robbins: Refinement of Timeliness Standards in Capital Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction In Re Malcolm J. Robbins, On Habeas Corpus is a landmark 1998 decision by the Supreme...
Clarifying the 'Actual Injury' Threshold in Legal Malpractice: Jordache Enterprises v. Brobeck

Clarifying the 'Actual Injury' Threshold in Legal Malpractice: Jordache Enterprises v. Brobeck

Date: Jul 31, 1998
Clarifying the 'Actual Injury' Threshold in Legal Malpractice: Jordache Enterprises v. Brobeck Introduction The case of Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. Brobeck, Phleger, Harrison et al. (18 Cal.4th...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in People v. Frye: Balancing Speedy Trial Rights and Effective Counsel

Affirmation of Death Penalty in People v. Frye: Balancing Speedy Trial Rights and Effective Counsel

Date: Jul 31, 1998
Affirmation of Death Penalty in People v. Frye: Balancing Speedy Trial Rights and Effective Counsel Introduction Case: The People, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Jerry Grant Frye, Defendant and...
Ensuring Robust Evidence for Juvenile Fitness Under Welfare and Institutions Code §707(e): THE PEOPLE v. JONES

Ensuring Robust Evidence for Juvenile Fitness Under Welfare and Institutions Code §707(e): THE PEOPLE v. JONES

Date: Jul 21, 1998
Ensuring Robust Evidence for Juvenile Fitness Under Welfare and Institutions Code §707(e): THE PEOPLE v. JONES Introduction In the landmark case of THE PEOPLE v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES...
FEHA Precedent: Employers Liable for Discrimination, Supervisors Not

FEHA Precedent: Employers Liable for Discrimination, Supervisors Not

Date: Jul 17, 1998
FEHA Precedent: Employers Liable for Discrimination, Supervisors Not Introduction The case of Kimberly Reno v. MariJo Baird (18 Cal.4th 640, 1998) addresses a critical question under the California...
Negligent Undertaking Liability in Toxicology Research: A Comprehensive Analysis of Eda Artiglio v. Corning Incorporated

Negligent Undertaking Liability in Toxicology Research: A Comprehensive Analysis of Eda Artiglio v. Corning Incorporated

Date: Jul 10, 1998
Negligent Undertaking Liability in Toxicology Research: A Comprehensive Analysis of Eda Artiglio v. Corning Incorporated Introduction The case of Eda Artiglio et al. v. Corning Incorporated et al....
People v. Deloza: Separate Analysis for Multiple Punishment and Consecutive Sentencing under the Three Strikes Law

People v. Deloza: Separate Analysis for Multiple Punishment and Consecutive Sentencing under the Three Strikes Law

Date: Jul 10, 1998
People v. Deloza: Separate Analysis for Multiple Punishment and Consecutive Sentencing under the Three Strikes Law Introduction People v. Deloza (18 Cal.4th 585, 1998) is a pivotal decision by the...
Reforming Jury Instructions on Accomplice Testimony: People v. Guiuan Establishes New Guidelines

Reforming Jury Instructions on Accomplice Testimony: People v. Guiuan Establishes New Guidelines

Date: Jul 7, 1998
Reforming Jury Instructions on Accomplice Testimony: People v. Guiuan Establishes New Guidelines Introduction The landmark case of People v. Guiuan (18 Cal.4th 558, 1998) addresses the critical issue...
People v. Hal Lee Flood: Clarifying Jury Instructions on Peace Officer Status

People v. Hal Lee Flood: Clarifying Jury Instructions on Peace Officer Status

Date: Jul 3, 1998
People v. Hal Lee Flood: Clarifying Jury Instructions on Peace Officer Status Introduction People v. Hal Lee Flood (18 Cal.4th 470, 1998) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California...
People v. Majors: Comprehensive Analysis of Capital Conviction and Appellate Challenges

People v. Majors: Comprehensive Analysis of Capital Conviction and Appellate Challenges

Date: Jun 23, 1998
People v. Majors: Comprehensive Analysis of Capital Conviction and Appellate Challenges Introduction People v. James David Majors, 18 Cal.4th 385 (1998), adjudicated by the Supreme Court of...
Admissibility of Prior Uncharged Crimes to Establish Identity and Intent: Analysis of People v. Kipp

Admissibility of Prior Uncharged Crimes to Establish Identity and Intent: Analysis of People v. Kipp

Date: Jun 23, 1998
Admissibility of Prior Uncharged Crimes to Establish Identity and Intent: Analysis of People v. Kipp Introduction The People v. Martin James Kipp is a landmark case decided by the Supreme Court of...
Affirmation of Death Penalty in People v. Paul Bolin: Establishing Standards for Effective Counsel and Jury Instructions

Affirmation of Death Penalty in People v. Paul Bolin: Establishing Standards for Effective Counsel and Jury Instructions

Date: Jun 19, 1998
Affirmation of Death Penalty in People v. Paul Bolin: Establishing Standards for Effective Counsel and Jury Instructions Introduction People v. Paul Clarence Bolin (18 Cal.4th 297) is a landmark...
Enhancing Reciprocal Discovery Obligations: People v. Tillis

Enhancing Reciprocal Discovery Obligations: People v. Tillis

Date: Jun 19, 1998
Enhancing Reciprocal Discovery Obligations: People v. Tillis Introduction People v. Marcellous Lee Tillis (18 Cal.4th 284) is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California, delivered on June...
Balancing Privacy and Press Freedom: Shulman v. Group W Productions

Balancing Privacy and Press Freedom: Shulman v. Group W Productions

Date: Jun 2, 1998
Balancing Privacy and Press Freedom: Shulman v. Group W Productions Introduction Ruth Shulman et al. v. Group W Productions, Inc. et al. (18 Cal.4th 200, 1998) is a landmark case decided by the...
Peculiar Risk Doctrine Clarified: Limitations on Hirer Liability for Independent Contractors' Employees

Peculiar Risk Doctrine Clarified: Limitations on Hirer Liability for Independent Contractors' Employees

Date: Jun 2, 1998
Peculiar Risk Doctrine Clarified: Limitations on Hirer Liability for Independent Contractors' Employees Introduction The case of Timothy Toland v. Sunland Housing Group, Inc. (18 Cal.4th 253, 1998)...
Affirmation of Death Sentence in People v. Millwee: Comprehensive Analysis

Affirmation of Death Sentence in People v. Millwee: Comprehensive Analysis

Date: May 19, 1998
Affirmation of Death Sentence in People v. Millwee: Comprehensive Analysis Introduction People v. Donald Ray Millwee is a pivotal case adjudicated by the Supreme Court of California on May 18, 1998....
Impact of People v. Benson on the Three Strikes Law: Counting Stayed Convictions as Separate Strikes

Impact of People v. Benson on the Three Strikes Law: Counting Stayed Convictions as Separate Strikes

Date: May 15, 1998
Impact of People v. Benson on the Three Strikes Law: Counting Stayed Convictions as Separate Strikes Introduction The People v. Russell Donald Benson (18 Cal.4th 24, 1998) is a landmark decision by...
No Tort Remedy for First-Party Spoliation of Evidence

No Tort Remedy for First-Party Spoliation of Evidence

Date: May 12, 1998
No Tort Remedy for First-Party Spoliation of Evidence Introduction Cedars-Sinai Medical Center v. The Superior Court of Los Angeles County is a landmark decision by the Supreme Court of California,...
Affirmation of the Modified Ceiling Approach in RFLP DNA Analysis: People v. Sergio Venegas

Affirmation of the Modified Ceiling Approach in RFLP DNA Analysis: People v. Sergio Venegas

Date: May 12, 1998
Affirmation of the Modified Ceiling Approach in RFLP DNA Analysis: People v. Sergio Venegas Introduction People v. Sergio Venegas is a landmark decision rendered by the Supreme Court of California on...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert